Ethics. The branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct Moral principles that govern.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PSYCHOLOGY – RESEARCH METHODS Ethical Guidelines Human Participants The British Psychological Society – Human Participants.
Advertisements

Research Ethics. 2 A Dilemma Researchers want to help advance understanding of behavior and perhaps improve lives while at the same time preserve the.
Informed consent requirements
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
© HRP Associates, Inc. Informed Consent, Parental Permission & Assent Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
Research Ethics The American Psychological Association Guidelines
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
Research at the Sociocultural Level of Analysis Ethical Considerations Alli Cales & David Rivera.
Seoul Foreign School IB Extended Essay Research Ethics.
IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.
Ethics Defined ethics (used with a sing. verb): The study of the general nature of morals and of the specific moral choices to be made by a person; moral.
Ethical Standards for Research with Children The principles listed below were published in the Directory,
Ethics in Social Science Research Special difficulties in Criminal Justice & Criminology.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
Ethics in Research Stangor Chapter 3.
ETHICAL RESEARCH © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Ethics and Politics of Social Research
Chapter 3 Ethics in research.
Its more exciting than it sounds.  a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct.
Ethics in Business Research
METHODS IN BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH NINTH EDITION PAUL C. COZBY Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 4: Vulnerable Populations.
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Ethics and Research Chapter Four.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
Ethics 101 In the main culled from Rosenthal and Rosnow (1991, 2 nd Ed.). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (Chapt. 11)
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Human Subjects Protections Research Ethics. Basic Assumptions about How Research Should be Conducted Subjects should be protected from harm. Subjects.
Research Seminars in IT in Education (MIT6003) Research Methodology II Dr Jacky Pow.
Ethics and Research. Ethics is Educational Research Committee on Scientific and Professional Ethics of American Psychological Association -- Ethical Principals.
Research Ethics. Ethics From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character Implies a judgment of character.
Research Ethics. Ethics: Human Research (Four Basic Principles)
Deception in Human Research Learning Objectives Define Deception and Incomplete Disclosure Understand when Deception or Incomplete Disclosure are allowable.
Research ethics.
ETHICS. All research must: Seek the approval of the IRB Report all data fully and accurately Share data with other professionals.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Frequently Asked Questions About Psychology Module 8.
Objective 9/23/15 Today we will be completing our research methods unit & begin reviewing for the upcoming unit assessment 9/25. Agenda: -Turn in all homework.
Ethics in Psychological Research. Connections with last day..... Psychologists strive for research which: Gathers empirical data and results Empirical.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Lecture 2 – Ethics in Psychological Research. Outline 1.Psychologists have a special responsibility to behave ethically towards others 2.There are no.
WHAT SHOULD NOT YOU DO IN A RESEARCH? 2. THIS IS WHAT WE CALL ETHICS IN RESEARCH.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Unit 4 Seminar. Key Terms  Confidentiality  Privileged communication  Privacy.
Information you obtain from a subjective report, an observation, or some kind of example that may or may not be reliable. It is not scientifically valid.
The Importance of Practicing Ethics in Research.  Summarize why it is important to practice ethical research.  Describe the basic principles of ethical.
Research ethics.
Ethics in Research Each research study involves a careful risk/benefit analysis prior to beginning data collection. The question each researcher must ask.
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
Research Ethics Dr Nichola Seare Aston Health Research & Innovation Cluster.
Ethical Issues in Psychological Research
Ch. 2 Section 5: Ethical Issues
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
Chapter 7 Ethics in Advanced Prehospital Care
Ethics in Research.
Hannah Butler Access Psychology Hannah Butler
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
IB Psych 9/15/17 Today’s Agenda: Peer editing our first SAQ
ETHICAL GUIDELINES AND SOCIAL RESEARCH.
Psychological Experimentation
Today’s Agenda: Ethics Cont. HW: Read & 1.6 (1.5 optional…)
Ethical Considerations
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
The Need for Ethical Principles
Research and Ethics.
Psychological Experimentation
Frequently Asked Questions About Psychology
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 14
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 14
Presentation transcript:

Ethics

The branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct Moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior

Why Have Them? Research on human behavior creates many ethical issues. Unfortunately on the quest for scientific knowledge can lead to exploiting people. When children take part in research, the ethical concerns are especially complex. Children are more vulnerable than adults to physical and psychological harm. In addition, immaturity makes it difficult or impossible for children to evaluate for themselves what participation in research will mean.

Why Have Them? For these reasons, special ethical guidelines for research on children have been developed by the federal government, by funding agencies, and by research-oriented associations such as the American Psychological Association Canadian Psychological Association The Society for Research in Child Development

Protection From Harm Children have the right to be protected from physical or psychological harm in research. If in doubt about the harmful effects of research, investigators should seek the opinion of others. When harm seems possible, investigators should find other means for obtaining the desired information or abandon the research

Protection From Harm Physical harm is any pain, injury, illness or impairment caused by another. Psychological experiments come with a certain level of risk. Even in the best of circumstances and with the best intentions, something might happen to someone. EX: researching the effects of exercise on a persons mood

Protection From Harm Psychological harm is any emotional or cognitive disturbances resulting from another's actions. Psychological studies often probe into the dark places of the human mind, asking things that wouldn't make polite conversation topics. Typically people don't ask about another's sexual abuse history and other painful experiences, but psychologists do. And in the quest to understand, it is not difficult for a researcher to overreach and push too hard to get an answer.

Informed Consent All research participants, including children, have the right to have explained to them, in language appropriate to their level of understanding, all aspects of the research that may affect their willingness to participate. When children are participants, informed consent of parents as well as others who act on the child’s behalf (such as school officials) should be obtained, preferably in writing. Children, and the adults responsible for them, have the right to discontinue participation in the research at any time

Informed Consent Informed consent provides participants with sufficiently detailed information on the study so that they can make an informed, voluntary and rational decision to participate. The purpose of the study Expected duration Procedures of the study Information on their right to decline or withdraw Foreseeable consequences of withdrawing or declining Potential risk, discomfort or adverse effects Prospective research benefits Incentives, such as payment or rewards Whom to contact for questions As part of obtaining informed consent, a researcher must allow time for questions the participants might have. The answers should provide sufficient information without compromising the study.

Privacy Children have the right to concealment of their identity on all information collected in the course of research. They also have this right with respect to written reports and any informal discussions about the research.

Privacy – Exceptions to the Rule Privacy is the protection of personal information provided to the psychologist that cannot be released unless established criteria are met. An example of common criteria to release information is that the safety of the individual or another is in jeopardy, meaning the person is suicidal or homicidal, and the psychologist is required to alert authorities. Another criterion that would allow information to be released is the removal of all identifying information.

Jeopardy & Unforeseen Consequences If information comes to the investigator's attention that may jeopardize the child's well- being, they have a responsibility to discuss the information with the parents/guardians and with experts in the field and then arrange the necessary assistance for the child. When research procedures result in undesirable consequences for the participant that were previously unforeseen, the investigator should immediately employ appropriate measures to correct these consequences, and should redesign the procedures if they are to be included in subsequent studies.

Knowledge of Results – Debriefing Children have the right to be informed of the results of research in language that is appropriate to their level of understanding. All ethical guidelines advise that special precautions be taken in the use of deception and concealment (when researchers observe children from behind one-way mirrors, give them false feedback about their performance) When these kinds of procedures are used with adult participants, debriefing, in which the researcher provides a full account and justification of the activities is typically understood. Despite explanations, children may leave the research situation with their belief in the honesty of adults undermined.

Beneficial Treatments Good research practice often requires the use of a no-treatment control group - a group of participants who do not get the treatment or program that is being studied. If experimental treatments are believed to be beneficial are under investigation, children in control groups have the right to alternative beneficial treatments if they are available.

Reinforcing The Ideas Psychological Research

10 Disturbing Child Experiments

Apply It Find a current article about an experiment or research being conducted on children. In paragraph form, respond to the following Part 1: Summarize the research/experiment Site link at the end of the paper Part 2: Are they following the code of ethics? If so – how? Examples? If not – what are they not doing? How could they correct it?