The New CAT Definition: Brain Injury in Children PENNY KARYG “Let me explain the nose job procedure.” Deanna S. Gilbert, Thomson Rogers Troy H. Lehman,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 AT Funding Sources $ PublicPrivateCommunity. 2 AT & Public Funding Health Care Medi-Cal Pays for medically necessary treatment services, medicines,
Advertisements

Head Injury Saurabh Sinha Department of Clinical Neurosciences Western General Hospital.
Cheshire and Merseyside Rehabilitation Network.. 2 year project – completed Jun 13 9 Hyper- acute Rehabilitation beds – for patients with the most complex.
Improving The Clinical Care of Children and Adolescents With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Madeline Joseph, MD, FACEP, FAAP Professor of Emergency Medicine.
Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Services: The Southern Picture Dr. Nicola Ryall Consultant in Rehabilitation Medicine 28 September 2006 NATIONAL REHABILITATION.
“The limits of consciousness are hard to define satisfactorily and we can only infer the self-awareness of others by their appearance the their acts.”
Effects of Age and Satisfaction on Acceptance of High-Technology Occupational Therapy Post Stroke Elizabeth Widicus, OTS and Dorothy Farrar Edwards, PhD.
INTRODUCTION TO TBI DATABASE RESEARCH Juan Carlos Arango, Ph.D Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center.
EFFECTIVE DELEGATION AND SUPERVISION
Traumatic Brain Injury Case Scenario Workshop Maurizio Berardino Neuroanesthesia and Intensive Care Neuroscience Department San Giovanni Battista Hospital.
The purpose of this Unit is to enable individuals to develop the key principles, values and attitude which are central to high quality care practice Key.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Office of Vocational Rehabilitation Amanda Smith, MSW, LSW Early Reach Coordinator OVR and the Early Reach Initiative Bureau of Vocational Rehabilitation.
MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IN PATIENTS WITH VASCULAR DEMENTIA Yuri Alekseenko Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery Vitebsk Medical University Vitebsk,
Glasgow Coma Scale.
An Overview of Head Injury Management Eldad J. Hadar, M.D. Department of Neurosurgery.
Traumatic Brain Injury
Glasgow coma scale Dr. S. Parthasarathy MD., DA., DNB, MD (Acu), Dip. Diab.DCA, Dip. Software statistics PhD (physio) Mahatma gandhi medical college and.
Competency Model for Professional Rehabilitation Nursing
MEDICALLY CLEARED NOW WHAT? From hospital to rehab where do the children go?
ACT NDIS Awareness Package Element 5: Assistance and Support.
Traumatic Brain Injury By: Brynn and Kacy. ● Occurs when a sudden trauma causes damage to the brain, disrupting the normal functioning of the brain. ●
Healthcare for London is part of Commissioning Support for London – an organisation providing clinical and business support to London’s NHS. Healthcare.
Traumatic Brain Injury and School Intervention Thomas B. King, M. Ed. Hospital Education Program VCU Health Care System.
Screening for Stroke and Cognitive Impairment Chapter 2: Background.
Reviewed process for follow up appointments for interpreters Review of information for patients regarding financial process & appointment letters for private.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Traumatic Brain Injury Definition
Using stroke scales to assess the patient – Rankin and NIHSS
Labeling  Allows students with disabilities to receive services  Labels may be stigmatizing or result in discrimination  View children by their abilities.
Carol Hawley1, Magdy Sakr2, Sarah Scapinello, Jesse Salvo, Paul Wren, Helga Magnusson, Harald Bjorndalen 1 Warwick Medical School 2 University Hospitals.
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 No decisions about me without me.
Going Home After a Head Injury Jacqueline McPherson Paediatric Neurology Nurse Specialist Ward 7 Neuroscience Department RHSC.
Stroke services Early supported hospital discharge Six month reviews.
DELEGATION. Delegation Definition – An essential decision-making skill – “Transferring to a competent individual the authority to perform a selected nursing.
Accreditation Canada Critical care team By Norah Khathlan MD Assistant Prof. Pediatrics Consultant Pediatric Intensivist Director PICU January/ 2009.
ADOLESCENTS IN CRISIS: WHEN TO ADMIT FOR SELF-HARM OR AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR Kristin Calvert.
The Face of Traumatic Brain Injury Gale Whiteneck, Ph.D. Director of Research Craig Hospital.
HEALTH CARE DECISIONS ACROSS THE TRAJECTORY OF ILLNESS Susan Barbour RN MS ACHPN.
Cheryl Stohler RN BSN University of Central Florida.
CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE’S HEALTH SUPPORT GROUP Unscheduled Care Helen Maitland National Lead.
The Pending Changes – a Review of the Imminent Cuts to Accident Benefits Adam Little October 20,
Standard 10: Preventing Falls and Harm from Falls Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 13 August 2012.
DDS SERVICES WHO WE SERVE, ELIGIBILITY & SERVICE STRUCTURE.
Striving Towards Excellence in Comprehensive Care: What do Children Need? July 10, 2007 Christopher A. Kus, M.D., M.P.H.
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Radiographic Evaluation of Inflicted Childhood Neurotrauma Robert A. Zimmerman, M.D. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
Part III of the Act Patients involved in criminal proceedings or under sentence 1)NEW DEFINITION OF MENTAL DISORDER e.g. S36 Remand to hospital for treatment.
Personhood and Persistent Vegetative State. What Is PVS? n Permanent unconsciousness n NOT coma-- sleep wake cycles n Random movements n No purposeful.
Module 1 What is incident reporting and why is it important? next Centre for Learning and Organisational Development.
1 Colorado Department of Human Services Division of Vocational Rehabilitation It’s About Employment! DVR Presentation for Youth & Family Members.
The Impact of the Changes to the SABS: Strategies for Survival Brian Cameron and Ryan Murray.
RUG-ADL & AKPS Assessment
West Gables Rehabilitation Hospital 2015 Stakeholder Report: Brain Injury Program For more than 25 years, West Gables Rehabilitation Hospital has made.
Changes to the Definition of Catastrophic Impairment James L. Vigmond.
Development of a Community Stroke Rehabilitation Team “meeting the need” NHS Blackburn with Darwen Tracy Walker Team Leader.
1. 2 Learning Outcomes Gain awareness and understanding of the definition of mental disorder contained within the MHA; Understand the criteria for detention.
Neuropsychological Approach to Traumatic Brain Injury Pires-Barata S, Vieira I, Palma Gois L*, Teixeira da Silva MH Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
EFFECTIVE DELEGATION AND SUPERVISION
Update on Changes to the SABS Adam Little and Steven Smyth September 29,
Cognition Amy Waite, MA/CCC-SLP Speech Language Pathologist
The role of a neurosurgeon in caring for patients with traumatic brain injury Kevin Yoo M.D.
Journal club 24/10/2016 Presented by Pitchayud Kantachuvesiri
The Impact of the Changes to the SABS: Strategies for Survival
Commissioning Quality Stroke Rehabilitation Event
The New CAT Definition: Brain Injury in Children
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Joining Disciplines to Establish Catastrophic Impairment
Dr. Kareema Ahmed Hussein
Presentation transcript:

The New CAT Definition: Brain Injury in Children PENNY KARYG “Let me explain the nose job procedure.” Deanna S. Gilbert, Thomson Rogers Troy H. Lehman, Oatley Vigmond Deanna S. Gilbert, Thomson Rogers Troy H. Lehman, Oatley Vigmond

What is a Child?

What Are Key Times? 1)Hospitalization 2)One Month 3)Six Months 4)Nine Months 5)Two Years

Who Will Ensure CAT Considered at Each Interval?

Criterion #1: Hospitalization and Imaging

Criterion No. 1: Hospitalization and Imaging “accepted for admission, on an in- patient basis, to a public hospital named in a Guideline with positive findings on CT, MRI or any other medically recognized brain diagnostic technology indicating intracranial pathology that is a result of the accident, including, but not limited to intracranial contusions or hemmorrhages, diffuse axonal injury, cerebral edema, midline shift or pneumocephaly.”“accepted for admission, on an in- patient basis, to a public hospital named in a Guideline with positive findings on CT, MRI or any other medically recognized brain diagnostic technology indicating intracranial pathology that is a result of the accident, including, but not limited to intracranial contusions or hemmorrhages, diffuse axonal injury, cerebral edema, midline shift or pneumocephaly.”

Criterion No. 1: Hospitalization and Imaging Three essential elements:Three essential elements: 1)In-patient admission to public hospital; 2) Positive findings of intracranial pathology; 3)Findings must be from medically recognized brain diagnostic technique.

Criterion #2: Admission to Pediatric Rehabilitation Facility

Criterion No. 2: Admission to Pediatric Rehab “accepted for admission, on an in- patient basis, to a program of neurological rehabilitation facility that is a member of the Ontario Association of Children’s Rehabilitation Services.”“accepted for admission, on an in- patient basis, to a program of neurological rehabilitation facility that is a member of the Ontario Association of Children’s Rehabilitation Services.”

Criterion No. 2: Admission to Pediatric Rehab What is OACRS?What is OACRS?

Criterion No. 2: Admission to Pediatric Rehab 5 Concerns: 1.Discrimination re: remote areas

Criterion No. 2: Admission to Pediatric Rehab Cont. 5 Concerns: 2.Wait lists 3. Community-based rehab 4. In-patient admission requirements 5. “Program of neurological rehabilitation”

Criterion #3: Kings Outcome Scale (1 to 5 months)

Criterion No. 3: KINGS Outcome Scale (1-5 months) Kings Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury (“KOSCHI”).Kings Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury (“KOSCHI”). Studies have found KOSCHI to be of limited use in predicting long-term outcome.Studies have found KOSCHI to be of limited use in predicting long-term outcome. No guidance on who will do assessments.No guidance on who will do assessments.

Criterion No. 3: KINGS Outcome Scale (1-5 months) KOSHCI rates impairment on following scale:KOSHCI rates impairment on following scale: 1)Death 2)Vegetative 3)Severe Disability 4)Moderate Disability 5)Good Recovery

Criterion No. 3: KINGS Outcome Scale (1-5 months) A child with a brain injury will be catastrophically impaired if, one month or more after the accident “his or her level of neurological function does not exceed category 2 (vegetative) on the Kings Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury (“KOSCHI”).”A child with a brain injury will be catastrophically impaired if, one month or more after the accident “his or her level of neurological function does not exceed category 2 (vegetative) on the Kings Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury (“KOSCHI”).”

Criterion No. 3: KINGS Outcome Scale (1-5 months) Vegetative:Vegetative: “The child is breathing spontaneously and may have sleep/wake cycles. He may have non-purposeful or reflex movements of limbs or eyes. There is no evidence of ability to communicate verbally or non-verbally or to respond to commands”“The child is breathing spontaneously and may have sleep/wake cycles. He may have non-purposeful or reflex movements of limbs or eyes. There is no evidence of ability to communicate verbally or non-verbally or to respond to commands”

Criterion No. 3: KINGS Outcome Scale (1-5 months) Severe disability:Severe disability: “The child is at least intermittently able to move part of the body/eyes to command or make purposeful spontaneous movements, for example, confused child pulling at nasogastric tube, lashing out at carers, rolling over in bed. May be fully conscious and able to communicate but not yet able to carry out any self care activities such as feeding.“The child is at least intermittently able to move part of the body/eyes to command or make purposeful spontaneous movements, for example, confused child pulling at nasogastric tube, lashing out at carers, rolling over in bed. May be fully conscious and able to communicate but not yet able to carry out any self care activities such as feeding.

Criterion No. 3: KINGS Outcome Scale (1-5 months) Very, very few children will be vegetative 1-5 month after injury.Very, very few children will be vegetative 1-5 month after injury. Study of 218 significant TBI’s not one was found to be vegetative at time of discharge or follow up.Study of 218 significant TBI’s not one was found to be vegetative at time of discharge or follow up.

Criterion #4: Kings Outcome Scale (6 or more months)

Criterion No. 4: KINGS Outcome Scale (6 + months) 6 months +6 months + “level of neurological function does not exceed category 3 (Severe Disability) on the KOSCHI.”

Criterion No. 4: KINGS Outcome Scale (6 + months) Severe disability (A & B) = CATSevere disability (A & B) = CAT B:B: Implies a continuing high level of dependence, but the child can assist in daily activities, for example, can feed self or walk with assistance or help to place items of clothing. Such a child is fully conscious but may still have a degree of post-traumatic amnesia.

Criterion No. 4: KINGS Outcome Scale (6 + months) Moderate Disability (A & B) not CATModerate Disability (A & B) not CAT A:A: The child is mostly independent but needs a degree of supervision/actual help for physical or behavioural problems. Such a child has overt problems; for example, 12 year old with moderate hemiplegia and dyspraxia insecure on stairs on needs help with dressing.

Criterion No. 4: KINGS Outcome Scale (6 + months) “High level of dependence” vs. “degree of supervision”“High level of dependence” vs. “degree of supervision” Clinical judgementClinical judgement Pre-morbid problemsPre-morbid problems Gaps in funding & ↓ limitsGaps in funding & ↓ limits Likelihood of meeting testLikelihood of meeting test

Criterion #5: Level of Function After 9 Months

Criterion No. 5: Post 9 Months “Nine months or more after the accident, the insured person’s level of function remains seriously impaired such that the insured person is not age appropriately independent and requires in-person supervision or assistance for physical, cognitive or behavioural impairments for the majority of the insured person’s waking day.”“Nine months or more after the accident, the insured person’s level of function remains seriously impaired such that the insured person is not age appropriately independent and requires in-person supervision or assistance for physical, cognitive or behavioural impairments for the majority of the insured person’s waking day.”

Criterion No. 5: Post 9 Months Government-made testGovernment-made test Areas of ambiguity & debate:Areas of ambiguity & debate: –What constitutes “age appropriately independent”? Who determines? –What constitutes “in-person supervision or assistance” –What constitutes the “waking day”?

Criterion No. 5: Post 9 Months Disagreements =Disagreements = 1)delays 2)gaps in funding 3)increased costs to all

Concluding Thoughts

Advocacy starts from day 1Advocacy starts from day 1 Team needs a “game plan” for point- in-time assessmentsTeam needs a “game plan” for point- in-time assessments WPI is still available [s. 3.1(6)]WPI is still available [s. 3.1(6)] Multiple disputes over multiple timesMultiple disputes over multiple times Ambiguities to be resolved in favour of childAmbiguities to be resolved in favour of child

Thank you Questions? Troy Lehman: Deanna S. Gilbert: