Investigation of supersonic and hypersonic laminar shock/boundary-layer interactions R.O. Bura, Y.F.Yao, G.T. Roberts and N.D. Sandham School of Engineering.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Turbulent flow over groups of urban-like obstacles

Advertisements

SolidWorks Flow Simulation

Outline Overview of Pipe Flow CFD Process ANSYS Workbench

University of Southampton Southampton, UK

Master’s Dissertation Defense Carlos M. Teixeira Supervisors: Prof. José Carlos Lopes Eng. Matthieu Rolland Direct Numerical Simulation of Fixed-Bed Reactors:

A Computational Framework for Simulating Flow around Hypersonic Re-Entry Vehicles David Stroh, Anthony Marshik and Gautham Krishnamoorthy, UND Chemical.

Andreas Krumbein > 30 January 2007 MIRACLE Final Meeting, ONERA Châtillon, Folie 1 Navier-Stokes High-Lift Airfoil Computations with Automatic Transition.

University of Western Ontario

An Analysis of Hiemenz Flow E. Kaufman and E. Gutierrez-Miravete Department of Engineering and Science Rensselaer at Hartford.

VISCOUS CFD ANALYSIS OF GENERIC MISSILE WITH GRID FINS By Swapnil. D

Advanced CFD Analysis of Aerodynamics Using CFX

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Numerical Simulation of a fully turbulent flow in a pipe at low Reynolds numbers Click to edit.

Mr. D. Cannoletta - Environmental Control System Department Mr. E. Riegel - Environmental Control System Department ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM CABIN.

Experimental Investigation of Impeller-Diffuser Interaction Rita Patel, Eric Savory and Robert Martinuzzi.

Optimization of an Axial Nose-Tip Cavity for Delaying Ablation Onset in Hypersonic Flow Sidra I. Silton and David B. Goldstein Center for Aeromechanics.

Inward-Turning Inlets for Low-Boom / Low-Drag Applications Chuck Trefny John Slater Sam Otto NASA Glenn Research Center 8th Annual Shock Wave/Boundary.

Experimental and Numerical Study of the Effect of Geometric Parameters on Liquid Single-Phase Pressure Drop in Micro- Scale Pin-Fin Arrays Valerie Pezzullo,

Investigations of Wind Tunnel Size and Shock Strength on Shock Boundary Layer Interactions John A. Benek, Ph.D. Casimir J. Suchyta III, Ph.D. Rick Graves,

Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester Aspects of Transitional flow for External Applications A review presented by.

Anoop Samant Yanyan Zhang Saptarshi Basu Andres Chaparro

Experimental investigations of the flow during the stage separation of a space transportation system Andrew Hay Aerospace Engineering with German.

Dr. Laila Guessous Suresh Putta, M.S. Student Numerical Investigations of Pulsatile Flows To develop a better understanding of the characteristics of pulsating.

3-D Large Eddy Simulation for Jet Noise Prediction A.Uzun, G. Blaisdell, A. Lyrintzis School of Aeronautics and Astronautics Purdue University Funded by.

1 Effects of Inflow Forcing on Jet Noise Using Large Eddy Simulation P. Lew, A. Uzun, G. A. Blaisdell & A. S. Lyrintzis School of Aeronautics & Astronautics.

Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.

Lecture 7 Exact solutions

1/36 Gridless Method for Solving Moving Boundary Problems Wang Hong Department of Mathematical Information Technology University of Jyväskyklä

DETAILED TURBULENCE CALCULATIONS FOR OPEN CHANNEL FLOW

LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 3 (ME EN )

© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.

1 CFD Analysis Process. 2 1.Formulate the Flow Problem 2.Model the Geometry 3.Model the Flow (Computational) Domain 4.Generate the Grid 5.Specify the.

Lecture #17 Boundary Layer Measurements  Boundary layer Thickness  * Displacement Thickness  Momentum Thickness.

Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies Numerical Study of Spontaneous Ignition of Pressurized Hydrogen Release through a length of tube with local contraction.

Zhaorui Li and Farhad Jaberi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan Large-Scale Simulations of High Speed.

Numerical methods in flow metrology Sampo Sillanpää, Centre for metrology and accreditation.

Gyeongsang National University Hanshik Chung. CONTENTS  Background of Study  Introduction & Objective  Results and discussion  Conclusions.

Hybrid WENO-FD and RKDG Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws

A. Spentzos 1, G. Barakos 1, K. Badcock 1 P. Wernert 2, S. Schreck 3 & M. Raffel 4 1 CFD Laboratory, University of Glasgow, UK 2 Institute de Recherche.

ICHS4, San Francisco, September E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport

Study of Oscillating Blades from Stable to Stalled Conditions 1 CFD Lab, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow 2 Volvo Aero Corporation.

Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:

Discontinuous Galerkin Methods and Strand Mesh Generation

Improved Near Wall Treatment for CI Engine CFD Simulations Mika Nuutinen Helsinki University of Technology, Internal Combustion Engine Technology.

Cascade Flow Research Capability Following figures present experimental results dealing with the measurement of boundary layer development along the suction.

School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Computational Analysis of Stall and Separation Control in Axial & Centrifugal Compressors Alex Stein Saeid NiaziLakshmi.

1 Direct Numerical Simulation of Compressible Turbulent Flows with Weighted Non-Linear Compact Schemes Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center Aerospace Engineering.

© Saab AB Transonic store separation studies on the SAAB Gripen aircraft using CFD Ingemar Persson and Anders Lindberg Stockholm,

Jet With No Cross Flow RANS Simulations of Unstart Due to Mass Injection J. Fike, K. Duraisamy, J. Alonso Acknowledgments This work was supported by the.

College of Engineering and Natural Sciences Mechanical Engineering Department 1 Project Number : PS 7.1 Rotorcraft Fuselage Drag Study using OVERFLOW-D2.

Computational Fluid Dynamics Applied to the Analysis of 10-mm Hydrocyclone Solids Separation Performance S. A. Grady, M. M. Abdullah, and G. D. Wesson.

Compressor Cascade Pressure Rise Prediction

Compressible Frictional Flow Past Wings P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi A Small and Significant Region of Curse.

DLR Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology 1 Simulation of Missiles with Grid Fins using an Unstructured Navier-Stokes solver coupled to a Semi-Experimental.

School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Numerical Simulation of Centrifugal Compressor Stall and Surge Saeid NiaziAlex SteinLakshmi N. Sankar School of Aerospace.

M. Khalili1, M. Larsson2, B. Müller1

Application of Compact- Reconstruction WENO Schemes to the Navier-Stokes Equations Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center Aerospace Engineering Department University.

Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology STUDY OF EFFECT OF GAS INJECTION OVER A TORPEDO ON FLOW-FIELD USING CFD.

1/50 1 Effect of Trailing Edge Geometry on the Flow Behavior through Rectilinear Turbine Cascades By: Mahmoud M. El-Gendi Supervisor: Prof. Yoshiaki Nakamura.

Theory of Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Its Group Performance, What Matters.……

Project 8: Development and Validation of Bleed Models for Control of Supersonic Shock-Wave Interactions with Boundary Layers.

Control of Boundary Layer Structure for Low Re Blades

Shock Wave/ Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions on a Cylinder

Rotors in Complex Inflow, AVATAR, WP2

Turbulent Boundary Layer

AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES

E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi

Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M

Analysis & Control of Profile Losses

Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M

Presentation transcript:

Investigation of supersonic and hypersonic laminar shock/boundary-layer interactions R.O. Bura, Y.F.Yao, G.T. Roberts and N.D. Sandham School of Engineering Sciences, University of Southampton _____________________________________________________________

Outline of Presentation Background and Motivation Configuration and Numerical Methods Range of Test Cases & Experimental Data Results: M = 2.0 and M = 7.73 Correlations of All Test Cases Conclusions _____________________________________________________________

Background and Motivation SBLI study: the effect on surface heating rates; Experiment: high heat fluxes in the re-attachment area, e.g. ramp flow (Smith, 1993); 2D CFD modelling: failed to predict the separation length and the peak heat flux, possibly due to transition. Ramp flowOblique shock/bl interaction _____________________________________________________________

Comparison of Peak Reattachment Heating with Laminar Interference Heating Correlations Compression ramp experiments, M = 6.85 (Smith, 1993)

_____________________________________________________________ Schematic of flow configuration

Numerical methods Compressible, unsteady 3-D Navier-Stokes code; Grid transformation for complex geometries; 3-stage explicit Runge-Kutta for time advancement; 4th-order central finite difference scheme; Entropy splitting for Euler terms and Laplacian form for viscous terms; Stable high-order boundary treatment; TVD/ACM for shock capturing. _____________________________________________________________ For details, see Sandham et al., JCP 178, , 2002

Reynolds numbers are based on the length from the leading edge to the shock impingement point in the absence of boundary-layer, x 0 _____________________________________________________________ Range of Test Cases

Simulation of case 6: Supersonic M = 2.0 inflow Previous studies: experiments by Hakinnen et al. (1959); computations by Katzer (1989), Wasistho (1998) p 3 /p 1 = 1.25, 1.40, 1.65, 1.86; Baseline grid: 151x128; Boundary Conditions: - Inflow: prescribed velocity and temperature b.l. profiles - Wall: non-slip, adiabatic; _____________________________________________________________

Case 6, M = 2.0, p 3 /p 1 = 1.40 Density contours Domain: 400 x 115 based on inlet displacement thickness; Grids: 151 x 128 (uniform in x and stretched in y) _____________________________________________________________

Case 6, M = 2.0 Wall pressure distributions _____________________________________________________________ Case 6, M = 2.0, p 3 /p 1 = 1.40 Wall pressure distribution

Case 6, M = 2.0 Skin friction distributions _____________________________________________________________ Case 6, M = 2.0, p 3 /p 1 = 1.40 Skin friction distribution

Simulation of case 2: Hypersonic M = 7.73 inflow Based on experimental studies of Kaufman and Johnson, NASA TN D-7835 (1974) p 3 /p 1 = 1.56, 3.08, 5.56; Computational domain conforms to experiments Baseline grid: 128x192; Boundary Conditions: - Inflow: normalised quantities based on freestream - Wall: non-slip, isothermal; _____________________________________________________________

Case 2, M = 7.73, β = , p 3 /p 1 = 5.56 Schlieren: density gradients Simulation: density gradients 1450 _____________________________________________________________

Case 2, M = 7.73, p 3 /p 1 = 5.56 Wall pressure and heating distributions _____________________________________________________________

Correlations: Influence of the Mach number and Shock Strength _____________________________________________________________ l B = separation bubble length   = displacement thickness of an undisturbed boundary-layer at the position of impingement point, x o

Correlations: Separation bubble length _____________________________________________________________

Correlations: Peak heating _____________________________________________________________

Conclusions and Future Work At M = 2.0 experiment and simulations agree fairly well; At M = 7.73 agreement between experiment and simulations is relatively poor; 2-D and 3-D laminar SBLI simulations have so far failed to resolve the discrepancies with experimental data; It is possible that the interactions undergo transition; 3-D unsteady simulations to investigate boundary-layer instability are underway and will be reported later. _____________________________________________________________