Identify boundaries (GEC for sustainability) Breaking down the “broad research themes” to provide more relevance in AP regions Need to incorporate: technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
Advertisements

Partnerships: influencing local economic and employment development Brussels, October 9th, 2007 Gabriela Miranda Policy Analyst OECD, LEED Programme.
Future Earth: Research for global sustainability in Asia
Short course marine ecosystem sustainability. Motivation Holistic approach to management addresses biophysical and social complexities Social-ecological.
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
© UKCIP 2011 Learning and Informing Practice: The role of knowledge exchange Roger B Street Technical Director Friday, 25 th November 2011 Crew Project.
Determining CLIMASP Competencies Jerash University Development of Interdisciplinary Program on Climate Change and Sustainability Policy- CLIMASP Development.
Lessons from Thematic Working Groups. Getting to Scale: NEEDS Capacity building at all levels – – for all Focus on the most vulnerable Conceive appropriate.
Seventh framework programme CAPACITIES specific programme Activities of international cooperation Coordination Support Action - Grant agreement no.:
Internationalizing the University: Exploring Academic Development Needs and Means in a Context of Shifting Cultural Identities Dr Yvonne Turner June 2011.
BELMONT FORUM E-INFRASTRUCTURES AND DATA MANAGEMENT PROJECT Updates and Next Steps to Deliver the final Community Strategy and Implementation Plan Maria.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
A New Initiative on Earth System Research for Global Sustainability
Session 8. GEOSS requirements, functions, architecture Session Feedback Presenter: Max Craglia.
The SEEAW in the context of Integrated Water Resource Management Roberto Lenton Chair, Technical Committee Global Water Partnership.
The Resilient Coasts Initiative A Partnership Response.
Connecting Geoscience Departments to the Future Where is our Research Going? A Perspective on the next 25 years Eric J. Barron.
Education for Sustainability UNSW and NSW State Initiatives.
Strengthening the Science-Policy Interface Towards Sustainable Development Dr. Gisbert Glaser International Council for Science (ICSU) Side Event at 2.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Guidance in Structuring a Communities of Practice.
Exchange A7: Linking activity in Europe – UNEP mapping and building sustainability across universities and colleges in Europe Wayne Talbot, WTA Education.
Curriculum Transformation Moving towards the Reality.
The SEEAW in the context of Integrated Water Resource Management and the MDGs Roberto Lenton Chair, Technical Committee Global Water Partnership.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
Our background: GeSCI’s Foundation Developing countries are placing ICT and Education at the centre of their development strategies. However, developing.
Capacity 2015 A Capacity Development Platform UNDP take on Capacity Development CD has been a fundamental component of TC since the Marshal Plan (1951)
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Task ID-05 IDIB report ID-05 Catalyzing Resources for GEOSS Implementation C1 - Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building C2 - Resource Mobilization.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
Planned Commission Communication on the role of the Private Sector in Development A contribution to the reflexion on How to Innovate International Cooperation.
Professor Philip Lowe Newcastle University Director of UK Research Councils’ Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Researching Environment - Society Relations.
Heide Hackmann Stockholm, 31 January Introduction: process, objectives and audiences 2.Why a world social science report on global environmental.
THE 21 ST CENTURY LEARNER Four Key Pillars of Education: Learning to Know Learning to do Learning to be Learning to Live Together UNESCO’S Commission on.
T he Istanbul Principles and the International Framework Geneva, Switzerland June 2013.
The Poverty Environment Initiative (PEI) in the Asia Pacific Region Draft Outline of the Regional Strategy.
Chapter 6: Integrating Knowledge and Action Scott Kaminski ME / 9 / 2005.
Introducing… the Sustainable Energy 4 All Action Accelerator! Adam Cooper Senior Manager, Accenture Sustainability Services United Nations Global Compact.
Presented by: Steve Litke, Fraser Basin Council Winnipeg, Manitoba June 18, 2012 Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Governance – Lessons from BC.
The 21 st Century Learner Siegfried Ramler IFE 2020 March 3, 2009.
Facilitator: Dr Alex Ryan Associate, Higher Education Academy Interdisciplinary Sustainability Education: Insights, Momentum and Futures 14 th December.
Visioning: Towards a new initiative on Earth system research for global sustainability research Prof. Deliang CHEN, ICSU Executive Director.
Create & Innovate ICTs for Education? Technology without Context lacks Purpose.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites CEO Team Plenary Agenda Item #14b 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
GEO Implementation Boards Considerations and Lessons Learned (Document 8) Max Craglia (EC) Co-chair of the Infrastructure Implementation Board (IIB) On.
Regional Sediment Management Policy and Implementation Workshop April, 2009.
IFLA: International Advocacy Programme. Address the information gap of library workers at community, national and regional levels Build capacity among.
Future Earth workshop – Kuala Lumpur Breakout session 2: Research priorities and opportunities to strengthen capabilities within Future Earth in Asia and.
Six global challenges were identified in policy for development cooperation: Oppression Economic exclusion Migration flows Climate change and environmental.
Future Earth Summary of comments received and initial responses.
Questions to be discussed: How can the research framework be further improved? What additional priority research questions should be included or how should.
GEO Disaster Resilience Breakout Group Summary GEO Work Programme Symposium 2016 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS/NOAA 4 May 2016 Geneva, Switzerland.
Consultation feedback so far on Research Strategy SC Diversitas BioSUSTAINABILITY, ecoSERVICES, bioGENESIS, bioDISCOVERY, ecoHEALH, GMBA, freshwaterBIODIVERSITY.
Future Earth workshop – Kuala Lumpur Breakout session 1: Developing a regional vision for Future Earth Key messages Group 3.
Future Earth research for global sustainability: The governance structure mechanisms Rik Leemans & Peter Liss Transition Team Members photos:
Future Earth research for global sustainability: The governance structure mechanisms Prof. Dr. Rik Leemans ESSP, Transition Team Member & Wageningen University.
NETWORKS OF EXCELLENCE KEY ISSUES David Fuegi
State of the Global Change Grand Challenge Report to the Portfolio Committee on Science and Technology 15 September 2010.
Break-out session 1: Group 1 Chair: Ekosse, Georges-Ivo. Rapporteur: Berefo, Eric Transition Team member: Hackmann, Heide Participants:  Abiodun, Babatunde.
Future Earth workshop – Kuala Lumpur Breakout session 1: Developing a regional vision for Future Earth Key messages.
GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Douglas Cripe GEO Work Programme Symposium 2-4 May 2016, Geneva.
Future Earth workshop – Mexico City Introduction Breakout session 1: Building a regional vision for Future Earth Group 1.
Future Earth workshop – Kuala Lumpur Breakout session 2: Research priorities and opportunities to strengthen capabilities within Future Earth in Asia and.
Future Earth Research for Global Sustainability photos:
LIVING LAB OF GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH
Priorities for International Development of e-Infrastructure and Data Management in Global Change Research Presentation by Robert Gurney, University of.
2. What are the major research priorities for the LAC region?
Launch of Towards 2020 GWP Strategy.
A Funders Perspective Maria Uhle Co-Chair, Belmont Forum Directorates for Geosciences, US National Science Foundation.
Meeting Outcomes “Building International Partnership To Enhance Science Based Ecosystem Approaches In Support Of Regional Ocean Governance” November.
Presentation transcript:

Identify boundaries (GEC for sustainability) Breaking down the “broad research themes” to provide more relevance in AP regions Need to incorporate: technology & engineering needs in solutions-oriented research; FE main objectives and identifying key indicators for success; deliverables Clarify how research projects can become a part of Future Earth Day 1 - Future Earth Research Framework - needs

How can Future Earth address the present needs (of the region) to focus and implement at the national and local level? Local issues are globally connected and sustainability must be addressed at local, national, regional levels within the global context. Need to develop a platform where knowledge from regions with common issues can scale up and/or scale down. Human resources and coordination are key to effective implementation Education/Capacity Building: at what levels; young scientists; communications and negotiations skills Funding needs in many countries need to be developed Challenges and Opportunities

Co-design/co-finance/co-implement and engage stakeholders at all levels (engaging the idea of inclusiveness) Common definitions and language (eg, sustainability, inter/trans/multi-disciplinary mean different things to different players, ) Addressing high-, medium-, low- level problems to effectively engage different actors/communities Bundle of global commons - ES-- Oceans and coasts, land need more attention – major envir and societal implications Addressing transformative economy, SDG Challenges and Opportunities

4

Key comments from panelists & audience responses: Common definitions are key to understanding - challenge to define global Sustainability. What is the definition of literacy? Differences in culture are also driven to some extent by economic constraints – FE needs to consider this For time-scales, not practical to think we are going to have an active dialogue with PMs at present level Human capability doesn’t exist in some countries (eg. PICs) Local tradition and knowledge is very important in AP region Need to find pilot projects/best practices that can be transferred Are fragmented actions able to deliver the global sustainability goals at the end – after 10, 20 years? Lot of opportunity for stakeholders to work with FE, but HOW can this be done – presently not clear to policy makers. Roundtable (rectangle table) on Regional Priorities and Opportunities to Develop Future Earth

7 Summary of day one in chronological order -Opening speech, presentations, panel & audience discussions; and outcomes (may be useful to print off for all members for break- out sessions)

Future Earth Research for Global Sustainability in Asia & the Pacific photos: Opening remarks from Professor Lee Business as usual is not an option Science needs to be stepped up to help with the transition to sustainability Meet the GEC sustainability needs of the Earth by: Scaling-up R&CB Efforts Engaging different disciplines Effectively connecting knowledge to solutions Regional component is extremely important for FE Green Technology is a key factor for Asia Future Earth in Asia and the Pacific Main Messages from Day 1

Future Earth Research for Global Sustainability in Asia & the Pacific photos: Carthage Smith – Objectives, Rationale & Design Process Transition Team is interdisciplinary in nature Present GEC programmes will come together to form Future Earth Critical criteria for Future Earth is to form a Research Programme for Transition to Global Sustainability Fully operational Future Earth by May – embark on integrating present projects and calling for new projects Future Earth in Asia and the Pacific Main Messages from Day 1

Future Earth Research for Global Sustainability in Asia & the Pacific photos: Anne Larigauderie - Research Framework L1: Developing Conceptual Framework of Future Earth that has Integrative Research Themes that include: Projects that are collaborative across disciplines, omterdos Projects that are disciplinary L2: Dynamic Planet, Global Development (short-term), transformation towards sustainability (long-term) L3: Future Earth will include: Present programmes Projects called by the Belmont Forum Single projects that address multiple themes Future Earth in Asia and the Pacific Main Messages from Day 1

Future Earth Research for Global Sustainability in Asia & the Pacific photos: Rik Leemans – Governance & Funding Mechanisms Principles: Science collaboration is central to Future Earth in an interdisciplinary manner Engagement with various users – holistic approach with boundaries Relevant to global environmental & societal challenges Sound scientific basis / Co-design & Co-financing with stakeholders Responsive / innovative / diverse (local/indigineous/common language) Presently engages an “Alliance” for an initial 10-year initiative (but there is no shelf-life) Future Earth in Asia and the Pacific Main Messages from Day 1

Key comments following presentations: addressing disaster risk – events that are significant to GEC technology/engineering links with Future Earth importance of boundaries that do not go beyond GEC involving stakeholders and engaging national communities at AP regional level engaging public and private partnerships language/communications for effective science-policy- stakeholder-community interaction while future earth will address key issues at all levels of stakeholder engagement it cannot (will not) attempt to solve all of the planet’s problems. what is the role of development in Future Earth? Future Earth – Asia-Pacific Perspectives Main Messages from Day 1

Key comments following presentations: education: roles, levels, young scientists (brain drain/ motivation) effective interdisciplinary research requires good disciplinary science component; smaller projects fundamental to success skills requirement on consensus building & negotiations co-design is crucial component for an effective Future Earth challenge to invite all stakeholders from the outset process has to be well-organised and will take time effective dialogue with policy-makers requires trust create guidelines for co-designing and co-production financing – engage donors not common to science community media/communications may need to be more deeply addressed Future Earth – Asia-Pacific Perspectives Main Messages from Day 1

Future Earth Research for Global Sustainability in Asia & the Pacific photos: 1.What is your view on the presentation of Future Earth? 2.What would be your recommendations to the Transition Team? 3.What contributions could Future Earth make in the Asia-Pacific region? 4.What are the key challenges & priorities in the Asia- Pacific region that you would like to see included in Future Earth? Future Earth – Asia-Pacific Perspectives Main Messages from Day 1

Key comments from panelists: how can sustainability be drafted into national development strategies policy-makers understand science, but scientists don’t understand policy- making processes example of a successful integrated sustainability project needed science-policy disconnect in Asia (presents co-design problem). green economy & development is a key issue for policy-makers FE research themes too broad - need to be fleshed out and include local- /sub-/regional levels Human equity role in relation to defining future earth boundaries How can we get involved in project co-design and co-financing that then need to be co-implemented –new and challenging issue Breaking down GEC into smaller problems brings different players into the picture and addressing high/middle/low level problems is key. Regional boundaries need to be defined Co-designing with SDG is what policy-makers would like to see from FE Feedback and Discussion on Global Design and Features of Future Earth – Asia-Pacific Perspective

Future Earth Research for Global Sustainability in Asia & the Pacific photos: 1.What are the challenges and opportunities to delivering solutions-oriented sustainability research and how can Future Earth contribute? 2.Given current activities on global environmental change in the region, how can Future Earth add value at the regional level? 3.What should Future Earth achieve in the Asia- Pacific region? Roundtable Discussion on Regional Priorities & Opportunities to Develop Future Earth

Key comments from panelists & audience responses: Common definitions are key to understanding - challenge to define global Sustainability. What is the definition of literacy? Differences in culture are also driven to some extent by economic constraints – FE needs to consider this For time-scales, not practical to think we are going to have an active dialogue with PMs at present level Human capability doesn’t exist in some countries (eg. PICs) Local tradition and knowledge is very important in AP region Need to find pilot projects/best practices that can be transferred Are fragmented actions able to deliver the global sustainability goals at the end – after 10, 20 years? Lot of opportunity for stakeholders to work with FE, but HOW can this be done – presently not clear to PMs. Roundtable (rectangle table) on Regional Priorities and Opportunities to Develop Future Earth