RACF Considerations in CJK NGN Test-Bed 2006. 10. Youngwook Cha, Taesang Choi, Youhyeon Jeong

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface Introduction to NSI Guy Roberts.
Advertisements

Diameter Bulk Signaling draft-liebsch-dime-diameter-bulksig-00.txt M. Liebsch, G. Punz IETF81, Quebec Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME) WG 28.
Push-to-Talk over Cellular
22-23 June 2004TISPAN-3GPP Workshop - Sophia-Antipolis 1 TISPAN NGN Architecture Overview Richard Brennan pulver.com, WG2 Chair
© 2003 Open Mobile Alliance Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Used with the permission of the Open Mobile Alliance Ltd. under the terms as stated in this document.
12/05/2000CS590F, Purdue University1 Sip Implementation Protocol Presented By: Sanjay Agrawal Sambhrama Mundkur.
A Heterogeneous Network Access Service based on PERMIS and SAML Gabriel López Millán University of Murcia EuroPKI Workshop 2005.
Membership and Media Management in Centralized Multimedia Conferences based on Internet Engineering Task Force Protocol Building Blocks Author: Ritu Mittal.
xx IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Proposed Presentation for 3GPP Date Submitted: July,
DOCUMENT #:GSC15-GTSC8-15 FOR:Presentation SOURCE: CJK Test-bed Ad-hoc Group(CCSA, TTA and TTC) AGENDA ITEM: GTSC 4.1 NGN CONTACT(S):CCSA:
Framework & Requirements for an Access Node Control Mechanism in Broadband Multi-Service Networks ANCP WG IETF 70 – Vancouver draft-ietf-ancp-framework-04.txt.
Tutorial for SC 32/WG 1 e-Business Standards Prepared for: SC Gyeongju Plenary Meeting Wenfeng Sun, Convenor ISO/IEC JTC1 SC32 WG1 (eBusiness)
22-23 June 2004TISPAN-3GPP Workshop - Sophia-Antipolis 1 Joint 3GPP & TISPAN Workshop on NGN-IMS - NGN-IMS issues handling - Alain Le Roux (France Telecom),
ITU-T workshop on Satellites in IP and Multimedia Geneva, 9-11 December 2002 Satellites in Next Generation Networks QoS issues Stéphane Combes, R&D, Alcatel.
NGN : current and beyond 21st CJK UNIOT-WG TTC Yoshinori
World Class Standards WG8 presentation of current Subscription Management Activities TISPAN WG8 – 3GPP SA#5 Joint meeting Sophia Antipolis, May14th - 15.
AIXM Users’ Conference, March Implementing AIXM in Instrument Flight Procedures Automation Presenter: Iain Hammond MacDonald, Dettwiler &
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). What is SIP? An application-layer protocol A control (signaling) protocol.
Framework & Requirements for an Access Node Control Mechanism in Broadband Multi-Service Networks ANCP WG IETF 71 – Philadelphia draft-ietf-ancp-framework-05.txt.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: MIH_Handover primitives and scenarios Date Submitted: April, 30,
A Conference Gateway Supporting Interoperability Between SIP and H.323 Jiann-Min Ho (Presenter) Jia-Cheng Hu Information Networking Institute Peter Steenkiste.
Presented By Team Netgeeks SIP Session Initiation Protocol.
Copyright © 2010 National Institute of Information and Communications Technology. All Rights Reserved 1 R&D and Standardization Activities on Distributed.
Applicazione del paradigma Diffserv per il controllo della QoS in reti IP: aspetti teorici e sperimentali Stefano Salsano Università di Roma “La Sapienza”
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: srho c-requirements-and-procedures Title: c Requirements and Procedures Date Submitted:
The 6th CJK NGN Working Group Meeting April 10 ~ 12, 2006, Hangzhou, China CJK NGN Test Scenario Proposal by TTA Taesang Choi
Resource control and signaling requirements and protocols in ITU-T Q5/SG11 DOCUMENT #:GSC13-GTSC6-15 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
The 11th CJK NGN-WG Meeting 1 11 th CJK NGN-WG (CJK NGN Test-bed Activity Report) CJK NGN Test-bed Ad-hoc Group.
IMS 架構與話務分析 網路管理維運資源中心 日期 : 2013/07/25 網路管理維運資源中心 日期 : 2013/07/25 限閱.
ACHIEVING MULTIMEDIA QOS OVER HYBRID IP/PSTN INFRASTRUCTURES QOS Signalling and Media Gateway Control ITU-T SG13/SG16 Workshop on IP Networking and Mediacom.
Framework & Requirements for an Access Node Control Mechanism in Broadband Multi-Service Networks IETF 66 - ANCP WG July 9-14, 2006 draft-ooghe-ancp-framework-00.txt.
IETF67 DIME WG Towards the specification of a Diameter Resource Control Application Dong Sun IETF 67, San Diego, Nov 2006 draft-sun-dime-diameter-resource-control-requirements-00.txt.
1 Status Report on CJK NGN Working Group China Communications Standards Association 9 th CJK meeting April 2009 HeyuanXu, Chairman of NGN-WG.
The 6th CJK NGN Working Group Meeting April 10 ~ 12, 2006, Hangzhou, China CJK NGN Test-bed Proposal by TTA Taesang Choi
CSE5803 Advanced Internet Protocols and Applications (14) Introduction Developed in recent years, for low cost phone calls (long distance in particular).
Status report on CJK NGN Working Group April 9, th CJK Standard Meeting Taesang Choi Chairman of CJK NGN Working Group.
SIP-H.323 Interworking Group RRR-1 IETF-48 SIP-H.323 Interworking Requirements draft-agrawal-sip-h323-interworking-reqs-00.txt Hemant.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: draft_invariants Title: Invariants in Proposed Drafts Date Submitted:
Doc.: IEEE /0371r0 Submission May 2005 S. McCann & E. Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 IEEE 802 Architecture Issues Notice: This document has.
17 February 2016 SIPPING - IEPREP Joint Meeting Fred Baker - IEPREP co-chair Rohan Mahy - SIPPING co-chair.
Generic Aggregation of Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) for IPv4 and IPv6 Reservation over PCN domains Georgios Karagiannis, Anurag Bhargava draft-karagiannis-pcn-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-01.
Diameter Maintenance and Extensions Working Group Requirement of Session State Machine for Diameter Server Initiated Session Tina TSOU (ITU-T Q. 5/11 Rapporteur)
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER Title: An Architecture for Security Optimization During Handovers Date Submitted: September,
OMA Instant Messaging Rel 1.0 Requirements with Possible Relevance to IETF Markus Isomäki OMA Issues BoF IETF #62.
Achieving All the Time, Everywhere Access in Next- Generation Mobile Networks by Marcello Cinque, Domenico Cotroneo and Stefano Russo Presented by Ashok.
CJK test-bed study Service control based on MPM-RACF communications Test-bed Ad-hoc Group Hideaki YAMADA, Norihiro FUKUMOTO KDDI (KDDI R&D.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Proposed Presentation for 3GPP Date Submitted: September,
Operations Area Working Group Mini-BOF Presentation COPS push mode policy configuration draft-xu-cops-push-00.txt Tom Taylor (draft editor) Tina Tsou (q.
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Coexistence architecture of Notice: This document has been prepared.
The 7th CJK NGN Working Group Meeting October 10 ~ 11, Tokyo, Japan CJK NGN Test-bed Activity Status Report Taesang Choi
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: hwnm Title: Thoughts on IEEE relation with IEEE Date Submitted: May 13, 2010.
Advanced Network HUFS Advanced Network HUFS Multicast Scenarios on ITU-T ( Y.2111 ) 김 양 중.
1 Implementation of IMS-based S-CSCF with Presence Service Jenq-Muh Hsu and Yi-Han Lin National Chung Cheng University Department of Computer Science &
A dynamic QoS control scheme for services based on RACF
Evaluation Scenarios of the CJK NGN Test-bed
CJK test-bed study based on MPM
Review of new Question descriptions under ITU-T SG11
CJK NGN test-bed study Phase Ⅲ&Ⅳ
Chae-Sub LEE TTA Summary Report of 6th FG NGN Chae-Sub LEE TTA
CJK NGN test-bed study Phase III&IV
Status on Rh interface between RACF and CPE/CPN
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
Proposal for the CJK NGN Test-bed Activity
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: sec
Taesang Choi CJK Testbed Collaboration for NGN Taesang Choi
Abstract: Relationship between and
Charles KIM TTA Collaboration Plan for CJK NGN Charles KIM TTA
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER
Hans (Hyungsoo) Kim KT corp.
Chae-Sub LEE TTA Future Collaboration of CJK NGN-WG Chae-Sub LEE TTA
Presentation transcript:

RACF Considerations in CJK NGN Test-Bed Youngwook Cha, Taesang Choi, Youhyeon Jeong

2/18 Introduction Phase III of CJK NGN Test-Bed RACF Reference Points Resource Control Modes & Schemes Messages and Protocols for Phase III Next Step Contents

3/18 Introduction CJK NGN test-bed plan was approved at 6 th CJK NGN WG meeting ( , Hangzhou, China). Three Phases toward CJK NGN test-bed –Phase I: rd /4 th Quarter, Scenario 1(Single Call Server within a single NGN Network Domain without PSTN) –Phase II: st /2 nd Quarter, Scenario 2~4(Call Servers across multiple NGN Network Domains with PSTN) –Phase III: rd /4 th ~ st /2 nd Quarter, Scenario 5~7(Media and Application Servers + RACF) This contribution is prepared to discuss functions, reference points and messages of RACF in the CJK NGN test-bed of phase III.

4/18 CJK NGN Test-Bed Schedule Phase III: rd /4 th ~ st /2 nd Quarter, Scenario 5~7(Media and Application Servers + RACF)

5/18 RACF Considerations RACF Reference Points Resource Control Modes –Push Mode, Pull Mode Resource Control Schemes –Single-Phase Scheme, Two-Phase Scheme, Thee- Phase Scheme Information exchanged over each Reference Point Protocols for each Reference Point

6/18 Generic RACF Functional Architecture Which Reference Points for Phase III? – Rs and Rw Reference Points for Phase III-1, rd /4 th Quarter – Rt and Rc Reference Points for Phase III-2, st /2 nd Quarter RACF: Resource and Admission Control Functions PD-FE: Policy Decision Functional Entity TRC-FE: Transport Resource Control Functional Entity TRE-FE: Transport Resource Enforcement Functional Entity PE-FE: Policy Enforcement Functional Entity

7/18 QoS Capability of CPE Type 1 – CPE without QoS negotiation capability (e.g., vanilla soft phone, gaming consoles) Type 2 – CPE with QoS negotiation capability at the service stratum (e.g. SIP phone with SDP /SIP QoS extensions) –The CPE is unaware of QoS attributes specific to the transport. Type 3 – CPE with QoS negotiation capability at the transport stratum (e.g. UMTS UE) –The CPE supports RSVP-like or other transport signaling (e.g. GPRS session management signaling, ATM PNNI/Q.931). What kind of CPE will be used in the CJK NGN test-bed? – Type 2 CPE may be an answer if we consider SIP phone.

8/18 Resource Control Mode (1) Push Mode: –The RACF makes the authorization and resource control decision based on policy rules and autonomously instructs the transport functions to enforce the policy decision. –The push mode is suitable for type 1 and type 2 CPEs. Authorization, Reservation, Commitment Reservation, Commitment SIP Invite

9/18 Resource Control Mode (2) Pull Mode: –The RACF makes the authorization decision based on policy rules and, upon the request of the transport functions, re-authorizes the resource request and responds with the final policy decision for enforcement. –The pull mode is suitable for type 3 CPE. Which mode will be used in the CJK NGN test-bed? – Resource control mode is dependent on the type of CPE. – For type 2 CPE, the push mode is suitable. Authorization Reservation, Commitment SIP Invite RSVP

10/18 Resource Control States and Schemes QoS Resource Control States –Authorization, Reservation, Commitment QoS Resource Control Schemes –Single-Phase Scheme : Authorization, reservation and commitment are performed in a single step. –Two-Phase Scheme : Authorization and reservation are performed in one step, followed by commitment in another step. Alternatively authorization is performed in one step, followed by reservation and commitment in another step. –Three-Phase Scheme: Authorization, reservation and commitment are performed sequentially.

11/18 Resource Control Modes and Schemes Push Mode Rs Authorization + Reservation + Commitment Commitment after Authorization + Reservation Rw Reservation + Commitment Commitment after Reservation Pull Mode Rs Authorization Rw Reservation + Commitment Commitment after Reservation Which control scheme? – Single-phase scheme is suitable for client-server-like applications to minimize the delay between the service request and the ensuring reception of content. – Three-phase scheme is suitable for network-hosted services in an environment where transport resources are scarce.

12/18 Resource Control using Single-Phase Scheme in Rs and Rw Authorization, Reservation, Commitment Reservation, Commitment

13/18 Resource Release

14/18 Information exchanged over each Reference Point RIR : Resource Initiation Request/ResponseRMR : Resource Modification Request/Response RAR : Resource Action Request/ResponseRN : Resource Notification RRR : Resource Release Request/ResponseARR : Abort Resource Request/Response RDR : Resource Decision Request/ResponseTRIR : Transport Resource Information Request/Response TRII : Transport Resource Information IndicationTRRN : Transport Resource Release Notification RRJ : Resource Request reJectionRUI : Resource Unavailable Indication

15/18 RACF Messages for Phase III Which messages will be exchanged over each reference point? – RIR and RRR are basic messages. – Other messages will be further exchanged according to the agreement of RACF functional scope.

16/18 Protocols for each Reference Point(1) Q.rcp.XProtocol BaseRef. Point Q.rcp.1DIAMETERRs Q.rcp.2 Part IRCIPRp Q.rcp.3.1COPSRw Q.rcp.3.2H.248 Q.rcp.XProtocol BaseRef. Point Q.rcp.4.1COPSRc Q.rcp.4.2SNMP Q.rcp.5To be determinedRt Q.rcp.6To be determinedRd Which protocol will be implemented for each reference point? –There are one more protocols for some reference points. –What will be criteria to select a specific protocol for those reference points?

17/18 Protocols for each Reference Point(2) TRC-FE collects the transport network topology and the transport resource status information via Rc reference point. Accepting various demands and requirements, SG 11 will generate several protocols for this reference point. How these protocols will be consistent with each other in a point of information semantics? Standardization direction: –1 st step : Requirements from SG 13 –2 nd step : Protocol Neutral Information Model in SG 11 –3 rd step : Protocol Dependent Data Models in SG 11 Information Model Requirement Data Model XML Schema UML Class Diagram MIBPIBOther.. Q.rcp.4.0Information Model for Rc Q.rcp.4.1COPS alternative Q.rcp.4.2SNMP alternative Q.rcp.4.3Web Services alternative ……

18/18 Next Steps Discussion of RACF functional scope for each reference point Positioning and mapping each functional entity into a physical entity –Concrete QoS resource information elements for each message RACF test cases