NASA PLANETARY DATA SYSTEM ARCHIVING IPDA Steering Committee Reta Beebe, Dan Crichton Paris, France July 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Effective Contract Management Planning
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
1 External Review Results November 30, 2011 Reta Beebe.
Performance Assessment Process: The Employee’s Perspective May 2014.
Board Brief March 24,  Previous survey conducted 7 years ago  PY assessment requested by President ◦ Conduct a complete review.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF The NAIF Node PDSMC Report Addresses both NAIF Node and Core SPICE Development August 23, 2011 Chuck.
LADEE PDS4 Experience G. Delory LADEE Instrument and PDS Teams LADEE SOC PDS Management Council Nov /19/2014 LADEE PDS4 Experience 1.
EGEE NA3 Planning Prof. Malcolm Atkinson Director John Murison Training Manager CERN 13 th November 2003.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Alliance for Strategic Technology (AST) SUNY Business Intelligence Initiative January 8, 2009.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
System Design/Implementation and Support for Build 2 PDS Management Council Face-to-Face Mountain View, CA Nov 30 - Dec 1, 2011 Sean Hardman.
NESCC Meeting March 28, Topics Accomplishments Since Last Meeting Program Management for NESCC Support to the NESCC Sponsor Committee Review and.
May Agenda  PeopleSoft History at Emory  Program Governance  Why Upgrade Now?  Program Guiding Principles  High-Level Roadmap  What Does This.
IPDA Update Dan Crichton Tom Stein August 2014 International Planetary Data Alliance.
Idaho Statewide Interoperability Executive Council.
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA 1 The Government of Canada and the Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector: Moving Forward Together Presentation to Civil Society Excellence:
AAAC Meeting February, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort at a.
Interim Executive Director June  Financial Management Practices Audit Results Fiscal Year Audit Results Fiscal Year Internal.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
1. Overview About Washington University / Planetary Data Systems Geosciences Node Initial and continued interactions in China NASA-CNSA Bilateral (July.
PDS4 Tool Development Strategy PDS Management Council Meeting November 18, 2014 Dan Crichton.
PDS Geosciences Node Page 1 Archiving Mars Mission Data Sets with the Planetary Data System Report to MEPAG Edward A. Guinness Dept. of Earth and Planetary.
Summary of NAST Major Accomplishments Dollars in Millions National Coalition White Paper NAST Congressional Testimony $54.5M RAND $2M Wind Tunnel Study.
Atmospheres Node Report Reta Beebe Nancy Chanover Lyle Huber Lynn Neakrase Jim Murphy Irma Trejo Matias Roybal Shannon Rees.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
Budget Workshop: Fiscal Policies, Process, and Budget Guidelines Board of Governors April 21, 2005.
Chapter 6: THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS FOCUS: This chapter provides a description of the application of customer-driven project management.
PDS Atmospheres Node Plans for PDS4 User Roll-out 8/28/12PDS4 Roll-outStatus 1 Reta Beebe Lyle Huber Lynn Neakrase Jim Murphy Nancy Chanover Joni Johnson.
Science Data in the Science Mission Directorate (SMD) Jeffrey J.E. Hayes Program Executive for MO & DA, Heliophysics Division August 17, 2011.
IP Offices and the Implementation of the WIPO Development Agenda: Challenges and Opportunities September 18, 2009 Geneva Irfan Baloch World Intellectual.
Creation of the Archiving Component of a MOU template for international missions IPDA MOU project members.
Data Standards Development August 29, Topics 1.Current Status 2.What was delivered for Build 2c 3.How was IPDA supported 4.What mission support.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD Committee on Public Involvement in Transportation LEARNING FROM EACH OTHER AND SHARING BEST PRACTICES.
Decision Making Process Program Planning and Control Deana Hackfeld Management Systems Office November 17, 2006.
CIWQS Review Phase II: Evaluation and Final Recommendations March 14, 2008.
Federal Geographic Data Committee Update Ivan DeLoatch NGAC Meeting August 26, 2009.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Indian Health Service Grants Management Grants 101- Fundamentals.
Assessment of Build 1d PDS4 Standards Reta Beebe Dan Crichton.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Smart Choice Pre-Select Phase Transition September 2002.
1 An Overview of Process and Procedures for Health IT Collaboration GSA Office of Citizen Services and Communications Intergovernmental Solutions Division.
GSMT SWG Meeting November, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort.
MEPAG Meeting February 27, 2013 web meeting David Des Marais, MEPAG Chair NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted by,
PDS4 Deployment Planning (Discussion) PDS MC F2F Columbia, Maryland Dan Crichton August 28,
PDS4 Project Report PDS MC F2F UCLA Dan Crichton November 28,
PDS4 Project Report PDS MC F2F University of Maryland Dan Crichton March 27,
PP 620: Public Policy and Health Administration Unit One Seminar Kris R. Foote, J.D., M.P.A., M.S.W. Kaplan University.
IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.
IANA Stewardship Transition & Enhancing ICANN Accountability Panel and Audience discussion | WSIS Forum | 5 May 2016.
Strategic Planning Mapping Process (2014 Example) RTD VisionTo deliver regional multi-modal transportation services and infrastructure improvements that.
Creation of the Archiving Component of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Template for International Missions IPDA MOU project members.
2016 NSF Large Facilities Workshop New Initiatives Business Roundtable II-III May 25-26, 2016 Jeff Lupis, Division Director, Division of Acquisition and.
International Planetary Data Alliance Registry Project Update September 16, 2011.
Standards Coordination Office NIST presentation to the FGDC September 25, 2014.
IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.
NASA PLANETARY DATA SYSTEM ARCHIVING IPDA Steering Committee Dan Crichton, Reta Beebe, Tom Stein, Steve Hughes Bangalore, India July
7/17/07NASA Report1 NASA Archiving Activities - Lessons Learned 2nd International Planetary Data Alliance Steering Group July 17, 2007 Reta Beebe PDS Program.
Presenter: Igna Visser Date: Wednesday, 18 March 2015
AN EASTERN CANADA AND CARIBBEAN DISTRICT EDUCATION MODULE
Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Bill [B 75–2008]
Atmospheres Node Report
IPDA Update for PDS Management Council
Helping Active Missions Convert to PDS4
Project Management Method and PMI ® PMBOK ® Roles
Presentation transcript:

NASA PLANETARY DATA SYSTEM ARCHIVING IPDA Steering Committee Reta Beebe, Dan Crichton Paris, France July

Part 1: Status of NASA missions and PDS4 Part 2: Federal funding for NASA Planetary Science Part 3: Requests from the IPDA Community Topics 2

NASA Policy for Implementing PDS4 Current Development Schedule for PDS4 Planetary Missions Impact on Missions Topics in Part 1 3

NASA Policy for Implementing PDS4 NASA/PDS hereby specifies 1 November 2011 as the transition date from PDS3 to PDS4. NASA missions confirmed for flight after that date will be required to archive their data according to PDS4 standards, while missions confirmed for flight prior to that date are allowed to continue using PDS3. Missions allowed to use PDS3 are encouraged to consider the advantages of switching to PDS4 and NASA will consider proposals for funding augmentations to accomplish the change. Data providers in R&A programs will be required to comply with PDS4 standards for any programs with proposal deadlines after 1 November Data providers whose proposals were submitted prior to that date are encouraged to consider the advantages of complying with PDS4 standards but will be allowed to complete their deliveries according to PDS3 standards. 4

PDS4 Current Development Schedule The PDS has released V1.0 in support of LADEE and MAVEN missions. Improvements, based on the experience of working with these missions, will be made to PDS4 in subsequent releases for future missions. LADEE will be the first mission with a launch in September and expected data distribution in the Fall of The discipline nodes have been actively testing the model and the associated schemas by migrating PDS3 datasets. A Change Control Board (CCB) has been established to manage changes to the PDS4 standards specification. Access to all PDS4 documents are available to IPDA members at 5

6

Impact on Missions Missions Currently Being Archived in PDS3 Cassini-Huygens Dawn LCROSS LRO Mars Odyssey MRO Smart 1 Stardust NExT 7 MSL/Curiosity GRAIL

Impact on Missions Missions Currently Being Archived in PDS3 (cont.) EPOXI Mars Express Spirit & Opportunity Messenger New Horizons Participation on International Missions WISE 8

Missions In Cruise or Development Juno Participation on International Missions MAVEN LADEE OSIRIS-REx Archived in PDS3 9 Archived in PDS4 InSight

Transition From PDS3 to PDS4 Missions already archiving in PDS3 will continue to do so and PDS will be responsible for converting their data. LADEE, MAVEN, Osiris-Rex and InSight will archive in PDS4. The PDS nodes will help them set up and test their PDS compatible pipeline. The PDS will deliver XML templates to the teams for their products. The PDS will migrate archived datasets based on usage and available staffing. More information will be provided during the PDS4 session. 10

How does funding of planetary science work? What is the National Academy? What is the relationship among the Academy, NASA and Congress ? What is the Decadal Report? How did the NASA Planetary Exploration Division respond the Decadal Report requirements for data archiving? Topics in Part 2 11

Federal Funding of Planetary Science 12 Funding for planetary science is a complex negotiation between NASA, the White House, and Congress. The NASA budget follows the federal fiscal year (October – September). The White House, via the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), first proposes a budget. Congress reviews the budget and may make changes to it. Congress will then send the budget back to the White House which may be signed or require further negotiation. (The largest stumbling block for unmanned missions is the OMB) If no agreement is made by October 1, the federal government maintains a continuing resolution operating on the previous year’s budget. NASA and congress rely heavily on the National Academy to set the science and mission priorities. It uses these to establish and justify what programs to fund.

13 What is the National Academy? The National Academy of Science was chartered by Congress under the leadership of President Abraham Lincoln, to provide scientific and technical advise to the government of the United States. The Academy has since been expanded to include The National Academy of Engineering and the Institute of Medicine, with the National Research Council coordinating the 3 groups. The Academy of Science is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society. Admission into the academy is highly respected and U.S. educational institutions consider participation in Academy activities confirmation of the high standing of the individual. It is considered an authority outside of the government. Participants in Academy activities receive reimbursement for travel expenses but no salary.

14 What is the relationship of the Academy, NASA and Congress? Congress accepts the Academy as the source of unbiased advice. Accordingly they will issue a mandate to NASA that the Academy should consider a certain subject and NASA must comply. NASA and the Academy negotiate the terms of the study and budget to carry it out. They Academy organizes the working group who will carry out the study, but NASA can refuse certain individuals. The Study is completed, reviewed by NASA, NASA generates a formal response and both are sent to Congress. This forms the basis for budget considerations and oversight of NASA.

15 What is the Decadal Report? Congress Mandates that the Academy produce a revised Decadal Report every 10 years. The current report has been completed and is in publication. A copy can be downloaded at NASA negotiates a contract with the Academy. The report must address the terms of the contract and lay out a recommended plan that must extend for 10 years. NASA works closely with the Academy and requires that proposed missions meet rigorous costing standards. The report is produced and Congress and NASA accept it. Congress considers this the standard for evaluating NASA and after 5 years they mandate that the Academy issue a “report card” that assesses how NASA has progressed in fulfilling the Decadal recommendations.

Statements In the Decadal Report Concerning Archiving The Decadal Report recognizes the PDS and addresses the key challenges of generating higher order products, upgrading PDS, and ensuring international interoperability The document states “It is crucial that the capabilities of the Planetary Data System be maintained by NASA, both to provide a permanent archive of planetary data and to provide a means of distributing those data to the world at large” It also states. “Announcements of Opportunity should mandate that instrument teams propose and be funded to generate derived products before missions have completed Phase E.” And, as planetary exploration continues to become a more international enterprise, it will be increasingly important for NASA to assure interoperability of the PDS with other international repositories of planetary data. 16

NASA Response to the Upgrade of PDS 17 As the PDS has evolved over the past 25 years, the transition from a simple data depository/archive facility to an online resource has required both major and incremental changes. The rollout of the next major revision to the PDS, PDS4, will begin in the next fiscal year. Standards and accepted data formats have been revisited and revised, with a focus on improved search capability and user experience. Results of a recent survey of the PDS are being worked and incorporated into the PDS4 product. The entire user community is encouraged to respond to future surveys and provide feedback to the PDS management as we continue to improve the system.

The input of the IPDA in developing standards for use by the international planetary science community is critical. Please share any development of tutorials and other support materials that you develop for your communities. Topics in Part 3: IPDA Requests 18

Thank You! 19 Please submit any questions you have on these topics to Dan Crichton or Reta Beebe