Table 5. Percentages of the answers followed of some relative subjects to the theme 3 (Evolution of the science: continuity and rupture) Abdeljalil Métioui.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Believing Where We Cannot Prove Philip Kitcher
Advertisements

WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Genesis on a laptop God’s operations from the beginning.
Meditations on First Philosophy
Abby Yinger Mathematics o Statistics o Decision Theory.
The Problem of Induction Reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’ by W. Salmon.
The Universe Exists. We Exist. What conclusions can we draw?
Undergraduate Students’ Laboratory Practice Illuminated by The Philosophy of Science TheoryVs. Experimental Evidence. Rachel Havdala Guy Ashkenazi Dept.
The Problem of Induction Reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’ by W. Salmon.
Introduction, Acquiring Knowledge, and the Scientific Method
Discovery Learning Theresa Murphy, John Malloy, Sean O’Brien
A Puzzle and an Adventure Bob Gemin WPAFB Educational Outreach.
Social Studies Curriculum Essentials of Elementary Social Studies By Turner, Russell, Waters Copyright 2013.
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH TRADITIONS.
Force and Acceleration with respect to Circular Motion and the Concept of Pseudo Forces.
Understanding Educational Innovation Professional Practice Module Dr Sue Wharton.
How to develop research skills in students. The model of searching information. Carol Collier Kuhlthau How to develop research skills in students. The.
Finding Reliable Research on the Internet. So where do I start? Your essays will be comprised of a variety of information, but because we live in a digital.
Hypothetico-Deductive Model
THE ESSAY: THE 3 LEVELS OF COMPOSITION. AN OVERVIEW OF THE 3 LEVELS  I. LEVEL ONE = MOST THEORETICAL (INCLUDES YOUR THESIS)  II. LEVEL TWO = DEFINED.
Finding our way back  The initial result of Descartes’ use of hyperbolic doubt is the recognition that at least one thing cannot be doubted, at least.
Main stepsMain steps 1.Find relevant literature 2.Read and while reading, write down the main concepts, variables, relationships, methods, and other important.
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
 Remember, it is important that you should not believe everything you read.  Moreover, you should be able to reject or accept information based on the.
Free Will FREEDOM VERSUS DETERMINISM. Are human beings free to make moral decisions and to act upon them? Are they determined by forces outside and.
Scientific Inquiry Created by: Mrs. Gismonde.  In the last PowerPoint we learned how to gather, collect and analyze our data.  Today you will learn.
Gile Sampling1 Sampling. Fundamental principles. Daniel Gile
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
Scientific Inquiry There will be a quiz tomorrow on the following 7 statements.
THE NATURE OF SCIENCE CHAPTER 1 SECTION 1. SCIENCE JOURNAL Open your book to page 4. Read the title, section headings and main ideas. Read the Yellow.
Scientific Inquiry There will be a quiz tomorrow on the following 7 statements.
The Scientific Method. What is Science? Write 3 questions a biologist might ask about this picture.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Life Science Chapter 1 Section 1.
1 Scientific Method. 2 Observation Employing your five senses to perceive objects or events.
A Conversation Between an Agnostic and a Christian (Con’t)
Fall 2009 Dr. Bobby Franklin.  “... [the] systematic, controlled empirical and critical investigation of natural phenomena guided by theory and hypotheses.
Do I need statistical methods? Samu Mäntyniemi. Learning from experience Which way a bottle cap is going to land? Think, and then write down your opinion.
The Rules of Sociological Method, Durkheim (1895) Tamara Sole Clark Backus HOL 8100 Organizational Culture.
Our life will make more sense We will discover the truth We will avoid being lied to or used by others.
Joel A. Bryan, Ph.D. Center for Mathematics and Science Education Texas A&M University
Scientific Methods in Earth Science. What You Will Learn  Explain how scientists begin to learn about the natural world.  Explain what scientific methods.
Critical Theory and Philosophy “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it” Marx, Theses on.
SCIENTIFIC METHOD What is the Scientific Method? This is a process by which scientists go about answering questions and solving problems. The process includes.
The inference and accuracy We learned how to estimate the probability that the percentage of some subjects in the sample would be in a given interval by.
Lesson 1-1 Nature of Science. QUESTIONS Communicate Observe Define scope of a Problem Form a testable Question Research the known Clarify an expected.
Twenty Questions. 20 Questions
Absolute truth v evolving changing truth. There are 2 kinds of truth that cause conflict between Religion & Science 1. Absolute truth 2. Evolving changing.
Table © The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing. Ma del Carmen Nolasco Salcedo et al. Perception of the Students in Computer.
Scientific Literature and Communication Unit 3- Investigative Biology b) Scientific literature and communication.
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Towards a Value-Based Theory Of Sustainability Problem Framing
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
Nature of Science.
Curriculum and Philosophy
SHOULD INTELLIGENT DESIGN
Important Concepts Above and Beyond Biology I
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
Simulation Frequency(Hz)
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
Cumulative Percentage
Table 4. Value creation (Y2)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

Table 5. Percentages of the answers followed of some relative subjects to the theme 3 (Evolution of the science: continuity and rupture) Abdeljalil Métioui et al. Conception of Quebec Students in Teacher Education Regarding the Construction Modes of Science Knowledge. American Journal of Educational Research, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 8, doi: /education © The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing. 3. The direction followed by the science of today is determined by orientations taken by the previous generations of scientists. In disagreement 31/184: 17 % I don't know 20/184: 11 % In agreement 133/184: 72 % In disagreement: « I don't believe that today's science is determined in the past. It is clear that the discoveries of the past have an important influence in the science of today, but the science is in constant evolution and it is why according to me, science is centered more on the stakes of news and even future, as the environment. » (E20) I don't know: « I don't know because I believe that every day the scientists make the discoveries that can throw into question orientations taken by the previous generations of scientists, therefore they don't necessarily follow the same direction. However, they are probably influenced one way or the other by what their predecessors made. » (E 13) In agreement: « It seems true, because now the science evolves. It tries to find new discoveries. Today's science doesn't question again the science of yesterday. It goes toward the before. Then, today's science leans on orientations taken by the previous generations of scientists. » (E 3) 7. The scientific problems of the past are bound intimately to those of today. In disagreement 35/184: 19 % I don't know 37/184: 20 % In agreement 112/184: 61 % In disagreement: « During the time the reality of the scientist's changes. The problems to which the scientists are confronted are different from those that one recovered in the past. » (E67) I don't know: « It would first be necessary that I know the scientific problems of the past to judge if they are at the source of our contemporary problems. » (E38) In agreement: « Certainly! Not only the problems, but also their resolution. The scientist's objective is to pull a conclusion: if some problems have been identified in the past, they constitute an element of analysis for the scientists of today. Of the same stroke, the gradual resolution of these problems serves as tracks for other problems, since it is a source of concepts. » (E1) 9. The scientific progress results in an improvement of the scientific theories. In disagreement 29/184: 16 % I don't know 5/184: 3 % In agreement 150/184: 81 % In disagreement: « The scientific progress results in an improvement of the scientific theories, but especially by an improvement with regard to the practice, the concrete life of every day (medicines, means of transportation, technologies, etc.). » (E28) I don't know: « It is as the chicken and the egg". Difficult to say what comes in first. Progress permits to perfect the conceived theories, but the theories are also to the basis of progress. It is a vicious circle. The two are in constant interdependence. The two work equally. » (E9) In agreement: « The scientists can make scientific discoveries indeed and can refine theories already emitted by other scientists of the past. They make progress therefore the science. » (E12) 12. Tomorrow's scientific theories will be the extension of the theories of today. In disagreement 47/184: 26 % I don't know 15/184: 8 % In agreement 122/184: 66 % In disagreement: « These theories won't necessarily be the extension. During the next years, it goes doubts to have itself there of it of new scientific theories coming from new discoveries. Some theories can be the extension, but not all. » (E4) I don't know: « One cannot be certain of it, but I imagine that an important continuity exists in the world of the science. A scientist's life is not long enough to allow him to arrive to an outcome (by himself). The scientists must hand over the torch. » (E21) In agreement: « The scientists constantly try to modify or to improve the former theories. It goes without saying that tomorrow's scientists will work on the theories that we know today. It is certain that they will develop some new theories, but the majority of them already exist now. » (E11)