Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Unmet Need MICS3 Data Analysis and Report Writing Workshop.

Advertisements

DATA DEMAND AND USE: S HARING I NFORMATION AND P ROVIDING F EEDBACK Session 5.

Nigeria Case Study HIVAIDS Specific Slides. ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA.

Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.

Goal 5: Improve maternal health Target 5b: Achieve, by 2015, universal access to reproductive health 5.3 Contraceptive prevalence rate 5.4 Adolescent birth.

By Statistics Indonesia and Ministry of Health Indonesia Workshop on MDGs Monitoring 2015 and Beyond UN-ESCAP, Bangkok, 9-13 July 2012 Workshop on MDGs.

GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.

Understanding the role of child marriage on reproductive health outcomes: evidence from a multi- country study in South Asia Deepali Godha, David Hotchkiss,

Is There a Causal Relationship Between Maternal Health Care Utilization and Subsequent Contraceptive Use?: Evidence from Kenya and Zambia Mai Do and David.

Begin with the End in Mind

Contraceptive discontinuation in urban Honduras Janine Barden-O’Fallon, PhD Ilene Speizer, PhD University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA 29 September.

What characteristics differentiate method switchers from discontinuers? Janine Barden-O’Fallon, PhD Ilene Speizer, PhD University of North Carolina at.

Women’s empowerment and choice of family planning methods Mai Do and Nami Kurimoto Department of International Health and Development Tulane University.

LINKING DATA TO ACTION Session 6. Session Objectives By the end of this session, you will be able to:  Identify priority decisions and programmatic questions.

DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.

UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.

Evaluation of family planning program

U SING G EOGRAPHY TO S TRENGTHEN THE D ECISION -M AKING P ROCESS.

Population Reference Bureau

MEASURE Evaluation DATIM Data Exchange Denise Johnson

Together for Health is funded by the United States Agency for International Development and implemented by JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. in collaboration.

Business as Unusual: Changing the Approach to Monitoring OVC Programs Karen G. Fleischman Foreit, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.

Measuring and Evaluating Reproductive Health Programs and Initiatives Bridgit Adamou Global Maternal Health Conference 2010 August 30 th, 2010.

Strengthening Health Information Systems: Creating an Information Culture Manila, June 14, 2011 Theo Lippeveld, MD, MPH,

Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap Session 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data- informed decision making  Understand.

PLACE Method Priorities for Local AIDS Control Efforts 1 1 MEASURE Evaluation, A Manual for implementing the PLACE Method.

Linking Data with Action Part 1: Seven Steps of Using Information for Decision Making.

Linking Data with Action Part 2: Understanding Data Discrepancies.

Regional Forum: Use of Gender Data in Sub-national Decision-making Kigali, Rwanda August 2012 Key Gender Terms and Concepts.

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.

WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.

Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Session 1: Setting the Gender Policy Context.

Day 4: Field Practicum This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for.

MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.

MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.

MER Essential Survey Indicators Jenifer Chapman, PhD & Lisa Parker, PhD February 2, 2015.

Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.

Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.

Integration of Community Based Services It seems like a good idea, but how to make it work? Molly Cannon Palladium/MEASURE Evaluation September 28, 2015.

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9:

Community Health Information System in Action in SSNPR/Ethiopia

Difference-in-Differences Models

Data Quality Assurance Workshop

Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:

Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment

Session: 8 Disseminating Results

Community Health Information System in Action in SNNPR/Ethiopia

Introduction MODULE 6: RHIS Data Demand and Use

The PLACE Mapping Tool Becky Wilkes, MS, GISP Marc Peterson, MA, GISP

MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:

Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification

Training Content and Orientation

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:

Introduction RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Introduction to Health Informatics:

Information Systems for Health:

Information Systems for Health:

Introduction to Health Informatics:

Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output

Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

Data and Interoperability:

Measuring Data Quality

Introduction to Health Informatics

Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

EHRs and Privacy Protection in LMICs

Willis Odek, PhD Chief of Party/Senior Technical Advisor,

Presentation transcript:

Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet need. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Do you come to the same conclusions? If not, why not?  What does this tell you about the strengths and limitations of each indicator?

Trends in CPR Source: DHS Statcompiler (married women)

Trends in Unmet Need 1992–2009 Source: DHS Statcompiler (married women)

Trends in FP Demand 1992–2009 Source: DHS Statcompiler (married women)

Trends in Percentage of FP Demand Satisfied 1992–2009 Source: DHS Statcompiler (married women)

 Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR)  Percentage of (married) women of reproductive age (15- 49) who are currently using a contraceptive method.  Unmet Need for FP  Percentage of fecund women exposed to the risk of pregnancy who say they want to wait at least two years for another birth (spacing) or do not want any more children (limiting), but are not currently using a method of contraception. Notes from presentation Common FP Indicators

Notes from presentation Related Indicators  Demand for FP  Percentage of (married) women using FP + percentage (married) women with unmet need for FP  Percentage of demand satisfied  Percentage of (married) women using FP / percentage (married) women with demand for FP  Couple Years of Protection  The estimated protection provided by family planning (FP) services during a one-year period, based upon the volume of all contraceptives sold or distributed free of charge to clients during that period

Notes from presentation CPR vs Unmet Need CPR  Relatively simple to define  Uni-dimensional  Consistency over time  Does not capture concept of meeting needs Unmet Need  Relatively complex to define  Multi-dimensional— demand & use  Definition has evolved  Captures concept of meeting need

MEASURE Evaluation is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group, ICF Macro, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, and Tulane University. Views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the U.S. government. MEASURE Evaluation is the USAID Global Health Bureau's primary vehicle for supporting improvements in monitoring and evaluation in population, health and nutrition worldwide.