Dr. Roger Roess UPDATE January 11, 2015 Mode Definitions in the HCM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Transportation Systems. PARTIII: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
Advertisements

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Transit Capacity & Quality of Service Manual, 3rd Edition Fixed Route Quality of Service.
Sharing the Roadway Chapter 11.
Statewide Mobility Performance Measures Team Meeting Webinar June 17, 2013.
Getting on the MOVES: Using Dynameq and the US EPA MOVES Model to Measure the Air Pollution Emissions TRPC – Smart Corridors Project Chris Breiland Fehr.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
Sharing the Road Look for Motorcycles Motorcycles Motorcycles have the same privileges as other vehicles on the road. The chances of being involved.
RECONSIDERING THE BICYCLE: An Anthropological Perspective on a New (Old) Thing CHAPTER ONE: Anthropology, Bicycles, and Urban Mobility © Routledge 2013.
HCM 2010 WORKSHOP PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA DAN SMITH, P.E. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
Chapter 14: Basic Freeway Segments and Multilane Highways
Ohio Department of Transportation Leadership Meeting#1 Jun 12, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Pike and Wok Travel.
CHAPTER 9 DRIVING IN URBAN TRAFFIC
Planning & Community Development Department GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROJECT SCHEDULE AND TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MEASURES City Council Meeting July 21,
Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority Safety Overview March 1, 2007 Exposition Light Rail Transit Project.
Chapter 2 (supplement): Capacity and Level-of-Service Analysis for Freeways and Multilane Highways Objectives of this presentation: By the end of this.
Capacity Analysis CE 453 Lecture #14.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
Interchanges, Arterials, And Networks Last Week. Interchanges Freeway – Multilane highway Ramps and weaves are the same Problem comes in when you have.
Three Phases of Commuting Trip 1.Collection Phase – the trip from home to the main travel vehicle Cost: a.basically zero for automobile b.time costs and.
Maintenance and Protection of Traffic (MPT) – HDM Ch 16.
2/27/06Michael Dixon1 CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Lecture 16: Freeways Basic Sections.
Chapter 3. Highway Design for Performance
Highway Capacity Software (HCS) – Part II
Analyses of Unsignalized Intersections
Level of Service Section 4.5. Level of Service: The Basics MMeasure performance by density. RRatio of operating capacity to speed. UUnits: passenger.
Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.
Ch. 4 Traffic Control NY State DMV.
Speed Offenses & Speed Enforcement
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
Sharing the Road with Others. DO NOW 10-9  Using your books…(Chapter 8) Explain what is meant by the No Zone Principle. Since 2011 research has shown.
Lec 17, Ch.9, pp : Capacity of freeway sections (objectives) Understand capacity and level of service are the heart of transportation analyses Understand.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Rochdale Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 998 – GMATS Rochdale Key Centre report Whereas report.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
Freeway Capacity Analysis
Changing Lanes Moving from right-hand lane to left-hand lane
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Fall 2001 Lectures 15 Policy Issues II: Public Transportation and Energy Conservation.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.
Stockport Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 947 – GMATS Stockport Key Centre report Whereas.
Bolton Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 974 – GMATS Bolton Key Centre report Whereas report.
Freeways and Multilane Highways CTC-340. HMWK Ch 13 Read Section 13.7 Ch 13 # 2, 3 Ch 14# 1, 4, 5, 6, 8.
Sharing the Road with Others
Oldham Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 997 – GMATS Oldham Key Centre report Whereas report.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee April 12, 2006.
Slide Congestion Management Program Update Presentation to PPLC April 11, 2011.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Highway Capacity Manual. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Most widely referenced and best selling document of the Transportation Research Board HCM 2000:
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Development of Guide Developed through two Cooperative Research Program (NCHRP and TCRP) projects over the past several years. Resulting research report.
SHARING THE ROADWAY Chapter 8. PROTECTING PEDESTRIANS BE ALERT IN THESE SITUATIONS  Crosswalks  Intersections  Alleys and driveways  Business districts.
HCM 2010: FREEWAY FACILITIES PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA
Complete Streets Training
Chapter 5 Sharing the Road.  When following a large vehicle, stay out of its "blind spots". Position your vehicle so the driver can see it in the side.
Sharing the Road with Others Chapter 8. Pedestrians  Pedestrians are the second largest category of motor vehicle deaths and injuries in NJ  Children.
Sharing the Road with Others Chapter 8. Pedestrians… Since 2004, over 30,000 pedestrians have been injured on New Jersey roads.
Roadway safety focus on unprotected road users - pedestrians and cyclists International Partnership Meeting January 13-14, 2016 Per Andersson.
The New 2010 Highway Capacity Manual An Overview.
Proposed Additions to MUTCD. Chapter 8E. Busway Grade Crossings Proposed revision submitted to FHWA in June Intended for next edition of MUTCD.
Elliot Road Extension design critique and recommendations Petition to the Town of Chapel Hill Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Board March 25, 2014 Geoffrey.
NCHRP 7-22 Planning & Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide for the HCM Kittelson & Associates 01/12/15 1 Status Report.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Complete Streets Training Module 4b – Designing for All Users.
Nixon Road Corridor Study: Findings & Options
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II
HCM – Sixth Edition What’s New in the HCM Sixth Edition
Freeway Capacity and Level of Service
Developing a Pedestrian -Bicycle Safety Action Plan
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Roger Roess UPDATE January 11, 2015 Mode Definitions in the HCM

UPDATE Background: Prior to HCM  Most chapters presented methods to predict operations and QOS of motorized vehicle traffic on roadways at facility, segment, and/or point levels  PCEs convert heavy vehicles into equivalent # of passenger cars when evaluating operations  “QOS requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream…. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions and the driver’s perception of those conditions.” (HCM2000, Ch. 2)  Separate ped, bike, transit chapters

UPDATE Background: HCM  Incorporated NCHRP 3-70 user-perception research Automobile drivers Pedestrians Bicycles Transit passengers  Multimodal approach to each methodological chapter Where modal methods existed for a particular system element, all were presented in the same chaper Automobile mode, pedestrian mode, bicycle mode, transit mode

UPDATE HCM 2010 Modal Definitions 4  Automobile mode “…includes all motor vehicle traffic using a roadway except transit vehicles. Thus, trucks, RVs, motorcycles, and tour buses are all considered members of the automobile mode for HCM analysis purposes.” (Ch. 2) “The HCM’s LOS thresholds for the automobile mode are based on the perspective of automobile drivers and passengers. Therefore, the automobile LOS measures may not necessarily reflect the perspective of drivers of other types of motorized vehicles, especially trucks.” (Ch. 2)

UPDATE HCM 2010 Modal Definitions 5  Automobile mode “The phrase automobile mode, as used in this chapter, refers to travel by all motorized vehicles that can legally operate on the street, with the exception of local transit vehicles that stop to pick up passengers at the intersection. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the word vehicles refers to motorized vehicles and includes a mixed stream of automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, and buses.” (Ch. 18)

UPDATE HCM 2010 Modal Definitions 6  Pedestrian mode “…travelers along a roadway or pedestrian facility making a journey (or at least part of their journey) on foot…. Sidewalks and pathways may be used by more than just foot-based traffic—for example, inline skaters and persons in wheelchairs—but the HCM’s LOS thresholds reflect the perspective of persons making a walking journey.” (Ch. 2)

UPDATE HCM 2010 Modal Definitions 7  Bicycle mode “…travelers on a roadway or pathway who are using a nonmotorized bicycle for their trip; bicycle LOS thresholds reflect their perspective. Mopeds and motorized scooters are not considered bicycles for HCM analysis purposes.” (Ch. 2)

UPDATE HCM 2010 Modal Definitions 8  Transit mode “Urban roadways are often shared with public transit buses and, occasionally, with rail transit vehicles such as streetcars and light rail vehicles…. The HCM’s LOS measure for transit on urban streets reflects the perspective of transit users—both those already on transit vehicles operating on the street and those waiting for transit vehicles at stops or stations along the street.” (Ch. 2) Bus speed is computed using auto speed method as a starting point, but also accounts for bus dwell time Transit LOS calculation uses ped LOS score as an input

UPDATE Trucks in the HCM 2010 Major Update 9  Truck mode added as separate mode “The HCM defines trucks as a subclass of heavy vehicles, with heavy vehicles being defined as any vehicle with more than four tires touching the ground, regardless of the number of axles. The other two subclasses of heavy vehicles within the HCM analysis framework are buses and recreational vehicles, primarily people-hauling vehicles.” (Ch. 3) NCFRP 41 research may add:  Updated PCE factors  Information on truck performance on grades  Truck LOS? (based on cargo/shipper perspective)

UPDATE Issues Raised 10  “Automobile mode” calculations reflect the performance of a mixed stream of motor vehicles, expressed in passenger car units  “Automobile mode” LOS primarily reflects auto driver perspective  “Transit” LOS reflects transit passenger perspective  “Truck” LOS reflects

UPDATE Issues Raised 11  “Automobile mode” calculations reflect the performance of a mixed stream of motor vehicles, expressed in passenger car units Is it confusing/inconsistent that trucks & buses (as vehicles) are included as part of the automobile mode in some cases, but are treated separately in other cases? Should it be called something else (e.g., “motor vehicle mode”)? Comparing HCM results to other tools  Should truck mode be called “freight” or “cargo” mode?