Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Jonathan Creel Electrical / Cryogenics Engineer Cryogenics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

Status of Cryogenics at point 4 following the power cut L. Tavian 20 August 2011.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Roberto Than R&D ERL Cryogenics Roberto Than February 17-18, 2010 CRYOGENICS.
ESS Cryogenic System Design
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Commissioning and Operation of the Horizontal Test Apparatus at SNS Presented at: CEC/ICMC.
ESS Cryogenic System Process Design Philipp Arnold Section Leader Cryogenics CEC – ICMC 2015 June 29, 2015.
12 GeV Upgrade of Cryogenics at Jefferson Laboratory (Jlab) Dana Arenius Engineering Division Cryogenic Systems ILC08 Nov This work is supported.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac MBL/HBL - CDS requirements Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden.
Conceptual Design Study - Cryogenic Requirements How to decide the layout of ILC cryogenic system Conceptual design of cryogenic system Layout of cryogenic.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy 2-K Pump Down Studies at SNS Presented at the CEC/ICMC 2015 – C3OrA Matthew Howell SCL Systems.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Roberto Than CRYOGENICS SYSTEM.
October, 2009 Cryogenics System Roberto Than October, 2009 Internal Review.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Cryogenic System Operating Experience at SNS Presented at the CEC/ICMC 2015 – C3OrA Matthew.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
Superconducting Electronics and Detectors Workshop “Jefferson Lab Cryogenic Operation” Mathew C. Wright December 1,
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 SPL Cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations 9-10 November, 2009 Joe Preble Workshop on cryogenic and.
Performance analysis of cryogenic system and cryomodules for the complete superconducting linear accelerator at IUAC, New Delhi. T S Datta ( On behalf.
Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.
PIP-II Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner and Jay Theilacker PIP-II Collaboration Meeting 9 November 2015.
1 st stage Possible extension XFEL Cryo System Project X Collaboration Meeting, FNAL September 8-9, 2010 Bernd Petersen DESY MKS (XFEL WP10 & WP13)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Mathew Wright Cryogenic Systems Operations Engineer
NML Cryogenic System Arkadiy Klebaner Cryomodule One Commissioning June 3, 2011.
PXIE Cryogenics Concept Arkadiy Klebaner Session 5 / WG1 (CW Linac and PXIE) October 26 th, 2011.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 Dana Arenius Cryogenics Control Account Manager 12 GeV Upgrade Project X Collaboration September.
Project X Workshop - Cryogenics1 Project X CRYOGENICS Arkadiy Klebaner.
2015 Operations Stay Treat CHL2 4K Cold Box Modifications SC1 2K Cold Box CC4 Failure Helium and LN2 Losses Contamination Operations Stay Treat.
CRYOGENIC SYSTEM of RAON Chul Jin Choi, Ki Woong Lee Cryogenics and Control Team Accelerator Division 5/23/2013 Chul Jin Choi, Ki Woong Lee Cryogenics.
Bruno Vullierme Sept LHC-CC09 - 3rd LHC Crab Cavity Workshop Slide 1 CRAB CAVITY INTEGRATION CRYOGENICS INSTALLATION.
EXAMPLE OF REDUCED CRYOMODULE HEAT CAPACITY DUE TO HELIUM PRESSURE RETURN LEVELS 0L04 CASE HISTORY.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
Energy efficiency considerations in cryogenics Philipp Arnold Section Leader Cryogenics Proton Driver Efficiency Workshop.
FCC Infrastructure & Operation Update on the cryogenics study Laurent Tavian CERN, TE-CRG 28 October 2015.
TDR Cryogenics Parameters Tom Peterson 28 September 2011.
ESS | Helium Distribution | | Torsten Koettig Linac – Helium distribution 1.
Vishy Ravindranath LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box FDR March 9, 2017
LCLS-II Technical Requirements
First operation of the XFEL linac with the 2K cryogenic system
Preliminary Review of LERF as Cryomodule Testing Facility for LCLS-II
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
Process Simulation for the LCLS-II Cryogenic Systems
FRIB Cryogenic Support
at STFC Daresbury laboratory
Electrical and Controls
Cryogenic Heater Controls in C100 Cryomodules
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
N. Hasan1, P. Knudsen2 and V. Ganni2
Dana M. Arenius Jefferson Laboratory Cryogenics Dept Head
SPS cryogenic proximity equipment and SM18 validation
Hongyu Bai LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box FDR March 9, 2017
CEPC Cryogenic System Jianqin Zhang, Shaopeng Li
Commissioning and First Cooldown of XFEL Linac
SC1R Cold Box PDR: Process Requirements
Cryogenic cavern in Asian site
Operation experience of cryogenic system and cryomodules for the superconducting linear accelerator at IUAC, New Delhi. T S Datta ( On behalf of Cryogenics.
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
LINAC Heat Management A New Approach
Mathew C. Wright January 26, 2009
ILC Experimental Hall Cryogenics An Overview
ESR 2 Presented to Joint Hall A/C Summer Meeting
Performance Recovery at CEBAF
SNS Cryoplant Commissioning Past Experiences
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
LERF Readiness Review Ed Daly / Matt Marchlik
ESR2 Process Cycle Design
Power Leads for Test Stands
ESR2 Process Cycle Design
Presentation transcript:

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Jonathan Creel Electrical / Cryogenics Engineer Cryogenics CEBAF Cryogenics and SRF Workshop Jefferson Lab April 3, 2014

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 2 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Outline System Overview CHL1 and CHL2 Systems Cold Compressor Pumpdowns Starting at 4K (warm pumpdown) Starting at 2K (cold pumpdown) CHL Performance Capacity Pressure Stability Efficiency Loads Calculated verses “measured” Summary Conclusion

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 3 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 CHL1 and CHL2 Systems CHL1-SCM-NL Warm compressors HP high pressure HP low pressure 4K Cold Box 4 Turbines Stages 2K Cold Box (SCM) 5 Cold Compressor Stages 190 g/s at atm Pressure stability +/ atm 6+ MW (before floating pressure implementation) 4.2 MW and 300 gal/hr LN2 Efficiency CHL2-SCN-SL/FEL Warm compressors HP high pressure HP medium pressure HP low pressure 4K Cold Box 7 Turbine Stages 2K Cold Box (SCN) 5 Cold Compressor Stages 195 g/s at atm Pressure stability +/ atm 3.1 MW and 300gal/hr LN2 Efficiency Value $500K per MW-Year

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 4 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Cold Compressors Wheel & Diffuser LN2 Cooled Motor CC1 & CC4/5 WheelsSide View Max Hz Max RPM Wheel Dia Inch CC CC CC CC CC

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 5 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Warm Pumpdown Process of pumping LINAC vapor space from 1 atm to atm Without violating individual cold compressor constraints Motor / variable frequency drive current overload limits Wheel surge / stall characteristics and CC inlet conditions (P, T, mass flow) Head pressure capacity verses tip speed Without violating maximum flow returning to 4K cold box

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 6 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Cold Pumpdown Cold pumpdowns are incredibly fast and unstable Liquid inventory overflow starts earlier (smaller volume and higher JT positions) Liquid inventory starts near lambda (less boil off vapor available) Cold compressors have trouble speeding up fast enough to support the head pressure requirements without return flow exceeding 4K CB capabilities Return line liquid flashing and fast changing inlet conditions One of the cold compressors loses its grip on the helium (stall)

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 7 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 “Heat” Loads North LINAC Expected capacity 190 g/s * 22 J/g = 4180 W (RF 2750W) + (Electric 2000W) + (Static 900W) = 5650 W 4180W – 5650W = -1470W South LINAC + FEL Expected capacity 200 g/s * 22 J/g = 4400 W (RF 2350W) + (Electric 1350W) + (Static 1200W) = 4900W 4400W – 4900W = -500W Expected verses “reported” do not match

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 8 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 LINAC Heat Compensation North LINAC South LINAC Too much electric heat added Too much electric heat removed RF turned off RF turned on

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 9 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 LINAC Heat Compensation Autoheat Divides up excess heat evenly among all cryomodules 2L24 and 2L25 have been removed from autoheat control and the heat request values sometimes get set lower than the expected RF heat in order to allow the cavities to be brought up in gradient Forces larger heat deltas to other cryomodules Prevents RF verses electric heat compensation from working Should consider moving toward SNS type heater control system

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 10 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Uncontrolled Loss of LINAC Heat 1.Lost electric heat in 2L22, 23, 24, 25, 26 when breaker tripped Tunnel pressure falls as remaining heaters ramp to maximums 2.Tunnel pressure begins to stabilize 3.Lost another CM worth of electric heat when 2L18 blew a fuse Tunnel pressure continues falling to a pressure ratio > 41 (norm ~ 33) 4.Electric heat control returns and pressure stabilizes

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 11 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Conclusion Completed Successful automated warm pumpdowns Successful operation of both LINACs at 2K In Process More work on automated cold pumpdowns Future Tests MOPS heat readback verses measured current and voltage MOPS heat verses JT position for every module Can be used to cross check RF heat calculations Low and high flow subatmospheric cold box testing

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 12 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Appendix

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 13 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Appendix

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 14 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Appendix