Award Acceptance Process Governance Team Project Update December 13, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Your Research Administration Team Supports You From Start to Finish Michelle Melin-Rogovin, Manager of Research Administration Research Administration.
Advertisements

Creating Proposal and Managing Grants Maria Whalen (508)
Graduate Application Project Design Concept Walkthrough
Proposal Submission 101. Proposal Timeline As soon as you have decided to submit, notify our SPPD contracts and grants coordinators, Nicole Burelli and.
Sponsored Projects Administration
DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY Grants Administration Pre-Award Process Business Office Sherry Mason Erika Hauff Anna Caruso Jeff Kolodica Matt Brott Lori Harris.
Award Acceptance Process for Externally Sponsored Projects as Proposed by the eRPM Governance Team 1.
Updates to the Post-Submission Proposal Change Process in eRPM (aka “The Revised PAF”)
LSA Research Administration Office. Paper forms our Office Still signs Material Transfers Travel to Cuba Research Faculty Hiring Packets MICHR proposals.
LSA Research Administration Office Overview. Paper forms our Office Still signs All of these items can be sent to me (Steve) at 2149 LSA Material Transfers.
EResearch Proposal Management Release 1.9 System Enhancements August 2010.
J. Thaddeus Schork Administrative Specialist “Pre-Awards Grants Manager”
Project Management: Post Award Policies, Procedures and Guidelines A Tutorial for New Principal Investigators.
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
Working with DRDA NSF Career Development Workshop Division of Research Development and Administration Dave Plawchan Managing Project Representative, DRDA.
NANCY ABBOTT CANR GRANTS DEVELOPMENT OFFICER [GDO] CANR Sponsored Project Proposal Process.
CSBS Fourth Friday Faculty Workshop 1: Grant Management CSBS: Frances Solano ORSP: Stefanie Friesen TUC: Stacey Lord / Maryann Camarillo 1/23/
1 NJ Dept. of Health Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 06/18/2015 Is this research defined as: A systematic investigation which includes research.
The proper protocol for grant approval at LCSC GRANT-WRITING 101: INTERNAL PROCEDURES.
1 Module 4: Post-Award Administration of Sponsored Projects (Part 1) Office of Research and Sponsored Programs The University of Mississippi 100 Barr Hall.
1. Proposal deadline 2. Timeline  A grant opportunity announcement will include a sponsor deadline for receipt of the proposal.  The instructions will.
Nuts and Bolts of Proposal Development Josie Causseaux May 24,
CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDIES Janette Hannam, MS, CTRA Asst. Director for Research, OSP.
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
Sponsored Programs Services (SPS) PROPOSALS. What is the PI’s role in the proposal?  Contact the central pre-award center,
Tips on Routing and Contracts: An Intro for the Campus Research Coordinator Michelle Artmeier Director of Award Services Ron.
Peggy McCoey, M.S. (215)
ORSP Proposal Process STEP 3 Upload all administrative components of the application and the draft technical section to Cayuse. Route to Chair, Dean, Director.
LSA Research Administration Office. Paper forms our Office Still signs Travel to Cuba Research Faculty Hiring Packets MICHR proposals Anything research.
LSA RAIN-Managing the Process Proposal Submission Guide Physics Proposal Submission Guide 1 1. Who is the sponsor NSF, DOE, ARO, DARPA, NIH, private foundations.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
LETTER OF INTENT FOR INDUSTRY SPONSORED RESEARCH Signe Denmark, SCTR Research Opportunities & Collaborations Ryan Mulligan, SCTR Grants & Contracts Navigator.
Office of Sponsored Projects The Funding Life Cycle.
Capturing Changes to PAF after Proposal is Submitted to the Sponsor but PRIOR to Award Option 1 – Budget change =>20% ( or other triger) 1.PAF sent back.
1 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR USE OF THE ST ScI ELECTRONIC GRANTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM January, 2001.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
Hamlet on Submission Deadlines: To Enforce Them or not to Enforce Them Presented by Darlene Allen, MBA, CRA Director, Pre-Award Administration Morehead.
An Overview of the Pre-Award Grant Process
Overview of Proposal and Award Process at UCLA A short “ How-to-Do ”
Office of Sponsored Projects The Funding Life Cycle.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
SELF-SUBMIT PROCESS CAYUSE424 Krystal Toups, CRA Assistant Director, Grants Ashley Popham Systems & Reporting Supervisor Office of Sponsored Projects (OSP)
RCC Update ORS Quarterly Meeting April 28, 2016 Julie Cole, Director Research Costing Compliance.
Top 10 Things that Can and Do Go Wrong at the Department Level CReATE ver. 04/08 © 2008 Florida State University. All rights reserved.
Contract Compliance Training. Department Personnel Office of the General Counsel (OGC) Mario K. Castillo General Counsel John Guest Deputy General Counsel.
Rev. May 2016 cuResearch User’s Manual. What is cuResearch? Introduction to cuResearch More information is available on the CURO website:
© 2016 University at Buffalo Click Training Agreements Module University at Buffalo Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development.
Contract Compliance Training
STEP Systematic Tracking of Exchanges in Procurement.
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
Training for Faculty Search Committees
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
Grants 102 (External).
SPECIAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS STATUS CTS Fall Planning Meeting San Marcos September 6, 2013 Don Drumtra Good morning.
Proposal Routing Overview
Contract Compliance Training
Progress Report Preparation and Submission
How to Complete a Subaward Requisition
CAS Exemption Update Bill Gair Contracts & Grants Accounting Services
Office of Grant Resources
CSBS Faculty Workshop: Cayuse
Get CLUed into VICTR Services and Support
Click Training Agreements Module
Top 10 Things that Can and Do Go Wrong at the Department Level
Top 10 Things that Can and Do Go Wrong at the Department Level
Top 10 Things that Can and Do Go Wrong at the Department Level
Articulation Manual Faculty Senate Presentation
Central IRB Components of ARCADIA
Step 3. Initiate Proposal
Presentation transcript:

Award Acceptance Process Governance Team Project Update December 13, 2011

Award Acceptance DRDA will obtain re-approval for All Departments/Units and Dean’s offices listed on the PAF prior to issuing a PAN for all awards where the award information represents a material change from what was proposed. This “re”-approval will be provided using the “Post a Comment to the Entire Project” activity so that all participating units have opportunity to review and re-affirm their participation. 2

Why Should We Do This? To provide a record of each unit’s willingness to participate under the new terms and conditions or other changes reflected in the award. 3

Award Acceptance & Routing Approvals are required when a sponsor’s draft Award Document differs from U-M’s proposal for the: – Indirect Cost rate – UM Cost Sharing, or – Total project’s Budget Amount (≥ 20%) 4 For these differences only, approvals will be recorded using the “Post a Comment for the Entire Project” Activity in eRPM.

Earlier E-Governance Recommendations Presented in March 2011 to Research Associate Deans (RADs) as a component of a recommendation for a complete automated Awards Acceptance process and system. Earlier request was a new feature to be added in addition to the Revised PAF change Decision was made that this was not feasible after RADs endorsement DRDA has since felt a need to include recorded input from other units prior to accepting award. 5

Using “Post-a-Comment” Essentially a system work-around which will not overwrite PAF information from the time of proposal submission. E-Governance Team supports this process to enable all-participant review. Automated process would be preferable in the future as recommended to the RADs and as part of a larger Project Award system integrated with E-RPM. 6

Proposed Business Process DRAFT award is received from a sponsor which reflects amounts, tasks, or information that differs from submitted proposal DRDA PR identifies that the DRAFT award includes material changes The DRDA PR uses “Post a Comment to the Entire Project” using the following sample template language: ACTION REQUIRED: DRDA has received an award that changes the total budget amount by more than 20% of the originally PAF’d amount of $_____. Principal Investigator, Department, and Dean’s Office, please post approval for the new award in the amount of $_____. Once DRDA receives approvals, DRDA will issue the PAN. Thank you.” 7

Business Process (cont’d) The Administrative Home will assume the responsibility of approving last to monitor and ensure that all participating units have had opportunity to review the revised amounts, terms and conditions, and other material changes. Upon approval by all participating units and the Administrative Home unit, DRDA will issue a PAN. The Administrative Home unit will “Post a Comment to the Entire Project” notifying all stakeholders that all signatures are complete. 8

What If Expedited Approval is Needed? In rare cases, the Administrative Home unit and/or the sponsoring agency require immediate acceptance of the terms of the award. In these cases, DRDA will use “Post a Comment to the Entire Project” to notify all units that expedited approval is required. The Administrative Home Dean’s Office may post its approval on behalf of all participating Departments/Units using the following sample template language: “As an authorized signer for the Administrative Home of this project, I approve, as a backstop measure, on behalf of the entire project all institutional commitments, terms, and conditions of this award. This will allow time for the participating units’ subsequent review for their approval and acceptance of their obligations. DRDA – Please issue a PAN.” 9

Administrative Home Responsibilities Monitor and ensure that all participating units have reviewed, re-approved, and provide final approval Notify DRDA when it is acceptable to issue a PAN. Monitor and follow-up with participating units for subsequent review and approval when expediting approval to meet sponsor and/or unit requirements Goal of a final “hand-shake” 10

What about Other Changes? If a sponsor requires changes which do not meet the threshold for obtaining re-approvals, posted comments can still be uploaded and recorded with the DRDA PR as a recipient. In these cases, re-approvals will not be required to issue a PAN. 11

DRDA Action Use the “Post a Comment for the Entire Project” activity in eRPM to: – Alert the PI(s), unit(s), and Dean’s Office(s) on the PAF – Request additional approvals 12 This comment will be altered by DRDA or the Administrative Home’s dean’s office only to clearly identify when expedited approval required.

When expedited approval required, the Dean’s office for the Administrative Home can approve on behalf of all participating units. In these cases, enter this text as the comment: PI/Unit/Dean’s Office Action Use the “Post a Comment for the Entire Project” activity in eRPM to: – Approve the differences to accept the award. – The Administrative Home department “signs” last, if numerous units on PAF 13

Resources Website: DRDA Standard Operating Procedures and Policies: – No “Revised Proposal Approval Forms” 14 To record other changes required by the sponsor, revise the PAF using the “Post a Comment” Activity. Include your DRDA Project Representative as an recipient.

QUESTIONS? 15