Arctic ice & ocean heat and freshwater fluxes: a new FAMOS coordinated experiment Sheldon Bacon National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK With thanks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coupled Arctic Regional Atmosphere-Ocean-Sea Ice Model Minwei Qian and Colin Jones.
Advertisements

An atmosphere-ice-ocean reanalysis of the Arctic for the IPY Lars Axell and Per Kållberg Research and Development Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological.
DBCP Workshop, Buenos Aires, October 2005 A novel ice platform for IPY.
1 ICES/NAFO Symposium Santander May Seasonal to interannual variability of temperature and salinity in the Nordic Seas: heat and freshwater budgets.
1 Plans for the European contribution to OceanSITES. FixO 3 Richard Lampitt National Oceanography Centre Southampton UK.
Collaborative Research on Sunlight and the Arctic Atmosphere-Ice-Ocean System (AIOS) Hajo Eicken Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks Ron Lindsay Univ. of Washington.
Understanding Variations of Volume & Freshwater Fluxes through CAA: Potential Application in Projecting Future Changes Youyu Lu, Simon Higginson, Shannon.
Heat and freshwater budegts, fluxes, and transports Reading: DPO Chapter 5.
Thermohaline Circulation
Outline Background, climatology & variability Role of snow in the global climate system Indicators of climate change Future projections & implications.
Energy in the Ocean- Atmosphere Climate System SOEE3410 : Lecture 2 Dr Ian Brooks Room 1.64a Environment Building
Fresh Water Budget of the Arctic and Atmospheric Mode of Variability NSF -- Fresh Water Initiative Bruno Tremblay Robert Newton Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory.
Challenges in Modeling Global Sea Ice in a Changing Environment Marika M Holland National Center for Atmospheric Research Marika M Holland National Center.
LINKING INFORMATION FROM SSS TO OCEANIC FRESHWATER FLUXES USING NEAR-SURFACE SALINITY BUDGETS NADYA T. VINOGRADOVA 1 RUI M. PONTE 1 MARTHA W. BUCKLEY 2.
The Louvain-la-Neuve sea ice model : current status and ongoing developments T. Fichefet, Y. Aksenov, S. Bouillon, A. de Montety, L. Girard, H. Goosse,
The Large-Scale Energy Budget of the Arctic Mark C. Serreze National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental.
Atlantic water transports to the Arctic and their impact on sea ice
Collaborative Research: Toward reanalysis of the Arctic Climate System—sea ice and ocean reconstruction with data assimilation Synthesis of Arctic System.
Ocean Synthesis and Air-Sea flux evaluation Workshop Global Synthesis and Observations Panel (GSOP) Organized by Lisan Yu, Keith Haines, Tony Lee WHOI,
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Using metrics to assess ocean and sea ice simulations Helene Banks, Cath Senior, Jonathan Gregory Alison McLaren, Michael.
Comparison of Surface Turbulent Flux Products Paul J. Hughes, Mark A. Bourassa, and Shawn R. Smith Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies & Department.
Collaborative Research: A Heat Budget Analysis of the Arctic Climate System Mark C. Serreze, Andrew Barrett, Andrew Slater CIRES/NSIDC, University of Colorado,
A data-model comparison study of the Arctic Ocean's response to atmospheric mode of variability Bruno Tremblay Robert Newton Peter Schlosser Lamont Doherty.
Surface Water Balance (1). Review of last lecture: Surface energy balance dT/dt SWdn =Scos  SWup =SWdn  LWdn =  Tair 4 LWup =  Ts 4 LH=  C d LV(q.
Components of the Global Climate Change Process IPCC AR4.
Arctic System Model workshop III Montreal, Canada, July 17 th, :50 – 11:10 Ocean/Atmosphere observations A. Proshutinsky, WHOI a)Model forcing validation.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 The Hadley Centre The forcing of sea ice characteristics by the NAO in HadGEM1 UK Sea Ice Workshop, 9 September 2005 Chris.
Steffen M Olsen, Polar Oceanography, DMI, Copenhagen DK CT3 Hamburg 22-23/ GEOMAR (6) Mojib Latif (CT/WP lead) Wonsun Park Thomas Martin MPG (2)
Nov.8, 2005CORE III protocol, Hobart Reaction of the oceanic circulation to increased melt water flux from Greenland - a test case for ocean general circulation.
Oceans and climate: an OCCAM perspective Andrew C. Coward 1 Large Scale modelling team James Rennell Division for Ocean Circulation and Climate Southampton.
Ocean Surface heat fluxes
1 Development of a Regional Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model Hyodae Seo, Arthur J. Miller, John O. Roads, and Masao Kanamitsu Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Diurnal Water and Energy Cycles over the Continental United States from three Reanalyses Alex Ruane John Roads Scripps Institution of Oceanography / UCSD.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Large Scale Salinity Budget in the North Atlantic and a First Look at ENSO from Aquarius Josh Willis.
AOMIP status Experiments 1. Season Cycle 2. Coordinated - Spinup Coordinated - Analysis Coordinated 100-Year Run.
The CHIME coupled climate model Alex Megann, SOC 26 January 2005 (with Adrian New, Bablu Sinha, SOC; Shan Sun, NASA GISS; Rainer Bleck, LANL)  Introduction.
Point Comparison in the Arctic (Barrow N, 156.6W ) Part I - Assessing Satellite (and surface) Capabilities for Determining Cloud Fraction, Cloud.
Nutrient fluxes in the eastern North Atlantic Clare Johnson (1), Stuart Cunningham (1), Penny Holliday (2) and Stefan Gary.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Met Office plans for sea ice model development within a flexible modelling framework Helene Banks Martin Best, Ann Keen and.
Assessment of the ECCO2 optimized solution in the Arctic An T. Nguyen, R. Kwok, D. Menemenlis JPL/Caltech ECCO-2 Team Meeting, MIT Sep 23-24, 2008.
THE WATER CYCLE.... Evaporation  Evaporation is when the sun’s energy turns the liquid to a gas Because the sun’s heat sours is energy lifts the water.
Drakkar January 2007 NEMO and Ocean Reanalysis Ocean Model Strategy in UK now focussed on NEMO (MetO+Hadley, ECMWF, Reading, NOC, POL, UEA) Rapid Climate.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 The Uses of Marine Surface Data in Climate Research David Parker, Hadley Centre, Met Office MARCDAT-2, Met Office, Exeter,
Atmospheric Circulation Response to Future Arctic Sea Ice Loss Clara Deser, Michael Alexander and Robert Tomas.
THEME#4: Are predicted changes in the arctic system detectable? OAII Focus on: Detecting Change(s) in the Arctic System - Ocean (heat, salt/freshwater,
FIGURE S5.1 Mean (1983–2004) shortwave radiation (W/m 2 ) from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP). (a) annual, (b) January,
CT2 : Assessing sources of uncertainty in ocean analysis and forecasts We consider the structural sources of uncertainty generic to all practical forecasting.
The effect of tides on the hydrophysical fields in the NEMO-shelf Arctic Ocean model. Maria Luneva National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool 2011 AOMIP meeting.
Alexandra Jahn 1, Bruno Tremblay 1,3, Marika Holland 2, Robert Newton 3, Lawrence Mysak 1 1 McGill University, Montreal, Canada 2 NCAR, Boulder, USA 3.
The North Atlantic Inflow to the Arctic Ocean from observations and high ‐ resolution modelling Yevgeny Aksenov 1, Sheldon Bacon 1, George Nurser 1, Vladimir.
Arctic Ice-Ocean Modelling at BIO Shannon Nudds 1, Ji Lei 1, Youyu Lu 1, Charles Hannah 1, Frederic Dupont 2, Zeliang Wang 1, Greg Holloway 1, Michael.
1 Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean – can we estimate the heat supplied through its inflow? Ursula Schauer + Agnieszka Beszczynska-Möller, Eberhard Fahrbach,
Acknowledgments: The study is funded by the Deep-C consortium and a grant from BOEM. Model experiments were performed at the Navy DoD HPC, NRL SSC and.
Oceanic freshwater flux at 26°N in the Atlantic Brian King, Harry Bryden, Peggy Courtois, Stuart Cunningham, Zoltan Szuts, Chris Atkinson, Neil Wells,
A New Climatology of Surface Energy Budget for the Detection and Modeling of Water and Energy Cycle Change across Sub-seasonal to Decadal Timescales Jingfeng.
Modeling Seasonal to Decadal Climate Variability using the Regional Arctic System Model W. Maslowski 1 and the RASM Team (25+ researchers from 10 institutions)
ASOF II Objectives What are the fluxes of mass, heat, liquid freshwater and ice from the Arctic Ocean into the subpolar North Atlantic? How will anticipated.
Argo’s Role in Climate Science
A sensitivity study of the sea ice simulation in the global coupled climate model, HadGEM3 Jamie Rae, Helene Hewitt, Ann Keen, Jeff Ridley, John Edwards,
Coordinated water circulation experiments in 2013
Mechanisms causing reduced sea ice loss in a coupled climate model
AOMIP and FAMOS are supported by the National Science Foundation
Overturning in the Subpolar North Atlantic Programme (OSNAP)
Alexandra Jahn NCAR, Boulder, USA
WP3: Linkages of Arctic climate changes to lower latitudes
The Arctic Ocean in CMIP5 Simulations
Ben Moat, Bablu Sinha, Penny Holliday and Gerard McCarthy
TALLEY Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
Xuezhu Wang, Qiang Wang, Sergey Danilov, Thomas Jung,
66-SE-CMEMS-CALL2: Lot-3 Benefits of dynamically modelled river discharge input for ocean and coupled atmosphere-land-ocean systems Hao Zuo, Fredrik Wetterhall,
Presentation transcript:

Arctic ice & ocean heat and freshwater fluxes: a new FAMOS coordinated experiment Sheldon Bacon National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK With thanks to Yevgeny Aksenov, plus Stephen Fawcett and the NOC NEMO team Ann Keen, Alex West and the UKMO Hadley team FAMOS Meeting, WHOI, October 2013

Motivation Arctic surface fluxes are poorly constrained in reanalyses –heat & FW fluxes are not well known –heat & FW fluxes are important components of the climate system Fluxes of mass or energy –only meaningfully defined as transfers between different components of a system –in our case, between atmosphere and ocean (including both liquid and solid parts)

Approach (1) Arctic ice & ocean heat and FW fluxes: –require closed volume –being calculated now (monthly) for one full annual cycle –based on closed circuit around Arctic (fixed measurement locations plus coastlines) –Bering, Davis, Fram Straits; Barents Sea Opening (see map) –NB calculation from models can include storage terms, eg Q net = Q surf + Q stor

Arctic Ocean Boundary Array Tsubouchi et al., JGR 2012

Approach (2) Description of method & first application in Tsubouchi, Bacon et al., JGR 2012 NB: outcome is real surface fluxes independent of any arbitrary reference values Note equivalence of ice & ocean boundary calculation with surface flux calculation Fluxes  transferrable metrics (can be calculated in any model with suitable geographical extent) Model fluxes can be compared with exact observational equivalent (in principle)

Illustrations NEMO model in 3 runs –1/4˚ with 2 different surface forcing sets –1/4˚ & 1/12˚ with the same surface forcing Showing monthly heat flux: –surface forcing –ocean liquid component –ocean ice (latent) component –ocean ice (sensible) component

Surface heat flux

Ice sensible heat flux (boundary)

Ice latent heat flux (boundary)

Liquid sensible heat flux (boundary)

Liquid sensible heat flux (boundary, HadGEM2)

Procedures & Outcomes A draft “recipe” is available Assessment of model performance in terms of flux metrics –comparisons (i) between models, and (ii) with observed metrics –decomposition into components (leads to identification of causes of differences)