June 2009 Jamboree, Brussels Edith van der Does, Netherlands EU PSC Usability Study United Kingdom Estonia Netherlands.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Will it Help Me Do My Job?
Advertisements

Parma, 21st November 2003Minerva European Conference : Quality for cultural Web sites Quality Framework and Guidelines for Cultural Web Sites Isabelle.
The Response Process Model as a Tool for Evaluating Business Surveys Deirdre Giesen Statistics Netherlands Montreal, June 20th 2007 ICES III.
STF 287 Multicultural Communication 1 Matching language and cultural requirements Specialist Task Force STF 287 User-oriented handling of multicultural.
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Making Europe easy for citizens and businesses Practical tools for local and regional authorities OPEN DAYS for Municipalities and Regions Brussels, 6.
Belgrade December With support from the European Union Progress Programme.
1 Making legislation work better for citizens and business The IMI NETWORK Bucharest, 23 rd June 2008 Presentation.
European vision for development and work of the national network Belgrade, 15 June 2012 Luk Zelderloo This event is sponsored by the PROGRESS Partnership.
Eurostat Georgiana Ivan Jean-Louis Mercy Eurostat, European Commission European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Vienna, 3-5 June 2014 Measuring.
Checklists Stakeholders Methods Pedagogy Learning styles Writing styles Style and language Content Intercultural aspects Multimedia Questionnaires Examples.
Martin Eber Integration and Migration Foundation Our People.
Session 2: Market Place The situation in the Public sector in Denmark, Michael Fagerlund, NITA.
DG Information Society: Telecommunications, Markets, Technologies - Innovation and Exploitation of ResearchE.C. LK/lk 1 ETSI, EMTEL workshop, 26 and 27.
“The preparation of annual financial reports in a single electronic reporting format will be mandatory as from January 1, 2020” XBRL Europe Working Group:
1 PROPOSAL FOR PROCEDURES AND SCOPE OF SHA DATA COLLECTION UNDER THE CO-OPERATION BETWEEN OECD, EUROSTAT AND WHO 7 th Meeting of Health Accounts Experts.
The principles used by AUTEC in granting ethical approval for research.
ECHR: CASE LAW PERTAINING TO FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATON Dragan Golubovic Nessebar,
Making the Services Directive Work Dublin 6 March 2014 Services Directive and why it matters.
1st MODINIS workshop Identity management in eGovernment Frank Robben General manager Crossroads Bank for Social Security Strategic advisor Federal Public.
1 Requirements Analysis and Design Engineering Southern Methodist University CSE 7313.
Creating an Effective Policy Central Missouri Chapter Jesse Wilkins April 16, 2009.
The new Services Act in The Netherlands Implementation of the EU Services Directive Jan Leerling, senior Legal Advisor The Netherlands Chamber of Commerce.
1 The Internal Market Information System (IMI) A tool enabling more mobility for health professionals AER Breakfast Briefing Brussels, 12 November 2009.
New Implementing Regulation DG Enterprise on the Administrative Requirements for the approval and market surveillance of 2- or 3-wheel vehicles and quadricycles.
Internal Market Information System JULY 2009
Judicial Cooperation in Civil and Commercial Matters Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28th May 2001 And Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European.
Electronic identity management for eGovernment Conceptual framework and objectives Frank Robben General manager Crossroads Bank for Social Security Strategic.
IFRRO Legal Issues Forum Brussels – 9 June 2011 Martin Delaney Legal Director.
Leonardo Da Vinci Programme TRANSFERENCE OF INNOVATION INTERJOB4YOUTH PROJECT.
1. 2 Main Features of the Services Directive Objective: remove obstacles to trade in services. Simplify and modernise the regulatory framework Freedom.
Legislative Texts. The legislative process in the EU Proposal, recommendation, communication from Commission, Green Paper, consultation, studies, draft.
Capacity building workshop on environment and health Public participation and the right to know: Aarhus Convention and PRTR Protocol Monica Guarinoni Sofia,
Some identification needs related to workers’ mobility eGovernment – eIDM ad hoc group meeting 4-5 May 2006 CBSS Crossroads Bank for Social Security Frank.
Problemsolving Problem Solving – 4 Stages Analysis Design Development Evaluate (ADDE) Note: In this unit Evaluate is not covered in depth.
1 European eGovernment Awards 2007 European eGovernment Awards 2007 Workshop for Finalists July, Brussels LIMOSA Belgium Reference project number.
Chapter 12: Introducing Evaluation. The aims To illustrate how observation, interviews and questionnaires that you encountered in Chapters 7 and 8 are.
1 AN INSTITUTIONAL POLICY ON “FUTILE” CARE ELEMENTS FOR SUCCESS.
Problem Solving – 4 Stages
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
Carlos Almaraz Deputy Director for Internal Market BUSINESSEUROPE Key elements for a useful Point of Single Contact Debate by Czech Government and CEBRE.
1 The Internal Market Information System (IMI) A flexible tool for administrative cooperation Brussels, 12 October 2010.
Systems Development Life Cycle
ASEM IFRS SEMINAR Shanghai, March 2006 IFRS implementation in the EU – experience from a Commission perspective Ulf Linder Deputy Head of Unit Accounting.
English- language editing for the Latvian EU Council Presidency Aidan McCartney European Parliament Editing Unit.
By Godwin Alemoh. What is usability testing Usability testing: is the process of carrying out experiments to find out specific information about a design.
Common sampling errors
1 Serbian Association of Accountants and Auditors (SAAA) IFRS and ISA TRANSLATION.
Leadership and You “The growth and development of people is the highest calling of Leadership.”
1 World Bank Workshop - 14 March 2006 The disclosure of financial information according to the Transparency Directive by Mina Filippa Legal Advisor/ Rapporteur.
16 October 2008 Forum on Future of Democracy, Council of Europe, Madrid Citizenlink “ The Missing Link” Matt Poelmans, Director Burgerlink (Citizenlink),
Tom McBride.  This report on the PPIR Project proposes a way of defining and formally recognising how professional engineers interact with, and respond.
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract INFSO-RI NA5 M. Heikkurinen NA5 Activity Manager All Activity Meeting, 13 th September.
Flood Awareness and Prevention Policy in border areas Brussels, 7 May 2007 Annelieke Laninga-Busch Project manager.
Round Table: Future challenges for PANDRH CARICOM Perspective.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 2– Freedom Movement for Workers Bilateral.
Personalized Messageboxes and Mypages A comparison of solutions in EU member states Tim Berkelaar & Rosalie Brasz ICTU 23 mei 2016.
© 2016 Cengage Learning ®. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
ARMA Boston Spring Seminar 2011 Jesse Wilkins, CRM.
Jamboree, Brussel, 4 th of june 2009 Dutch PSC Indra Henneman.
Improving the Efficiency of Your Boiler
We understand that thinking about your finances can be daunting
Rule-based writing: The technical writer´s viewpoint
EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE
22 November 2017, CoR, Rue Van Marlant 2, Brussels, Room VMA 1
The Dutch approach Implementing the PSC in The Netherlands
Dashboard eHealth services: actual mockup
Data Privacy by Design Expanding Security for bepress Users
Presentation transcript:

June 2009 Jamboree, Brussels Edith van der Does, Netherlands EU PSC Usability Study United Kingdom Estonia Netherlands

2 The presentation – About the project – The PSCs – Starting points – General guidelines Source and Scope Information and Language Procedures Contact Registration and Log in – What next?

3 EU PSC Usability Study Benefits for participating Member States – Feedback from actual users – General guidelines – Feedback on specific PSCs – Cooperation

4 EU PSC Usability Study The Study 3 Member States: UK, Estonia, Netherlands 8 participants per country each participant viewed prototypes of 2 PSCs standard protocol: –Exploratory interview –Usability tasks: exploration of the PSC, finding information, doing a transaction, logging in, communication –Concluding questions

5 PSC Estonia

6 PSC UK

7 PSC Netherlands

8 Starting points for development and design The service provider knows very little to nothing about the other country The service provider acts from his or her own references and experiences One-stop-shop

9 General guidelines – Source and Scope 1. Source of the PSC – Explicitness about government Reliability of the information Security

10 General guidelines – Source and Scope 2. Title/Name of the PSC – Rememberable or comprehensible Short word or abbreviation Understandable translation

11 General guidelines – Source and Scope 3. Orientation – Not just regulations and permits – But also information about: The country Society and culture Business climate and culture The market

12 General guidelines – Source and Scope 4. Homepage – Business card – Not too much information – Aim and source of the PSC

13 General guidelines - Information and Language 5. Language – Probably not native language – From the perspective of the service provider – No legal jargon, technical or formal terminology – No grammatical or spelling errors

14 General guidelines – Information and Language 6. Translation – All or nothing

15 General guidelines – Information and Language 7. Translation services – When information is not translated: Offer translation services

16 General guidelines – Information and Language 8. Step by step guide – What is mandatory, specific for the service providers' situation – Willingness to go through a decision tree or use filters

17 General guidelines - Procedures 9. Positioning within the PSC – Information first then transaction

18 General guidelines - Procedures 10. Completing a transaction – No new information – Easy to find or direct access – Comprehensible terminology – Provide sufficient 'help'-options – 'How to send in' information – Contact information of relevant competent authority

19 General guidelines - Procedures 11. Sending in a form – Information about who or which authority the form will be sent to – Information about what will happen next

20 General guidelines - Contact 12. Contact everywhere – Contact information of competent authorities available when necessary

21 General guidelines - Contact 13. Who? – Who can be contacted for what – Clear distinction between website, competent authorities, others 14. How? – Telephone –

22 General guidelines – Registration and Log in 15. Only when necessary – At the moment it is necessary – Central log in is optional

23 General guidelines – Registration and Log in 16. Why? – Information about benefits of creating an account or logging in

24 General guidelines – Registration and Log in 17. Privacy – Terms and conditions – Privacy statement

25 General guidelines – Registration and Log in 18. Method of logging in – Depends on national method – Might feel not secure – Give information!

26 What next? What to do with the general guidelines? – Up to each Member State – Short term, before December 28th – Long term – Next usability study?

27 More information Edith van der Does Adviseur Onderzoek/Research Consultant ICTU – eOverheid voor Bedrijven T +31 (0) M +31 (0) E Wilhelmina van Pruisenweg AN Den Haag The Netherlands