COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 7 – LAND USE ELEMENT 4/03/2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Click here to add text Click here to add text. Joint Informational Meeting Cornelius Road Area Presented by Iredell County and the Town of Mooresville.
Advertisements

City of Tybee Island 2007 Master Plan Summary Report Area Character Maps and Area Development Recommendations.
Planning Commission April 14, 2010
Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY PLAN - An Introduction Presentation to Planning and Development Committee – February 16,
From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
Communities In Motion Blueprint for Good Growth Preferred Growth Scenarios March – April 2005.
Green Garden Township Plan Update March 9, 2015 Colin Duesing - Long Range Planner Natalie Kubik - Development Analyst.
DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES CLIMATE ADAPTATION GUIDEBOOK Kate Marshall, SRA International, Inc. (703) ,
The Mystic River Corridor Strategy Project Metropolitan Area Planning Council Boston Redevelopment Authority City of Chelsea City of Everett City of Malden.
City of Fitchburg, WISAA Design Group + Teska +Montgomery NORTH STONER PRAIRIE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Steering Committee Workshop: Plan Vision, Principles,
Proposed Modification of Policies for Rural Employment Centers Policy 6.3 of the Future Land Use Element of the Alachua County Comprehensive plan CPA
PRESERVATION and PROGRESS IN THE DRAGON RUN SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS PRESERVATION and PROGRESS IN THE DRAGON RUN SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS PARADIGM.
Community Opportunities The values associated with Smart Growth communities encourage affordable, mixed income housing; higher density; and a vibrant,
Where are we now Dover grew by 3,103 persons between 2000 and 2010 making it the fastest growing community in the region during that time, by.
Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division Board of County Commissioners March 10, Neighborhood Improvement Plan.
Multi-Family Development Trends in Delaware David L. Edgell, AICP Principal Planner.
Tampa Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Affordable Housing Policies.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
August 2004 Hickory by Choice Linking Land Use and Air Quality Planning.
Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Springfield Zoning Ordinance Revision Project Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame April 25, 2006 Planning and Economic Development Office Sponsored by a grant.
North East Study Area Staff Recommendation Thursday, June 25, 2009.
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
Implementing the Freeland Subarea Plan Zoning and Development Regulations Island County Planning & Community Development 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
CPA-14-08: Transfer of Development Rights Large Scale Text Amendment Adoption Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 23, 2008.
F O R W A R D L A P O R T E What are the city’s top 3 economic development priorities? n=300.
City of Palm Coast EAR Public Input Process Update Prepared for the Palm Coast City Council By The FCRC Consensus Center November 24, 2009 Update Prepared.
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act December 18, 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection.
DRAFT Clark County Land Use Categories – Urban Areas 10/8/2015 – Draft, for discussion1.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
Session Two Perspectives on Smart Growth. American Planning Association Core Principles of Smart Growth A.Recognition that all levels of government, and.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
NOVEMBER 19, 2015 STUDY SESSION R IDGEFIELD J UNCTION S UBAREA P LAN DRAFT NOVEMBER 2015.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
2015 Growth Policy Update – Lewis & Clark County RGA UGA George Thebarge, AICP Director of Community Development & Planning Lewis & Clark County Cole Peebles,
Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
Comprehensive Plan Update 2014 TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT Planning Commission October 17, 2013.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER MASTER PLAN PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA Board of County Commissioners Hearing May 13, 2008.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 5 – PART I: REVIEW OF PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS PART II: ECONOMICS & PRIORITY INVESTMENT ELEMENTS 2/13/2014.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
Community Development Department Rezone Application #1783 Parcel ID No RPOF-0031.
Area Plan Overview Public Comments and Area Plan Changes Environmental Analysis Schedule Presentation Overview.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
DeSoto Hampton Corridor Revitalization Overview of Mixed Use Development.
Objectives Today Introduction Key Items  Passing 100,000 population  3 rd largest city in region  Community of workers  Housing affordability edge.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 3 – NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE ELEMENTS 1/09/2014.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 4 – POPULATION & HOUSING ELEMENTS 1/30/2014.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 8 – LAND USE ELEMENT 4/08/2014.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 1 – ANNEXATION, PLANNING AREA, AND DENSITIES 11/07/2013.
Council Grove Zoning & Planning Committee Final Plan Presentation March 9, 2016.
Downtown Stockton Housing Strategy Stockton City Council/ Stockton Redevelopment Agency Draft Report August 28, 2007.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
Community Development Department MADISON GREEN AND TUSCAN RESERVE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2616.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
J5 UDC Amendment Clustering January 20, 2015 Chance Sparks, Director of Planning.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 6 – COMMUNITY FACILITIES ELEMENT 3/13/2014.
GREEN GROWTH TOOLBOX Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Black-crowned night heron.
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
Planning Commission Meeting: August 3, 2016
WWPNA General Member Meeting October 16, 2018
Presentation transcript:

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 7 – LAND USE ELEMENT 4/03/2014

1.Discuss Land Use Element goals, strategies and action plan items 1.Review current goals, strategies, and action plans 2.Discuss possible amendments or additions 2.Review and discuss Urban Growth Boundary Line 3.Review and discuss Planning Area Boundaries 4.Review and discuss Future Land Use map GOALS FOR TODAY

 The 2009 Comprehensive Plan goals were derived from various sources of stakeholder input, including the Town-wide Visioning Workshop, stakeholder interviews, and ongoing conversations with Town of Mount Pleasant staff and management. Many of the goals were adapted from the 2003 Comprehensive Plan.  The goals provide the big picture direction for the development and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. Strategies, incentives, and regulations are continuously updated and necessarily adapt to changing circumstances, but goals should endure and provide stability and direction over time. Town of Mount Pleasant Comprehensive Plan ,Introduction to Goals INTRODUCTION TO GOALS

1.Focus future growth in the Town of Mount Pleasant on areas that have sufficient transportation infrastructure and are located near existing centers of employment and activity. 1.Higher density development should occur on the southern side of the Town (i.e. closer to Johnnie Dodds Boulevard and Coleman Boulevard), with densities gradually decreasing northwards. The Town of Mount Pleasant should have an “edge” where there is a transition to rural densities at Mount Pleasant’s Urban Growth Boundary. Consideration: Change to “Higher density development should occur predominately on the southern side of the Town, particularly in the Urban Corridor, Waterfront Gateway, and Community Nodes, with densities gradually decreasing northwards. The Town of Mount Pleasant should have an “edge” where there is a transition to rural densities at Mount Pleasant’s Urban Growth Boundary.” 2.Denser development should occur closer to the US 17 corridor where there is greater transportation infrastructure. Development adjacent to waterways and marshes that edge the Town should take measures to incorporate low impact development design principles such as maintaining undisturbed buffers to promote excellent water quality. 3.Encourage development of infill properties with appropriately scaled redevelopment to utilize infrastructure already in place. 2.Focus redevelopment and revitalization on older commercial areas which are served by existing infrastructure and are underutilized; ensure any redevelopment is compatible with existing residential neighborhoods. REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT GOALS

3.Recognize the significance of historic, traditional, rural, and planned communities, and maintain their desirable characteristics such as prevailing densities, building types, and quiet streets. 1.Preserve key historic properties through acquisition or easements, enacted either by the Town or an appropriate non-profit entity. 2.Ensure that new development in residential districts is compatible in scale and character and conserves important neighborhood characteristics. 3.Maintain the character of business communities of particular value to the Town, such as Shem Creek and Pitt Street. 4.Recognize remaining agricultural areas in the Town as cultural landscapes linking the Town with its agricultural roots. 5.Encourage the production, purchase, and consumption of locally grown or harvested foods and the preservation of local food heritage. 4.Increase the flexibility of the zoning code to accommodate new types of development, including mixed use, so long as they are compatible with their surrounding context and sensitive to nearby neighborhoods. REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT GOALS

5.Develop a series of nodes of activity which include a wide variety of land uses and public spaces. Ensure that all Town residents live within close proximity to public gathering space. 1.Encourage the location of workplaces and educational facilities in close proximity to concentrations of residential development to provide convenient access from home to work. Consideration: Change to “Encourage the location of workplaces and educational facilities in close proximity to concentrations of residential development and public transportation to provide convenient access from home to work.” 2.Continue to work on a variety of Placemaking initiatives to create gathering places for the residents and workforce of Mount Pleasant and to enhance quality of life. Consideration: Change “gathering places” to “public gathering places” 3.Locate small parks and other passive recreational facilities in close proximity to residential areas to improve accessibility to the facilities for residents of all ages. 6.Guide development in rural areas to reflect rural characteristics and densities. REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT GOALS

 Target Strategy: Promote appropriate infill and redevelopment.  Target Strategy: Create and promote access to a Cultural Landscape District in the center of Mount Pleasant (in the Rifle Range Road, Six Mile Road, Long Point Road, and Hamlin Road areas) that recognizes the area’s traditional landscapes, serves to draw residents and tourists, and connects the Town with its agricultural roots.  Consideration: No longer a Target Strategy and change to “Continue to refine plans for the Cultural Landscape District in the center of Mount Pleasant, that recognize the area’s traditional and historic landscapes, serve to draw residents and tourists, and connects the Town with its agricultural and historical roots.”  Target Strategy: Create Waterfront Gateway Districts at the Ravenel Bridge that capitalizes on the Town’s waterfront as a tourism, entertainment, and cultural district and at the Wando River Bridge along Highway 41 that is sensitive to the surrounding areas.  Consideration: Remove  Higher density development should occur on the southern side of town, with densities gradually decreasing northwards. The Town of Mount Pleasant should have an edge where there is a transition to rural densities and character at the Town’s Urban Growth Boundary REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT STRATEGIES

 Limit the extension of infrastructure and public services outside the Urban Growth Boundary; promote more rural development patterns outside the Urban Growth Boundary.  Consideration: Change to “Limit the extension of infrastructure outside the Urban Growth Boundary and promote more rural development patterns outside the Urban Growth Boundary. Review the provision of and impact on public services for rural development outside the UGB.”  Promote a nodal development pattern for commercial and higher density housing development.  Rewrite the zoning ordinance to reflect the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan, to promote Traditional Neighborhood Developments, and to consolidate the type and number of special districts.  Consideration: Change to “Revise the zoning ordinance to consolidate the type and number of special districts.”  Consider utilizing a form-based zoning code rather than a conventional Euclidian zoning code.  Consideration: Change to “Consider developing a provision to allow for form-based zoning where appropriate.”  Protect the character of Mount Pleasant’s existing neighborhoods. REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT STRATEGIES

 Recognize the importance of the traditional land use patterns of historic African-American communities in the Planning Area.  Incentivize the provision of public access for waterfront developments.  Encourage the location of work places and educational facilities close to concentrations of residential development to provide convenient access.  Consideration: Change to “Encourage the location of work places and educational facilities close to concentrations of residential development and public transportation to provide convenient access.”  Play an active role in regional and Charleston County planning efforts to coordinate land use, transportation, and environmental decision making.  NEW – Consideration: “Develop standards for cluster design techniques within waterfront developments to limit development within the floodplain.”  For Discussion: Transitional land uses between major thoroughfares and existing residential neighborhoods. REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT STRATEGIES

 Encourage the donation of easements as a tax deduction for the proposed Cultural Landscape District. Pursue funding for conservation easements.  Status: Complete; Hamlin property purchased, Cultural Landscape District ordinance adopted, Oyster Point Park approved.  Consideration: Remove  Research incentives to promote redevelopment, including parking reductions, public funding for infrastructure and public spaces, and other funding mechanisms. Determine which obstacles exist in the Town that hinder redevelopment.  Implement a Green Building outreach program to promote energy efficiency and environmentally sensitive construction techniques.  Develop Master Plans for the Waterfront Gateway Districts.  Status: Complete.  Consideration: Remove REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT ACTION PLAN

 Rewrite the appropriate sections of the Zoning Code to implement the changes in the Comprehensive Plan, including specific criteria governing development and redevelopment in designated Community Nodes, Neighborhood Nodes, and Core Redevelopment Corridors.  Consideration: Change to “Develop an ordinance to implement the specific criteria governing development and redevelopment in designated Community Nodes and Neighborhood Nodes.”  Revise land use protections for areas designated as Community Conservation. Can be incorporated with Zoning Code Update.  Consideration: Change to “Continue to coordinate with Charleston County on land use issues for unincorporated areas within the Town’s planning area, with a specific focus on protecting areas designated as Community Conservation.”  Develop a Redevelopment Plan for Chuck Dawley Boulevard.  Status: Complete; Incorporated into the Urban Corridor Overlay District.  Consideration: Remove  Plan and design a series of Green Gateways into the Town. REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT ACTION PLAN

 Commence integrated Comprehensive Plan and Long Range Transportation Plan Update.  Adopt and implement the Johnnie Dodds Boulevard Master Plan.  Consideration: Remove  Continue to coordinate with Charleston County on land use issues for unincorporated areas within the Town’s planning areas.  Consideration: Remove (incorporated into an earlier action plan item) REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT ACTION PLAN

 Consideration: Move the Urban Growth Boundary Line to match Charleston County’s to provide better coordination of plans. REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY LINE Town of Mount Pleasant UGBLCharleston County UGBL

REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY Jurisdiction Map U.S. Forest Service Map

 Residential densities for Commercial parcels  Residential density is established in the Comprehensive Plan for Residential land uses, but has not been provided in the Commercial or Special land use categories. Currently the zoning dictates the density.  As discussed at the November 7, 2013 meeting:  Limited Office allows single-family residences (based on lot sizes, density equals 4 units per acre)  Office Professional allows combination residential structures limited to 6 units per acre  Neighborhood Commercial, Areawide Business, and Areawide Business – 2 allow combination residential structures limited to 12 units per acre.  Mixed Use Planned Developments permit higher density. Consideration: Eliminate residential uses in OP. Establish density for vertical mixed-use (same building) for the other commercial zoning districts at 12 units per acre. Consideration: Incorporate established densities for Waterfront Gateway District and Urban Corridor into Comprehensive Plan. REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT FUTURE LAND USE

 Future Land Use Map Considerations  Incorporate the recommendations from the Economic Development Committee report  Belle Hall PD parcel behind Roper on Long Point Road – designate as ED  Abide-a-While and adjacent parcels – designate as ED  Remove tracts with Development Agreements from the Future Land Use map and incorporate their development maps as attachments  Carolina Park  Central Mount Pleasant  Watermark  Minor corrections and updates REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT FUTURE LAND USE

 Considerations:  Skyzone change from Public Institutional to BUS/LI/ED (correction/update)  Long Point Roper tract and adjacent parcel change from Commercial to BUS/LI/ED (ED Committee recommendation)  Alhambra Hall from Recreation Open Space to Public Institutional (correction/update) REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP

 Considerations:  Island Walk East from CC to LDR (correction/update)  Whipple Rd. SCE&G parcel from BUS/LI/ED to PI (correction/update)  17N – JDB – I-526 Island from Commercial to BUS/LI/ED (ED Committee Recommendation)  Charles Pinckney site and Christ Church to Cultural Landscape (correction/update)  Brewer/Hamlin parcel to Cultural Landscape (correction/update)  Central Mount Pleasant (Development Agreement)  Watermark (Development Agreement) REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP

 Considerations:  Parkers Island parcel to Low Density Residential (correction/update)  Tributary parcels from Medium Density and Recreation to Low Density (correction/update)  Carolina Park (Development Agreement)  Carolina Park Passive Park to ROS (correction/update)  Commonwealth to LDR (correction/update) REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP

 Considerations:  County parcels along 17N adjacent to George Browder Blvd. Commercial or High Density Residential?  County parcels in front of Carolina Park to Commercial? REVIEW OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP

End