Doc: IEEE 802.11-07/0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 1 Preferred Channel and DFS Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc: IEEE /0388r5November 2006 Submission Kwak, Rudolf, InterDigital 1 Extended Channel Switch Response Notice: This document has been prepared.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0049r0 Submission January 2007 Matthew Fischer, BroadcomSlide 1 Signaling of intolerance for 40 MHz transmissions Notice: This document.
Doc: IEEE /0468r0March 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 1 Preferred Channel and DFS Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc: IEEE /0956r2November 2006 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 Preferred Channel for Power Saving Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0247r1 Submission March 2005 Atsushi FujiwaraSlide 1 Advantages of multiple channel usage in 11s WLAN Mesh network Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0866r1 Submission September 2005 Michael Montemurro, Chantry NetworksSlide 1 Mobility Domain Definition and Description Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE Jan07-RR-TAG_Liaison_Report.ppt _RR-TAG_802.22_Liaison_Report_Jan07 Submission January 2007 Peter Murray,
Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /1280r1 Submission Jan 2006 Bin Wang, ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Frequent Handover Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Doc.: IEEE /2797r00 Submission Oct 2007 Jiyoung et al. Path Selection and Path Switch Mechanism Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0787r2 Submission July 2008 Ruijun Feng, China Mobile Table of Neighbor APs Adopting the Same Channel Date: Authors: Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0644r2 Submission May 2006 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Measurement Pilot Transmission Information as optional information in Probe.
Doc.: IEEE /0027r0 Submission January 2006 Slide 1 WiNOT Consortium: Proposal for online enrollment cluster Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc: IEEE /0468r2July 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 1 Preferred Channel without DFS Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /1219r2 Submission January, 2006 S. Ponnuswamy (Aruba Networks)Slide 1 Virtual AP Presentation Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0054r0 Submission May 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Discussion on mode of management service Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0408r0 Submission May 2005 John Klein, SymbolSlide 1 TPC Comments Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It.
November 2005doc.: IEEE /1079r0 Stuart GoldenNovember Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a.
Doc.: IEEE /1057r0 Submission November 2005 Bin Wang, ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Using AP’s Location Information in Load Balancing Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0041r1 AP Location Capability January 2007 Donghee Shim et alSlide 1 AP Location Capability Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE Jan06-RR-TAG_Liaison_Report.ppt Submission January 2006 Peter Murray, MotorolaSlide 1 RR-TAG Liaison Report IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /86r2 Submission March, 2010 Gabor BajkoSlide 1 Location Proxy Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is.
Doc.: IEEE /0039r1 Submission January 2007 Larry Green, Ixia Slide 1 TCP Parameters and Settings Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0028r0 Submission January 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 Definitions and Terminology Notice: This document has been.
November 2005doc.: IEEE /1079r1 Stuart GoldenNovember Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a.
Doc.: IEEE /1528r0 Submission 22 September 2006 Naveen Kakani, Nokia, IncSlide 1 TGn PSMP adhoc Group September Closing Report Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0197r0 Submission March 2005 Nancy Cam-Winget et alSlide 1 TAP & JIT Merge Process Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0460r1 Submission March 2006 Fujio Watanabe, DoCoMo USA LabsSlide 1 Japanese Emergency Call Regulation Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE RR-TAG_Nov05_Liaison_Report.ppt Submission November 2005 Peter Murray, MotorolaSlide 1 RR-TAG Liaison Report IEEE
Doc: IEEE /xxxxr0July 2006 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 Preferred Channel for Power Saving Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc: IEEE /0120r0January 2007 Submission Kwak, Rudolf, Jokela 1 Preferred Channel for Power Saving Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Doc.: IEEE /0652r1 Submission May 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D0.12 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Beacon Measurement on Pilot Frames
Submission on comments to +HTC frames
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
Waveform Generator Source Code
Japanese Emergency Call Regulation
Some Operator Requirements on Management
Dynamic Multi Level RF Power
Protection Assurance Method
CID#102 - Channel Allocation for P2P
Managed BSS Channel Switch
Kwak, Rudolf, InterDigital
DLS Link Timeout Date: Eunkyo Kim
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Protection Assurance Method
Extended Channel Switch Announcements
TGu Motions Date: Authors: July 2006 July 2006
Coexistence Straw Polls from November 2006 Plenary in Dallas, TX
Null Beacon Energy Conservation concept
Solution for 40MHz in 2.4 GHz band
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Extended Channel Switch Announcement for TGn
Proposed changes to the v Draft
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Preferred Channel for Power Saving
Appended Channel Switch Announcement
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
Suggested comment resolution on ATIM window parameter
Use of More Data Field Date: Authors: Nov 2005 Month Year
Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios
Use of More Data Field Date: Authors: Jan 2006 Jan 2006
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Managed BSS Channel Switch
Greenfield protection mechanism
E911 Bits Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 1 Preferred Channel and DFS Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Authors : NameCompanyAddressPhone Joe KwakInterDigitalBolingbrook, Jari JokelaNokiaVisiokatu 1, Tampere, Finland Roger Durand RIM

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 2 OUTLINE Introduction Power Saving Benefits Deffered Channel Operation DFS Regulations ETSI’s Compliant DFS Specification Preferred Channel Specification Comparison of Compliant vs Preferred Channel specifications wrt regulations Uniform Spreading requirement details Conclusions

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 3 Introduction Use of Preferred Channel for STAs searching for APs for association saves 80% of battery power. NOV06 (06/956r2) meeting held straw poll for support of Preferred Channel with an AP control instead of distributed control showing 92% support. JAN06 (07/120r0) meeting presented Preferred Channel with AP control. Vote to incorporate normative text showed only 45% support due to concerns about DFS compliance. MAR06 meeting presented text changes fully complying with DFS. Vote still showed only xx% support, several commenters still objected on regulatory grounds. Later discussion revealed that real reason was observation most APs available for the DFS markets are not capable of complying with the requirements in the normative text. This presentation shows modified normative text making AP capability for Preferred Channel a PICS option.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 4 Power Savings for Network Discovery Power savings is obtained by reducing number of scanned channels when searching for available BSS when STA is not connected to any network. Power savings of 80-85% is guaranteed no matter what scanning mode or scanning period is used by the STA. APs monitor Preferred Channel for the operating Regulatory Class and ensure that Preferred Channel is active. STAs which passively scan a Preferred Channel and detect no activity need not scan any other channels in that Regulatory Class. For mobile STAs out of radio range of any WLAN, network discovery is the only STA task and consumes 100% of the terminal's power. For these STAs, power savings is very significant and can multiply standby time by a factor of 5 !!

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 5 Preferred Channel Power Savings for 2.4GHz Only scan 1 channel per defined channel set. In USA or Europe need to scan only 1 channel. In Japan need to scan only only 2 channels. If Region is unknown, need to scan only 2 channels Power is saved by scanning only 1 or 2 channels instead of 14, ===> 85% less scanning.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 6 Preferred Channel Power Savings for 5 GHz Only scan 1 channel per defined channel set. In USA need to scan only 8 of 41 channels (80% less). In Europe need to scan only 3 of 19 channels (84% less). In Japan need to scan only 7 of 32 channels (78% less). If unknown, need to scan only 15 of 73 channels (80% less).

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 7 Concept for Preferred Channel One channel in each regulatory class /channel set is defined to be the Preferred Channel. Preferred Channel is randomly reselected daily for each defined channel set. Preferred Channel procedures insure that there is an active BSS or Network Advice frames transmitted once each beacon period on the Preferred Channel. STAs scan only the Preferred Channels for beacons or network advice frames. Power is saved by not scanning other channels.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 8 Wifi Scanning for Dual Mode STAs WIFI covers 10% of cities, 1% of states Most dual mode STAs constantly scanning for Wifi MAJOR Impact on dual mode product standby time Cellular Metro Coverage area WIFI Metro Coverage area Metro Coverage area

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 9 Preferred Channel Definition Preferred Channel is randomly selected using the same Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG) already used in for WEP encryption. Procedure RC4 is called to generate a random number which selects the Preferred Channel for each day: DATE= YYYY*365 + MM*31 +DD where DDMMYYYY is the current date SEED= DATE*10E12 +DATE*10E6 +DATE Preferred Channel Order = (call RC4(SEED,64))modQ where a call to RC4() returns a random 64 bit number and where Q is the number of channels in a defined channel set  Preferred Channel Order indicates which channel (first, second, third, etc.) in the defined channel is the Preferred Channel.  This selection method satisfies DFS regulatory requirements.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 10 Use of Preferred Channel Preferred channel is favored when selecting channel for BSS operation. Preferred Channel Procedure: 1. AP will select Preferred Channel for operation unless: a. it is already in use b. it is unsuitable based on the AP's channel selection rules c. it has unacceptable interference, or is otherwise unsuitable. 2. AP operating on non-preferred channel shall: a. monitor Preferred Channel for continued activity b. if Preferred Channel is inactive, AP shall transmit or selects STA(s) to transmit Net Advice frames on Preferred Channel 3. Selected STA(s) shall transmit Net Advice on Preferred Channel: Once each beacon period (TBTT) At beacon data rate & at max transmit power Switches to Preferred Channel, transmits and switches back

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 11 NET ADVICE FRAME If no BSS is operating on preferred Channel, Net advice frames are transmitted at the beacon rate and "point to" operating BSS channel. Net Advice always transmitted at lowest rate and highest power. Net Advice frame advertises the operating BSS of the on- duty STA: Country, Regulatory Class, and BSS Channel values are for the BSS in which the transmitting STA is associated.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 12 Review of Normative Text Changes In 07/0118r4: AP procedures split into procedures with DFS and procedures without DFS. PICs modified to indicate AP procedures with DFS is optional.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 13 Conclusions Preferred Channel is shown to save 75-80% power for STAs scanning for Wifi services (07/0120r0). Preferred Channel Procedures insure transmissions on Preferred Channel, active BSS or Net Advice frames at beacon rate. Preferred Channel operation with DFS is more complex due to requirement for STA enabling, channel clearing and DFS monitoring. Preferred Channel operation in DFS regulatory classes is optional. STAs with DFS detection capability may evolve to provide STA- STA adhocs and mesh operation in DFS markets, enabling greater Preferred Channel operation in DFS regions. Complexity is limited, benefits are great.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 14 Motion Move to include 07/0118r4 into next version of TGv draft Moved:_Kwak_____ Second:__________ YES _______ NO _______ ABSTAIN _______

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 15 DFS Backup Slides

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 16 European DFS Regulations ”Every WAS/RLAN, when operating in the frequency ranges 5 250–5 350 MHz and 5 470–5 725 MHz, shall employ a DFS mechanism with a Radar Interference Detection function to detect radar signals which have a level above the interference detection threshold as defined in Recommendation ITU-R M With regard to DFS, a WAS/RLAN device shall operate in either Master or Slave Mode. WAS/RLAN devices operating in Slave Mode (Slave Device) can only operate in a network controlled by a WAS/RLAN device operating in Master Mode (Master Device). Every Master Device will use the Radar Interference Detection function in order to check for any co-channel radar signal prior to use a channel but also during normal operation. In addition to this Radar Interference Detection function, every Master Device shall also implement a channel selection mechanism to ensure a near uniform spread of the loading of available spectrum. The Slave Devices shall not transmit before having received an appropriate enabling signal from a Master Device. Slave Devices with a power level of 200 mW e.i.r.p. or above shall have their own Radar Interference Detection function.” Verbatim from Decision ECC/DEC/(04)08, 12NOV04, Equiv to FCC ruling. DFS Regulation Uniform Spreading Requlation

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 17 DFS Master Requirements ( EN ) “a) The master device shall use a Radar Interference Detection function in order to detect radar signals. b) Before initiating a network on a channel, which has not been identified as an Available Channel, the master device shall perform a Channel Availability Check to ensure that there is no radar operating on the channel. c) During normal operation, the master device shall monitor the Operating Channel (In-Service Monitoring) to ensure that there is no radar operating on the channel. d) If the master device has detected a radar signal during In-Service Monitoring, the Operating Channel is made unavailable. The master device shall instruct all its associated slave devices to stop transmitting on this (to become unavailable) channel. e) The master device shall not resume any transmissions on this Unavailable Channel during a period of time after a radar signal was detected. This period is referred as the Non-Occupancy Period.”

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 18 DFS Slave Requirements ( EN ) “a) A slave device shall not transmit before receiving an appropriate enabling signal from a master device. b) A slave device shall stop all its transmissions whenever instructed by a master device to which it is associated. The device shall not resume any transmissions until it has again received an appropriate enabling signal from a master device. c) A slave device which is required to perform radar detection (see table D.3), shall stop its own transmissions if it has detected a radar”

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 19 Uniform Spreading Requirements (EN ) “Definition: The Uniform Spreading is a mechanism to be used by the RLAN to provide, on aggregate, a uniform loading of the spectrum across all devices. This requires that a RLAN device shall select a channel out of the list of usable channels so that the probability of selecting a given channel shall be the same for all channels. The probability of selecting each of the usable channels shall be within 10 % of the theoretical probability. For n channels, the theoretical probability is 1/n.”

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 20 ETSI’s Compliant Requirements Summary 1.Master/Slave enabling of transmissions 2.Radar detection for channel availability check 3.Continuous radar detection to monitor operating channel 4.Uniform Spreading for channel selection 5.Shutdown if radar detected (=channel switch). Items in RED apply to Preferred Channel, last requirement already satisfied by TGh Channel Switch.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand Master/Slave Enabling  Preferred Channel is designed for AP to control STA transmissions by set/reset of NetworkAdviceEnabled bit.  No STA shall transmit on Preferred Channel unless so enabled by AP which sets NetworkAdviceEnabled bit.  This is eqivalent to ETSI requirement sufficient for regulatory purposes.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand Radar Detection for Channel Availability Explicit requirement in new normative text: “If dot11SpectrumManagementRequired is true,..the AP shall periodically monitor the Preferred Channel for frame transmissions. If no beacons and no network advice frames are detected on the Preferred Channel, the AP should perform a channel availability check on the Preferred Channel to ensure that there is no radar operating on the channel.” “Should” is used because the AP may not have the resources to detect radar on 2 channels. Preferred Channel uses same wording as ETSI.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand Radar Detection for Monitoring Preferred Channel Explicit requirement in new normative text: “If an AP has set dot11NetworkAdvice- Enabled to true at any STA, the AP shall ensure that a STA shall use radar interference detection to monitor the Preferred Channel for radar per the regulatory requirements.” Preferred Channel uses same wording as ETSI.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand Uniform Spreading for channel selection required  Regulation requires “channel selection mechanism to ensure a near uniform spread.”  In practice this is accomplished simply by randomly selecting an operating channel.  The Regulation does not specify when the random channel number is selected or how often the channel is to be reselected, nor does it address the source of the required random selection or the restrictions on who may use the selected channel.  The goal is to provide “near uniform spread”.  Random selection is ETSI’s chosen requirement mechanism to satisfy the regulation, others exist.  Preferred Channel is randomly selected and satisfies the spirit and letter of the regulation.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 25 Uniform Spreading trials with Preferred Channel chan BSS +1 BSS Without Preferred Channel With Preferred Channel All channels randomly selected before use. BSS = 40-70% utilization (typ) P.C. = 1- 5% utilization (typ) time

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 26 Results from Spreading Trials  Use of Preferred Channel produces spectrum spreads no less uniform (and possibly more uniform) than currently permitted applications.  Worst case for non-uniform spread occurs with a single BSS in the regulatory class.  In this case using the Preferred Channel produces a spread more uniform than conventional operation since usually occupies two channels instead of one.  All operating channels shall defer and shut down for radar. The Preferred Channel does this, but further defers and shuts down for beacons, thus making the Preferred Channel “available” for all users, according to the current terms and definitions.

doc: IEEE /0468r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak, Jokela, Durand 27 STRAW POLL Do you support use of Preferred Channel for Power Saving? YES _______ NO _______ ABSTAIN _______