Science Translation, Conservation Adoption and Delivery: Revised process for needs and projects related to science translation and adoption Steve Fuller.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Roundtable on Sustainable Forests. Forests cover about 750 million acres -- more than a quarter of the entire United States -- and sustainable management.

Advertisements

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.

Building pride in Cumbria Do not use fonts other than Arial for your presentations The Cumbria Local Sites Partnership and NI 197 Richard Newman Environmental.

PROPOSED PRIORITIES FOR SCIENCE AND COLLABORATION OCTOBER 2012.

Status of implementation of the Ronald Vargas and Ines Beernaerts Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Samarkand, Uzbekistan - 10 September.

Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.

Briefing to the Caribbean Fisheries Management Council April 23, 2014.

Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.

Shared Priorities Conservation Actions Frameworks for achieving outcomes Engaging management in the science process Product delivery and communications.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mountain-Prairie Region Landscape Conservation Implementation Status Report: Summer, 2010.

Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.

Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.

New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.

Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda Item: 15 Chu ISHIDA(JAXA) on behalf of Rick Lawford, GEO Water CoP leader GEO Water.

EBSAs to Marine Spatial Planning toward achieving Aichi Targets in marine and coastal areas in support of Blue Economy 8 th Meeting of the Conference of.

Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.

LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.

The State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources The Global Plan of Action FAO

From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.

Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.

Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,

1 Capacity Building: Strategy and Action Plan GEF-UNDP Strategic Partnership Capacity Development Initiative.

Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.

Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.

USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center and SE Regional Hub Sonya Jones USGS Southeast Area NIDIS Planning Meeting.

NFHP Science and Data Committee Report Gary E. Whelan and Andrea C. Ostroff NFHP Science and Data Committee Co-Chairs November 2014.

Stock Assessment Peer Review: Findings and Actions Shannon Cass-Calay Caribbean Fishery Management Council April 2015 Southeast Fisheries Science Center.

Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan North Bay Watershed Association Meeting November 3, 2006 Working together to enhance sustainable water.

A Strategic Analysis for identifying MPA’s : - Towards a Marine Spatial Planning Method for the French MPA Agency CAML Workshop Villefranche s/mer 18th.

Lower Mississippi Valley Joint Venture Management Board Meeting the Expectations and Challenges of Joint Venture Implementation Buras, Louisiana June.

GEF IN TAJIKISTAN Dr. Neimatullo SAFAROV CBD and CPB National Focal Point Republic of Tajikistan.

Strengthening Coastal Decision- making in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick Making coastal development geospatial data available and delivering tools needed.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.

A Decade of Working Together on Conservation & Sustainable Use of Canada’s Natural Assets CBS endorsed by FPT Ministers in April 1996 Federal, provincial,

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative December 4, 2009 Dr. Benjamin Tuggle and Steve Guertin Regional Directors,

THE FAMILY FOREST Jim and Jean Ballenthin & Jasmin.

Congress on Building Capacity for Coastal Solutions Renewable Natural Resources Foundation Lessons from the Gulf of Maine Sponsored by: National Oceanic.

The South Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative’s Third Thursday Web Forum The SALCC Strategic Plan and What It Means Thursday, April 19, 2012.

1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.

Tools to Inform Protection, Restoration, and Resilience in the Hudson River Estuary The North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC)

2013 Western Hemisphere Migratory Species Initiative -- Interim Steering Committee Meeting Washington December 2013 Strategy on Integrating Migratory.

Draft. NAWMP Progress Assessment You did what with our $3 billion?

Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.

1. Adaptation – management actions to help fish and wildlife and their habitats adapt to climate change, using a Strategic Habitat Conservation Framework.

Key Functions & Responsibilities (from the old governance document) – Coordinates the program-level adaptive management system and assists the GITs in.

The Convention on Biological Diversity Progress report Marjo Vierros Secretariat Convention on Biological Diversity ICRI General Meeting Palau, 31 October.

Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.

Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.

Problem Definition Exercise Summary & Discussion.

Data Stewardship and Data Standards Practices Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Prepared for: USBR Tech Transfer Meeting Jennifer.

Designing Sustainable Landscapes in the Northeast A Potential Application for Vernal Pool Results Scott Schwenk, Ph.D. Science Coordinator North Atlantic.

For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.

Progress Under Guidance Documents Northeast Conservation Framework LCC Conservation Science Strategic Plan USFWS Science Investment and Accountability.

The importance of engaging in Health systems strengthening to ensure Nutrition interventions are truly delivered within the health system TECHNICAL MEETING.

CriteriaYesNoEffectiveness of CVC 1. Continuity of Participation4100% 2. Representation and Access3175% 3. Self Efficacy4100% 4. Information Exchange and.

Conservation Targets Next Steps North Atlantic LCC Steering Committee Meeting Gardiner, New York December 12, 2012 Ken Elowe U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Superior Infrastructure – Phase One Lenora Chapman & Michelle Stevenson Presenting.

North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.

Update on Northeast Landscape Conservation Design and Synthesis for SWAP Revisions Steve Fuller Conservation Design Specialist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Technical Workshop for Climate Services Portal Development: Setting the Stage National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC August 13-15, 2008.

Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.

Conservation Targets Next Steps North Atlantic LCC Steering Committee Call February 8, 2013 Ken Elowe Chair, North Atlantic LCC Andrew Milliken Coordinator,

EBTJV Performance Evaluation Measure 1: Fish Habitat Conservation Projects implemented during Federal FY EBTJV Performance score:

Progress Relative to the Northeast Conservation Framework and Strategic Plan Setting the Stage for Conservation Design and Delivery Andrew Milliken North.

LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery

Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Science Center

CEOS Organizational Matters

Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011

North Atlantic LCC RFP Topics 1&2: Recommendations for Funding

Presentation transcript:

Science Translation, Conservation Adoption and Delivery: Revised process for needs and projects related to science translation and adoption Steve Fuller Conservation Design Specialist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1 Background: An ad hoc demonstration projects committee was convened in 2011 to address demonstration projects. The work of the ad hoc committee resulted in submission at the April meeting of the NALCC of three proposals for the application and testing of science and tools. The proposals were advanced for further development, were submitted and were approved by the LCC Steering Committee in September.

2 The ad hoc demonstration projects committee was asked to develop a framework for demonstration projects; The committee recognized that demonstration projects are part of a broader need for assessment of science delivery projects in NALCC; …and better inclusion of land mangers, NGOs, land trusts, including NEHTC and other delivery oriented entities in the development of projects

Which species/habitats to conserve? At what levels? Who decides? GOAL-SETTING What do we know about the status of priority wildlife? BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SCIENCE TRANSLATION How do we make science solutions useful? CONSERVATION ADOPTION How do we get communities and landowners engaged in conservation? INFORMATION MANAGEMENT How will we manage the demand for and creation of data? CONSERVATION DESIGN What should landscapes look like to conserve species at goal levels CONSERVATION DELIVERY How will we most efficiently put conservation on the ground? What new information will we gather to support conservation? PRIORITIES Which species and issues demand immediate attention? Northeast Conservation Framework MONITORING, EVALUATION AND RESEARCH 3 SCIENCE DELIVERY

Requested Actions: 1. Initiate a Science Delivery needs assessment process in parallel with the science needs assessment over the next year to reflect the broad need of managers and decision-makers to develop and use specific applications of NALCC science products in support of the implementation of landscape conservation. This needs assessment is consistent with elements of the Northeast Conservation Framework related to Conservation Design, Science Translation, Conservation Adoption, and Conservation Delivery. 2. Integrate demonstration projects broadly as one of the approaches to address priority needs identified by the Science Delivery needs assessment. 3. Dissolve the ad hoc demonstration committee established in November, 2011.Establish a standing Science Delivery team that would focus on the tasks above and would complement the LCC Technical Team. Science Delivery has unique needs beyond our current activity 4

To date, certain science translation, conservation adoption and conservation delivery needs have been identified through the Northeast Conservation Framework Workshop, the North Atlantic LCC Conservation Science Strategic Plan and prior LCC science needs assessments. Several LCC projects are now developing decision support tools and engaging partners to get their input on what their decision support needs are. 5

Conservation Design Regional consistent spatial data NEAFWA/LCC Regional Synthesis Habitat condition, capacity & objectives Designing Sustainable Landscapes; geospatial condition analysis; secured and managed lands status Predicting Landscape Change Designing Sustainable Landscapes; brook trout; piping plovers & SLR; PARCA Landscape Designs/ Decision Support tools Designing Sustainable Landscapes; PARCA; marine birds; brook trout; piping plovers, geospatial condition analysis Science Delivery Overlaps with Conservation Design 6

Conservation Translation Adoption and Delivery Science Translation Northeast Landscape Conservation Design: Conservation Design Specialist, GIS Analysts, NEAFWA/LCC Regional Synthesis Assess Decision Support Needs Decision-maker workshops: Designing Sustainable Landscapes; Forecasting Changes in Aquatic Systems Conservation Adoption Demonstration Projects Conservation Design Specialist Science Delivery Team Support for regional geographic partnerships (e.g. Gulf of Maine, Connecticut River Watershed, Chesapeake Bay Science Delivery has unique needs beyond our current activity 7

Preliminary Needs Assessment Categories: Testing Landscape Design Tools Science Translation Adoption Tools and Strategies Enhancing Practitioner Networks Data management tools Science Delivery has unique needs beyond our current activity 8

Examples: Engage implementers such as NGOs, NE Habitat Technical Committee, and Regional Planners in assessment process Develop desktop GIS tools for local management decisions Develop Strategies to use science to identify and recruit specific landowners for conservation Develop step-down products from regional plans Provide training and support to users of NALCC science Develop database tools to track habitat management and land protection Science Delivery has unique needs beyond our current activity 9

Suggested Next Steps: Develop timeline for assessment Identify key members of a Science Delivery Team Allocate funds to priority needs based on scope of needs Science Delivery has unique needs beyond our current activity 10