The EU Floods directive -Implementation in Sweden.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bush Fire Risk Management Planning Community Participation Department of Lands, National Parks and Wildlife Service, Integral Energy, Rural Fire Service,
Advertisements

NGO work with the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Finland Hannele Ahponen Water project coordinator Finnish Association for Nature Conservation.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
Wrap up and next steps. Remit of Water Forum To enable stakeholders to engage & influence statutory authorities in implementation of WFD To help ensure.
Our Water, Our Resource, Our Responsibility Module 2: Water Management Unit 1: Roles, Responsibility and Legislation Muckno Mill Lough.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission, the Civil Protection Financial Instrument, – Directorate General for Humanitarian.
Prof. Dr. Robert Jüpner 4th ISFD, Toronto 2008 The new European Flood Management Directive and the municipal flood management system as one realization.
URBAN FLOODS IN GREECE Current situation and major research and development needs in Urban Flood Management Cost meeting, Warsaw, 29-31/5/2008 Vassilopoulos.
Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment in Relation to The Project of Flood Directive Marcin Jacewicz Regional Board for Water Management in Gdańsk.
Do we have the capabilities needed to deal with the risks we are facing? Capability Assessment The Swedish Experience Kristin Jacobsson and Maria Wahlberg,
FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability on Gaps Identification in the BSR Neringa Brogaitė-Karvelienė Fire and Rescue Department under MoI of Lithuania.
With the support of the Civil Protection Financial Instrument European Commission – Directorate General for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection - ECHO.
Emergency Action Plans Miriam Gradie Anderson Planning Specialist 608/ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
1 Swiss-Slovak Cooperation Programme April SWISS-SLOVAK COOPERATION PROGRAMME  New possibilities of financial support for the 10 new member states.
The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes A.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
FBAG Flood Risk Assessment and Mapping. Purpose Review role of FBAG sub-group Summarise research/project agenda.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Coordination and Net Working on DRR Rapid Emergency Assessment and Coordination Team (REACT) Bishkek November, 2009.
Welcome to Skåne (SWEDEN) Skåne County Administrative Board HAMED ARWAND.
EU Water Policy Sustainable water management for generations to come.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan PUBLIC MEETINGS April 5-7, 2010 Rochester, Montesano, and Chehalis.
Session 111 Marketing Plan Form a publicity subcommittee Make the media work for you Preparing to work with the media What is your message?
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Brownfields in Baltic States - Lifelong Educational Project CZ/08/LLP-LdV/TOI/ Legal aspects of brownfield redevelopment in Latvia Edmunds Teirumnieks.
FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the BSR Project Lead Partner: Fire and Rescue Department under the Ministry.
EXPERIENCE IN PREPARING THE FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN IN AUSTRIA CLEMENS NEUHOLD FEDERAL MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, ENVIRONMENT AND WATER MANAGEMENT.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
River Basin Management Planning Cath Preston Senior Planning Officer (River Basin Planning) 2 nd March 2006.
Gaps to Caps project Why we need a discussion on capability and scenario analysis and why task group C and task group D need to work together when it comes.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Integration FRMP into RBMP: experience in Flanders Sven Verbeke, Flemish Environment Agency 4 th European Water Conference, March 2015.
FBAG- Catchment Planning Floods Directive and Flooding Bill Flood Risk Management Planning.
Water.europa.eu Floods Reporting Drafting Group Progress report WG D Maria Brättemark WFD Team, DG ENV.D.1, European Commission.
FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the BSR Project Lead Partner: Fire and Rescue Department under the Ministry.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
Seminar on early warning systems October 2008 Aix-en-Provence Summary of outcomes.
THE PAST, THE TRANSITION AND THE FUTURE – ROLE OF THE FRONTIERS RIVERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN FINLAND AND SWEDEN Josefin Gooch, Faculty of Law, Lund University.
João Paulo F. A. Carvalho The 5 step model on Risk Assessment How to assess the risks (5 steps model) and Completion of the 5 steps.
The Flood Directive 2007/60/EC (and its coordination with WFD) The European Union Twinning Project for Turkey “Capacity building to implement the Flood.
Floods: An EU Directive to coordinate and reduce risks
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
Katrien Debeuckelaere Legal Advisor, Land Use Planning, Flemish Region
NATIONAL YOUTH WORK AND YOUTH POLICY PROGRAMME FOR 2017–2019
Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy Priorities
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
BALTIC SEA NETWORK - ESF
Presented by Russell Arthurton Coastal Geoscience, UK
Links between the Floods Directive and the Water Framework Directive
Dilemma of Boundaries in the Implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Finnish Experiences from the Public Consultations Juha-Markku Leppänen.
Water Directors meeting
River Kokemäenjoki – Flood risk management & WFD
River Kokemäenjoki – Flood risk management & WFD
Flood hazard maps and Flood risk maps (Guidance and Schema)
Draft Work programme / revised mandate for WG F
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Addressing the challenge of water scarcity and droughts
1st Implementation Report of the Water Framework Directive
Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment
WFD in Sweden Water management in practice Fontevraud Nov
Directive on the assessment and management of flood risks - towards implementation SCG, By Maria Brättemark, European Commission, DG Environment,
Progress report WG F Maria Brättemark, WFD Team, DG ENV.D.1, European Commission.
Development of Marine Spatial Planning in Sweden
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Basic principles Overview on proposals Clustering proposals
Item 4 b) Marine Strategy Framework Directive and CIS WFD
Presentation transcript:

The EU Floods directive -Implementation in Sweden

National implementation work The Floods Directive is implemented in Sweden through a regulation on flood risk (SFS 2009:956). Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) is the responsible authority and carry out the work in close cooperation with the county. The work is carried out in three steps during the years

National implementation work Step 1 involves a nationwide preliminary flood risk assessment to be carried out. With this assessment, the geographical areas with significant flood risk are identified. Step 2 means that for those areas where significant flood risk exists, two types of maps are prepared. Flood hazard maps (2a) and flood risk maps of the areas at risk (2b). Step 3 involves the development of Flood risk management plans.

Floods Directive Process

Step 1 In step 1 analysis of flood risk was carried out in Sweden. The conclusion is that 18 locations have a significant flood risk. These locations have been identified based on MSBs flood mapping overview and possible implications for human health, economic activity, the environment and the cultural environment National implementation work

Step 2a Where risks of flood damage exist, MSB must by 2013 develop flood hazard maps for such areas. The flood hazard maps will show the flooded areas for four different flows; 50-year flow, 100-year-flow, 200-year flow and a calculated maximum flow. In addition, the maps will also show the depth and it is also possible to obtain information on the velocity.

Example of flood hazard map Flood hazard maps of the 18 affected towns will be developed with similar detail, but with the new national elevation database as a basis.

National implementation work Step 2b During 2013, flood risk maps for the 18 identified towns should be developed by the five county administration boards. The flood risk maps should include information such as number of affected persons, land use, protected areas and hazards that can cause contamination at a flooding. Guidelines and guidance for the development of the flood risk maps are developed by MSB.

National implementation work Step 3 The flood risk management plans are to include measures to reduce the probability of flooding and its potential consequences. They will address all phases of the flood risk management cycle but focus particularly on prevention, protection and preparedness

Inventory of historic floods in each county, coordinated by district. The county administrative boards supplied documentation – Submission for comments concerning identified areas of special risk for flood risk. The county administrative boards commented Designation of areas with special risk for flood risk (Step 1). MSB Flood hazard maps (Step 2a). MSB with consultant Guidance for the preparation of risk maps. MSB Risk maps (Step 2b). Coordinated by district, different organization (different units, different approaches) but discussions nationally in county administrative board network. 2014/ Risk Management Plans (Step 3)

National implementation work These steps need to be reviewed every 6 years in a cycle coordinated and synchronised with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) implementation cycle.

Regional implementation work The County Administrative Board of Norrbotten has since 2009 coordinated the work on flood regulation in Norrbotten and the Gulf of Bothnia water district.

Regional implementation work The County Administrative Board of Norrbotten is waiting for the flood hazard maps from MSB for Vännasby, Älvsbyn and Haparanda – Expected in May Starting up coordination with Västerbotten and Finland (a.s.a.p.) - mutual exchange of information. Preparing risk maps - In a first step, the flood risk area upstream and downstream will be identified, e.g. to calculate the population that may be affected. Work on risk maps will be completed by December th

Thank you!

Links between WFD and Floods Directive Similar planning and timetables Target Directives A) Defined B) Criteria for implementation Similar geographical areas Measures need to be effective Consultation and participation