Online Interaction and Small Group Work Inez M. Giles June 8, 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting It all Together Facilitating Learning and Project Groups.
Advertisements

The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with “right answers.”
SOCRATIC SEMINARS An Inquiry Strategy. Socratic Seminar Vision  Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than.
Company LOGO Assessment and Evaluation in an Online Environment Leslie Graham RN MN CNCC.
What does Socratic mean? Socratic comes from the name Socrates Socrates Classical Greek philosopher who developed a Theory of Knowledge.
Introduction to Socratic Seminar. What does Socratic mean? Socratic comes from the name Socrates. Socrates (ca B.C.) was a Classical Greek philosopher.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Socratic Seminars The Power of Questions. What is Socratic Seminar A teaching strategy to encourage students to engage in critical thinking, listening,
SOCRATIC SEMINARS An Inquiry Strategy. Socratic Seminar Vision  Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than.
The Socratic Seminar: A Student-Centered Approach to Inquiry-Based Discussion Elizabeth Smith English Language Fellow.
The Socratic Seminar 1. Socrates Socrates was a famous Greek philosopher. His focus was the development of the human character. His method of teaching.
Writing an editorial To be worthy of print space, the editorial needs to tell the reader something that would not be discussed in a straight news story.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
"Like other professionals, teachers cannot become effective by following scripts. Instead, they need to create knowledge in use as they practice... knowledge.
“Let us examine this question together my friend, and if you can contradict anything that I say, do so, and I shall be persuaded.” Crito, Plato Socratic.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
MAKING THE SHIFT: FROM CLASSROOM TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN: SESSION 4 Patricia McGee, PhD and Veronica Diaz, PhD.
Peer Consultancy: Observation, Debrief, Analysis.
Learning Assessment Techniques
Administrative Introduction
Online engagement Techniques
Academic Conversations
Using Collaborative Learning Techniques in the Writing Classroom
Malia Crouse Regis University January 22, 2009
Collaborative Learning
2017 Federal Courts and Constitutional Controversies
An Introduction to Persuasion and Argument
Session 1: To Blend or Not to Blend
Welcome.
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
AVID Professional Learning
NMUSD Adult School Professional Growth Plan Martha Rankin
test 2
Applying CIQ in your classroom. Assignment 5 Digital Project Marcelo Cabral.
Module 1 The Inviting Classroom
WebTycho An Overview Enid Bank Director, Instructional Technology
Socratic Seminars.
MGMT 570 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
MGMT 570 Education for Service- -snaptutorial.com.
MGMT 570 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com.
Action learning Session Two
Evidence2Success Community Board Orientation
Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts
Foundation of Socratic Seminars
Socratic Seminars.
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
Introduction to Socratic Seminars
Socratic Seminars.
Small Group Discussions
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
Socratic Seminar Prep.
Shelby Morge, Ph.D. Tracy Hargrove, Ph.D.
Creating an Interdisciplinary assessment activity Flex day 1/12/2017
Opportunity Nottingham in partnership with NCVS
Socratic Seminars.
Building Leadership Capacity Maximizing Performance Case Studies
Socratic Seminars.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
iEARN Forum Interactions Presentation by Farah S. Kamal
Socratic seminar.
How to conduct an effective student – led discussion in class
FLIPPED CLASSROOM PRESENTED BY Dr.R.JEYANTHI Asst.Professor,
The Caregiver-Friendly Hospital and Community Hub
Lesson 6: Analyze & Evaluate London’s Argument
Session 1: To Blend or Not to Blend
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Leveraging Technology to Increase Learning Through Student-Feedback Tools       Leveraging Technology to Increase Learning Through Student-Feedback.
Sue Forsythe, Cathy Smith, Charlotte Webb Mathematics Education
Presentation transcript:

Online Interaction and Small Group Work Inez M. Giles June 8, 2000

Agenda n Discuss nature of interactivity/dialogue n Look at small group issues n Demo of online classes to illustrate points n Hands-on exercise

Why online? n Convenience! – Anecdotal – Survey results – Giles’ dissertation n 89% of students cited convenience as reason

Convenience Defined n Distance education frees students from the constraints of time and place (Moore) n Asynchronous interaction

Quality Benchmarks n Teaching/Learning Benchmarks n Course Structure Benchmarks n Student Support Benchmarks n Faculty Support Benchmarks n Evaluation and Assessment Benchmarks

Non-Essential Benchmarks n Courses should be broken into modules n Specific time expectations are set for faculty and students n ***Courses require collaboration and group work***

Some Key Findings n Policies follow practice n Faculty teaching distance classes were usually volunteers and highly regarded by their peers n ****Interactivity is essential to quality***

Interactivity/Async. Dialogue n Conversation between two or more people n Facilitates changes and perspective transformation (Mezirow) n Valuable for revealing diversity of opinion that lies below the surface of complex issues (Brookfield)

Interactivity/Dialogue n Exemplifies democratic process (Dewey) – Have opportunity to voice opinions n “Moral endeavor” (Rorty) – Bringing people together in conversation and challenging them to create new meanings

Opposition to Interactivity n Insufficient time n No experience with moderating dialogue (especially online) n “Just the facts” n Risky n Others?

Techniques n Ask open ended questions n Give opposing point of view (counter arguments) n Ask which questions they would like to discuss n Develop a “Critical Incident Questionnaire (Brookfield)

Planning for Interactivity n Define interactivity for students – Don’t assume they understand your intent n Present the idea carefully – Don’t assume they will be happy about dialogue participation n Model participation

Continuing Interactivity n Questioning, Listing, Responding – Ask for more evidence – Ask for clarification – Link two student’s questions – Post summary/synthesis questions – Paired listening exercises (online) n Establish an online community

Online Community n Suggested traits – Hospitality – Deliberation – Appreciation n For caring enough to share, for thoughtful comments or deep insight n Raises level of trust in classroom

Faculty Development Sessions n Should allow participants to experience asynchronous firsthand n Model behavior in training session n Discuss participant experiences n Don’t focus on technology – Courseware should be in background n Provide rich references and resources

Small Groups Online n Compressed timeframe – Forming, storming, norming, performing n Requires very specific guidelines – Need to manage student expectations of the small group experience

Small Group Issues n Size n Participation – Self-select or assigned n How to kick-off n Performance assessment – Ask students to rate their performance as well as other participants

Reference for lab: n URL: tychousa.umuc.edu n Login: ____ guest (1 - 9) n Password: fotc