A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation and Institutional Renewal Michael F. Middaugh Assistant Vice President Institutional Research and Planning University.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
TCNJ Program Review Overview. Purpose Meet Middle States (MSCHE) Expectations Provide structure of periodic review and update of strategic plans Provide.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Understanding Teaching Effectiveness and Assessment Projects.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Learning Outcomes Assessment RESULTS AND ACTION PLAN Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Departmental Assessment Process.  The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Addressing Six Critical Questions of Senior Administrators Addressing Six Critical Questions of Senior Administrators Using WEAVEonline Jeanne Butler,
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
WRITING LEARNING OUTCOMES AND MAPPING CURRICULUM UK Office of Assessment.
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Wednesday, June 6, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS Accreditation.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
August 15th 2007 Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes by Kirby Hayes.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Committee on University Effectiveness Working Group on Institutional Assessment April 8, 2011.
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC.
Assurance of Learning “Eberly AOL” All College Meeting – January 21, 2009 Prashanth Bharadwaj, Dean’s Associate Cyndy Strittmatter, Assistant Dean.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Understanding Assessment Projects. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate the requirements.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
The Assessment Process: A Continuous Cycle
The assessment process For Administrative units
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Presented To: College Planning Council
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
February 21-22, 2018.
Outcomes Training.
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Fort Valley State University
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING FY’17
Presented To: College Planning Council
Presentation transcript:

A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment

 Student Learning Assessment  What  Why  Who  How  When  Specifics

WhatWhy A cycle of teaching, learning, measurement, and program improvement that is systematic, explicit, documented and ongoing  For internal program purposes – “good practices” in program functioning and improvement  For external purposes ◦ NYU assessment initiative ◦ Regional accreditation requirements (Middle States) ◦ National focus on student learning assessment

 Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal  An institution conducts ongoing planning and resource allocation based on its mission and goals, develops objectives to achieve them, and utilizes the results of its assessment activities for institutional renewal. Implementation and subsequent evaluation of the success of the strategic plan and resource allocation support the development and change necessary to improve and to maintain institutional quality.  Standard 7: Institutional Assessment  The institution has developed and implemented an assessment process that evaluates its overall effectiveness in achieving its mission and goals and its compliance with accreditation standards.  Standard 14: Assessment of Student Learning  Assessment of student learning demonstrates that, at graduation, or other appropriate points, the institution’s students have knowledge, skills, and competencies consistent with institutional and appropriate higher education goals.

Answer the following questions in a systematic, documented and explicit way: 1. What do we expect our students to learn? 2. What educational opportunities do we offer to support their learning? 3. How can we ensure that students are learning what we expect of them? 4. If we identify strengths and weaknesses in student performance, how can we adjust educational opportunities to better support student learning?

WhoHow  All academic units at NYU – schools, departments, programs  Implement an assessment cycle: ◦ Develop and implement an assessment plan ◦ Use and document assessment results

An ordered 4-step process: 1. Establish student learning goals and objectives 2. Align educational opportunities (curriculum, instruction, learning supports) with learning goals 3. Measure student performance to determine how well students are reaching goals; identify strengths and weaknesses 4. Adjust educational opportunities as needed to target strengths and weaknesses

 Learning Goals and Objectives  Educational Opportunities  Assessment Measures

 Which goal(s) did you assess?  How did you measure student performance?  What were the results of the assessment?  Why might these results have occurred?  What improvements or changes will you make based on assessment findings?  About a page

Student Learning Assessment When – Departments/Programs DateTask Early April 2012 Develop student learning goals Determine which goal(s) you would like to assess first Early to Mid-Fall 2012 Outline objectives/ outcomes Identify assessment methods and measures Late Fall 2012 Assess student performance Spring 2013 Analyze assessment data Determine educational intervention(s) Submit Annual Assessment Report Fall 2013 Implement educational intervention(s) Middle States accreditation visit – document review

Student Learning Assessment When – Schools DateTask Mid-Fall 2012 Develop student learning goals Ensure alignment of educational opportunities with goals Fall 2012 to Spring 2013 If needed: Adjust educational opportunities Develop and implement assessment Fall 2013 Middle States accreditation visit – document review