Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Persistent Title (as needed) Proposed Zoning Regulations Revisions.
Advertisements

Planning & Community Development Department East Green Street Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting November 4, 2013.
Small Zone Lot Parking Exemption in all Mixed Use Commercial Zone Districts.
City of Gulf Breeze Land Development Code Update
Zoning Ordinance Update Planning Commission February 25, 2015.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
City of Rehoboth Beach Managing Impacts of Current Development Trends on Residential Neighborhoods: Issues and Possible Solutions City of Rehoboth Beach.
PALM COAST COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CENTER – PHASE Application No. SP-MAJ
MISSOULA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD La Quinta Inn 5059 N. Reserve Street Case Planner: Ana Aronofsky Public Hearing Date: April 8, 2009 Applicant: Jeff Anderson.
WORK SESSION CH. 38 (Zoning) LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE Zoning Division March 24, 2015.
WORK SESSION CH. 38 (Zoning) LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE Zoning Division July 29, 2014.
Amendments to Chapter 30 & 38 (Zoning Regulations) 1 st BCC PUBLIC HEARING April 22, 2008 Amendments to Chapter 30 & 38 (Zoning Regulations) 1 st BCC PUBLIC.
Draft Zoning Code Residential Focus Neighborhood Meeting May 8, 2007.
Town of Salisbury Lafayette-Main Rezoning Proposal Continued Public Hearing April 22, 2015.
Zoning rewrite woodside park planning dept mncppc feb 11.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
Planning & Community Development Department 277 North El Molino Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting May 5, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District March 10, 2009 Board of County Commissioners.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
Amendments to Chapter 30 & 38 (Zoning Regulations) BCC ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING May 13, 2008 Amendments to Chapter 30 & 38 (Zoning Regulations) BCC ADOPTION.
Zoning Regulations Zoning authority is a “police power” granted to the City by the State. Land Development Code Purpose: To implement the City’s Comprehensive.
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
Subcommittee on Heights, Massing, and Alternate Standards    Third Report – January 20, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 2006 Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (06-004) for a porch addition at th Avenue NW.
Northwest Quadrant Draft Zoning Ordinance NWQ Draft Zoning Ordinance Planning Commission Review February 21, 2006 Phil Carlson, AICP DSU Planning Consultant.
An Overview of Garrett Park Building Regulations Harry Gordon, FAIA Chairman GP Setback Advisory Committee May 2009.
ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 24, 2014.
FIRST PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 3, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon.
Board of County Commissioners Second Public Hearing August 10, /10/
Dockets R-11-06;07;09 Zoning Regulation Amendments Proposed Amendments to the Cochise County Zoning Regulations regarding Lot Development Administrative.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments December 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments October 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Historic Review Board Public Hearing: DR – th St. September 15, 2015.
Siemon & Larsen Outline of New Zoning Code. Siemon & Larsen Goals Eliminating redundant and conflicting provisions An overall update Address concerns.
Planning Commission Second Unit Study Session. Tonight’s Conversation Project Background (10 minutes) Community Process (10 minutes) Council Direction—Ord.
To provide for alcohol-free commercial uses that serve as a transition between commercial districts and one- and two-family residential areas. PURPOSE.
Planning & Community Development Department 3202 East Foothill Boulevard (Mixed Use Project – Space Bank) City Council May 16, 2016 Predevelopment Plan.
Town of Chapel Hill | 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. | Land Use Management Ordinance Update Planning Commission September 1,
Discussion and Input on the Comprehensive Rewrite of the CLUP and Zoning Code Discovery Phase City Commission Workshop January 22, 2004.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS ZOA Tuesday, October 9, 2012.
Residential Infill Project Scale of Houses (a primer) Stakeholder Advisory Committee October 6, 2015.
The Planning & Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment Joint Workshop May 24, 2010 May 24, :00 P.M. 6:00 P.M.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
TREE ORDINANCE WORKSHOP DISCUSSION September 3, 2014.
City of Coral Gables Zoning Code Re-Write. Proposed Review Process Consultant presentation and explanation of revisions Questions and answers to clarify.
Public Hearing Amendments to Chapter 38 Horizon West Development Standards Orange County BCC May 24, 2016.
City of East Palo Alto Planning Commission
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: CLEARING UP THE CONFUSION
Animal Care Facilities
8/23/2016 Luis N. Serna, AICP David, Healey, FAICP
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Proposed Zoning Ordinance
8/23/2016 Luis N. Serna, AICP David Healey, FAICP
Special Exception to Reduce the Required Front Yard Setback for
City Council Meeting April 23, 2018
City of Coral Gables Zoning Code Re-Write.
City Commission Workshop
City Council Meeting April 29, 2019
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Impact of Zoning on Affordable Housing February 16, 2018
Board of County Commissioners
115-Unit Mixed-Use Project (711 E
12 D. Variance Request – 211 Jennifer Lane
Design Regulations Update
Presentation transcript:

Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts

Monster Home Issue Create new provisions for review of new or expanded houses in the context of neighborhood Refine FAR provisions Modify lot split provisions to create viable alternative to “monster” houses Create new provisions for review of new or expanded houses in the context of neighborhood Refine FAR provisions Modify lot split provisions to create viable alternative to “monster” houses

Contextual Review New or expanded homes with an FAR of greater than.35 or new or expanded homes on parcels of land of greater than 100 feet in width subject to a discretionary professional staff approval Discretionary staff approval addresses compatibility of proposed home in context of character of particular address New or expanded homes with an FAR of greater than.35 or new or expanded homes on parcels of land of greater than 100 feet in width subject to a discretionary professional staff approval Discretionary staff approval addresses compatibility of proposed home in context of character of particular address

Parcel Proposed For Development Parcel Proposed For Development Area of Analysis

Contextual Review Standard “The mass and character of the proposed dwelling is consistent and compatible in terms of mass, height, scale and design with the existing dwellings on both sides of the street on which the dwelling is proposed to be located.”

Contextual Review Standard The extent to which the design of the proposed dwelling has employed the following standards which would enhance the consistency and compatibility of the proposed dwelling: Additional front yard set back equal to ten percent of the depth of the lot

Additional setback

Vacant Lot

Additional Setback

Contextual Review Standard The façade which faces the front setback does not exceed 40% of the lot width 40%

Contextual Review Standard Garage doors shall not be located within 5 feet of the front setback line

Contextual Review Standard 40% of the total roof area surface shall be a gabled roof 1,953 sq. ft. 1,026 = 53%

Contextual Review Standard No more than 40% of the roof area shall have the same height, plus or minus 3 feet.

Contextual Review Standard No more than 40% of the roof area shall have the same height, plus or minus 3 feet. 1,912 sq. ft.

Contextual Review Standard No more than 40% of the roof area shall have the same height, plus or minus 3 feet. 576 sq. ft. – 30% 667 sq. ft. – 35% 668 sq. ft. – 35%

Refined FAR On lots with an area of 7,500 square feet or less:.48. On larger lots:.48 up to 7,500 square feet, plus.35 for each additional square feet of area up to 15,000 square feet, plus.1 for each square foot of area in excess of 15,000 square feet. On lots with an area of 7,500 square feet or less:.48. On larger lots:.48 up to 7,500 square feet, plus.35 for each additional square feet of area up to 15,000 square feet, plus.1 for each square foot of area in excess of 15,000 square feet.

Lot Split Modifications Assumes that in some cases, 2 compatible homes are preferable to 1 very large home Offer an alternative to larger homes as only way to realize value of larger parcels of land Establish objective standards Make process more efficient Assumes that in some cases, 2 compatible homes are preferable to 1 very large home Offer an alternative to larger homes as only way to realize value of larger parcels of land Establish objective standards Make process more efficient

Lot Split Modifications Lot split permitted where parcel has a width of more than100 feet, and At least 60% of existing homes within a block with frontage on either side of the have frontages which are equal to or smaller than 50% of the width of the parcel proposed to be split Lot split permitted where parcel has a width of more than100 feet, and At least 60% of existing homes within a block with frontage on either side of the have frontages which are equal to or smaller than 50% of the width of the parcel proposed to be split

Example Assume a parcel of land with 100 feet of frontage In order to be entitled to divide the parcel into 2 lots with 50 feet of frontage, at least 60% of the homes in the “area of analysis” are on lots with 50 feet of frontage or less Assume a parcel of land with 100 feet of frontage In order to be entitled to divide the parcel into 2 lots with 50 feet of frontage, at least 60% of the homes in the “area of analysis” are on lots with 50 feet of frontage or less

125’

% % LOT SPLIT NOT PERMITTED

150’

% % LOT SPLIT PERMITTED

150’ LOT SPLIT INTO TWO 75” LOTS

MF Districts Consolidate A, D and TH districts into 2 MF districts MF 1 is a low density multifamily district MF 2 is a higher density multifamily district derived from the moratorium ordinance Consolidate A, D and TH districts into 2 MF districts MF 1 is a low density multifamily district MF 2 is a higher density multifamily district derived from the moratorium ordinance

Non-Residential Districts Consolidate CA, CB and CC into 2 districts CL is a limited commercial district (contiguous to single family districts) and C is a general commercial district Consolidate 257 specific uses into 57 use classifications “Use equivalency” chart provided for review Consolidate CA, CB and CC into 2 districts CL is a limited commercial district (contiguous to single family districts) and C is a general commercial district Consolidate 257 specific uses into 57 use classifications “Use equivalency” chart provided for review

Non-Residential Districts Add provisions governing night time uses in proximity to single family residences New provisions governing entertainment uses Make X and mixed uses conditional uses in commercial districts Add provisions governing night time uses in proximity to single family residences New provisions governing entertainment uses Make X and mixed uses conditional uses in commercial districts

Article 5. Development Standards Consolidated and enhanced landscaping provisions Consolidate design standards Merge Mediterranean bonus and TDRs Modify sign regulations to enhance “content neutrality” Reorganized and clarified off-street parking provisions Consolidated and enhanced landscaping provisions Consolidate design standards Merge Mediterranean bonus and TDRs Modify sign regulations to enhance “content neutrality” Reorganized and clarified off-street parking provisions

Article 6. Nonconformities Incorporation of all provisions regarding nonconformities Inclusion of nonconforming sign provisions Entirely new section on nonconforming accessory uses and structures Incorporation of all provisions regarding nonconformities Inclusion of nonconforming sign provisions Entirely new section on nonconforming accessory uses and structures

Article 6. Nonconformities Inclusion of entirely new section on terminating nonconforming status through use of “upgrading” Inclusion of existing “non-permitted garage” provisions Inclusion of entirely new section on terminating nonconforming status through use of “upgrading” Inclusion of existing “non-permitted garage” provisions

Article 7. Violations, Enforcement, Penalties Consolidation of all enforcement provisions in existing code which are currently scattered throughout Clarification of existing provisions and expansion of authority where possible Consolidation of all enforcement provisions in existing code which are currently scattered throughout Clarification of existing provisions and expansion of authority where possible

Article 8. Definitions Consolidation of all definitions in existing zoning code and other Code provisions incorporated into the LDRs Proposed addition of numerous definitions (both for new uses and for numerous terms used in the LDRs not previously defined) Consolidation of all definitions in existing zoning code and other Code provisions incorporated into the LDRs Proposed addition of numerous definitions (both for new uses and for numerous terms used in the LDRs not previously defined)

Landscaping Provisions Created a unified landscaping division by incorporating those sections of the existing code which referenced landscaping requirements into one division. Incorporated the Miami-Dade County Code where applicable Created a unified landscaping division by incorporating those sections of the existing code which referenced landscaping requirements into one division. Incorporated the Miami-Dade County Code where applicable

Landscaping Provisions Provide: –For preservation of existing landscaping; –Single Family Districts: exempt from the Division except required to provide a minimum landscape open space of 35% and a minimum number of three (3) trees –Applicability to all new development, redevelopment and change in use –Graphics to assist the reader, such as depicting existing dimensions of Vehicular Use Area Right-of-Way Landscaping Provide: –For preservation of existing landscaping; –Single Family Districts: exempt from the Division except required to provide a minimum landscape open space of 35% and a minimum number of three (3) trees –Applicability to all new development, redevelopment and change in use –Graphics to assist the reader, such as depicting existing dimensions of Vehicular Use Area Right-of-Way Landscaping

TDRs Bonus under Mediterranean only with TDRs Sending from multiple locations in City where reductions of on-site density are necessary North Ponce as an additional receiver area Bonus under Mediterranean only with TDRs Sending from multiple locations in City where reductions of on-site density are necessary North Ponce as an additional receiver area

Sign Ordinance Relocated procedural language Eliminated references to content of signs without changing the substance of the sign code Linked permitted temporary signs to zoning district Off-premises commercial signs are prohibited Relocated procedural language Eliminated references to content of signs without changing the substance of the sign code Linked permitted temporary signs to zoning district Off-premises commercial signs are prohibited

Parking Reorganized and simplified parking regulations Moved landscaping requirements to landscaping division Added and incorporated illustrations (parking space dimensions illustrations were previously cross-referenced) Reorganized and simplified parking regulations Moved landscaping requirements to landscaping division Added and incorporated illustrations (parking space dimensions illustrations were previously cross-referenced)

Parking Enhanced illumination standards to require relatively even illumination of parking areas (added 12:1 luminance ratio where no ratio had been required). Removed reduced requirements for CBD and did not provide for shared parking, both per Parking Advisory Board recommendation 9/23/04 Enhanced illumination standards to require relatively even illumination of parking areas (added 12:1 luminance ratio where no ratio had been required). Removed reduced requirements for CBD and did not provide for shared parking, both per Parking Advisory Board recommendation 9/23/04

Parking Modified off-street parking table (simplified and made consistent with proposed use table) Provided recommended parking standards where none were previously provided (e.g., golf/tennis grounds; heliports; helistops; municipal facilities; public transportation facilities) Modified off-street parking table (simplified and made consistent with proposed use table) Provided recommended parking standards where none were previously provided (e.g., golf/tennis grounds; heliports; helistops; municipal facilities; public transportation facilities)