Cohort B Observation Cycle for 06-07 © 2007 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 3 Implementation and Documentation.
Advertisements

PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
Implementing the CCSS Through Coaching Atomic Conference December 2, 2014.
Year 1 School Based Training Have experience across all three key stages; Develop an understanding of the multiplicity of roles within the primary school;
Oregon Reading First Cohort B Statewide Coaches’ Training Session February 27, 2007 Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. University of Oregon.
Oregon Reading First IBR V - Cohort B Coaches and Teachers Working Together to Improve Student Outcomes.
Oregon Reading First Cohort B Leadership Session March 3, 2008 Checking in on Lesson Progress Reporting Systems (LPRs)
Oregon Reading First Cohort B Statewide Coaches’ Session September 14, 2006.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Coach Observation Strategies: A Follow-Up Cohort B Statewide Coaches’ Training Session April 25, 2007 Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. University of Oregon.
1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.
Oregon Reading First Cohort B-ELL Statewide Coaches’ Training Session February 28, 2007.
Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph. D. Oregon Reading First Center March 22, 2006
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
1 A Behavior and Reading Improvement Center Presentation Integrating Academic and Behavior Support Richard White and Bob Algozzine Integrated Systems for.
IES e-PATT Grant e-PATT: Parents and Teachers Together.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,
STRATEGIC PLAN Tennessee Department of Education School Team Training Series Opening Session – Literacy June 2014.
Grade-level Data Team Meetings.
Instructional Coaching Columbia High School February 17, 2011 JoAnn Moore, Facilitator 10 minutes.
ICreate Session 6 of 8 Conducting a Peer Review. Focusing Questions How can I improve my technology- enriched lesson? What methods can I use to get feedback.
IDENTIFYING & PRIORITIZING PROBLEMS OF PRACTICE December 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director Sue Cohn, School Improvement.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Mentoring Moments: Classroom Observation and Debriefing for NTIP Teachers & Mentors Teaching Policy and Standards Branch Issue 15 / March 2013.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Instructional Coaching February 1, Welcome! Please Do Now: Take 2 minutes to write 3 lines: How would you define Instructional Coaching? What is.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
Visible Learning at John B. Cary Elementary School Heidi Brezinski Principal
Mentoring Moments: Powerful Designs for Mentoring Teaching Policy and Standards Branch Issue 12 / Nov 2012.
Session 4 Planning for Implementation of APP. 1 PROCESS Familiarisation with AFs & Standard files Practice in levelling Standard files using APP guidelines.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Early Literacy – Teacher Feedback Mendota Unified School District March 26, 2015.
IU 14 - Instructional Coaches’ Meeting December 14, 2012.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY Focus Lesson Guided Instruction “I do it” “We do it” “You do it together” Collaborative Independent “You.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
The Instructional Practice Suite for ELA/Literacy Core Advocate Webinar November 17, :00 – 8:00 EST The webinar will begin shortly. You may wish.
KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.
© 2010 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
HOW TO USE NURLAELI KHOERIYAH ( ) SARI DIANA ( ) 1.
Responsive Instruction at Algonkian Elementary October 1, 2013.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
ESP Contact Meeting FY 17.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Data-Based Leadership
Coach Observation Strategies: A Follow-Up
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
HCS Elementary Education Department
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
BANKED DAY #8 REFLECTION AND REVISION December 13, 2016.
Systems Problem Solving
The School Mentor Updated 2018.
BANKED TUESDAY REFLECTION AND REVISION OCTOBER 18TH, 2016.
Introduction:- Instructional technology has become an important part of teaching and learning within the classroom as well as working with fully online.
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Learning Intentions We are learning to (W.A.L.T.):
Impossible Induction.
Planning and Conducting Data Collection – Structured Observations
Implementation data will continue to be collected
Presentation transcript:

Cohort B Observation Cycle for © 2007 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning

Cohort B Observation Cycle Fall to Winter –Non-Observations –Summary due December 15th Winter to Spring –Targeted Observations –Summary due May 25th

Non-Observations: Fall to Winter 2006 End of September to Mid October- All coaches begin with a round of 5- minute observations focusing on the Nine General Features of Instruction (posted on website). The goal of the observations is to prioritize areas of focus for “non-observations.” Mid October through December- All coaches conduct one “non- observation” for each K-3 classroom teacher. Coaches will use the same form as last year to document non-observations. (Due on December 15th.) Enhancement Coaches: –Conduct a “Core Enhancement Internship” –First, focus non-observations on teachers using the core enhancements (or discuss possibility of using the enhancement observation tool.) Next, conduct non-observations with teachers not using the core enhancements.

Targeted Observations: Winter to Spring 2007 In preparation for the targeted observations, coaches will receive training on the LPR system and strategies for observing student response to instruction. Step 1. After each LPR data collection, the coach will target 4 instructional groups that are not making adequate progress. Step 2. Coach will observe each of the 4 groups, recording segments of the lesson, time involved, tasks, and students’ responses (i.e., student success rate). Step 3. Coach and teacher will review the lesson data together to identify the problems students are having and collaboratively determine a remedy that focuses on one of the general features of instruction. Together, the coach and teacher will identify and carry out next steps..

Examples of “Next Step” Coaching Activities: Co-Teaching Practice Sessions Whisper Coaching Peer Observations Program Enhancement Student Assessment Regrouping Other examples?___________________ _________________________________

Targeted Observation Documentation Coaches will complete targeted observation cycle 2 times-- once following each LPR data collection (e.g., February, March). Coaches will turn in documentation of targeted observations after each cycle. By May 25th, both documentation cycles should be submitted to the ORFC. The observation process will be documented on a form similar to the one below: