RIC 2009 Human Factors DAC/ITAAC Reviews Michael Junge USNRC/NRO/DCIP March 11, 2009.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 RIC 2009 Construction Inspection Program Glenn M. Tracy, Director Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs March 11, 2009.

Advertisements

A Blended Curriculum for Bermuda Public Primary Schools

OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUSINESSES TO DIRECTLY IMPROVE THE BOTTOM LINE THROUGH ENERGY EFFICIENCY 3 rd May 2010 Kees Brinkman Managing Director.

D EEMED M EASURE R EVIEW P ROJECT Final Report December 7, 2010 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Michael Baker.

Integrity Management Program Special Permits (IMP-SP) Draft Administrative Plan 12/5/2007.

“Regulatory Risk-Informed Activities and Supporting PRA Technical Acceptability” Presented to Nuclear Energy Standards Coordination Collaborative (NESCC)

NREP 2009 Emergency Preparedness and the New Reactor Licensing Process: An Update on Where We Are Now Dan Barss Division of Preparedness & Response Office.

Cumulative Impacts James Slider November 7, 2013.

Modeling Choices & Approaches Key Model Outputs: Carbon emissions Other emissions Electricity prices Total electricity system costs Fuel use and diversity.

ACS 567: Software Project Management Spring 2009 Instructor: Dr. John Tanik.

STRAGEGY FOR ENHANCING SHARE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY – Ensuring Safety & viability S.S. Bajaj Chairman, AERB 6 th Nuclear Energy Conclave, New Delhi 14 Oct 2014.

Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.

Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.

CENTRALIZED WASTE TREATMENT 40 CFR 437 Lessons Learned.

MLLC Meeting Presentation Monday 2 nd March, 2015 MLLC Areas – Jess and Lesley St John’s Primary School, Footscray.

Project Management Lecture 5+6 MS Saba Sahar.

 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”

PMP® Exam Preparation Course

The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon) December 2, 2009 David B. Matthews, Director Division of New Reactor.

R. Brad Harvey, CCM Physical Scientist Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11th NUMUG Meeting, St. Louis, MO, October.

Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.

PPMT CE-408T Engr. Faisal ur Rehman CED N-W.F.P UET P.

Transportation of Radioactive Material in the United States Earl P. Easton.

MABS Learning Centers and Standard Toolkit for Bank Hosting Activities MABS Learning Centers Training Workshop.

1 A Dialogue to Raise Awareness of Operating Nuclear Power Plant Issues RIC 2009 Regional Breakout Session A Dialogue to Raise Awareness of Operating Nuclear.

1 Attributes of a Successful Nuclear Construction Project – A Regulator’s Perspective Victor M. McCree Deputy Regional Administrator for Operations U.S.

Design Project Experience: Goals n The goal is to provide our students with a significant design experience which incorporates several technical subject.

MGT 461 Project Management Institute Knowledge Areas

Small Modular Reactor Licensing Design Specific Review Standards 11/29/20121 Joseph Colaccino Acting Deputy Director Division of Advanced Reactors and.

1 RIC 2009 Engineering Issues Design Acceptance Criteria Laura Dudes Deputy Director, Division of Engineering NRO/DE March 11, 2009.

Professional Development for the Teachers of Tomorrow’s Children WACTE October 28, 2008 Sheila Fox, WWU.

Configuration Management in New Reactor Construction Tom Kozak, NRO/DCIP/CAEB

Paul Hardiman and Rob Brown SMMT IF Planning and organising an audit.

1 Emerging Issues: Materials and Mechanical Michele G. Evans, Session Chair 2009 RIC.

7-1 IS Development Project Track Record Source: The Standish Group International, Inc., “Chaos: A Recipe for Success” canceled before completion Over budget,

Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.

New Reactor Licensing R. William Borchardt Director, Office of New Reactors US NRC February 19, 2008.

1 Moving Forward with the USEPR Greg Gibson Vice President Regulatory Affairs.

1 RIC 2009 Perspectives on Digital I&C Licensing in the 10 CFR 52 Environment Thomas R. Fredette, PE NRO/DE/ICE2 March 11, 2009.

Commercial Project Reviews Information to assist with your project.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.

Comparability Protocols Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer DBA/OBRR/CBER September 16, 2009.

Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.

Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.

Project Management Process

RIC 2009 Construction Inspection Program: Industry Perspectives Russ Bell Director, New Plant Licensing March 11, 2009.

P r o j e c t : from INITIATING to CLOSING ( 1 ).

1 RIC 2009 NRO New Reactor Design Reviews and Engineering Jennifer Dixon-Herrity USNRC/NRO/DE March 11, 2009.

Adding Nuclear Power to the Grid ASQ Energy and Environmental Conference August 28, 2006.

ISTOG – NRC Update Winter Meeting 2010 – Clearwater, FL Tony McMurtray Chief, Component Performance & Testing Branch Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

Online Radiation Safety Training Programs Tomas Herrera FSME/MSSA/Licensing Branch OAS Annual Meeting Milwaukee, Wisconsin August 27-30, 2012.

1 RIC 2009 Design Acceptance Criteria: Searching for Acceptance Andrea Sterdis Tennessee Valley Authority March 11, 2009.

The Planning Phase Recognize the problem MIS steering committee 7. ManagerSystems analyst Define the problem Set system objectives Identify system constraints.

Proposed Update of Appendix I to Part 50 RIC 2009 Radiation Protection Proposed Update of Appendix I to Part 50 Jean-Claude Dehmel NRO/DCIP/CHPB March.

Stage 2: Business Case Objective of the Business Case Stage Collect, in a standardized manner, the essential data required to define (in this order):

Prof. Shrikant M. Harle.  The Project Life Cycle refers to a logical sequence of activities to accomplish the project’s goals or objectives.  Regardless.

Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit Contract

TechStambha PMP Certification Training

Flooding Walkdown Guidance

CY 2017 Goals and Objectives

MOD.A’s Quality Standard

Urge identification of the real requirements.

The Economics of Industrial Radiography Safety Certification

Adding Nuclear Power to the Grid

CIS12-3 IT Project Management

NRC Update Nader Mamish, Director Emergency Preparedness Directorate

TRTR Briefing September 2013

RESOLUTION OF GENERIC SAFETY ISSUE 191

Role of the External Examiner

PROJECT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT BEST PRACTICES RICHARD MAGU

Presentation transcript:

RIC 2009 Human Factors DAC/ITAAC Reviews Michael Junge USNRC/NRO/DCIP March 11, 2009

2 Impacts on Fuel Load Schedule Licensed operators are required to load fuel. Prior to fuel load, Industry estimates two licensed operator examinations will be required. Operator license exams require a plant- referenced simulator. (10 CFR 55.46) Certification of the simulator requires a complete control room design. A complete control room design requires an HFE program implementation.

3 HFE Program Review HFE program review approach –Program level review –Implementation Plan level review –Results review Sequence of reviews

4 NUREG 0711 chart

5 Impact of Review Approach on DAC/ITAAC Inspection Resources Designs Approved To-DateDesigns Under Review Applicants submitted high-level HFE program descriptions Completed Implementation Plans provide detailed acceptance criteria Fewer resources required for focused inspections Staff is conducting implementation plan level reviews Applicants providing detailed HFE program Implementation Plans Staff conducted program-level reviews Implementation Plan deferred to DAC/ITAAC DAC/ITAAC inspection of Implementation Plan & results Significant resources (staff & time) required for DAC/ITAAC inspection DAC/ITAAC inspection of results against detailed acceptance criteria

6 Bottom Line DAC/ITAAC inspection sequence must be managed to support fuel load schedules. DAC/ITAAC closure resources for designs approved to-date must be budgeted appropriately.