Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tier III Meeting Outline. Roles of Team Members Coordinator –Set up meetings, contact parents, inform members of team about agenda, inform teachers about.
Advertisements

DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Overview of Progress Monitoring Training Session Part of a training series developed to accompany the AIMSweb Improvement System. Purpose is to provide.
Big Ideas About Frequent Formative Evaluation Using General Outcome Measures and the Progress Monitoring Program One of the most powerful interventions.
1 Progress Monitoring Content developed by Wayne Callender and Jeanie Mercier Smith The Link Between Instruction and Reading Proficiency.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
DIBELS – Part II SED 368 Fall Review DIBELS Benchmarks – 3 times/year – At grade-level learners may need only benchmarks – Can be used as a screener.
Survey Level Assessment
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Informal Academic Diagnostic Assessment: Using Data to Guide Intensive Instruction Part 2: Reviewing Graphed Data 1.
Progress Monitoring of Special Education Students Dr. Deirdre J. Osypuk Director SSS Bloomfield Public Schools.
RTI Data-based Decisions Marilyn Bechtel Psychologist/Elliott Elementary School Lincoln Public Schools July 30, 2007.
1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
Determining Eligibility Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework TASP 2013 Fall ConferenceTASP 2013 Fall Conference Theresa Nicholls, Ed.S., NCSPTheresa Nicholls,
Oregon Reading First Cohort B Regional Coaches’ Meeting October, 2005
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
Curriculum Based Measures vs. Formal Assessment
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
AIMSweb and Goal- Setting December 8, 2010 PRTI. Basic goal setting Measurable goals include: Conditions Timeline, materials, difficulty level In 9 weeks.
Response to Intervention How to Monitor RTI Reading Interventions Jim Wright
Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf
Setting Ambitious & Attainable Student Goals OrRTI Spring Training May 3 rd, 2011.
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Center for Reading Research 175 Peik Hall 159 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN Contacts: Kathrin Maki:
Use of Reading Data to Drive Instruction in District 200 April 13, 2012.
RTI Grade Level Team Meetings Presented by April Kelley.
Response to Intervention RTI Data Challenge: Setting Individual RTI Academic Goals Using Research Norms for Students Receiving.
PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation Level 2 at Middle School Curriculum Based Assessment.
Intervention Management. Keeping RtI on Track Jigsaw chapter 1 (pps. 1-6) Each person reads one section Share a big idea from your section and answer.
Today’s Learning Objectives: 1.What is Progress Monitoring? 2.Brief review of Universal Screening data, 2.Brief review of Universal Screening data, identifying.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Progress Monitoring for students in Strategic or Intensive intervention levels Based on the work of Roland Good and Ruth Kaminski.
PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation Curriculum Based Assessment Determining Level of Intensity and Type of Services Needed.
Webinar Series to support Keystone AEA 1 Session #2 ●Substantial Deficiency ●Progress Monitoring ●Interventions.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Student Progress Monitoring and How Will it Help Me? Laura Florkey.
Progress Monitoring Strategies for Writing Individual Goals in General Curriculum and More Frequent Formative Evaluation Mark Shinn, Ph.D. Lisa A. Langell,
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Data Based Decision Making Using Progress Monitoring Data.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
What Do I Do With My DIBELS Data? Aligning Student Needs and Instruction source: Tracy Cormane:
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
A Look at Repeated Readings. Agenda What is repeated readings? Why is repeated readings effective? What does the supporting research for repeated readings.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Using DIBELS to Improve Reading Outcomes in Grades 3-5.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.
Using Assessments to Monitor and Evaluate Student Progress 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) ctserc.org.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
3.0 Problem-Solving Process for Reading: Digging Deeper Cohort 7 Elementary Schools Winter 2012.
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
K-5: Progress Monitoring JANUARY, 2010 WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM INTERVENTION ALIGNMENT.
STAR Reading. Purpose Periodic progress monitoring assessment Quick and accurate estimates of reading comprehension Assessment of reading relative to.
Nuts and Bolts of Progress Monitoring Response to Instruction and Intervention RtII.
Data Collection Challenge:
Systems Problem Solving
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention in Educational Transformation Schools
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
Presentation transcript:

Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support

Outcomes Driven Model Roland Good Progress Monitoring decision rules, Review of alterable variables

Why is progress monitoring important for the intensive reader ?

Test back procedure for progress monitoring Students with INTENSIVE Needs: Survey Level Assessment

What is it and why use it? Provides a general sample of a student’s performance to guide instructional decisions. “Test back” procedure for out of grade level assessment to identify a level at which a student is successful. Provides increased sensitivity to instruction (i.e. more sensitive to growth) Provides a procedure for out of grade level goal setting and progress monitoring.

Who needs to be progress monitored “out of grade” level? Students who are approximately two or more grade levels behind their peers in reading Beth, 6 th grade –Typical peers read cwpm –Beth is reading cwpm

Survey Level Assessment Steps: AIMSweb 1.Administer 3 probes in the student’s grade level material. Calculate and graph the median score for that time of year (fall, winter, or spring). 2.If the student’s score falls between the 25 th and 75 th percentile compared to the AIMSweb© National Aggregate Norms for that time of year. If not, drop down one level and give 3 additional probes. Calculate and graph the median. 3.If the student has not met the criteria, repeat the procedure, dropping down level by level until the student’s median score falls between the 25 th and 75 th percentile compared to the AIMSweb National Aggregate Norms for that time of year.

Survey Level Assessment Goal Setting – AIMSweb Set the student’s goal for the end of the year, at least one year above the level at which the student met benchmark. Both the goal and progress monitoring will be at this level.

AIMSweb Example Beth is a 6th grade student functioning in the intensive range on AIMSweb Fall Benchmark assessment. Survey level assessment data –6 th – 21 cwpm –5th - 23 cwpm –4th - 37 cwpm –3rd - 42 cwpm –2nd - 48 cwpm

Example, cont’d Beth did not meet benchmark in 5th, 4th, or 3rd grade level materials. She did meet benchmark for fall of 2nd grade. A goal will be set for the end of 3rd grade grade (at least 92 correct words per minute) and Beth will be progress monitored in 3rd grade level materials.

Determine the grade level appropriate for goal setting and progress monitoring for these students along with an appropriate goal: Determine the grade level appropriate for goal setting and progress monitoring for these students along with an appropriate goal: Dave earned these cwpm scores in winter of 7th grade. 6 th – 30, 5 th - 43, 4 th - 60, 3 rd - 80 Jessica earned these median cwpm scores in fall of 6th grade. 5th - 23, 4th - 26, 3rd - 31, 2nd - 455th - 23, 4th - 26, 3rd - 31, 2nd - 45 Partner Practice

How will you provide training on Survey Level Assessment to your staff? Team Time

In addition... Document intervention used –Time (minutes per day, days per week) –Group size –Materials used Use decision rules

Decision Rule 1: If 3-6 consecutive data points are below the aimline, make an instructional change in the student’s program. x x

Decision Rule 2: If student’s performance is above the aimline for 3-6 consecutive data points, adjust long-term goal and draw a new aimline. x x

Decision Rule 3: If the student’s performance is not consistently above the aimline (i.e., more than 3-6 consecutive data points), make no changes x x

How Frequently to Assess? Balance IDEAL with FEASIBLE… Too little data, too infrequently means students may stay in ineffective programs longer than necessary. (AIMSweb, 2009)

5 data points over 15 weeks vs. 5 data points over 5 weeks (AIMSweb, 2009)

Think about your intensive students. What is your plan for ensuring that these students’ progress is being monitored frequently (i.e. 1x/week)?What is your plan for ensuring that these students’ progress is being monitored frequently (i.e. 1x/week)? Do any students need a survey level assessment to establish an appropriate baseline and goal level?Do any students need a survey level assessment to establish an appropriate baseline and goal level? How will you use the decision rules?How will you use the decision rules? Who coordinates this process?Who coordinates this process? Team Time