Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 Presented by: Office of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
Advertisements

Office of Management & Budget
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
Documentation, Cash & In-Kind Match. Session Objectives Gather information on proper documentation Allowable, allocable & reasonable costs Gain knowledge.
Page 1 Discretionary Grant Administration. Page 2  Overview of ED financial policies  Managing budget  Avoiding audit problems  Identifying key resources.
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Administrative Costs Leveraged Resources Accrued Expenditures & Unliquidated Obligations MoHealthWINs.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
PROGRAM INCOME / IN-KIND ASSISTANCE / IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION
YouthBuild Financial Management. DOL Requirements DOL adapted OMB Circular A -102 under 29 CFR Part 97 –States follow their own policies and procedures.
Match & Leveraged Resources. Non-Federal Share AKA Match.
WIA Closeout Handbook Presented by: Dave Rexius, EDD April Eales, EDD.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Grant Management: Fiscal Insights. What’s Covered Financial Management –Rules and regulations –Cost Principles –Internal Controls –Budget Controls –Cost.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Audit-Readiness Riverside Community College District Grants Office.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
June 3, 2007NTIA PSIC Public Meeting1 How to Avoid Audit Problems: Matching Share and Cost Principles National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
Budget Controls Budget Controls Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region 4 Discretionary Grantee.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Federal Financial Management Requirements An overview.
Monitoring Region 3 Discretionary Roundtable May 20 – 23, 2008 Mary Evans And Conyers Garrett EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT.
COMMUNITY FOOD COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM Award Information Webinar Thursday, October 22, 2015 Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial.
Cost Sharing. Objectives Review roles and responsibilities Facilitate pro-active, continuous monitoring of cost share commitments Review Cost Share Summary.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
Eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
Kiev, Ukraine October 2009 Cost Share. Objectives  Understand the definition of Cost Share  Identify USAID regulations that apply to Cost Share.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Matching and Cost-Share Requirements Allowable Items and Accounting for Cost Share.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Division of Adult Education and Literacy U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC.
United States Department of Labor Employment & Training Administration TAA-CCCT Round 4 New Grantee Fiscal and Administrative Q&A TAA-CCCT Round 4 New.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Leveraged Resources, Match & Intellectual Property June 2009.
YouthBuild Learning Exchange January 13-15, 2009 Leveraged Resources and Match.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: November 3, 2015 Presented by: Office of Grants.
Implementing TAACCCT Round 2 Consortium Grants Management September 27, 2013.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Financial and Administrative Management
TAA-CCCT Round 2 New Grantee Fiscal and Administrative Q&A
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT -
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 Presented by: Office of Grants Management U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration

2# Enter your location in the Chat window – lower left of screen

Uniform Guidance changes the process of budget modifications Budgets provide a blueprint for managing your grant to achieve maximum effectiveness Budget controls are a necessary and vital tool for an entity's management to control costs and help management anticipate potential problems on a timely basis. There are tools that you can use to manage your costs in compliance with requirements Why This Session Is Needed

Understand the processing of budget modifications for discretionary DOL-ETA grants Describe how accounting information is tracked and compared against budget Explain what kind of grant actions can arise from budget analysis Understand the link between budget controls and program effectiveness Identify common mistakes Module Objectives 4

On a scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), rate your knowledge and understanding of the following by circling the appropriate number in the middle column of the sheet, labeled Pre-Training, for each of the statements. 1.I am fully aware of the requirements for budget controls 2.I know the format of the federally required budget and how to obtain data 3.I understand the various methods for budget analysis 4.I know the grant actions that may result from budget analysis 5.I am aware of the consequences that arise from failure to comply Knowledge Check

#6

Internal control system –Designed to provide methods to ensure costs are in line with projections “planned vs. actual” analysis –Require approval from Federal agency for certain items of cost –Identify potential performance issues What are Budget Controls?

2 CFR Financial management. Financial Standards (b)(5) –Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts Revision of budget and program plans (e) Authority to restrict transfer of funds Key Uniform Guidance Changes

IMPORTANT CHANGE - BUDGET MODIFICATION & PRIOR APPROVAL PROCESS –For funds awarded after December 26, 2014, requests for budget modifications must be submitted in writing at least 30 days before the effective date of any change –For grants that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($150,000), ETA has the option to require prior approval if budget changes exceed 10% of the total grant award See (e), , and –Replaces previous requirement that all changes in salaries and fringe benefits required Grant Officer approval Discretionary Recipients

Several DOL exceptions at 2 CFR Revision of budget and program plans. –Award does not constitute prior approval of those items requiring prior approval Prior approval requests. –Must request prior approval actions at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the requested action Uniform Guidance-DOL Exception

Revision of budget and program plans including extension of the period of performance Must request prior approval for an extension to the period of performance Revision of budget and program plans approval from Grant Officers. Unless otherwise noted in the Grant Agreement, prior written approval must come from the Grant Officer (See (d)) Uniform Guidance-DOL Exception (2)

Required budget format –As contained in the grant agreement Assists to ensure budget controls in place –By object class as linked to recipient expenditure records Standard Form 424A (SF-424A)

Clearly written narrative Links appropriate resources to meet project objectives Budget in line with resources requested Qualifications of key staff sufficient to assure proper direction, management and completion of the project Budget Narrative

#14

Quantify planned actions & activities Facilitate communication –Including program and fiscal staff and management Allocate resources Benchmark in comparing actual results Basis for evaluating and improving performance Basis for course correction Budget Purposes

SF-424A Budget Categories

Administrative costs Program costs Cost limitations –E.g., support costs Match requirements Direct costs Cost allocation plan Additional Items to Track

Accounting records need to track to budget categories –Linking spreadsheets or chart of accounts Spending according to quarterly budget estimates Spending within approved line items –Awardee level –Subawardee level Budget Controls

Monitor costs and make adjustments –Pass-through entity level –Subrecipient levels Indication of potential modification needs –To redirect unused funds for more effective utilization –To make administrative adjustments for unanticipated changes Budget Controls (2)

#20

Components of Budget Analysis Compare actual results with budget plan –All budget categories –At least quarterly but more often if red flags –Identify significant variances –Analyze cause(s) of variances –Identify and take appropriate corrective action Conduct trend analysis over time –Compare results from one period to the next –Track impact of corrective actions Combine the analysis of financial and program performance indicators

Budget Analysis Worksheet

Total Expenditure Analysis

Tracking Overall Expenditures Overall expenditures –Is the grant “on-track”? –Spending too fast or too slow? –Are costs proportionate to outcomes? Where does data come from? –Grant books of account as reported

Administrative Costs Analysis

Tracking Administrative Expenditures Administrative expenditures –Are costs appropriately reported? –Are your costs within limitation? –Is your expenditure rate “too fast” or “too slow”? Where does data come from? –Grant books of account –ETA 9130

Match Expenditures

Tracking Match Expenditures Match expenditures (if required) –Are you reporting required match? –Is match generated at an appropriate rate? Where does the data come from? –SF-424A, Section C, Line 8e (Requirement) –Books of account as reported on ETA 9130 –Not applicable to formula or most discretionary programs

Performance Analysis

Enrollment or performance outcomes –“On-track” to meet service outcomes of grant? –Phased training transitions? –Curriculum development? –Performance standards? Where does the data come from? –Data provided on quarterly narrative reports –Data provided on the quarterly performance reports Tracking Outcomes

Combined analysis of financial and program results at the end of the 5 th quarter of a 12 quarter period of performance 41.67% of grant time elapsed 27.66% of total award expended 51.54% of allowable admin costs expended 34.68% of required match expended 42.75% of total planned enrollments 39.06% of planned training enrollments Combined Analysis

Are expenditures consistent with the budget? Have you exceeded any budget line item(s)? How?? –Planned vs. actual analysis –Trend analysis over time Analyze the Results

Grant start-up –Too slow or too fast –Single large item purchases Look for trends over time –Continued under or over spending –Comparisons with performance data Analysis should be performed quarterly Analyze the Results (2)

Determine compliance with budget control requirements Identify if budget modification may be needed: –Is there a need to move funds between categories? –Review requirements of and to determine if Grant Officer approval is required prior to moving funds among line items What do you do with results?

Consequences of Lack of Budget Controls Primarily: failure to compare planned expenditures to actual expenditures Failure to have link between budget categories and chart of accounts Failure to control expenditures –Modifications not requested timely –Over-expenditure or under-expenditure –Failure to link financial and program performance Failure to communicate Common Mistakes

On a scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), rate your knowledge and understanding of the following by circling the appropriate number in the final column of the sheet, labeled Post-Training, for each of the statements. 1.I am fully aware of the requirements for budget controls 2.I know the format of the federally required budget and how to obtain data 3.I understand the various methods for budget analysis 4.I know the grant actions that may result from budget analysis 5.I am aware of the consequences that arise from failure to comply #36

You should know and understand the components of the budget and how this is used to monitor program and financial activity The requirements for budget controls and analysis are contained in the Uniform Guidance There are a number of tools available for use in performing budget analysis All financial activity should also be compared to performance activity to achieve effectiveness Key Concepts

Not every program uses same definition Not all grants have same limits Includes Direct and Indirect Administrative Cost Reporting on 9130 Line 10f Administrative Costs

Administrative v. Program: Administrative Costs Costs associated with carrying out administrative and general management functions Accounting, Budgeting, Payroll, Procurement, Cash Management Facilities, Property Management, Insurance, Personnel Monitoring, Audit, Investigations, Incident Reports, Resolution activities General legal, Human Resources Automated systems, maintenance, equipment Any contract or sub-award that is “administrative” in function

Costs associated with carrying out administrative and general management functions Accounting, Budgeting, Payroll, Procurement, Cash Management Facilities, Property Management, Insurance, Personnel Monitoring, Audit, Investigations, Incident Reports, Resolution activities General legal, Human Resources Automated systems, maintenance, equipment Any contract or sub-award that is “administrative” in function Administrative v. Program: Administrative Costs

Costs directly associated with the functions dealing with participants and training are program costs Costs not considered administrative in definition or nature Costs related to participants; direction, supervision, management, tracking Costs related to training, providers, LMI, performance Cost directly associated with a program activity or participant Administrative v. Program: Program Costs

43

(b) provides the following criteria: Verifiable in recipient records Not used to support another Federally funded program Necessary and reasonable Allowable cost under Cost Principles Not paid with Federal funds Provided for in approved budget Conform to other applicable Uniform Guidance provisions DOL exception at Contributions are accounted for as funds are expended Basic Criteria for Match

(b) provides the following criteria: Verifiable in recipient records Not used to support another Federally funded program Necessary and reasonable Allowable cost under Cost Principles Not paid with Federal funds Provided for in approved budget Conform to other applicable Uniform Guidance provisions DOL exception at Contributions are accounted for as funds are expended Basic Criteria for Match

Non-Federal Cash expenditures –Funds or services provided and paid for by recipient or subrecipient from non-Federal funds –Payment for services that are allowable under the grant –3 rd party cash contributions to recipient that are spent by the recipient on allowable costs In-kind contributions –Products, space or services provided by a third party organization and not paid for by recipient or subrecipient Both cash and in-kind contributions must be for activities that are allowable under the grant Two Types of Match Expenditures

Personnel services not paid for with grant funds or other Federal funds –Grantee/subrecipient staff –3 rd party services not paid for with grant funds Equipment & supplies expended by the grant but not paid for with grant funds Unrecovered or unclaimed indirect costs Donated Space Other recipient/subrecipient resources used to support the grant but not charged to the grant Meets the standards for allowable costs to the grant but are not charged to grant funds Match Examples

Costs –Paid for with Federal funds –Used as match for another Federal program –Construction/purchase of facilities (WIA) Except YouthBuild –Expenditure of program income Match Exclusions

Personnel services –Volunteers or paid non-recipient staff Services provided by a third party Equipment & supplies donated for grant use Space donated for grant use Valuation standards in prior Circulars –29 CFR Part 97.24(b)(7) governments –29 CFR Part 95.23(c-h) non-profits Valuation standards in Uniform Guidance –2 CFR and.434 In-Kind Contribution Examples

Valuation of In-Kind and Personnel Services –Individual performing regular job activity Regular rate of pay + allocable fringe benefits –Individual performing other volunteer services Rates consistent with recipient pay for like work or Rates of pay for similar work in the local area Include reasonable amount for fringe benefits

Loaned equipment: Fair rental value Donated Supplies –Fair market value at time of donation Donated equipment or supplies –Fair market value at time of donation or –Depreciation [when item has long term value] Donated space use –Fair rental value of comparable space –Depreciation Donated buildings and land –Depreciation Valuation of In-Kind (2)

Source documentation (b) –Recorded in books of account –Included in audit scope & review Support for 3rd party contributions –Verifiable from subrecipient records or –Maintained by recipient –Methods used to value in-kind If not expended and not in the financial records, it does not qualify as match –Same type of financial records needed for match as for grant expenditures Documentation

Do not verify 3 rd party records to support claimed match –Need to monitor 3 rd parties do not retain match records –Need to collect records or ensure their proper storage Rely on letters of intent and undocumented assurances –Not acceptable documentation Staff costs as match not supported –Need time records to support Value of in-kind contributions not documented or supported –Apply same standard as with direct grant expenditures –Use valuation methods cited in this training Cannot be counted as BOTH match/leveraged resource and allowable grant cost Common Errors

If required match is not met: –Determination whether required by statute or regulation –If required under statute or regulation, federal share is proportionally reduced –Shortfall may affect future award potential Remember that required match must be reported on the ETA 9130 under line 10.j., Total recipient share required When leveraged resources are not met: ‒ No formal penalty ‒ May affect future funding Closeout

Recipient Share 10j. Total Recipient Share Required: = Required Match 10k. Recipient Share of Expenditures 10l. Recipient Share of Unliquidated Obligations 10m. Total Recipient Share [Calculated] 10n. Remaining Recipient Share to be Provided [Calculated]

10l. - Unliquidated Obligations 10m. - Total Recipient Share (Calculated) 10n. - Remaining Recipient Share to be Provided Balance of Match not yet provided. (Calculated) Recipient Share (2)

“Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.” -Mark Twain THANK YOU! PLEASE COMPLETE YOUR EVALUATIONS

58#