COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 - 21/09/2010 Slide 1 COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting Cambridge, September 20 th – 21 st, 2010 Determination of the conflict potential.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ex 7 Climbing Aim To enter and maintain a steady full power climb then to return to level flight at a predetermined altitude, also to enter and maintain.
Advertisements

Integration of HALE UAS into non-segregated airspace
Air Traffic Management
PROCEDURE DESIGN CRITERIA
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Influence of Structure on Complexity Management Strategies of Air Traffic.
International Civil Aviation Organization Hands-on Exercises Performance Based Planning and use of IFSET SIP/ASBU/Bangkok/2012-WP/32B Workshop on preparations.
Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) to support the predictability of future environmental crisis > 07/09/2010 Slide 1 Volcanic Ash Crisis Seminar.
Instrument Ground Training Module 4 & 5
Estimating Requirements and Costs of 4D ATM in High Density Terminal Areas Gunnar Schwoch DLR Institute of Flight Guidance Braunschweig, Germany ICNS 2012.
Detect and Avoid for UA COST ES nd – 04 th of September 2009 Dr. Dirk-Roger Schmitt - Dipl. Phys. Mirsad Delić German Aerospace Center.
Applications from packages I to III
Ames Research Center 1October 2006 Aviation Software Systems Workshop FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Aviation Software Systems.
Air Law 1.05 Airspace References: FTGU pages TC AIM.
Flight Performance, Stability and Control PDR Brian Barnett Rob Benner Ryan Srogi John Keune Alex Fleck.
Presented on REACT Workshop, Seville > June 24-25, 2008 Slide 1 > Future Air Ground Integration > A. Kuenz FAGI – Future Air Ground Integration Alexander.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
AN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL PERSPECTIVE ON VOLCANIC ASH HOW TO DEAL WITH IT.
Satellites enabling the integration in non- segregated airspace of UAS in Europe Dipl. Phys. Mirsad Delić, Dr. Henk Hesselink Dipl. Ing. Frank Morlang,
Air Traffic Control System Team #3. Introduction The purpose of air-traffic control is to assure safe separation between en-route aircraft and the safe.
Sep 2012 Lesson 3.4 Air Law Air Traffic Rules. Reference From the Ground Up Chapter 5.1: Air Traffic Rules and Procedures Pages
USER-DEFINED RADAR DATA ANALYSIS FAA Headquarters Office of System Safety Washington, DC September 5, 2001 Austin Digital Inc. and Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
AERO2K Global Aviation Emissions Inventories for 2002 and 2025.
AIRSPACE What’s old –What’s new!.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Rob Eagles Director ASIA PACIFIC Safety, Operations & Infrastructure.
Study Continuous Climb Operations
Section 03 - Altimetry (cont) Lesson 09
COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > /09/2010 Slide 1 COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting Cambridge, September 20 th – 21 st, 2010 Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 rd -25 th April 2007 ASAS LC&P Applications in Radar Airspace: Operational Scenario Example and Fast-Time Simulation Results.
Leading Cadet Training
Clustering ASAS Applications ASAS-TN2 First Workshop, Malmö 26 to 28 September 2005 Fraser McGibbon BAE Systems.
Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR3/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG WP2 Current situation analysis – Aircraft perspective Philippe Louyot (CENA)
ATC1 Air Traffic Control ATC2 Purpose of ATC Safety — Conflict Avoidance — Separation of aircraft Visual Flight Rules Instrument Flight Rules Efficiency.
Ames Research Center 1 FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Banavar Sridhar Shon Grabbe First Annual Workshop NAS-Wide Simulation.
IFly project: Airborne Self Separation as basis for advanced en route ATM Henk A.P. Blom iFly coordinator National Aerospace Laboratory NLR
Lecture 10: Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
Optimum Airspace Partitioning for Center/Sector Boundary Design Arash Yousefi George L. Donohue Research Sponsors: NASA ARC, FAA, Metron Aviation Inc.
DIRECTION TECHNIQUE CERTIFICATION Paris, April 2008 SL ASAS TN2 Workshop ppt ASAS & Business.
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
LECTURE 4: ICAO CHART requirements
EMISSIONS OPERATIONAL-MEASURES WORKING GROUP CAEP WG-4 REDUCING FUEL BURN THROUGH IMPROVED OPERATIONAL MEASURES Colloquium on Environmental Aspects of.
1 ILA Berlin - May 2008 Marc Brochard - EEC EPATS ATM General Requirements & relative issues to be solved.
1 Airborne Separation Assistance Systems (ASAS) - Summary of simulations Joint ASAS-TN2/IATA/AEA workshop NLR, Amsterdam, 8 th October 2007 Chris Shaw.
National Airspace System
Airspace 1 st LT Zouhar Jakub 12 th September 2014.
FAA Support for DoD’s UAS AI Joint Test Joint University Program (JUP) TIM Al Schwartz, Modeling and Simulation Branch, ANG-C55 January 21, 2016.
ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.
ADVANCED AIR TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES DISTRIBUTED AIR/GROUND-TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 5 th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar Budapest June 2003.
AAE 451 Group IV -- January 31, BAT Co. 01/31/06 Slide 2 System Requirements Review Content Introduction Business Case Competing Existing Aircraft.
Navigational Aids. Discussion What would you do if you lost sight of land and your compass didn’t work? What clues might help you go in the right direction?
UML DESIGN By: J Kamala Ramya Y Devika
Information Support for Air Traffic Management in the SuperSector: Color-Saturation Coding of Aircraft Altitude & Effects on Air Traffic Controller Performance.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Universal Flight Plan Translator. The purpose of this presentation is to look at each section of a Universal International Flight Plan and provide you.
NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURE DESIGN
Vertical, lateral separations based on time / distance
AIR TRAFFIC ONTROL.
Assignment of Cruising Levels
A case study at Gothenburg Landvetter Airport
1.05 Airspace References: FTGU pages TC AIM
Normal Hills Route Departure Times from Normal Hills
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
SEPARATION Module 1, Topic 1.
Hands-on Exercises Performance Based Planning and use of IFSET
Crossing and Passing MA-AFAS
Hands-on Exercises Performance Based Planning and use of IFSET
Magesh Mani BSACIST.
New Entrants, Commercial Space and Changing Airspace Management
Air Traffic Control System
Presentation transcript:

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > /09/2010 Slide 1 COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting Cambridge, September 20 th – 21 st, 2010 Determination of the conflict potential in case of use of UAS in non-segregated airspace Dipl.-Phys. Mirsad Delić (DLR, Institute of Flight Guidance)

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 2 Content Simulation environment Investigated parameters Results Conclusion

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 3 Simulation environment DLR Traffic Simulator Real-time and fast-time simulation Physically correct simulation of aircraft through the use of BADA performance data Used scenario is based on radar data of a high traffic operations day in Germany in September 2008 More than aircraft movements

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 4 Simulation environment DLR Traffic Simulator

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 5 Investigated parameters (1) UA Types HALE: High Altitude Long Endurance MALE: Medium Altitude Long Endurance Altitude HALE: ft (12500m) MALE: ft (7500m) Climb strategies HELIX: Climb in a helix-like structure above the airfield / airport DIRECT: Climb along the cruising route

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 6 Investigated parameters (2) Separation Horizontal: 5NM, vertical: 1000ft (today’s standard) Horizontal: 10NM, vertical: 1500ft Horizontal: 10NM, vertical: 2000ft Variation of takeoff time between 5:00 am and 10:00 pm in steps of twenty minutes Different mission scenarios have been investigated: National: Schleswig/Jagel ► Ingolstadt/Manching International: Schleswig/Jagel ► Paris - Orly National (civil):Egelsbach ► Schleswig/Jagel

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 7 Results (1) Relation between HALE and MALE UA

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 8 Results (2) Relation between HELIX and DIRECT climb strategy Used scenario: MALE UA, Schleswig / Jagel > Ingolstadt / Manching, Separation: 10NM, 2000ft

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 9 Results (3) Relation between HELIX and DIRECT climb strategy Used scenario: MALE UA, Egelsbach > Schleswig / Jagel, Separation: 10NM, 2000ft (Egelsbach is located in the vincinity of Frankfurt/Main Airport)

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 10 Results (4) Relevance of takeoff time

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 11 Results (5) Relevance of takeoff time

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 12 Conclusion Number of conflicts is highly depending on Selected altitude Climb strategy Departure airport and surrounding airports Crossing of highly frequented ATS routes Recommendation is depending on the mission scenario Simulation shall be used to create an assistive mission planning tool for integration into DLR’s Generic Ground Control Station efforts

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 13 GCS mission planning tool Extension to existing DLR simulation environment Requires input of important parameters Waypoints Traffic data Payload Take-Off time Cruise altitude Simulation checks for potential conflicts based on given parameters Recommendations of solutions if high conflict potential is found

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 14 Thank you. Questions?

COST ES0802 MC/WG Meeting > 20 – 21/09/2010 Slide 15 Thank you. Questions?