Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner Software Tools for Commissioning Robin Lauckner 28 th March, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jan Uythoven, AB/BTLHCCWG, 3 May 2006 Page GeV Commissioning Machine Protection Needs to be commissioned to: Prevent damage with the used, higher.
Advertisements

1 15 April 2010: Post Mortem Analysis by M.Zerlauth Automatic POWERING EVENT Analysis Adam, Arek, Gert-Jan, Ivan, Knud, Hubert, Markus, Nikolai, Nikolay,
Overview of Data Management solutions for the Control and Operation of the CERN Accelerators Database Futures Workshop, CERN June 2011 Zory Zaharieva,
TE/MPE/MI OP section meeting 29 th September 2009 HCC 2009 Frequently Asked Questions 0v1 M. Zerlauth.
The purpose of this Software Requirements Specification document is to clearly define the system under development, that is, the International Etruscan.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Technology Education Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
IMMW14, Ferney Voltaire, September 2005 (slide 1/35) Experience with configurable acquisition software for magnetic measurement.
W. Sliwinski – eLTC – 7March08 1 LSA & Safety – Integration of RBAC and MCS in the LHC control system.
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project CSCM Mini Review Powering Implementation H. Thiesen 30 November 2011.
Powering Group of Circuit Doubts and proposals of the procedure reviewing team (Gianluigi, Rob, Sandrine, Matteo, Boris) Ref document: LHC-MPP-HCP-071.
LARP Collaboration April 26 th 2006 The Commissioning of the Technical Systems of LHC 1.The final validation that all the collider components/systems.
Copyright © 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved. Managing Concurrent Requests.
Components of Database Management System
André Augustinus 10 September 2001 DCS Architecture Issues Food for thoughts and discussion.
Operational tools Laurette Ponce BE-OP 1. 2 Powering tests and Safety 23 July 2009  After the 19 th September, a re-enforcement of access control during.
TE-MPE-EP, RD, 06-Dec QPS Data Transmission after LS1 R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP TIMBER PM WinCC OA Tsunami warning:
Powering of the Superconducting Circuits: Procedures and Strategies for Circuit Validation Antonio Vergara on behalf of the Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
LHC Hardware Commissioning Review May 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 LHC Hardware Commissioning Review Contribution ID: 20 – Quality assurance and.
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
3 Copyright © 2004, Oracle. All rights reserved. Working in the Forms Developer Environment.
Training LHC Powering R. Denz Quench Protection System R. Denz AT-MEL.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
Interlocks for Magnet Protection System Iván Romera Ramírez, Markus Zerlauth - CERN.
HC Review F. Rodriguez-Mateos Powering tests The outcome of the work conducted within HCWG and many discussions among colleagues.
Hardware Commissioning Tools Robin. AB-CO TC 8th February 2007Hardware Commissioning Tools - RJL2 Summary Hardware Commissioning View Slides from Antonio.
Hardware Commissioning Review, Markus Zerlauth, 11 th July CO deliverables for HWC – lessons learnt and the proposed way ahead Markus Zerlauth,
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
WebDat: A Web-based Test Data Management System J.M.Nogiec January 2007 Overview.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
TE/MPE activities currently planed for YETS Reiner Denz, Knud Dalherup-Petersen, Markus Zerlauth & Bruno Puccio YETS coordination meeting.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
SAFETY DURING HARDWARE COMMISSIONING, 18 October 2007, D. Bozzini, AT/MEL-EM 1 Safety during Hardware Commissioning Davide Bozzini on behalf of the ELQA.
1 15 April 2010: Post Mortem Analysis by M.Zerlauth Automated analysis of Powering Events – Progress update.
OVERVIEW OF THE NEW FEATURES PVSS SCADA SYSTEMS USED DURING HCC MP3 - Frédéric BERNARD.
PM System Architecture Front-Ends, Servers, Triggering Ingredients Workshop on LHC Post Mortem Session 1 – What exists - PM System, Logging, Alarms Robin.
AB/CO Review, Interlock team, 20 th September Interlock team – the AB/CO point of view M.Zerlauth, R.Harrison Powering Interlocks A common task.
European Organization for Nuclear Research Industrial Controls Group Workshop on QPS Software Layer, 26/08/15
DIAMON Project Project Definition and Specifications Based on input from the AB/CO Section leaders.
16-17 January 2007 Post-Mortem Workshop Logging data in relation with Post-Mortem and archiving Ronny Billen AB-CO.
Conclusions on UPS powering test and procedure I. Romera Acknowledgements: V. Chareyre, M. Zerlauth 86 th MPP meeting –
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
MPP Workshop Status of Powering Interlocks I. Romera on behalf of MPE-MS MPP Workshop, 12 June 2015, I. Romera (TE-MPE)1.
HWC Review – Sequencer Vito Baggiolini AB/CO, with the team: Carlos Castillo, Daniele Raffo, Roman Gorbonosov.
MPP Meeting 07/03/2007 MPP Main Ring Magnet Performance Panel Meeting Wednesday 7th March 2007 Agenda: 1)Matters arising 2)Recommendations for the case.
An invitation to an open discussion We are team reviewing its performance globally We want to help each other to reach the objectives We know the other.
The prototype test String 2 May 13, 20082Roberto Saban – Academic Training Lecture 1 – Why LHC Hardware Commissioning?
 Automation Strategies for LHC System Tests and Re-Commissioning after LS1 Kajetan Fuchsberger TE-MPE LS1 Workshop On behalf of the TE-MPE-MS Software.
AB-CO Review September Session on circuit commissioning Session on circuit commissioning Post-Mortem requirements F. Rodríguez-Mateos on behalf.
MPE Workshop 14/12/2010 Post Mortem Project Status and Plans Arkadiusz Gorzawski (on behalf of the PMA team)
PLCs at CERN for machine protection and access interlocks Session: Machine Protection and interlock systems at different labs I. Romera Ramírez (CERN /
Training LHC Powering – Blanca Perea Solano From Individual System Tests to Powering to Nominal Blanca Perea on behalf of Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
H2LC The Hitchhiker's guide to LSA Core Rule #1 Don’t panic.
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
LHC Post Mortem Workshop - 1, CERN, January 2007 (slide 1/52) AB-CO Measurement & Analysis Present status of the individual.
Working in the Forms Developer Environment
R. Denz, A. Gomez Alonso, AT-MEL-PM
Powering LHC magnets version 30/3/2007.
How SCADA Systems Work?.
Powering the LHC Magnets
J. Uythoven for the MPE-MI & MS Teams
The Control System For LHC Hardware Commissioning
Status of Magnet Setup Cycling for LHC
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
+ many slides from various colleagues (KH, Rudiger, Paul, …)
Commissioning of the LHC superconducting magnets systems: Why an LHC Hardware Commissioning? Specificity and complexity of this machine Roberto Saban.
Review of hardware commissioning
Presentation transcript:

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner Software Tools for Commissioning Robin Lauckner 28 th March, 2007

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner2 Summary Control System Architecture Sequence of Tests for Commissioning Overview of the Software Circuits, SOCs and Tests in the Control System Applications –Sequencer –SOC editor –Circuit synoptic –Post Mortem Analysis (PMA). People roles and authorisation

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner3 Control of a circuit Quench Detector Quench Heater PS PIC Quench Detector Quench Heater PS Power Converter Energy Extraction QPS Controller Quench Detector FGCFGC SCADA SERVERS APPLICATION SERVERS PM SERVERS OPERATOR CONSOLES Tunnel UA83 SR8 CCC WORLDFIP Bus Ethernet WORLDFIP Front End PLC

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner4 Sequence of Commissioning Tests There are three main phases for cold circuit commissioning 1.Short Circuit Tests - warm 2.Interlock Tests – during and after cooldown 3.Powering to Nominal - cold Phases consist of several tests that may vary depending on the circuit under test The short circuit tests are the same for all cold circuits except the 60A orbit correctors that are powered for a shorter time. The interlock tests to be performed on a circuit depend on the interlock type, (see M. Zerlauth). Interlock type depends on the hardware interfaces between the PIC, PC and QPS systems. The sequence of tests during powering to nominal depends on the circuit type, (see R. Schmidt). Circuit type depends on the energy stored in the electrical circuit, and way of protecting magnets and current leads

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner5 PC QPSPICPC CIRCUIT_QUENCH POWERING_FAILURE PC_PERMIT PC_FAST_ABORT DISCHARGE_REQUEST PC_DISCHARGE_REQUEST Interlock Type A (=13kA main + IT) QPSPICPC CIRCUIT_QUENCH POWERING_FAILURE PC_PERMIT PC_FAST_ABORT Interlock Type B1 (=600A EE, 600A no EE, 600A no EE crowbar + all dipoles of IPQD) QPSPICPC CIRCUIT_QUENCH POWERING_FAILURE PC_PERMIT_B2 PC_FAST_ABORT Interlock Type B2 (=all quads of IPQD) PICPC POWERING_FAILURE PC_PERMIT Interlock Type C (= A) Interlock Types PC_PERMIT_B1 Markus Zerlauth

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner6 Sequence of Interlock Tests Test NameInterlock Type AB1B2C PC_PERMITxxxx POWERING_FAILURExxxx CIRCUIT_QUENCH_VIA_QPSxxx PIC_FAST_ABORT_REQUEST_VIA_PICxxx PC_DISCHARGE_REQUEST_VIA_PCx PIC_DISCHARGE_REQUEST_VIA_PICx

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner7 Superconducting Circuit Types 13 kA Main: Main dipoles and main quadrupoles (24 circuits) IT: Inner triplet quadrupoles (8 circuits) IPQD: Individual powered insertion main magnets (94 circuits) Extraction of the energy stored in the magnets is performed by the QPS system 600 A EE:most 600 A corrector magnets powered in series (202 circuits) Extraction of the energy stored in the magnets is performed with an energy extraction unit back to back to the power converter rack 600 A no EE crowbar: most individual 600 A trim quadrupoles (136 circuits) Extraction of the energy stored in the magnets is performed with the power converter 600 A no EE: inner triplet correctors (56 circuits) No energy extraction unit required A: 80 A and 120 A (300 circuits) No energy extraction unit required, connected to the Powering Interlock Controller 60A: 60 A (752 circuits) No energy extraction unit required, not connected to the Powering Interlock Controller Rüdiger Schmidt

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner8 Sequence of Powering Tests

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner9 Goals of the Commissioning Software Two goals to achieve during cold circuit commissioning are: Key features for meeting these goals are: Drive each circuit through the appropriate sequence of tests Identify any non-conformity of the protection systems before it becomes critical The data describing the circuits and the commissioning tests in the operational database A task sequencer that executes validated tests reproducibly Software for analysis of tests results so that experts and operators can make the correct interpretations and decisions after each test. The control software for circuit commissioning aims to help the operator reach these goals while performing the tests efficiently.

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner10 Control System View of a Circuit Each LHC circuit has a description in the operational database. A circuit has a name, a circuit type, an interlock type, the name of the last test passed, the short circuit status, a flag indicating that the circuit is locked (and may not be powered). Tests that are not to be run on this circuit are also defined – cancelled tests This information is used to manage the sequence of tests of this circuit and it is important that the responsible people ( not database team) maintain the data accurately. Design and test data are also stored for each circuit: I_NOMINAL, I_INTERIM1, … Circuit Name Circuit type Interlock type Last test passed Short status Is locked Cancelled tests UA 83 Quench Detector Quench Heater PS PIC Quench Detector Quench Heater PS Power Converter Tunnel Energy Extraction QPS Controller Quench Detector Arc cryostat DFBAO

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner11 Set of Circuits - SOC SOCs are collections of, 1 or more, circuits that are represented by attributes in the operational database. SOCs are created, deleted or edited freely. Each SOC has its own name, the names of the member circuits and records to indicate whether it is operational and whether a console has reserved the SOC for running tests. Operational SOCs are logged and have fixed displays made available. During commissioning tests are performed on SOCs. The circuits in a reserved SOC may not be used by other consoles. SOC Name Circuits Operational Reserved

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner12 Control System View of a Test Test Name Order Short Status Circuit types Interlock Types Tests are also stored in the operational database. Their attributes are the test name, the order in the sequence of tests, which short status is required, and the circuit types and interlock types for which the test is applied. Not all tests are known in the control system (entered in operational database). Some are known but no procedure is defined and the test is performed manually – “hurdles”. Such tests usually concern many circuits i.e. CRYO_START is TRUE, which pertains to Powering Subsector.

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner13 Context and Data Flow LHC Functional Layout DB (Machine Layout) LSA DB (Operational Data) Set of Circuits Circuit Information Test parameters Test plan (tests done / to be done) Test outcome (success/failure) MTF DB (Assets) Test Software Journals, Analysis (files) [ upload every 2 h] Circuit Information, design data [ changes copied once / day ] [ created after each test ] [ after each test ] [ before each test ] MTF sequence, step names [ updated manually on change ] Vito Baggiolini Machine Layout Assets control Configuration Operational Data Ronny Billen

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner14 Automated Test Procedures (Sequencer) PVSS-CMW Interface ETHERNET PVSS-CMW Interface CMW WorldFIP PC_DISCHARGE_ REQUEST QPS Power Converter PC_PERMIT PC_FAST_ABORT POWERING_FAILURE PIC CIRCUIT_QUENCH DISCHARGE_ REQUEST Operational DB Interacting with the systems PM Data PVSS Supervision Front Ends Markus Zerlauth

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner15 The Sequencer The Sequencer executes sequences of tasks Essential tool for commissioning and operating LHC –Guides operators through sequences of tasks –Executes sequences manually (step by step / task by task) or automatically What is the Sequencer? The sequencer executes on a central server, it can execute sequences launched and monitored by multiple consoles The sequencer creates a journal and informs operator of execution status The sequencer supplies GUI panels specifically developed for hardware commissioning, these display SOCs, circuits and tests The sequencer reads the sequence of tests from the operational database Features Sequencer Sequence = Commissioning Test

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner16 Sequencer GUI – operator view

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner17 Sequencer GUI – code view

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner18 The SOC Editor The SOC editor creates and edits SOCs It is the tool for organising the commissioning work each day The SOC editor also edits the electrical circuit information held in the operational database The sequencer runs tests on SOCs What is the SOC Editor? Provides a powerful search interface for assembling sets of circuits Allows the operator to manage console reservations and the operational status of the SOCs Protected access to Short Status, Locking, Cancelled Tests and the Last Test Passed pointer The same methods are used by the SOC editor and the sequencer to establish the sequence of tests for each circuit Features

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner19 SOC Editor Create GUI A Set of Circuits is being created for the commissioning of the circuits of interlock type B2 whose power converters are located in UJ63. These circuits have completed the 24 Hour Heat run and been equipped with low current shorts ready for the PIC1 tests.

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner20 SOC Editor and Sequencer - Setting up The SOC has been made operational to start logging services and reserved by a console. The sequencer offers 1 test from the sequence of tests for RQ10.L6. Circuits are tested one at a time

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner21 SOC Editor – Editing Circuit Information After a test failure the circuit is locked and may not be powered again. Mr. Circuit privileges are required to unlock the circuit. At present this action is not critical but later in the commissioning authorisation will be checked.

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner22 The Circuit Synoptic The Circuit Synoptic gives a commissioning overview of the LHC electrical circuits A panel monitors the interactions between the QPS equipment, the PIC and the Power Converters in a circuit From this monitor the operator can drill down to the supervision of the QPS and PIC and also access a web page displaying the PC controller What is the Circuit Synoptic?

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner23 Analysing Tests During PIC tests the circuit synoptic is used for on-line monitoring of circuits Periodic data for long term storage is stored in the Logging Database and can be recalled by the generic browser – Timber More detailed periodic data is stored for a week in the Measurement Database and can be browsed with – Meter Transient data is collected on the Post Mortem Server A series of tools is under development for Post Mortem analysis of periodic and transient data after aborts of electrical circuits These tools, so-called PMA, are being adapted and used for analysis of PIC tests

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner24 PMA Display For each commissioning test during PIC1 a fixed set of signals has been retrieved and displayed using the PM Analysis tools. The display has windows for analogue and digital signals. On the left is the result of a Powering Failure test. The sequence provoked a powering failure in the converter. The operator must check the signal transactions following this action and comment. This data is stored in the control system and sent to the MTF as an image file by the sequence.

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner25 The SOC Editor Functions & Rights 1.Specification of new SOCs FE 2.Create new SOCOP 3.Edit existing SOCOP a)Release reservation b)Change operational status c)Delete SOC d)Add / remove circuits 4.Edit Electrical Circuits a)Set short statusFE b)Lock a circuitOP c)Unlock a circuitMrC, EIC 1 d)Set last test passedMrC, FE 2 e)Add / remove testMrC Footnotes 1 EIC should not perform this action if locking results from analysis criterion failure 2 FE should only report 24 hrs run to enable PIC1 to start Under discussion

Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner26 Glossary Explained here: Circuit, Control System view Circuit Synoptic Post Mortem Analysis Sequence of Tests Sequencer, sequence SOC Editor SOC, set of circuits Test, Control System view More information can be found here: and in SACEC Minutes: