26 Aug 2008PC 325 1 Shield walls – extend the length of channel – will ‘pull’ field x y Coil Centred coil + 2 walls  X – Y asymmetry Off-centre coil +

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

RFQ Matcher. What am I doing this time?! Concerned that modulations and matcher affect field flatness and frequency These are very small features How.

Advertisements

CM-18 June The Measurement and Monitoring of the Field from the MICE Magnets Michael A Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, USA Frank Filthaut.

Magnetic measurements of MICE target stator Ben Shepherd MICE target meeting 11 October 2010.

1 26 Nov 2010 SOLID ABSORBERS Solid absorbers will provide first cooling demonstration –This is important for a number of reasons! Can use only solids.

OPTICS UPDATE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 3 August 2004.

1 PID status MICE Analysis phone conference Rikard Sandström.

1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.

MICE VC 17 Aug MICE MAGNETIC FIELDS & SHIELDS J. H. Cobb & H. Witte Oxford University Magnet fields for MICE (VI) calculated including magnetic shield.

Downstream transversal sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE detector meeting.

10 October 2006 MICE CM-16 at RAL 1 Distributed versus Lumped Coupling Magnets Michael A. Green and Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley.

1 AFSWG Mtg 1 Aug 2003 Elwyn Baynham RAL Eddy Current Summary Work done by Oxford/RAL Group Contributors Holger Witte Jim Rochford.

Status report about the e-  identifier Study of shielding against the stray magnetic field at the downstream end of the spectrometer F. Huveneers, Gh.

1 Fringe fields for stage V Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, Jim Rochford RAL MICE Video Conference, 9 April 2003.

1. Optical matching in MICE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 June 2004 Constraints Software MICE proposal mismatch MICE Note 49 (September 2004, Bob.

Talk outline 1 st talk: –Magnetic forces –Quench in the absorber cryostat 2 nd talk: –Shielding of magnetic fringe fields.

March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Beamline Performance with New Magnet Descriptions Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.

Solenoid Magnetic Field Measurement. MICE solenoid includes 5 coils First solenoid expected at FNAL for magnetic field measurements in April Measurements.

8/07/ J.M. Rey1 J.M. Rey CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM Saclay The different (magnetic) ways to run the MICE experiment.

1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.

1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 28 June 2005.

1 Chris Rogers MICE Collaboration Meeting 11th Feb 2005 Tracking and Cooling performance of G4MICE.

(FEA) Analysis P J Smith University of Sheffield 27 th November 2008.

Diffuser Studies Chris Rogers, IC/RAL MICE VC 09 March 2005.

MICE magnetic measurements Sequence of events and MICE hall movements Alain Blondel – 10-April 2012 revision from 13 December 2012.

Page 1 Christian Grefe, DESY FLC Status of PCMAG fieldmapping analysis Annual EUDET Meeting Paris, Status of PCMAG fieldmapping analysis Christian.

MICE CM30 Magnetic Shielding Update Mike Courthold 6 th July

Timothy Carlisle, Oxford CM 28. Step 3 Matching Step 3  Step 3 rematched for 830 mm spool piece  Calc. B(z) & BetaFn with the following:  Minimize.

Induction and Inductance Chapter 30 Magnetic Flux.

MICE CM30 Magnetic Shielding Update Mike Courthold 6 th July

Magnetic Induction April 1, 2005 Happenings Short Quiz Today New Topic: Magnetic Induction (Chapter 30) Quiz NEXT Friday Exam #3 – April 15 th. Should.

Magnetic Shielding Issues Roy Preece STFC - RAL. Overview Issues Items in harms way – Step IV Step IV mitigation plan –Racks –Compressors Current / Future.

MICE CM32 8 th February 2012 Magnet Group Report Vicky Bayliss Victoria Blackmore John Cobb Mike Courthold Roy Preece Mike Zisman 1.

1 W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting Feb , PSI W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting.

Physics E1-E6 tests are in your folders on front desk. Printouts of all grades and your midterm will be given next week 141 possible No. of students

1 Layout and Installation MICE Collaboration Meeting, RAL, October 27-29, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Paul Drumm, Matthew Hills, Yury Ivanyushenkov,

Some Thoughts on Magnetic Measurements for MICE Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA 94720, USA.

1 Forces Yury Ivanyushenkov RAL. 2 Goal: find maximal (static and dynamical) possible forces in MICE magnetic system. Method: calculation of axial magnetic.

Research student: Gustavo A. Gandara Montano

COBRA Magnet Status W. Ootani June 27th, 2006 MEG Review W. Ootani June 27th, 2006 MEG Review.

18 December, 2007 Analysis PC 18 Dec PIDer’s Question of Friday 14 Dec: Dear John and Marco, would you be able to give us a first preliminary ball-park.

11 Nov 2008PC Analysis PC Schedule 2008 Tuesdays fortnightly 9 September  23 September  2 October  CM22  11 November  25 November 9 December.

MICE CM31 Magnetic Shielding Update Mike Courthold 1.

PID PC 7th Sept MICE MAGNETIC FIELDS & SHIELDS J. H. Cobb & H. Witte Oxford University Magnet fields for MICE (VI) calculated including magnetic.

3 June 2009J. H. Cobb 1 ANALYSIS SUMMARY CM24 Agenda for Analysis parallel session at CM Sunday 31 May 14:00.

1 Search for Worst-Case Forces MICE Video Conference, September 8, 2004 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department,

14 Aug 2008PC New task at last meeting (29 July): MICE magnets will be bolted to steel plates on floor of MICE Hall What – if any – is the effect.

2 July 2002Realistic Fields for a Ring Cooler Magnet System -- S.Kahn Page 1 Realistic Fields for a Ring Cooler Steve Kahn 2 July 2002 NuFact’02 Meeting.

Mapping the Magnetic Field of the ATLAS Solenoid Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester ATLAS experiment + solenoid Objectives Field mapping machine.

Initial Results from a 3D Magnetic Model of the Injector Cryomodule Entrance Shield Jim Crittenden ERL General Meeting, 2 April 2009 Post-meeting annotations:

Beam dynamics simulations with the measured SPARC gun- solenoid field G. Bazzano, P. Musumeci, L. Picardi, M. Preger, M. Quattromini, C. Ronsivalle, J.

FIELD MAPPING V. Blackmore CM38 23rd February /70.

1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.

CM Nov 2009 DOES MICE NEED STEP III ? Somewhat hard to understand MICE Schedule… –If the gods are (un)kind it’s possible that SS1, SS2 & FC1 are.

Example Problem #2 Maxwell 2D Hall Sensor. T7_3D, pg. 2 7/21/02 Hall Sensor Description: The Hall sensor works similarly to the vr sensor, except that.

Magnetic Shielding Studies of the LHCb RICH Photon Detectors Mitesh Patel, Marcello Losasso, Thierry Gys (CERN )

MICE Magnetic Modelling CM 36 IIT 17 th – 19 th June 2013 P. J. Smith.

MAGNET MAPPING J. Cobb V. Blackmore (not responsible for the content of this talk) 27 September 2017.

Interaction Region and Detector

Magnetic System Overview Solenoid and Anti-DID

Why do we need to know the fields / map the magnets?

MAENTOUCH Simulation Giles Quéméner – IN2P3/LPC Caen

Magnetic System Overview Solenoid and DID

Preliminary Electron Transportation Channel Project for EIC Facility (FAIR, Germany) Dmitry Berkaev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Russia, ,

Validating Magnets Using Beam

Effect of Reduced Focus Coil Current on Step IV and Step VI

C. Rogers, ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Impact of Magnet Performance on the Physics Program of MICE

Calculation of the Stress intensity factor with CINT command in 3D

KICKER STATUS G-2 meeting March 5, 2014

Induction and Inductance Chapter 30

Presentation transcript:

26 Aug 2008PC Shield walls – extend the length of channel – will ‘pull’ field x y Coil Centred coil + 2 walls  X – Y asymmetry Off-centre coil + 2 walls  X (= L-R) asymmetry also Hard to estimate Need 3D field calculation with iron (mirrors) ~ – 4.6m + 3.7m

26 Aug 2008PC Looked here z = 5800mm (only place we looked) 3D Opera Observed A ~ 8% r=10mm A ~ 4% r= 20mm  Xo ~ 0.4mm (need to check not ‘mesh effect’) 0.4mm doesn’t seem bad BUT 1) looked in region (5800mm) screened by current sheet 2) region between FC & CC not screened 3) CC is largest coil – r = 0.8m  expect much larger effects ??? I am in contact with Jim R. He will re-run 3D calc. (had some incorrect J’s) & we shall look again at other z’s I expect big effects! TBC

26 Aug 2008PC D Model of MICE + Hall shields and beams etc. (From Jim Rochford) Everything shown is either coil or ferromagnetic Compare field components Bx,By, Bz on axis with and without the iron Difference = Error field on axis

26 Aug 2008PC Bz on axis Flip Mode, 240 MeV/c Bx, By on axis (Gauss) 1G = Tesla should = 0 Max Br ~ 34 G = 3 x T Undoubtedly major effect from Coupling Coils at +/ m It takes ~ 24 hours to compute one set of 2700 points.....

26 Aug 2008PC Does this matter? A stupid calculation using error field alone gives ~20mm displacement for 200 MeV/c muon starting on axis  Big problem (but dumb calculation) Various reasons to think it does / does not. Various reasons to think it does not.  Need to track with a field map ! Problem – how to get field map in a finite time?? Possible Solution ‘Image Coils’ – but shield wall geometry is complicated To be continued