Student Outcomes (SO) 2013. Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO). Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.
Advertisements

Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Value Added Assessment RAD Reading Assessment Teacher Moderation Greg Miller Supervisor of Assessment Lynda Gellner Literacy Consultant Juanita Redekopp.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Amphitheater Career Ladder Orientation
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Student Achievement Plan A Guide for Development.
Are any of these questions familiar? How do teachers know what to teach? How do we know when a student is ready to advance? What is an effective way to.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Professional Growth Plan / Professional Development Guide.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Orientation Winthrop University-School Partnership Network Orientation.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Implementation Overview and Orientation. Goals for today Provide an overview of the plans and goals for your Odyssey implementation Provide necessary.
Community Planning Training 5- Community Planning Training 5-1.
Gronlund, Chapter 10 Burke, Chapter 4
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Collaborative Action Research Option (2013) Staff Development.
OPGES online session Mid year review January 11, 2016.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Dissemination Training
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Teacher Evaluation Process
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Highly Capable Education
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Welcome to the session on Student Growth
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Student Outcomes (SO) 2013

Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement

Program Expectations for Student Outcomes Professional Growth Completion of this Power Point orientation by August 16, 2013 and read all materials on the web site. Completion of an Individual Professional Growth Plan Participation in one (1) Student Outcomes Module training session Participation in three (3) dialogue meetings with Instructional Support Leader Participation in a Collaborative Group led by CAR teachers

Maintenance and completion of a teacher portfolio, professionally presented and organized Evaluate progress on Teacher Evaluation Rubric for Student Outcomes Mastery To meet the standard for Student Outcomes and advance to Entry to Collaborative Action Research the following year, teachers must reach Practitioner or Mastery on the Teacher Evaluation Rubric for Student Outcomes Mastery by Dialogue #3 Meeting. Adherence to all due dates Program Expectations for Student Outcomes Continued

Instructional Skills Expectations for Student Outcomes (SO) Instruction is modified and adjusted based upon analysis of student data Amphitheater Teacher Performance Evaluation System (ATPES) evaluations (formal and informal) conducted by site administrator

Student Outcomes Expectations for Student Outcomes (SO) Development and implementation of year-long Student Achievement Plan based on AZ State Standards/Common Core Standards Class Data Sheet for entire population with a minimum of three (3) assessments (pre, mid, post) Completion of the Student Data Analysis and Teacher Reflection Forms (3) Evidence of 21st Century Skill(s) in student work explained on Student Work Sample Cover Sheets

Your Career Ladder Support System Includes : Instructional Support Leaders (ISL) Collaborative Action Research group members Team members Career Ladder Website for Student Outcomes ladder/student-outcomes-(so) aspx