Chapter 8 War and Strife. Security Issues Global trends, see: –Human security.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professor Brendan Howe Department Chair Graduate School of International Studies Ewha Womans University.
Advertisements

Promoting Cooperative Solutions for Space Security 1 Is Current International Humanitarian Law Sufficient to Regulate a Potential.
Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2010 Global Social Problems: War and Terrorism This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The.
International Law and Armed Conflict MA Course Lecture: Conduct of Contemporary Warfare.
The Ethics of War Spring Main normative questions When, if ever, is resort to war justified? What can we permissibly do in war? Who are responsible.
© SEESAC, SALW Control Name? Organisation? Event? Date?
1. 2
Purpose of War.
1 INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST GROUPS & ARMED CONFLICT.
Internal Armed Conflict and the Law
The Language of the Military Profession
Realism.
Neo-realists – neo-liberals The debate to date. Neo-realism Neo-Liberalist.
© Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing
Crisis Management and Arms Control The Evolutions of Nuclear Strategy US – Soviet Security Cooperation Yi-Ren Chen | Hist 5N | May 4 th, 2004.
Just War Theory Unit #7: The Cold War Essential Question: Was the Cold War a just war?
ADP 1 The Army.
Goals of Foreign Policy
Government 1740 International Law Summer 2008 Lecture 9: The Use of Force.
POSC 2200 – International Security, War and Strife Russell Alan Williams Department of Political Science.
POSC 2200 – International Security, War and Strife Russell Alan Williams Department of Political Science.
Military Ethics in the New Millennium
ESSENTIALS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Chapter 8 War and Strife.
The law of war: Humanitarian law THE STORY BEHIND THE STORY.
Chapter 9 Pursuing Security. Causes of War 1.System-Level Causes: wars may be caused by a number of factors related to the general nature of the world’s.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Chapter 17 Global Social Problems: War and Terrorism This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright.
Citizenship Issues C.I.4 U.S. Domestic and Foreign Policy Students are able to: 4.2 Describe U.S. foreign policy. Students may indicate this by: – Defining.
Human security and international law (Borrowed from 2008 lecture by Professor Gro Nystuen, University of Oslo)
POSC 2200 – Modern Conflict Russell Alan Williams Department of Political Science.
Situating International Humanitarian Law (IHL) ATHA Specialized Training on International Humanitarian Law May 31, 2010 Stockholm, Sweden.
Disarmament & Development. Background Disarmament and development are two of the international community’s most important tools for building a world free.
Use of violence is any violence against humans justified? what about violence in entertainment, sport, etc.? Wars? just war theory, more below. how can.
International law and IR theories The invasion of Iraq, 2003.
Dr. Steve Hays BKHS Leadership and Ethics Spring 2014.
SeungJu Kim I Realism  State is the pre-eminent actor in the international system.  Self-help: state must build up its military power to ensure.
Violence and Religion. Assessing the sources Are they reputable? (where published?) How do they engage Islamic teaching? Can you perceive whether the.
TYPES OF WAR. CLASSIFYING WARS The main traditional way of classification is to consider the weapons used in war Since 1945, war has either been nuclear.
Government 1740 International Law Summer 2006 Lecture 9: The Use of Force.
Notes on Harry van der Linden, “Barack Obama, Resort to Force, and U.S. Military Hegemony” (2009)
Justice in Action: Just War Theory Just War Theory   Jus ad bellum: proposals to justify the use of force in a particular type of situation   Jus.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory PHI 2604 January 25, 2016.
Security in International Relations Prepared for Junior Int'l Politics class at NENU, Fall 2015.
Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning FOREIGN POLICY AND NATIONAL SECURITY Chapter Seventeen.
Before formal intro, hand out hit/myth sheet as students get settled and ask them to fill it out. Encourage them to discuss with others and not worry if.
Chapter 1 Main Ideas About War (7). Warfare is… …armed conflict involving different states (governments).
Justice in Action: Just War Theory. Just War Theory Jus ad bellum: proposals to justify the use of force in a particular type of situation Jus in bello:
Conceptual Overview. Jus ad Bellum (start) Jus in Bello (middle) Jus post Bellum (end)
 War  Guerrilla war  Terrorism  Coups d’état  Assassination  Economic/property damage  Sabotage  Riot Continuum 1.
Purpose of War POLITICAL SCIENCE – SPRING 2016 – MS GORSKI.
WHAT IS “SECURITY”; WHAT IS CONFLICT? Why does “intl.” security matter to us? What is “world peace”? Should we always prefer peace? “War isn’t the answer”
A country uses all its human, economic and military resources to fight the war.
University of Colorado – Denver
Human security from a legal point of view
GOVT Module 16 Defense Policy.
Chapter 18 War and Terrorism.
Balance of Power Theory
Chapter 8 War and Strife.
This is Why you can’t just blow stuff up.
ELEC4011 Ethics & Electrical Engineering Practice Hugh Outhred
War in the 21st Century Wars in the 20th century
Just War Theory. Just War Theory JWT is not Pacifism Pacifism says that war is always unjust, and therefore always wrong. This is an absolute statement.
War and Violence Can war be just?.
UNIT FOUR| DEFENSE & SECURITY
Justice in Action: Just War Theory
TERRORISM Terrorism—the planned threat or use of violence, often against the civilian population, to achieve political or social ends, to intimidate opponents,
Introduction to IHL: Application and Basic Principles
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 8 War and Strife

Security Issues Global trends, see: –Human security includes economic/social well-being, literacy, adequate health care, safe environment, etc. Security dilemma –anarchic international system, absence of centralized authority –one state’s becoming more secure diminishes another state’s security –permanent condition of tension, power conflicts Key questions: –Is self-help only alternative? –Can states mitigate effects of security dilemma? –How can insecurity be managed short of war?

Causes of War Individual –aggressiveness, misperceptions, mass attributes, communication failure State –Capitalist states, nondemocratic regimes, domestic politics, scapegoating (diversionary war), struggle between groups for economic resources, ethnonational challengers System –Anarchy, lack of arbiter, cycles of war and peace, power transitions, aggressive international capitalist class Most product of interaction of various factors at different levels of analysis

Types of Wars General war = conquer and occupy enemy territory, all available weapons, targeting military and civilian –massive loss of life, widespread destruction –many participants, multiple major powers Civil war = conflict within state between factions to control government; may have international repercussions, often leading to intervention –Ethnonationalist movements -- to gain autonomy, secede Limited war = fought for limited objectives, selected weapons and targets; object less than total subjugation

Modes of Warfare Conventional means –key developments (since 1980s) precise targeting, miniaturization/lighter-weight weapons Increase in international armaments market Weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) = nuclear, chemical, biological; lethal and indiscriminate –Controversy whether nuclear weapons/proliferation destabilizing Asymmetric warfare = between parties of unequal strength; weaker party tries to neutralize opponent’s strength by exploiting weaknesses –Guerilla warfare = irregular militaries hide in civilian population, use hit and run to wear down enemy –Terrorism = use of violence by groups or states usually against noncombatants to intimidate, cause fear, or punish victims to achieve political goals

Just War Tradition Just cause (jus ad bellum) –Self defense, defense of others, massive violation of human rights (humanitarian intervention) and declaration of intent by appropriate authority (Security Council) –Correct intentions (end abuses, establish just peace) –Exhausted all other alternatives (war as last resort) Just conduct (jus in bello) –Differentiation between combatants and noncombatants –Violence proportionate to ends –Undue human suffering avoided Humanitarian intervention (responsibility/imperative to protect) controversial

Liberal Approach to Security International institutions coordinate actions to manage power Collective security –Unlawful aggression met by united action –States join together against aggressor Arms control and disarmament –Fewer weapons means greater security –Regulation of arms proliferation (arms control) –Reducing amount/type of arms (disarmament) –Reduces costs of security dilemma

Realist Approach to Security Reliance on force or threat of force to manage power Balance of power –States make choices to increase capabilities and undermine capabilities of others, thereby maintaining balance of power (internal and external) Alliances are tool to enhance power and check power potential of rival (example of external balancing) Deterrence War can be prevented by the threat of use of force