Christos G. Cassandras CODES Lab. - Boston University ELEVATOR DISPATCHING PASSENGER QUEUES COMPLEXITY: Huge state space, Movement constraints, non-stationary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ch. 12 Routing in Switched Networks
Advertisements

Research Directions Mark Crovella Boston University Computer Science.
DISMISSAL CAR CIRCLE PROCEDURES. 0UR GOAL IS TO SAFELY LOAD STUDENTS AND MINIMIZE PARENT WAIT TIME.
Technische universiteit eindhoven 1 Problem 16: Design-space Exploration Jeroen Voeten, Bart Theelen Eindhoven University of Technology Embedded Systems.
Operations Scheduling
Traffic and routing. Network Queueing Model Packets are buffered in egress queues waiting for serialization on line Link capacity is C bps Average packet.
SCORT/TRB Rail Capacity Workshop - Jacksonville Florida1 1  A Primer on Capacity Principles  New Technologies  Public Sector Needs 22 September
Min Song 1, Yanxiao Zhao 1, Jun Wang 1, E. K. Park 2 1 Old Dominion University, USA 2 University of Missouri at Kansas City, USA IEEE ICC 2009 A High Throughput.
Load Balancing of Elastic Traffic in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks Abdulfetah Khalid, Samuli Aalto and Pasi Lassila
A Case for Relative Differentiated Services and the Proportional Differentiation Model Constantinos Dovrolis Parameswaran Ramanathan University of Wisconsin-Madison.
The Capacity of Wireless Ad Hoc Networks
1 Design of Evacuation System for High-Rise Building Danqing Yu.
Design and Performance Evaluation of Queue-and-Rate-Adjustment Dynamic Load Balancing Policies for Distributed Networks Zeng Zeng, Bharadwaj, IEEE TRASACTION.
Observations from Analyzing GM New Car Delivery Network Data
Wavelet-Based VBR Video Traffic Smoothing Dejian Ye, J. Cam Barker, Zixiang Xiong, and Wenwu Zhu IEEE Trans. Multimedia, Aug
“Batching Policy in Kanban Systems”
Cs238 CPU Scheduling Dr. Alan R. Davis. CPU Scheduling The objective of multiprogramming is to have some process running at all times, to maximize CPU.
Lec 15, Ch.8, pp : Signal Timing (Objective)
1 On a Unified Architecture for Video-on-Demand Services Jack Y. B. Lee IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, VOL. 4, NO. 1, MARCH 2002.
Queuing. Elements of Waiting Lines  Population –Source of customers Infinite or finite.
Scheduling. Model of Process Execution Ready List Ready List Scheduler CPU Resource Manager Resource Manager Resources Preemption or voluntary yield AllocateRequest.
Quadratic Programming Model for Optimizing Demand-responsive Transit Timetables Huimin Niu Professor and Dean of Traffic and Transportation School Lanzhou.
Design and Scheduling of Proton Therapy Treatment Centers Stuart Price, University of Maryland Bruce Golden, University of Maryland Edward Wasil, American.
Location Models For Airline Hubs Behaving as M/D/C Queues By: Shuxing Cheng Yi-Chieh Han Emile White.
Distributed Quality-of-Service Routing of Best Constrained Shortest Paths. Abdelhamid MELLOUK, Said HOCEINI, Farid BAGUENINE, Mustapha CHEURFA Computers.
Client: North Texas Food Bank Senior Design 2010 Nafees Ahmed Prajyot Bangera Shahrzad Rahimian Pablo De Santiago May 10, 2010 “Passionately pursuing a.
L13. Shortest path routing D. Moltchanov, TUT, Spring 2008 D. Moltchanov, TUT, Spring 2014.
OPTIMAL SERVER PROVISIONING AND FREQUENCY ADJUSTMENT IN SERVER CLUSTERS Presented by: Xinying Zheng 09/13/ XINYING ZHENG, YU CAI MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL.
Terminal Design Passenger Processing. errata  Consider TSA impacts.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
TRB 88th Annual Meeting, Washington DC January, 2009 Huan Li and Robert L. Bertini Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting Washington, DC January.
1 [3] Jorge Martinez-Bauset, David Garcia-Roger, M a Jose Domenech- Benlloch and Vicent Pla, “ Maximizing the capacity of mobile cellular networks with.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Goal intervals in dynamic multicriteria problems The case of MOHO Juha Mäntysaari.
M/M/1 queue λn = λ, (n >=0); μn = μ (n>=1) λ μ λ: arrival rate
CPU Scheduling CSCI 444/544 Operating Systems Fall 2008.
Competitive Queue Policies for Differentiated Services Seminar in Packet Networks1 Competitive Queue Policies for Differentiated Services William.
An Optimal Design of the M/M/C/K Queue for Call Centers
1 Ardavan Asef-Vaziri Sep-09Operations Management: Waiting Lines3  Mean inter-arrival time = 1/Ri = 1/R  Probability that the time between two arrivals.
Building Elevator System Simulation © 2012 ~ Mark Polczynski All rights reserved 1Building Elevator System Simulation.
CONCURRENT SIMULATION: A TUTORIAL Christos G. Cassandras Dept. of Manufacturing Engineering Boston University Boston, MA Scope of.
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Structure of a Waiting Line System Queuing theory is the study of waiting lines Four characteristics of a queuing system: –The manner in which customers.
Introduction Definition M/M queues M/M/1 M/M/S M/M/infinity M/M/S/K.
Basic Queuing Insights Nico M. van Dijk “Why queuing never vanishes” European Journal of Operational Research 99 (1997)
Improving the left-turn flow at McKellips and Scottsdale Rds. IEE 545 Discrete Event Simulation December 6, 2011 Yousef Dashti Kevin O'Connor Serhan S.
Uniform Problem A subway train on the Red Line arrives every 8 minutes during rush hour. We are interested in the length of time a commuter must wait.
Elevator Scheduling Mingzhou Hu Yujian Gao Haogang Su Xiangya Yan.
Lecture 4 CPU scheduling. Basic Concepts Single Process  one process at a time Maximum CPU utilization obtained with multiprogramming CPU idle :waiting.
CPU scheduling.  Single Process  one process at a time  Maximum CPU utilization obtained with multiprogramming  CPU idle :waiting time is wasted 2.
Web Servers load balancing with adjusted health-check time slot.
Serve Assignment Policies
Terminals and Transport Interchanges
Design of Evacuation System for High-Rise Building Danqing Yu
Cross-Layer Optimization for State Update in Mobile Gaming
30 miles in 1 hour 30 mph 30 miles per hour
Hourly distribution of train passengers: Zürich HB.
Simulation Continuous Variables Simulation Continuous Vars
Scheduling.
Native simulation of different scheduling policies
Part (a) Total # of cars turning left = L(t) dt 18 = 1,658 cars.
Terminal Design Passenger Processing
example 3 Miles Per Gallon
Problem 8.3 John Doe has promised a total service time of 20 minutes. Processing time at the oven = 15 min Preparation = 2 min At most 3 minutes waiting.
Topic IV. Single Channel Systems (Limited queue length system)
24 February 2019 Model Antrian M/D/1.
Traffic Light Simulation
Determining When a Second Cart Should Be Added to El Toro
ThyssenKrupp Elevator Americas
Adaptive Traffic Control
Presentation transcript:

Christos G. Cassandras CODES Lab. - Boston University ELEVATOR DISPATCHING PASSENGER QUEUES COMPLEXITY: Huge state space, Movement constraints, non-stationary distributions, etc.

Christos G. Cassandras CODES Lab. - Boston University ELEVATOR DISPATCHING CONTINUED UPPEAK DISPATCHING CONTROL PROBLEM:

Christos G. Cassandras CODES Lab. - Boston University ELEVATOR DISPATCHING CONTINUED Can be shown that the optimal policy minimizing average waiting time is a threshold policy with thresholds that depend on passenger arrival rate service rate Ref: Pepyne and Cassandras, IEEE Trans. on CST, 1997 Ref: Pepyne and Cassandras, IEEE Trans. on CST, 1997 WHAT DOES THIS MEAN IN PRACTICE? Load one car at a time – call this car the “next car” to be dispatched Dispatch the “next car” when: number of passengers inside car  

Christos G. Cassandras CODES Lab. - Boston University ELEVATOR DISPATCHING CONTINUED Variation in over 12 5-min. intervals for 1 hour uppeak traffic ( courtesy P. Powell, OTIS Elevator ) PROBLEM: How to determine thresholds, one for each 5 min. interval of fixed traffic rate? How to automatically adjust them on line?