Welcome to Unit 4!! Kaplan University. Graded items: 1. Discussion Board 2. Quiz 3. Seminar Unit 3 recap.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Tim, and Brendan. Arizona V. Miranda.
Advertisements

CJ305: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Welcome to Unit 6! Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings.
AJ 104 Chapter 14 Self-Incrimination.
Forensic Science FORENSIC SCIENCE The History When Did Forensics First Get Started?
The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
What would society look like if Eric Cartman was a police officer.
Unit I: Basic Principles of Government The Citizens.
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Do you know your civil rights?
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
Miranda v. Arizona.
BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.
1966 Chief Justice Warren’s handwritten notes about the case.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Miranda v Arizona Escobedo v Illinois By Austin Lallier.
Miranda vs. Arizona 1966.
Daniel Moody PD. 3 3/25/10 Miranda VS. Arizona 1966.
Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.
U.S. Constitutional Amendments 1-10
By: Holden Luce.  Mapp was accused of harboring a criminal involved in a bombing case.  The Officers confronted Mapp at her home and demanded that she.
Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F Government 4 th Hour Mr. Baker.
Arrests and Miranda. 2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as.
Chapter 16.2 Criminal Cases.
Rights Warning/Waiver Certificate
III. Rights of the Accused. A. Exclusionary Rule Exclusionary Rule – Supreme Court ruled any evidence collected illegally cannot be used in federal court.
Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.
Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.
Call To Order Complete the following statement: You have the right to remain silent… And take out your homework!!!
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Statements and Confessions
Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
Homework: Read/OL 14.3 for Monday FrontPage: Have 3 worksheets on your desk.
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.
CJ210: Interrogation: Purpose, Guidelines, Procedures, and the Miranda Ruling Unit 6 Seminar: Miranda, Interrogation, Interviews, and other.
Miranda v. Arizona GREYSON PETTUS PLS 211 MR. NOEL DECEMBER 2ND, 2015.
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
Supreme Court Cases on Self Incrimination Sarah Claypoole.
Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.
MIRANDA WARNINGS 1. You have the right to remain silent. 2. Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law. 3. You have the right to talk to.
Land Mark Supreme Court Cases Assignment
Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.
Miranda Warnings. Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Objective Students.
Welcome to Unit 4!! Kaplan University. Graded items: 1. Discussion Board 2. Quiz 3. Seminar 4. Matching Project Unit 3 recap.
Miranda: Its Meaning and Application Chapter 6 Basic Criminal Procedures, 3/E by Edward E. Peoples PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle.
Know Your Rights Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda Rights.
Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.
Miranda Rights Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F
John F. Kennedy
Tori Roupe and Haley Leavines
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
Miranda Warnings.
Lesson 6- Copy the following
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) The Warren Court.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Miranda Rights You have the right to remain silent…
Rights Warning/Waiver Certificate
Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.
Ap u.s. government & politics
by Marcos Cardona-7th period
Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.
By: Michaela Hull and Elena Butler
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to Unit 4!! Kaplan University

Graded items: 1. Discussion Board 2. Quiz 3. Seminar Unit 3 recap

Discussion Board Seminar Quiz Unit 4 graded items

Discussion Board Question Miranda v Arizona Must go to these websites to read about Miranda: Unit 4 Discussion Board

Unit Four Discussion In the scenario: Is the patrol officer required to advise the defendant of his rights? Is the detective required to advise the suspect of his rights at the county jail? Why or why not?

Miranda Background A landmark 5 to 4 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court Ernesto Miranda arrested on circumstantial evidence that he kidnapped and raped an 18 year old woman ten days earlier. Miranda interrogated by police for two (2) hours Miranda signs a sworn statement confessing to the rape Deposition contains the following statement “I do hereby swear that I make this statement voluntarily and of my own free will, with no threats, coercion, or promises of immunity, and with full knowledge of my legal rights, understanding any statement I make may be used against me”. Miranda was not advise of his right to counsel or to remain silent.

Miranda At trial – Miranda’s lawyer argues that the statement was not voluntary because he did not know his rights and therefore the statement should be excluded. Initial objection overruled – Miranda convicted of rape and kidnapping and sentenced to 20 to 30 years in prison on each charge – concurrent sentences. Appeal filed with Arizona State Supreme Court who affirms Miranda’s conviction U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear case

Miranda – Supreme Court Decision The Court wrote “The person in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed that he has the right to remain silent, and that anything he says will be used against him in court; he must be clearly informed that he has the right to consult with a lawyer and to have the lawyer with him during interrogation, and that, if he is indigent, a lawyer will be appointed to represent him” Miranda’s conviction was overturned

After The Court Decision Miranda is retried – prosecution does not use confession, but calls witnesses and uses other evidence. Miranda is convicted again in 1967 and again sentenced to 20 to 30 years. Miranda paroled in 1972 Miranda is murdered (stabbed to death in a bar) in 1976

Must have TWO things for Miranda to apply: 1. Person is “in-custody” – arrest or just being detained and not free to leave 2. Person is being interrogated – being asked questions that are incriminating Miranda v Arizona

Your Thoughts? Should police officers have to advise suspect of their rights prior to custodial interrogation/interview? Should a confession be thrown out of court if an officer does not follow the “letter of the law”?

There are five core operational strategies, each with unique features: 1. Preventive patrol 2. Routine incident response 3. Emergency response 4. Criminal investigation 5. Problem solving Additionally, there is a 6 th ancillary operational strategy: support services. Unit 4 PPT

Patrol is designed to: 1. Deter crimes 2. Interrupt crimes in progress 3. Position officers for quick response to emergencies 4. Increase the public’s feeling of safety and security Preventive Patrol

Routine incident responses include restoring order, documenting information, or provide another immediate service to the parties involved in routine occurrences such as minor traffic accidents.  This is the second most common police activity.  Having a good response time is strongly linked to citizen satisfaction. Routine Incident Response

Emergency responses (or critical incidents) occur in response to crimes in progress, serious injuries, natural disasters, and other situations in which human lives may be in jeopardy. Emergency Response

Criminal investigations dominate media attention but constitute a relatively small proportion of police work. An investigation involves discovering, collecting, preparing, identifying, and presenting evidence to determine what happened and who is responsible. Criminal Investigation

Problem solving policing requires: Gathering knowledge of problem causes Developing solutions in partnership with the community Responding with a workable plan Assessing the progress Problem Solving

Support services are ancillary services such as dispatch, training, personnel, property control, and record-keeping that keep agencies running. Support Services

Unit Five Unit Five is your midterm week. You have no assignments due during this time. This would be an excellent time/opportunity to catch up on any assignments that you may have forgotten to turn in up to this point. Remember, there is no Seminar in Unit 5 – enjoy your week off!!! I will be contacting individual students by phone that are missing assignments this week. As always, please don’t hesitate to contact me if you need assistance.

IN CLOSING… I truly want to thank each of you for your hard work up to this point in the class. As you will see the course will become a little more difficult as we progress. I will be focusing a little more on the content (grammar, wording, spelling, etc) that you use in your discussion posts for the second half of the course. Please make sure you proofread your work prior to submission. I will be unavailable (by computer at least) on from Friday November 18 th at noon until Saturday evening November 19 th. If you have an urgent matter that needs assistance please call me ( ) or contact me via AIM. Finally, since we will not have a Seminar next week I want to wish each of you and your families a healthy and safe Thanksgiving holiday.