T-76.115 Project Review Magnificent Seven Final demonstration 16.3.2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T Project Review I3 Iteration T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 2 Agenda.
Advertisements

Sixth Hour Lecture 10:30 – 11:20 am, September 9 Framework for a Software Management Process – Artifacts of the Process (Part II, Chapter 6 of Royce’ book)
T Iteration Demo BaseByters [I1] Iteration
Online Peer Evaluation System Team Green Apple Team Members Ada Tse Amber Bahl Tom Nichols Matt Anderson Faculty Mentor Prof. M Lutz Project Sponsor Richard.
Implementation. We we came from… Planning Analysis Design Implementation Identify Problem/Value. Feasibility Analysis. Project Management. Understand.
Professional Informatics & Quality Assurance Software Lifecycle Manager „Tools that are more a help than a hindrance”
Planning Iteration Demo Suunto Training Program Planner.
FINAL DEMO Apollo Crew, group 3 T SW Development Project.
Introduction to RUP Spring Sharif Univ. of Tech.2 Outlines What is RUP? RUP Phases –Inception –Elaboration –Construction –Transition.
DaISy – Datacast Information System Group: Sotanorsu Customer: Digita Oy T Final Demonstration and Review.
T Project Review RoadRunners [PP] Iteration
COMP-14: Automating your deployments using ANT Gary S Clink Business Consultant.
T Software Development Project I Customer Info Jari Vanhanen Ohjelmistoliiketoiminnan ja –tuotannon laboratorio Software Business and.
Deliverable Readiness Review LexEVS 5.1 December 17, 2009.
T Project Review Magnificent Seven Project planning iteration
T Iteration Demo Team WiseGUI I2 Iteration
Bringing power of simulation to the public.
T Project Review ITSUPS Implementation
T Final Demo Xylophone I2 Iteration
T Project Review X-tremeIT I1 Iteration
T Final demonstration Tetrastone-group [RosettaNet End-user Interface]
T Final Demo Tikkaajat I2 Iteration
T Iteration Demo CloudSizzle PP Iteration
T Project Review Tetrastone [Iteration 2]
Party Management System Vitamin B. Agenda Party Management System (PMS) The Project.
T Iteration Demo BitPlayers I2 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Apollo Crew I1 Iteration
T Project Review WellIT PP Iteration
Planning Iteration Demo Suunto Training Program Planner.
T Iteration Demo Group name [PP|I1|I2] Iteration
FINAL DEMO Apollo Crew, group 3 T SW Development Project.
Continous Integration & Continous Deployment - For the new nameserver infrastructures of DENIC eG 15/10/03 – Christian Petrasch
T Project Review Tetrastone Projext Planning Iteration
T Project Review Sotanorsu I3 Iteration
T Iteration demo T Iteration Demo Team Balboa I1 - Iteration
T Project Review (Template for PI and I1 phases) Group name [PI|I1] Phase
T Project Review RoadRunners [IM1] Iteration
T Iteration Demo BitPlayers I1 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Team 13 I1 Iteration
T Sprint Demo Team Tarantino Iteration 1 / Sprint
T Project Review RoadRunners [IM3] Iteration
Rob Davidson, Partner Technology Specialist Microsoft Management Servers: Using management to stay secure.
T Final Demo BaseByters T Final demo 2 Agenda  Project introduction (5 min)  Project status (5 min)  achieving the goals.
Rational Unified Process Fundamentals Module 4: Core Workflows II - Concepts Rational Unified Process Fundamentals Module 4: Core Workflows II - Concepts.
T Iteration Demo Team DTT Project planning (PP) Iteration
T Iteration Demo Software Trickery I2 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Group name [PP|I1|I2] Iteration
T Iteration Demo Group 1 Project Planning Iteration
Timesheet training Version: Introduction Duration: 1.5 hours Purpose: Guide on how to use Timesheet.
T Iteration Demo Vitamin B I1 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Tikkaajat [PP] Iteration
T Project Review MalliPerhe Iteration 3 Implementation
T Iteration Demo MapGuide based Web Edit Interface I2 Iteration
T Project Review RoadMappers I2 Iteration
T Project Review Muuntaja I1 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Tempus I1 Iteration
T Iteration Demo BitPlayers PP Iteration
T Project Review Final Demo T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 2 Agenda.
T Project Review MTS [PP] Iteration
T Project Review Wellit I1 Iteration
T Project Review Sotanorsu I2 Iteration
T Iteration Demo LicenseChecker I2 Iteration
T Project Review X-tremeIT PP Iteration
T Project Review X-tremeIT I1 Iteration
SOFTWARE TESTING Date: 29-Dec-2016 By: Ram Karthick.
Software Configuration Management
TeXlipse [I1] Iteration
Managing the Project Lifecycle
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

T Project Review Magnificent Seven Final demonstration

2 T Project Review Agenda  Product presentation (5 min)  Overview  Customer benefits  Demo (20 min)  Project evaluation (10 min)  Project planning  Implementation 1  Implementation 2  Finalization & Delivery  Summary  Future work  Discussion and questions (5 min)

3 T Project Review Product presentation

4 T Project Review Product presentation Overview  IRMii is an information resource management software, which can be used to manage any type of resources.  Based on an old tool (IRM).  Essentially made for Nokia Networks to manage computer-related resources.  Interface between customers-lab personnel.  Reporting tool of resource availability and other related information.  Resource tracking IRMii Customer Administrator HTTP

5 T Project Review Product presentation Benefits  Good control over resource usage  Good customer-administrator interaction  Any resources can be managed  Easy to learn  Easy to use  Integrated into Nokia intranet  Uses Nokia LDAP  Nokia look&feel  Implementation  Modular  Easy to maintain  Easy to develop further  Extended accessibility for customers  myirm  myprogramme  Easy to follow what is happening

6 T Project Review Demonstration 20 min

7 T Project Review Project evaluation

8 T Project Review Project evaluation Project planning  First meetings with the customer to discuss the project domain.  Setup of infrastructure  Development platforms  Documentation system  Et cetera  Documented work practices  Deliverables  Project plan  Requirements document  Use cases  Problems  Unbalanced working hours  Slow start with PEAR learning  Requirements not studied enough  Installation of old IRM

9 T Project Review Project evaluation Implementation1  System architectural work done.  Minor testing done.  Deliverables  Technical specification  Test plan and QA plan  Demonstration version of IRMii  Problems  Requirements changing.  Everyone still not understanding the system.  GUI specifications not done.  Installation of IRM

10 T Project Review Project evaluation Implementation2  Most of implementation done.  Extraordinary work done despite materialized risks and problems.  Testing  Deliverables  Test cases  Test log  Test report  Peer test plan  Database migration plan  User’s and administrator’s guide  First version of IRMii  Problems  Lack of motivation  Slow progress  Hour usage

11 T Project Review Project evaluation Finalization & Delivery  Finalization of system  Testing and bug fixing  Peer-testing  Deliverables  Final report  Final version of IRMii  Problems  Too few hours to do any new implementation

12 T Project Review Project evaluation Summary – customer goals  Goals of the customer  8 goals have been met:  IRM as baseline  Fully-functional core system  Modular and extendable implementation  Source code follows conventions  GUI uses Nokia guidelines  Intranet-integrated authentication mechanism  Integrated customer front-end and administrator back-end  Migration plan for old data  1 goal still to be verified by the customer:  Light-weight and minimal overhead  1 goal not completely met:  Well-documented

13 T Project Review Project evaluation Summary - requirements  Total 129 requirements of which 101 implemented.  Most requirements have been implemented and verified  A couple mandatory still not implemented, but they should maybe had been lower priority requirements.  Unbalanced prioritization  “impossible” to divide them in any other way.  IRM as baseline

14 T Project Review Project evaluation Summary – quality assurance  lines of code  7200 lines of comments  Only three bugs open  46 bugs closed  Quality assurance OK All bugsOpen bugs

15 T Project Review Project evaluation Future work  Real-environment deployment will determine the level of quality.  What would be nice?  Searching/sorting functionalities  Reports  Notifications and announcements  Binary attachments  Fine-tuning the code  Event logging  (Automated) unit testing for all classes and GUIs  Documentation for users, administrators and developers  Roll-back option for actions (undo)  Knowledge base add-on

Thanks to Our customer Our mentor Course personnel