The Art of Preparing for a Unit Mandy Kelly Cartelia Lucas Mary Schoenfeldt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SSE Lesson Plan “Look For” List
Advertisements

LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Instructional Planning Documentation
Assessment In P.E. A Backward Design.
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Getting to Common Formative Assessments NMUSD Adult School We share to impart, impact, improve and empower.
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
Nevada Educator Performance Framework
Preparing for the Data Team Process 1.  Know the rationale for “Step A” with respect to the data team process.  Experience Step A as a tool to help.
STARTALK: Preparing Russian Teachers for the 21st Century Day 4.
Direct Instruction Instructional Model. Three Features I. Learner Outcomes Mastery of well structured knowledge (step by step) Skill Mastery II. Environment.
General Notes for Facilitator 1.Depending on the number of participants that you have you may need two decks of cards. You will need a stack of cards that.
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
Evaluation Toolkit. Strategies and Tools to Assist You.
Learning Centered Conferencing Using the Marzano Framework Beth McGibbon and Brent Perdue Part 1: The Preconference.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Understanding by Design
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Professional Learning Communities. Today’s Learning Targets ✓ I can explain common formative assessments. ✓ I can unwrap a standard. ✓ I can identify.
Agenda New Teacher Induction
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
1 Iowa Core Curriculum Session 2 January
Kacie Pugh » Deciding on the most important material to bring back to your site. » Deciding how you will bring items back to staff.
BACKWARDS MAPPING 5/20/13 – Sara Turley. What is Backwards Mapping?  Backward design begins with the end in mind:  What standards do I want my students.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 3: Quality Instructional Design.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Authentic Assessment Kellie Dimmette CI Pretest on Evaluation Part I 1.C & D 2.B & C 3.T 4.Valid, reliable 5.T 6.T 7.T 8.A & B 9.C 10.B.
Monkemeier  For Classroom Use – Materials must align with learning outcomes.  Resources for Students – text books, web links,  To extend.
Understanding the Common Core Iredell-Statesville Schools Wednesday, April 13, 2011.
Learning by Doing: A Workshop Model Facilitators Debbie Poslosky (Mason Ridge) Erin Arledge (Carman Trails) Francesca Kottkamp (Shenandoah Valley)
{ Data Driven Instruction Shifting from “what is taught” to “what is learned”
Developing an Assessment Plan and Objectives for a Unit of Study “What Do you Really Want to Assess?”
Curriculum Overview New Teacher Staff Development August 2007.
PLC Team Leader Meeting
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
NCEES & Social Studies Through the Lens of Standards 3 and 4.
FINDING THE PATH AND STAYING ON IT Sue Howell August 12 & 13, 2010.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
Backwards Design. Activity-Oriented Teaching Many teachers engage in “activity-oriented” teaching.
How to Effectively Communicate With Families A deeper understanding of component 4c: Communicating with Families.
Professional Learning Communities: Improving Student Learning through Best Practices Derrick Cameron, Ed.D. Candidate University of Calgary.
Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results. A Culture of Collaboration - PLC Norms - Systems Support A Focus on Results -Pre-assessments -Common Formative.
Chapter 2 Designing and Planning Technology Enhanced Instruction By Tracy Theriault and Erika Davis.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
The New Face of Assessment in the Common Core Wake County Public Schools Common Core Summer Institute August 6, 2013.
New Lesson Plan Template 2012 Major Divisions of the Lesson Plan Objectives Assessment Methods Lesson Overview.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Assessment In P.E. A Backward Design.
Lesson Planning Sequence
Assessment In P.E. A Backward Design.
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
3 Stages of Backward Design
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Understanding by Design
Assessment of Classroom Learning
UbD: Stages of Backward Design
Presentation transcript:

The Art of Preparing for a Unit Mandy Kelly Cartelia Lucas Mary Schoenfeldt

Where Are We Now…  How do you usually get ready to teach a unit? o Think-Pair-Share  Challenges/Successes

Getting Ready to Teach a Unit  Review the hand-out  Discuss as a team  Noticings

Step 1: Big Ideas Looks Like…Sounds Like… Studying: General Information Essential questions Enduring understandings Standards Professional reading Taking notes Why is this important for students to learn? What does this look like in the lives of children? What does this look like in our lives as adults? What else do I need to know about the content? OCG Stage 1

Step 2: Learning Outcomes Looks Like…Sounds Like… Studying : Standards Knowledge and Skills Learning Targets Developing ideas, “I can… This means…” Taking notes How do the standards, knowledge and skills fit with the big ideas? How do the standards, knowledge and skills fit with the learning targets? What kind of thinking is implied by the standards? What else do I need to know about the learning outcomes? OCG Stage 2

Step 3: Defining Proficient Looks Like…Sounds Like… Sorting student work Looking at student exemplars Studying Stage II, Assessment Evidence Consider summative assessments Creating formative assessments Creating rubrics/proficiency scales What does proficiency look like for the standard(s)? Why do we use these formative assessments? How do we formatively assess without paper and pencil? How can our conferring notes help us determine proficiency? What else do I need to know around assessing proficiency? OCG Stage 2

Step 4: Lesson Planning Looks Like…Sounds Like… Brainstorming lesson options Digging through resources Referring back to Stage 3 Listing strategies Finding anchor text Planning for student-driven instruction on a blank calendar What are the best practices to ensure student understanding? How will we respond when students do not understand? How will we respond when students already understands it? What are the specific strategies we can teach students for each skill? How will we teach/model the strategies? What tools will we use during instruction? OCG Stage 3

Step 5: Weaving in Our Professional Learning  Look at the “Getting Ready to Teach a Unit” Handout  Identify where in the process your team needs to “slow down” and engage in learning

What Questions Do You Have?

Our Work For Today…  Use this process to get read to teach your team’s unit  Discussion of big ideas  Understanding of learning outcomes  Agreement regarding assessing proficiency  Collaboration regarding teaching strategies

Strategy Group Lesson  Teaching Point: When teachers are engage in the work of step three, they develop measures to assess when students meet their goals. This involves:  Reviewing the learning targets  Considering how students will demonstrate proficiency  Determine how you will measure proficiency  This may be a checklist, non-pencil/paper formative assessment, a conference, etc.  Hand-out resources for designing formative assessments