Warren Hill, MD, FACS East Valley Ophthalmology 5620 E. Broadway Road

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Comparison of Distance Image Quality with Accommodating and Multifocal Aspheric Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs John F. Doane, M.D., F.A.C.S. Discover Vision.

Advertisements

VisTor The new Toric IOL by Hanita Lenses

Dr H. Razmjoo Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Multifocal IOLs

Introduction to Refractive Error and Prescription Writing Walter Huang, OD Yuanpei University Department of Optometry.

Measurement of lens power by Lensometer

Diffractive Multifocal IOL Prof. Dr. Daniel H. Scorsetti

Lens and its forms Faculty Aravind School of Optometry.

Straylight (disability glare) results in case of a diffractive multifocal IOL design with apodization pattern adjusted to reduce glare. Ruth Lapid-Gortzak.

Physiological optics 9 th lecture Dr. Mohammad Shehadeh.

A simple and accurate method of alignment for toric intraocular lens implantation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). Kazuno Negishi,

R. Lehmann, MD ASCRS 2008 Clinically Relevant Advantages in the Functional Performance of the AcrySof ® IQ IOL Robert P. Lehmann, MD, FACS Lehmann Eye.

Optics 1----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics

Keiichiro Minami, Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima, Mami Yoshino, Kunihiko Nakamura Department of Ophthalmology Tokyo Dental College Suidobashi Hospital, Tokyo,

Fig Spherical aberration for a lens

Aspheric IOL’s: clinical benefits and customizing cataract surgery Bojan Pajic, MD, PhD, FEBO Swiss Eye Research Foundation, ORASIS, Reinach, Switzerland.

Myoung Joon Kim, MD Len Zheleznyak, MS2

Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,

Multifocal and Toric IOLs: An Update on the Resident Experience M. Allison Roensch, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K Aggarwal, MD, Justin W. Charton,

The authors of this poster have no financial interest in any products and technologies mentioned in this presentation.

Walter Huang, OD Yuanpei University Department of Optometry

1 Clinical Performance of the Crystalens® AO Guy M. Kezirian, MD, FACS.

Retrospective Comparison of 3177 Eyes Implanted with Presbyopic IOLs Carlos Buznego MD Elizabeth A. Davis MD, FACS Guy M. Kezirian MD, FACS William B.

M. Allison Roensch, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K Aggarwal, MD, James P. McCulley, MD Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Southwestern.

Justin Charton, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K. Aggarwal, MD, James P. McCulley, MD University of Texas Southwestern Department of Ophthalmology.

Visualized light paths in different multifocal

Mitchell A Jackson MD Founder/Director, Jacksoneye Lake Villa, IL USA

Functional Vision With Apodized Diffractive Aspheric Multifocal IOL With +3.0 D Add Jonathan M. Davidorf, MD Los Angeles, CA ASCRS Annual Symposium March,

Human Image Formation What is the quality of the optics of the human eye? How can we measure it and describe it empirically?

Notes on Chapter 30 Lenses

W. A. Maxwell, MD, PhD ASCRS 2008 Comparison of the Optical Image Quality for Presbyopia Correcting IOLs using Modulation Transfer Function Testing W.

1 Cataract Surgery Stephen G. Slade MD, FACS. 2 Financial Disclosure Alcon, AMO, B&L Consultant, Clarity, NuLens, RVO, Technolas 2 This presentation represents.

Recent Advances in Intraocular Lenses Jim Schwiegerling, PhD Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences Optical Sciences.

W. Maxwell, MD, PhD California Eye Institute Fresno, California

Unilateral multifocal lens implantation in patients with a contralateral monofocal or phakic eye is a viable presbyopic correction option Robert J. Cionni,

A Fellow Eye Comparison of Aberrations, Modulation Transfer Function and Contrast Sensitivity After AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural IOL Implantation. Mayank.

A New Definition of Refraction: Basics and Beyond Austin Roorda, Ph.D. Unversity of Houston College of Optometry.

P91: Clinical Performance of Phakic Angle-Supported Investigational IOL in Prospective Global Trials, ASCRS 2010, Boston P91: Clinical performance of phakic.

Optics for Residents Astigmatic Lenses Amy Nau, OD.

Section 7.3 – The Ellipse Ellipse – a set of points in a plane whose distances from two fixed points is a constant.

Emmetropia and the Ametropias Scott P. Drexler OD University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

AREA 2: Fitting single-vision lenses Topic 4: Alignment, decentration, and minimum diameter Topic 5: Calculating thickness in spherical lenses Topic 6:

Advanced Optics for Ophthalmology

Binocular Defocus Curve of Apodized Diffractive Multifocal IOL in Asian-Indian Eyes Dr.A. Shetty; Dr. M. K. Kummelil; Dr. S.Nagappa Cataract and Refractive.

DGII 2008 Comparison of Aspheric ReSTOR and Tecnis multifocal IOL Dongho Lee MD, PhD Yonsei eye center, Seoul, South Korea No Financial Interest.

AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL. Aspheric IOL AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® 2 AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL SN6AD3 Add Power: +4 D Spectacle Plane: 3.2 D Range:

Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences

Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.

I have no financial interest in any devices or techniques discussed in this presentation.

Investigation of Multifocal Toric IOLs to Compensate for Corneal Astigmatism and to Provide Near, Intermediate, and Distance Vision José L. Rincón, MD.

Preliminary Results after Cataract Surgery with the Aspheric Acrysof ReSTOR IOL to Correct Presbyopia Meeting of the ASCRS Chicago 8-10 February 2007 R.M.M.A.

Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;

Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Quantitative Performance of Bifocal and Multifocal.

Kavita Gala David Spalton Mayank Nanavaty St Thomas’ Hospital , London

Postoperative Refraction and Patient Satisfaction after Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Robert Cionni, MD Financial.

Multi focal IOL.

Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

Review of geometrical optics

Intraocular Lens.

Consultant for Alcon. AMO, Bausch and Lomb

Cataract Surgery in Bapunagar

Samir I. Sayegh, MD, PhD, FACS 1

Aphakia and its correction

Thomas Kohnen, MD Department of Ophthalmology

Comparison of vision with an accommodating IOL versus a multifocal IOL

성모병원 안센터 CHANGES IN ASTIGMATISM RELATIVE TO IOL HAPTIC INSERTION AXIS IN WITH-THE-RULE AND AGAINST-THE-RULE ASTIGMATISM PATIENTS Hyun Seung Kim, M.D.

Refractive errors.

Visual Outcomes and Satisfaction with Toric IOL Versus Monofocal IOL

Comparative Global Literature Review of Visual and Optical Quality of Refractive, Diffractive, and Hybrid IOL Designs James P. McCulley, MD Department.

Consultant Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth

Presentation transcript:

Comparison of MTF Performance of Spherical and Toric Apodized Diffractive Multiofocal IOLs Warren Hill, MD, FACS East Valley Ophthalmology 5620 E. Broadway Road Mesa, AZ 85206 Jim Schwiegerling, PhD University of Arizona Optical Sciences Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences Disclosure: Hill: Consultant, Speaker & Research Support Alcon Research Schwiegerling: Research & Travel support from Alcon Research.

Introduction The optical performance of +3D-Add aspheric apodized diffractive multifocal IOLs is compared to an equivalent toric +3D-Add aspheric apodized diffractive multifocal IOL. Spherical Lens is ReSTOR SN6AD1 (Alcon Laboratories) Toric Lens is ReSTOR SND1T5 (Alcon Laboratories) The toric lens is measured along its astigmatic axis as well as perpendicular to the astigmatic axis

Measuring MTF The IOL is placed in a wet cell mounted behind an artificial cornea. The blurred image of a slit target is analyzed to determine the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF). The slit is moved axially to measure MTF for different object distances.

Toric Multifocal Since the lens under test is toric, its imaging properties change with meridian. MTF testing for the toric lens was performed along the 45° and 135° meridians. For the spherical lens, performance is tested along a vertical meridian. 45° 135°

Slit Images The slit images are for different object vergences measured from spectacle plane. The contrast of the slit images has been reversed to highlight the structure. The left column is along the toric axis, while the right column is 90° away. The left column shows foci for distance (0D) and +2D, which shows the multifocal effect (equivalent to +3D add in IOL plane). The right column shows foci for +2D and +4D, which shows the combined effect of the multifocal powers and the toric power.

Slit Images Distance Foci Near Foci Spherical Lens Toric Lens @45°

MTF Spatial Frequency = 50 cyc/mm and a 6 mm pupil.

MTF Registered Spatial Frequency = 50 cyc/mm and a 6 mm pupil.

Conclusion The MTFs of the toric multifocal lens designs along the principal toric axes are comparable. The toric lenses give similar results to their equivalent spherical powered counterparts. Based on these results, the new toric apodized multifocal IOL should deliver the same optical quality as the currently available SN6AD1 (Alcon Laboratories), since the only difference between the lenses is the toric component. The key limiting factor to performance of these lenses will be matching the toric power to the corneal astigmatism and alignment of the IOL axis with the corneal astigmatic axis