Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mitchell A Jackson MD Founder/Director, Jacksoneye Lake Villa, IL USA

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mitchell A Jackson MD Founder/Director, Jacksoneye Lake Villa, IL USA"— Presentation transcript:

1 Mitchell A Jackson MD Founder/Director, Jacksoneye Lake Villa, IL USA
Aspheric Balanced Curve (ABC) IOL Technology: An Enhanced Aspheric Effect with Better Clinical Outcomes Mitchell A Jackson MD Founder/Director, Jacksoneye Lake Villa, IL USA Dr. Jackson is a consultant for Hoya Surgical

2 Coma Asymmetry mistake
If light rays refract slant on a optical surface, you will get a deformation as illustrated Coma

3 Spherical aberration Aperture error
Abaxial rays outside of the „Gaußschen territory“ (approx. 5°around the axis) will be refracted stronger optical axis „Gauß territory“

4 Influence of Aspheric IOL
spherical IOL Good DOF Worse visual Quality ++ + +++ negative SA IOL ++ - - 00 - Worse DOF - Best Image Quality

5 Spherical aberration & IOLs
aberration-free negative SA SA = + SA = 0 SA = - +20.4 +20.0 +18.0 +20.0 +20.0 +20.0 +20.4 +20.0 +18.0 Power increases from center to edge Power is uniform for all areas Power decreases from center to edge (B&L, Acritec,Lenstec) (Alcon, AMO,Acritec,HOYA)

6 Clear image different between both lenses with large pupil
Effect of pupil size on Image Quality is mainly significant with large pupils spherical aspheric Clear image different between both lenses with large pupil

7 Angle Kappa 0.36mm ± 0.22 Visual Axis Angle Kappa (2o to 5o)
Uday Devgan, MD Angle Kappa (2o to 5o) Pupillary Axis Visual Axis Fovea Angle Kappa 0.36mm ± 0.22 Average of 18 studies This slide is © Uday Devgan, MD Mean displacement between foveal axis and center of pupil of 0.37mm mm Rynders M, Lidkea B, Chisolm W, Thibos LN. J Opt Soc Am A 1995; 12:

8 Devices can measure both pupil size & angle kappa: Hoya iTrace and Marco OPDIII examples
Angle kappa = 0.72 mm Angle kappa = 0.62 mm

9 Power distributions (+20.0 D) Hoya “Super-prolate” effect
Spherical IOL Negative SA IOL HOYA Modified 1 2 3 17 18 19 20 21 Lens Radial Distance (mm) Power (D) ABC=Aspheric Balanced Curve - design

10 Effect of Decentration on Contrast
Optimum settings for a standard aspheric IOL (under the condition of Z40 = 0.27) Hoya’s original settings 1 0.8 0.6 Contrast Contrast 0.4 0.2 Spheric Aspheric Aperture 4.0 mm HOYA Spatial freq 50 c/mm 0.2 0.4 0.6 Decentration (mm) Decentration (mm) Hoya aspheric has better contrast, compared with a standard aspheric. Even at 0.5mm decentration, Hoya aspheric has better contrast than a spherical IOL.

11 Higher-Order aberrations
0.35 preoperative postoperative FY-60AD (aspheric IOL) 0.30 Pupil size: 5mm 0.25 0.20 (RMS µm) 0.15 p<0.005 p<0.05 n.s. 0.10 0.05 0.00 Spherical aberration Vertical coma Horizontal coma

12 Aspheric Balance Curve (ABC) IOL Technology
Image Quality is the key to patient satisfaction Coma & Spherical Aberration are the bad guys Pupil size is not the only culprit Beware of angle kappa (especially over 0.4 mm) Angle kappa helpful in selecting which aspheric IOL Hoya AF-1 “super-prolate” enhanced effect is especially advantageous in high angle kappa cases >0.4 mm Angle kappa measurements may also be helpful in determining multifocal vs accommodating IOL selection


Download ppt "Mitchell A Jackson MD Founder/Director, Jacksoneye Lake Villa, IL USA"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google