1. SIGCSE Panel March 12, 2010 Heikki Topi

2.  Discussions between NSF (Harriet Taylor and Joe Urban) and ACM Education Board in 2007, culminating in a joint meeting in December 2007 ◦ Early focus on enrollment crisis and RAGS report ◦ Original intent to have the meeting in Summer 2008  Formal funding application to NSF in Summer 2008  Strong pushback related to RAGS in the December 2008 ACM Education Council meeting  Reorientation of the summit focus (with NSF’s approval) in early 2009

3.  Planning Committee: ◦ Mark Guzdial (Chair), Jane Prey, Heikki Topi, and Joe Urban, advised by Boots Cassell  Invitations to participating organizations in February – March 2009  Planning meeting in March 2009  Preparation of the summit booklet in May- June 2009  Summit on June 25-26, 2009 in Washington, D.C.

4.  Sent in February – March 2009  Including a request to fill out an information form: ◦ Mission, membership, role in computing education, three challenges, top three things that should be done, suggestion for a common goal  Stated purpose: “to come to a shared vision of the problems facing us in computing education and of how we might address those problems”  Commitment to “release the complete agenda and participant list, as well as the completed information forms well in advance of the meeting”

5.  A one-day face-to-face meeting of the Planning Committee in March 2009  Clarified summit goals ◦ A consensus view of the challenges facing Computing Education ◦ A shared set of strategies for addressing these challenges ◦ Plans for coordinated effort for implementing these strategies

6.  Formulated the agenda and specified the processes for conducting the meeting ◦ Used the information form submissions ◦ Challenges  Strategies  Actions  Priorities and commitments ◦ Initial categorization of challenges: Diversity, Revising Curriculum, Professional Development/Life-long Learning, Attractive and Inviting Pedagogy, Identity of Computing, Promoting Computing  Identified additional participating organizations

7.  List of Attendees ◦ 12 organizations participated: ACM Ed Board, ACM SIGCSE, ACM SIGITE, AIS, ASEE, CRA, CSTA, IEEE-CS, iSchool Caucus, NCWIT, NSF, and SIM  Foreword  Agenda  Society information pages ◦ Additional organizations: Coalition to Diversify Computing, CompTIA Educational Foundation, EDUCAUSE

8. Participants ACM Ed BoardMark Guzdial, Jane Prey, Heikki Topi, Lillian (Boots) Cassel ACM SIGCSEBarbara Boucher Owens ACM SIGITEHan Reichgelt AISMary J. Granger ASEESarah Rajala, Dennis Silage CRAAndy Bernat, Andy Van Dam CSTAGail Chapman, Stephanie Hoeppner IEEE-CSTom Hilburn, Alan Clements, Stephen B. Seidman iSchoolsJohn Unsworth NCWITLucy Sanders, Lecia Barker NSFHarriet Taylor, Janice Cuny, Joan Peckham, Victor Piotrowski, Rajinder Khosla, Ty Znati, Amy Sharma SIMDebabroto “Dave” Chatterjee Texas Tech / formerly NSF Joe Urban

9.  Day 1 ◦ Groups worked on Challenges  Report back ◦ Planning Committee integrated results ◦ Groups worked on Strategies  Report back ◦ Groups worked on Actions to implement Strategies ◦ Planning Committee integrated results for voting  Day 2 ◦ Reports on Actions ◦ Voting on Actions: Ownership and Participation ◦ Enabling Communication and Coordination ◦ Conclusion

10.  Services of a professional writer were included in the budget  All sessions were recorded and transcribed  A report was completed in September 2009 and distributed to the participants  Website now available at http://www.acm.org/education/future-of- computing-education-summit