1. Gene Davis TD Solutions Division M&S Technical Manager J7, Joint Warfighting Center U.S. Joint Forces Command Joint Modeling & Simulation Capability Working Group Training Gaps Analysis Forum (TGAF) Worldwide Joint Training and Scheduling Conference

2. Agenda Purpose TGAF Background M&S Training Issues Discussion –Top M&S Issue Quad Charts –Breakdown of Needed Resources

3. Purpose To provide the Joint Modeling & Simulation Capability Working Group an update on the genesis of the TGAF, the issues arising from the forum, and discuss the Top M&S issues.

4. 4 TGAF Background (1) Background Formerly met as the Joint Training Review Group (JTRG) Reconvened Nov 24 - 25, 2008 at JFCOM as TGAF with same charter and membership as JTRG TGAF collected the top M&S training issues from stakeholders Additionally TGAF updated terminology and reprioritized the 35 TC AoA Gaps with COCOM/Service concurrence as Training Needs Provided top TGAF Issues and actions

5. 5 TGAF Background (2) Outcomes Continue to work with stakeholders to update training needs and capabilities Complete plan to include POM by WJTSC 09-2 Actions Briefed the TGAF M&S strategy and process at WJTSC 09-1 March 09 Submitted M&S issues in FY11 Program Review Package, issues fell below the line, will resubmit for FY12 Provide input for the Training Community M&S Business Plan

6. 6 Top M&S Issues from Nov ‘08 TGAF Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) Exercise Design, Conduct and Integration Cross Domain Information Sharing (CDIS) Joint Logistics Note: Air Ops issue rolled into IAMD

7. Top M&S Issues Summary #1 Issue (Integrated Air and Missile Defense) / (Air ops) combined with ATM effort (ongoing last conf 28-29 Apr 09) –#1 CCDRs and Services require a distributed, integrated, synthetic IAMD training and exercise capability that stimulates real world systems, that is dynamic, scalable and affordable within the Joint Training Environment. –#4 The capability to exercise air missions in a multi-echelon, multi-domain LVC environment. #2 Issue (Exercise Design Conduct and Integration) –Economical and manageable joint simulation architecture to support requirements to plan and conduct unilateral, coalition, and partner nation operational level JTF / CTF (Tier I / II) joint / combined command and control exercises. –Need JLVC capability that is modular and can be tailored based on training requirements for large exercises and home station training day to day. Capabilities that support home station staff training that are light-weight and can be operated by existing staff for individual and collective training. NOTE: Recommend an analysis of training methodology occur in order ( how training is planned and executed) to drive development of technical solutions. #3 Issue (Cross Domain Information Sharing) –Combatant Commands (COCOMs) and Services require a persistent capability to exchange high fidelity training data with coalition partners routinely and securely. Implementation of standards and policies in support of cross domain solutions is needed to allow increased opportunities to train with coalition countries (via M&S). #4 Issue (Joint Logistics) –Develop M&S capabilities to allow end-to-end ITV by maintaining TCN integrity across all segments of the transportation pipeline. Under the current capability, each transportation segment is processed separately which can cause TCN’s to change as they pass between transportation segments. 7

8. Integrated Air and Missile Mission TN # 7: Provide multi-command missile defense training MilestonesEstimated Cost Potential Solutions: Currently Unknown Through the “All Things Missile” (ATM) initiative, USSTRATCOM w/ USJFCOM J7/J8 support will complete the functional needs analysis completed May 09. The functional solutions analysis and analysis of alternatives will be complete NLT Nov 09. All findings will continue to be vetted and prioritized among the COCOM and Service ATM stakeholders with MDA support. Intent is to establish ATM as a Program of Record Unfunded estimated total cost is $10M Need: CCDRs require a distributed, integrated, synthetic Missile Warning (MW) and Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) training and exercise modeling and simulation (M&S) capability that stimulates real world display systems that is dynamic, portable, scalable and affordable. In the operational world, the Missile Mission area occurs accurately and seamlessly. Missile Mission functional training occurs in isolation (i.e. lacks the big picture) and lacks synergy. This results in a dysfunctional team where true teamwork does not occur and each function is only looking at its individual area and not the mission as a whole. Therefore, each mission area is trained individually. Additionally, there is no cross functional technical training capability that allows for fully integrated, dynamic training across COCOMs and Services within the Joint Training Environment. TGAF Issue #1, USSTRATCOM (w/USNORTHCOM) Training Requirements Analysis- completed May 09 Technical Requirements Analysis-NLT Sep 09 Initial draft ATM ICD, an annex to the current IAMD ICD - Dec 09 8

9. 9 Breakdown of Needed Resources Integrated Air and Missile Mission

10. Exercise Design, Conduct & Integration TN # 3: Provide faster/higher fidelity Mission Rehearsal MilestonesEstimated Cost Need: Potential Solutions: 1.Maintain/Sustain JTLS (funds for FY10 approved, seeking additional funds for FY11 and beyond) 2. Enhance JECS and JLOD 3. Develop way ahead for JLVC CORE Capability 1.3M funded for solution 1 (JTLS) unfunded estimated total cost of 16M dollars for enhancements and initial capability for solutions 2 & 3 This capability directly supports the intent for TC AoA Alternative 5 – Low cost light weight simulation solutions Establish modular JLVC Federation that can scale to support a range of needs and requirements (12 Months) Implement the ability to stimulate Joint C2 Systems to reduce exercise support and footprint cost. (12 months) Deploy light-weight staff training capabilities that provide Joint Context within DoD sites—in progress with initial capability. Develop way ahead for NEXTGEN capability– in progress Low cost, small footprint training capability that is modular and can be tailored based on training requirements for large exercises and home station training day to day. Capabilities that support home station staff training that are light-weight and can be operated by existing staff for individual and collective training TGAF Issue #2, USPACOM 10

11. 11 Breakdown of Needed Resources Exercise Design, Conduct & Integration

12. Cross Domain Information Sharing TN #2 :Train forces in a JIIM environment Milestones Estimated Cost Potential Solution: Develop a Cross Domain Information Sharing (“guard”) training capability with correct rule set to allow sharing of mission critical simulation data with mission partners. Total unfunded estimated cost is 9.3M FY 10 funds available ( 600K R&D/500K OP) for initial capability Need: Ability to share mission critical C2ISR data and training environment data with coalition partners and US DoD/Interagency partners at different security levels. Currently, US is unable to share joint training environment simulation data (HLA, DIS, TENA formats) with mission partners in multiple theaters due to network security and information sharing policy and lack of secure network interface infrastructure. TGAF Issue #3, USEUCOM Conduct and document front end analysis  Develop Training Use cases ( AC-10, HOA)–in progress Establish CDIS COI ( COCOM/Service)—in progress Host CDIS Summit/PAT– TBD Oct 09 12

13. 13 Breakdown of Needed Resources FY11FY12FY13FY14FY15 Proposed CDIS (RTD&E) Proposed CDIS (O&M) Proposed CDIS (OP) Cross Domain Information Sharing $800K$600K $0$400K$500K$800K $600K $800K $1 M

14. Joint Logistics TN # 6: Train forces on realistic logistics requirements including RSOI Milestones Estimated Cost Need:Solution: Enhance JDLM-DESS Capabilities to stimulate IGC during JLVC Spiral Development. Enhance JDLM and Maneuver Simulations within the JLVC to support Retrograde Operations in JLVC Spiral. Requirement Analysis (3 Months May-June 09) JLVC Spiral IV Design Meeting (August 09) JLVC Test Cycle Jan-June 10) JLVC Spiral IV Delivery Jul FY10 TCAoA Gap #14: Train forces on realistic logistics- Specifically Strategic Level Force Flow and Sustainment in support of TRANSCOM and COCOM Training Audiences Support TRANSCOM migration to Integrated Data Environment Global Transportation Network Convergence (IGC) to ensure realistic training Enhance Force Flow capabilities to include Retrograde Operations TGAF Issue #4, USTRANSCOM Total cost: 4M FY11-15 Current funding provided by JDTC, funding expected to continue FY11-15 14

15. 15 Breakdown of Needed Resources Joint Logistics EFFORTFY 11FY 12FY 13FY 14FY 15 (R&D) LOG Devel $0 (O&M) JLVC Design $800K (OP) JLVC Design $0 $800K

16. Questions? 16 UNCLASSIFIED QUESTIONS?