Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

RULES OF ENGAGEMENT RESPECT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL NO CELL PHONE USE DURING WORKSHOP THERE ARE NO STUPID QUESTIONS.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "RULES OF ENGAGEMENT RESPECT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL NO CELL PHONE USE DURING WORKSHOP THERE ARE NO STUPID QUESTIONS."— Presentation transcript:

1 RULES OF ENGAGEMENT RESPECT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL NO CELL PHONE USE DURING WORKSHOP THERE ARE NO STUPID QUESTIONS

2 teambuilding YOUR EXPECTATIONS FOR THIS WORKSHOP ???? ---- MY EXPECTATIONS…… - ESTABLISH CREDIBILITY FOR THE CONCEPT - EXPOSE YOU TO SUCCESSFUL STRATEGIES - INSPIRE YOU TO ATTEMPT TO BUILD BETTER TEAMS

3 GETTING YOUR ATTENTION ICEBREAKER: “SIMON SAYS”

4 TEAMWORK INDUSTRY – SIZE – LOCATION ATTITUDE LEADERSHIP RESPONSIBILITY

5 INITIAL UNDERSTANDINGS EXERCISE: -THE MAIN BENEFIT OF A TEAM IS___________________ ? -FOR A TEAM TO BE SUCCESSFUL, A LEADER MUST_____________? -THE NUMBER ONE THING THAT WEAKENS A TEAM___________? -THE KEY FACTOR FOR A TEAM’S SUCCESS IS______________? -FOR A TEAM TO BE SUCCESSFUL MEMBERS MUST______________? -AS A LEADER, HOW DO YOU BEGIN TO BUILD YOUR TEAM ?

6 OUR CHALLENGERECOGNIZE THE ADVANTAGES LEARN TO ARTICULATE THE CONCEPT THEN DO IT…. EMPLOY THE PRINCIPLES REWARD THE RESULTS

7 Key components of a team TRUSTCOMMITMENTACCOUNTABILITY ATTENTION TO RESULTS

8 TRUST CAN YOU DEFINE IT WHY IS IT IMPORTANT IN A TEAM HOW DO YOU DEVELOP IT DO YOU HAVE IT WITH YOUR STAFF

9 UNDERSTANDING TRUST HOW DO YOU KNOW WHEN YOU CAN TRUST SOMEONE ? WHEN YOU WANT SOMEONE TO TRUST YOU, WHO HAS MOST OF THE RESPONSIBILITY, YOU OR THE OTHER PERSON ? WHY ? SHOULD WE START OFF TRUSTING OTHERS AND ONLY STOP TRUSTING THEM IF THEY PROVE THEY’RE NOT WORTHY ? SHOULD WE ONLY TRUST OTHERS AFTER THEY PROVE THEY ARE WORTHY ? DO YOU TRUST ME AND EACH OTHER ?

10 TRUST GAME -FOUR/FIVE TEAMS -ONE INVESTOR WITH HIS/HER ADVISORS -ONLY INVESTOR KNOWS WHAT SHE/HE WILL INVEST -IF INVESTORS HIT THE TARGET-THEY EARN A BONUS -IF INVESTORS MISS THEIR TARGET THEY LOSE THEIR MONEY LESSONS LEARNED: - - - -

11 TRUST AMONG TEAM MEMBERS FUNDAMENTAL EMOTIONAL VULNERABLE OPEN WITHOUT FILTERS

12 COMMITMENT YOUR DEFINITION…….

13 COMMITMENT WEBSTER’S DEFINITION….. AN AGREEMENT OR PLEDGE TO DO SOMETHING IN THE FUTURE; THE STATE OF BEING OBLIGATED OR EMOTIONALLY IMPELLED

14 COMMITMENT AMONG TEAM MEMBERS ALL OPINIONS/IDEAS ON THE TABLE OPEN PROCESS FULL EXPRESSION CONFIDENCE FULL COMMITMENT

15 TEAMBUILDING EXERCISE: “COOKIE MONSTERS” - THE TEAM THAT CAN EAT THE MOST COOKIES IN 3 MINS WINS - 2 TEAMS OF 3 MEMBERS EACH ACTIVITY: - -TEAMS WILL HAVE 3 MINS TO PREPARE - -EACH TEAM WILL BE GIVEN AS MANY COOKIES AS THEY NEED - -NO ONE CAN USE THEIR HANDS EXCEPT TO PLACE A COOKIE ON A FOREHEAD OR TO PICK UP A COOKIE OBJECTIVES: - -SIMPLE PLANNING EXERCISE WITH LIMITED TEAM STRATEGIES - -ICE BREAKER ACTIVITY OR TO LIGHTEN THE MOOD OF A MEETING

16 ACCOUNTABILITY YOUR DEFINITIO N……

17 ACCOUNTABILITY WEBSTER’S DEFINITION…. SUBJECT TO GIVING AN ACCOUNT; TO FURNISH A JUSTIFYING EXPLANATION

18 ATTENTION TO RESULTS ESTABLISH STANDARDS SCHEDULE REPORTING PROVIDE FOR ADJUSTMENTS AVOID APATHY

19 TEAMBUILDING EXERCISE: IMPROVISATION - -3 TEAMS OF 3 MEMBERS EACH - -3 DIFFERENT BUSINESSES – 1 FOR EACH TEAM ACTIVITY: - -EACH TEAM TO PRESENT THEIR BEST SELLING DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICE SHOWN ON THEIR ADVERTISEMENT - -15 MINS TO PREPARE - -3 MINS FOR EACH PRESENTATION - -TEAM WITH THE BEST PRESENTATION WINS OBJECTIVES: - -OBSERVE GROUP/TEAM DECSION MAKING PROCESS - -HAVE EACH GROUP RECOGNIZE INDIVIDUAL STRENGTHS - -ENCOURAGE GROUP/TEAM TO SEEK CONSENSUS IN DECISIONS DEBRIEFING: WHAT DID WE LEARN ABOUT THESE TEAMS ?

20 THE FIVE DYSFUNCTIONS OF A TEAM ABSENCE OF TRUST FEAR OF CONFLICT LACK OF COMMITMENT AVOIDANCE OF ACCOUNTABILITY INATTENTION TO RESULTS

21 ABSENCE OF TRUST WHAT ACTIONS WOULD CAUSE AN ABSENCE OF TRUST WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION ? -

22 CONFLICT WEBSTER’S DEFINITION….. ANTAGONISTIC STATE OF STRUGGLE RESULTING FROM INCOMPATIBLE OR OPPOSING NEEDS, DRIVES, IDEAS OR INTERESTS

23 CONFLICT AMONG TEAM MEMBERS NO FEAR PASSIONATE DIALOGUE CHALLENGE QUESTION BEST DECISIONS

24 INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY AMONG TEAM MEMBERS TEAM STANDARDS TEAM DECISIONS PEER TO PEER NOT LEADER DRIVEN

25 INATTENTION TO RESULTS COMPLACENT NAÏVE UNAWARE IGNORING THE HANDWRITING ON THE WALLS

26 TEAMBUILDING EXERCISE: DESIGNING THE PERFECT TEAM MEMBER - -4-5 TEAMS OF 8 MEMBERS EACH ( ENTIRE CLASS) ACTIVITY: - EA. TEAM WILL DESIGN THE PERFECT TEAM MEMBER BASED ON WHAT THEY BELIEVE THAT PERSON SHOULD BRING TO A TEAM - -EA. MEMBER SUGGESTS 1 CHARACTERISTIC TO BE INCLUDED - -TEAM DECIDES ON ONLY 8 CHARACTERISTICS - -TEAM DECIDES ON A NAME FOR THEIR PERFECT TEAM MEMBER - -TEAM DRAWS A PICTURE OF THEIR PERFECT TEAM MEMBER - - TEAM WRITES A 3 MIN. STORY ABOUT HOW THIS PERSON USES THEIR 8 CHARACTERISTICS TO BENEFIT THE TEAM - -A MEMBER OF EA. TEAM IS CHOSEN TO SHOW THE PICTURE AND TELL US THE NAME OF THEIR PERFECT TEAM MEMBER AND READ THEIR STORY DEBRIEFING: - -WHAT DID YOU LEARN ABOUT THE TEAMBUILDING PROCESS ? - -DO YOU THINK THAT YOUR STAFF WOULD LEARN WHAT YOU LEARNED BY PARTICIPATING IN THIS EXERCISE ?

27 HOW DO WE DEAL WITH THE CHANGES REQUIRED ?

28 DEALING WITH CHANGECOMMON REACTIONS: FEAR = “CIRCLE THE WAGONS” DEFENSIVE = “THERE IS NO PROBLEM” DISMISSIVE = “NOTHNG NEW” WELCOMING = “IT’S ABOUT TIME”

29 WE ARE HERE WE WANT TO GET HERE T E R R I T O R I A L C U R I O U S D I S C O V E R Y C A N D I D S H A R I N G P A R T N E R I N G


Download ppt "RULES OF ENGAGEMENT RESPECT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL NO CELL PHONE USE DURING WORKSHOP THERE ARE NO STUPID QUESTIONS."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google