1. ANNUAL WORK PLAN & BUDGET ( 2012-13) MIZORAM

2. Issues Significant increase/decrease in enrolment: a)Lunglei – 27% (increase) b)Mamit-48% (increase) c)Serchhip-48% (increase) d)Kolasib-15% (decrease) Reasons: a)Wrong assumption of Cl-V enrolment in the Primary Section. b)Wrong assumption of Cl-VIII enrolment in the Middle School Section. c)Wrong-entry of enrolment in district-wise.

3. Issues Increase/decrease in enrolment of all districts are: 1.Aizawl- 8.82% 2.Champhai-10.91% 3.Kolasib-20.60% 4.Lawngtlai-13.01% 5.Lunglei-12.44% 6.Mamit-38.46% 7.Saiha-11.99% 8.Serchhip-10.25% Repatriation of Bru-Refugees in Mamit and Kolasib District indicate the high increase in enrolment.

4. Issues Difference in 3 rd QPR and AWP&B figures on Cooking Cost & Honorarium of Cooks-cum Helpers & delay in payment of Honorarium to cook cum helper. The actual payment of Cooking Cost and Honorarium of Cooks-Cum Helper was shown as actual in the 3 rd Quarter QPR and it is shown as anticipated expenditure in the AWP&B 2012-13. Reasons: At the time of preparation and submission of AWP&B 2012-13, the Department released the Cooking Cost and Honorarium of Cooks Cum Helpers only upto the October, 2011 due to non-availabilty of fund. It is very regretted that as it is wrongly entered in the AWP&B 2012-13 as payment.

5. Issues Irregular Supply of Rice in Schools during the visit of M.I There was certain problems in Food, Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs Department in lifting of Rice to Schools for a certain period of time during the visit. They were requested to lift as an earliest and the same problem does not repeat till date.

6. Mid-Day Meal fund Receipt & Expenditure Statement for the year 2011-12 under Central Fund as 31.3.2012 Sl.No RECEIPTExpenditure (+) Saving/(-) Excess (Rs in lakhs) Particular Amount received (Rs in lakhs) Particulars Financial (Rs in lakhs) 1Opening Balance 93.740 Cooking Cost 927.141 2Adhoc Grant 482.160 Honorarium of Cook 451.440 3First Intallment 375.030 Cost of Foodgrains 205.783 4Second installement 720.370 Transportation Cost 144.230 5 Additional (not yet drawn) 23.870 MME 29.994 TOTAL1695.170 1758.588-63.418

7. Reason for excess in Expenditure Against PAB approval of 1,10,000 students in Primary stage and 50,000 students in Upper Primary stage, the State has provided MDM to 137,401 primary students and 51107 upper primary students. The Total approved Students being 1,60,000 while the state feeds 1,88,508 (Pry + Upp. Pry) students by exceeding 28,508 which is 17.82%. The average actual availed is more than the PAB approval by 13,426. PAB has approved 4,876 Cook-cum-Helper while the State engaged 5,044 Cook-cum Helper according to norms. 168 cook-sum helper were engaged in excess of PAB approval. The excess in expenditure is met from the State Share available in the account.

8. Budget for the year 2012-13

9. No. of Institutions for 2012-13 Institutions ExistingPROPOSAL Primary Schools1484 Upper Primary Schools1022 TOTAL2506

10. No. of Students for 2012-13 Institutions EnrollmentPROPOSAL Primary Schools (Cl I -V)1,37,4011,27,000 Upper Primary Schools (Cl VI-VIII)51,10747,000 TOTAL 1,88,5081,74,000

11. Transportation Cost The average prevailing PDS rate for the whole state at present is Rs 396.00 per quintal.

12. Allocation in the state Budget The State will allocate Rs 934.30 lakhs for the year 2012-13 in its Budget.

13. Sl No.ITEMGapReplacement Grand Total 1Kitchen Devices 78608786 Proposal for 2012-13 Kitchen- Device

14. Mid-Day Meal fund Receipt & Expenditure Statement for the year 2011-12 under Central Fund as 31.3.2012 Sl.No RECEIPTExpenditure (+) Saving/(-) Excess (Rs in lakhs) Particular Amount received (Rs in lakhs) Particulars Financial (Rs in lakhs) 1Opening Balance 93.740 Cooking Cost 927.141 2Adhoc Grant 482.160 Honorarium of Cook 451.440 3First Intallment 375.030 Cost of Foodgrains 205.783 4Second installement 720.370 Transportation Cost 144.230 5 Additional (not yet drawn) 23.870 MME 29.994 TOTAL1695.170 1758.588-63.418

15. Reason for excess in Expenditure Against PAB approval of 1,10,000 students in Primary stage and 50,000 students in Upper Primary stage, the State has provided MDM to 137,401 primary students and 51107 upper primary students. The Total approved Students being 1,60,000 while the state feeds 1,88,508 (Pry + Upp. Pry) students by exceeding 28,508 which is 17.82%. The average actual availed is more than the PAB approval by 13,426. PAB has approved 4,876 Cook-cum-Helper while the State engaged 5,044 Cook-cum Helper according to norms. 168 cook-sum helper were engaged in excess of PAB approval. The excess in expenditure is met from the State Share available in the account.

16. Issues Significant increase/decrease in enrolment: a)Lunglei – 27% (increase) b)Mamit-48% (increase) c)Serchhip-48% (increase) d)Kolasib-15% (decrease) Reasons: a)Wrong assumption of Cl-V enrolment in the Primary Section. b)Wrong assumption of Cl-VIII enrolment in the Middle School Section. c)Wrong-entry of enrolment in district-wise.

17. Issues Increase/decrease in enrolment of all districts are: 1.Aizawl- 8.82% 2.Champhai-10.91% 3.Kolasib-20.60% 4.Lawngtlai-13.01% 5.Lunglei-12.44% 6.Mamit-38.46% 7.Saiha-11.99% 8.Serchhip-10.25% Repatriation of Bru-Refugees in Mamit and Kolasib District indicate the high increase in enrolment.

18. Issues Difference in 3 rd QPR and AWP&B figures on Cooking Cost & Honorarium of Cooks-cum Helpers & delay in payment of Honorarium to cook cum helper. The actual payment of Cooking Cost and Honorarium of Cooks-Cum Helper was shown as actual in the 3 rd Quarter QPR and it is shown as anticipated expenditure in the AWP&B 2012-13. Reasons: At the time of preparation and submission of AWP&B 2012-13, the Department released the Cooking Cost and Honorarium of Cooks Cum Helpers only upto the October, 2011 due to non-availabilty of fund. It is very regretted that as it is wrongly entered in the AWP&B 2012-13 as payment.

19. Issues Irregular Supply of Rice in Schools during the visit of M.I There was certain problems in Food, Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs Department in lifting of Rice to Schools for a certain period of time during the visit. They were requested to lift at an earliest and the same problem does not repeat till date.

20. Thank you