1. MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL REGULATION NO. 5 YEAR 2008 ABOUT SMOKE- FREE AREA (SFA) AND SMOKE- RESTRICTED AREA (SRA) IN SURABAYA Oleh Kurnia Dwi Artanti Santi Martini Kusuma Scorpia Lestari Presented at The 2 nd ITCRN 21April 2015 Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University Surabaya, East Java

2. Background Local regulations regarding Smoke Free Area (SFA) and Smoke Restricted Area ( SRA) in Surabaya city have been implemented since 2009 75.4 % facilities in the area SFA and SRA have not yet put right “no-smoking signs” The survey in Smoking- Restricted Area ( SRA ) in 2012 found smoker inside the building, an ashtray, cigarettes butt, and seller cigarette

3. Background (Cont..) Smoke Free- Area : an area where individuals who is prohibited to conduct activities related smoking like as: producing or making cigarettes; sell cigarettes; organized cigarette advertising; promoting cigarettes and cigarette use. Smoke Restricted Area : an area where individuals are permited to smoke in limited areas. The management must provide a designated smoking room and put “ No smoking” signage in other areas.

4. Research Objectives General : To monitor and evaluate of implementation of Local Regulation No. 5/ 2008 in Surabaya about SFA and SRA public facilities Specific : To get description of the local regulation implementation at work and public places. To identify obstacles and supporting factors in regarding to implement the local regulation To get input for implementation the local regulation optimally.

5. Methodology Research design : cross – sectional study The Study location consist of restaurant, hotel, mall, park, market, transportation. Sample size are 200 places chosen randomly Sampling for this study used cluster random sampling based on area in Surabaya (East, West, Center, North, and South).

6. Methodology (cont.....) To get description of implementation of the local regulation at work and public places. Observation Check list 200 places To identify obstacles and supporting factors in regarding to implement the local regulation. Semi-structure interview Questionnaire open ended 200 places To get input for implementation the local regulation optimally Semi-structure interview Questionnaire open ended 200 places

7. Results Signate HotelRestoMallParkTransportMarket Frequency n% Get “No smoking” Signage Accordance to Regulation 00200021 Get “ No smoking” Signage Not Accordance Regulation 3431131418442 Not Get Signage322241414111457 Sum66531915542200100 Overview Implementation Regulation about Signage

8. The Signage The Standard Signage No The Standard Signage

9. Result (Cont.....) Overview Implementation Regulation about Founded smoking room Indicators HotelRestoMallParkTransportMarket Frequency N% Outside Building Accordace Regulation 00101021 Outside Building Not Accordace Regulation 652040 178.5 Inside Building 71410000 3115.5 Outside Building Not Accordace Regulation and Inside Building 221000 52.5 Do Not have smoking room 5132515042 14572.5 Sum66531915542200100

10. Result (Cont.....) Indicators HotelRestoMallParkTransportMarket Frequency N % Founded Smoker weekday2518131454011557,5 Founded Smoker weekend 2716131154011256 Founded the smell cigarette smoke weekday 301310843610150,5 Founded the smell cigarette smoke weekend 35910853310050 Founded Astray and Lighter weekday 602613431912562,5 Founded Astray and Lighter weekend 602713431712462 Overview Implementation Regulation about Violation

11. Result (Cont...) Overview Implementation Regulation about Violation Indicators HotelRestoMallParkTransportMarket Frequency N % Founded Cigarette Butts weekday 532191554214572,5 Founded Cigarette Butts weekend 5224101554114773,5 Presence cooperation with tobacco industry weekday 1519612226532,5 Presence cooperation with tobacco industry weekend 1520612226633 Founded cigarette sales weekday 311513453610452 Founded cigarette sales weekend 311513353610251

12. Supports and Obtacles 64.5% managers of public facilities did not know about the regulation SFA in Surabaya which ban smoking in the area public facility. Facilities have done implement these regulations were still 52.5%. Although public facilities have been implementing regulations, but still a little (30%) already provides for sanctions include verbal warning. Only 12% of public facilities are already recorded every sanctions already given. Managers do not aware that if they do not implement the regulation of SFA and SRA cause managers public facilities get sanction from the local government.

13. Suggestion to Increase Implementation NoSuggestionNumber of Facilities 1. Given Information session conducted by public facilities management 50 2. Given Information session conducted by outsider 43 3. Give Punishment or Reward 30 4. There is a smoking area / special place 19 5. Signing No smoking 12 6. Establishment of a monitoring team at public facilities 7 7. Rejected 23

14. Conclusion An overview of the implementation of the Regional Regulation of Surabaya No. 5 of 2008 is still very weak because there are many violation in almost all indicators observed. The most violation is installation signage “no smoking” and providing smoking room that is not in accordance with the Regional Regulation No. 5 tahun 2008 of Surabaya City. Constraints met by managers of public facilities in the implementing regulations SFA and SRA is the manager did not know about the regulation SFA and SRA in Surabaya which bans smoking in the building / the public facility The Most Suggestion for Optimization of implementation regulations are give Information session from the manager of a public facility or outside.

15. Recommendations To improve the effectiveness of the implementation of Regulation No. 5 of 2008 about SFA and SRA, Given Information session of these regulations should be done regularly and continuously. Installation of signange “no-smoking “ in accordance Perwali no. 25 of 2009 and its implementation should be monitored by the Monitoring Team SFA and SRA at City level. For the implementation of this Regulation SFA and SRA optimally, then sanctions for violations should be upheld both for smokers who violate the regulations and management public facilities.

16. Thank You