Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

® CoolRunner vs. Competition Power and Feature Comparison Cross Reference.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "® CoolRunner vs. Competition Power and Feature Comparison Cross Reference."— Presentation transcript:

1 ® CoolRunner vs. Competition Power and Feature Comparison Cross Reference

2 ® CoolRunner vs.Competition Contents  Dynamic Power Comparison  XPLA3 vs. Altera Max7000AE  XPLA3 vs. Altera Max7000B  XPLA3 vs. Altera Max3000A  XPLA3 vs. Lattice 2000VL  Altera to CoolRunner Cross Reference Guide

3 ® * Icc calculated according to vendor data sheets, using a 16 bit counter in each logic block, with no output loading. Dynamic Power Comparison

4 ® XPLA3 vs. Altera Max 7000AE

5 ® XPLA3 vs. Altera Max 7000B

6 ® XPLA3 vs. Altera Max 3000A

7 ® XPLA3 vs. Lattice 2000VL

8 ® Altera to CoolRunner Cross Reference  The following chart provides information for crossing Altera Max7000 & Max3000 devices to CoolRunner.  The 32, 64, 128 and 256 macrocell parts are listed first, followed by the 96, 160, 192 and 512 macrocell parts.  For each density, the devices are sorted by family, with VCC shown. Within each family, parts are listed by package & pin count, with available speed grades shown in parenthesis.  If the CoolRunner equivalent is shaded, there is no direct cross and the part shown is a recommendation.

9 ® Altera to CoolRunner Cross Reference

10 ®

11 ®

12 ®

13 ®

14 ®

15 ®

16 ®

17 ®


Download ppt "® CoolRunner vs. Competition Power and Feature Comparison Cross Reference."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google