1. Dias 1 Department of Science Education Our common knowledge Peer supervision

2. Dias 2 Department of Science Education Example Focus p: I’ve got a problem with a PhD student. The student does not get any results. I suggested another method which I know will get results. But the student wants to keep going with her method and try and modify it. Now I have doubts. Should I insist that she changes her method or should I support her in her project with the risk that she doesn’t get any useful results? Supervisor:How long has she been going? Focus p: One year. Supervisor: But she’s got to get some results. You’ve got to tell her that if she doesn’t get any results and get them published soon, she won’t have a PhD at all in two years. Focus p:No. I’ve problably got to tell her that.

3. Dias 3 The dialogue: Structure and progression Department of Science Education Mind model Revealing of problem situation Own suggestions for solution with justifications Alternative ways of understan- ding the problem solutions Attempt at solving problem Extension, transfer to other situations Application in a dialogue Supervision dialogue

4. Dias 4 Department of Science Education Practise triangle – our teacher P3P3 P2P2 P1P1 VALUE BASIS Ethical, political JUSTIFICATION Experiential, theoretical ACTION Thinks student should have responsibility for own project Wants students to get results Suggests alternative method

5. Dias 5 Supervisor’s toolbox Enhedens navn Sted og dato Dias 5 Approaches / styles Meta-communication Perspectives Caps Themes and progression Feedback and Assessment

6. Dias 6 Department of Science Education Peer Supervision - Oslo model Three phases in supervision: Pre-supervision with groundwork paper Observation of teaching Post-supervision Observation of the supervision dialogue Three persons involved: Focus person, supervisor, observer

7. Dias 7 Problem-focused peer supervision in groups Department of Science Education

8. Dias 8 Pre-supervision exercise Department of Science Education