Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Money Ethic Scale Part 4. OCB Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Bateman & Organ, 1983; Organ, 1988; Organ & Ryan, 1995; Smith, Organ, & Near, 1983;

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Money Ethic Scale Part 4. OCB Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Bateman & Organ, 1983; Organ, 1988; Organ & Ryan, 1995; Smith, Organ, & Near, 1983;"— Presentation transcript:

1 Money Ethic Scale Part 4

2 OCB Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Bateman & Organ, 1983; Organ, 1988; Organ & Ryan, 1995; Smith, Organ, & Near, 1983; OCB: Altruism Generalized Compliance (Conscientiousness)

3 OCB Altruism: a class of helping behaviors aimed directly at specific persons Generalized Compliance (Conscientiousness): a good soldier or good citizen syndrome of doing things that are right and proper, for the sake of the system

4 OCB Motives 1. A single undifferentiated helping motive (Cnaan & Goldberg-Glen, 1991) 2. A two-dimensional structure: 3. Altruistic, Instrumental (Allen & Rush, 1998; Eastman, 1994)

5 OCB Motives 4. Altruistic, Egoistic (Frisch & Gerranrd, 1981) 5. Other-serving, Self-serving (Batson & Shaw, 1991) 6. Personal Value, Egoistic (Puckett & Wagner, 1996)

6 OCB Motives Public Self vs. Private Self (Baumeister, 1986) Private Self-Serving Motives Public Other-Serving Motives

7 Private Motives Impression Management Self-handicapping Social Exchange Receiver Characteristics

8 Public Motives Concern for Organization Organizational Culture Concern for People Situational Variable

9 OBSE Organizational members believe that they can satisfy their needs by participating in roles within the context of an organization (Pierce, Gardner, Cummings, & Dunham, 1989)

10 OBSE As such, it is the self-perceived value that employees have of themselves within their employing organization.

11 OBSE OBSE predicts both the Altruism and Conscientiousness dimensions of OCB in American and Mid-eastern cultures (Tang & Ibrahim, 1998)

12 Money and OCB The lowest levels of helping behavior have been documented among participants assigned difficult goals and paid on the basis of goal attainment (Wright, George, Farnsworth, & McMahan, 1993)

13 MES, Motives, OBSE, & OCB Whole MES Success Private Motives Public Motives OBSE Altruism.46*.07 -.18*.59* Conscientiousness.65*.61*.21.00.38.42.38

14 MES, Motives, OBSE, & OCB The US MES Success Private Motives Public Motives OBSE Altruism.46*.06 -.17*.59* Conscientiousness.65*.61*.21.00.37.43.37

15 MES, Motives, OBSE, & OCB Non-US MES Success Private Motives Public Motives OBSE Altruism.43* -.13* -.15*.78* Conscientiousness.83*.38*.19.02.64.69.15

16 MES, Motives, OBSE, & OCB The US MES Success Private Motives Public Motives OBSE Altruism.46*.06 -.17*.59* Conscientiousness.65*.61*.21.00.37.43.37

17 MES, Motives, OBSE, & OCB Taiwan MES Success Private Motives Public Motives OBSE Altruism.49*.40* -.02.66* Conscientiousness.76*.56*.24.16.43.58.31

18 MES, Motives, OBSE, & OCB Poland MES Success Private Motives Public Motives OBSE Altruism.59*.13.02.54* Conscientiousness.59*.27*.35.02.29.34.07

19 MES, Motives, OBSE, & OCB Egypt MES Success Private Motives Public Motives OBSE Altruism.39* -.11 -.26*.64* Conscientiousness.96*.89*.16.01.50.93.80

20 Culture Free (etic) Paths 1. MES  Private Motives 2. Public Motives  OBSE  Altruism

21 MES, Motives, OBSE, & OCB etic MES Success Private Motives Public Motives OBSE Altruism * * Conscientiousness *

22 Materialism and Money Ethic In popular usage, materialism more often refers to a “devotion to material needs and desires (Oxford English Dictionary, 1989) The importance a consumer attaches to worldly possessions (Belk, 1985; p. 265)

23 Materialism and Money Ethic The worship of things (Bredemeier & Toby, 1960, p. 77) 3 elements: 1. Acquisition Centrality 2. Acquisition as the pursuit of Happiness 3. Possession-defined Success (Richins & Dawson, 1990, 1992)

24 Materialism and Money Ethic Materialism  Money Ethic Money Ethic  Materialism

25 MES  Materialism Age Sex Education Materialism MES -.14* -.02 -.17*.74*.03.54*

26 Materialism  MES Age Sex Education Materialism MES.57*.32.01 -.09* -.04 -.07

27 Discussion F Money is important for people in the USA and around the world. F Income has a significant impact on the American people’s Money Ethic endorsement. F Money can be used to attract, retain, and motivate employees.

28 Discussion F American people who value money have high voluntary turnover regardless of their intrinsic job satisfaction. Money attitude (Money Ethic) has a significant impact on work-related attitudes and behavior. F Money Ethic Scale will be a useful tool for researchers and practitioners in HRM and OB fields.

29 Thank You Danke Dankeshen Grazie Merci Muchas Gracias

30 Money and the Agency Theory F Agency theory can be meaningfully used to analyze internal control relationships between allocators (principals) and those receiving allocations (agents). F It provides a theoretical framework to predict the basis of pay for “nonprogrammable” jobs, or jobs consisting of tasks that are difficult to structure and where incumbents enjoy extensive discretion (Gomez-Mejia & Balkin, 1992)

31 Pay-Performance Linkage: 190 Private Universities F Research Institutions F Doctorate-Granting I Institutions F Liberal-Arts Institutions F Expenditures F Type of Institution F Academic Reputation Ranking F Mid-point SAT Scores F Tang, Tang, & Tang

32 University CEO Pay F Expenditures*** F Research/Doctoral** F Law, Business, Medical Schools* F Region F Reputation** F SAT, Year Founded F Faculty, Student F Tuition

33 CEO Benefits F Expenditures*** F Research/Doctoral*** F Law, Business, Medical Schools F Region F Reputation** F SAT, Year Founded F Faculty, Student F Tuition*

34 CEO Total Compensation F Expenditures*** F Research/Doctoral** F Law, Business, Medical Schools F Region F Reputation* F SAT, Year Founded F Faculty, Student F Tuition**

35 Derek Bok (1993): The Cost of Talent F Do we compensate highly educated people in the United States in ways that serve the best interests of the nation? F Are some people paid too much and others too little? F What effect do differences in earnings have on the career choices of the talented? F Do we pay executives and professionals in ways that motivate them to work hard at the right things?


Download ppt "Money Ethic Scale Part 4. OCB Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Bateman & Organ, 1983; Organ, 1988; Organ & Ryan, 1995; Smith, Organ, & Near, 1983;"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google