1. No Child Left Behind

3. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving America’s Schools Act, 1994 Reauthorization of ESEA - No Child Left Behind, 2002 1965-2002

4. Close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, parental choices, and research-based reforms PURPOSE

5. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by 2013-2014 ALL limited English students will become proficient in English ALL teachers will be highly qualified by 2005-2006 ALL students will be educated in safe, drug-free environments ALL students will graduate from high school GOALS

6. Key Points Accountability Teacher Quality Options and Choices for Parents Instructional Methods Flexibility KEY POINTS

7. Testing Requirements Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Consequences Public Reporting Accountability ACCOUNTABILITY

8. States administer own tests which are: –Aligned –Valid and reliable –Inclusive: Limited English Proficient Students Special Education Students ACCOUNTABILITY Testing Requirements

9. ACCOUNTABILITY Testing Requirements Annual reading and math assessments at grades 3-8 by 2005-2006 Science assessments by 2007-2008 –At least once at elementary, middle, and high school grades NAEP biennially starting 2002-2003 in grades 4 and 8: –Random sampling –Mandatory participation Limited English students must be assessed annually for English language proficiency

10. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Demonstrate Proficiency: –All schools reach 100% proficiency within 12 years –Schools must meet annual state objectives for progress Continual Achievement: –States will determine annual objectives for progress –All subgroups must meet annual objectives for progress –95% of all students and all subgroups of students must be included in the assessment ACCOUNTABILITY

11. Adequate Yearly Progress - Example 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% Baseline Target 2001-2002 100% Target 2013-2014 ACCOUNTABILITY

12. Consequences Failure to make AYP will result in implementation of specific consequences Each consecutive year, corrective actions become more intensive

13. Consequences School Improvement Status–First Year (Two consecutive years of not making AYP): –Technical assistance –Must provide public school choice –Two year School Improvement Plan –10% of Title I funds must be allocated for professional development ACCOUNTABILITY

14. Consequences School Improvement Status – Second Year (Three consecutive years of not making AYP): –Continue actions from first year of school improvement status –Provide supplemental services to low-achieving, disadvantaged students At least 5% of Title I funds for this purpose, if needed Supplemental service providers must be approved by the state ACCOUNTABILITY

15. Consequences School Improvement Status - Third Year (Four consecutive years of not making AYP) Corrective Action: –Continue actions from previous years of school improvement –Districts must take at least one of the following actions: Replace relevant school staff Implement a new curriculum and provide professional development Significantly decrease management authority Appoint outside expert to advise on school improvement plan Extend school year or school day Restructure internal organization of school ACCOUNTABILITY

16. Consequences School Improvement Status - Fourth Year (Five consecutive years of not making AYP) Restructuring: –Continue activities from school improvement and corrective action –Districts must take at least one of the following actions: Reopen school as a charter school Replace all or most of relevant school staff Contract with outside entity to operate school State takeover Any other major restructuring of school’s governance that makes fundamental reform ACCOUNTABILITY

17. Consequences–Safe Harbor Provision Schools not meeting annual state objectives can make AYP if: –Percentage of students not proficient for all students and each subgroup is reduced by 10% from the previous year ACCOUNTABILITY

18. Public Reporting 2002-2003 State Report Card requirements include: –Dissemination at the beginning of school year –Disaggregated student MEAP data –Comparison of student achievement levels –Percentage of students not tested –Graduation rates –Number and names of schools in need of improvement –Comparison of actual academic achievement to annual objectives for all subgroups –Teacher qualifications ACCOUNTABILITY

19. Public Reporting ACCOUNTABILITY School and District Report Cards must include: –Same information as in State Report Card, applied to the district and individual schools –Comparison of student scores on state assessments with other students within the district and state

20. Public Reporting New requirements to provide parent notification on: –Teacher qualifications –Student performance on state assessments –School choice information –Limited English Proficiency student placement and program information ACCOUNTABILITY

21. Accountability Teacher QualityTeacher Quality Options and Choices for Parents Instructional Methods Flexibility KEY POINTS Key Points

22. All core academic subject area teachers not highly qualified must meet the requirements by 2005-2006. TEACHER QUALITY Teacher Quality

23. All states must: –Develop a plan demonstrating how teachers will become highly qualified by 2005-2006 –Require annual increase in the percentage of highly qualified teachers in each local district beginning in 2002-2003 –Increase annually the percentage of teachers receiving high quality professional development beginning in 2002-2003* TEACHER QUALITY

24. Teacher Quality –Paraprofessionals hired after January 8, 2002 must meet requirements for qualification standards –Paraprofessionals hired prior to January 8, 2002 must meet requirements for qualifications by January 8, 2006 TEACHER QUALITY

25. Key Points Accountability Teacher Quality Options and Choices for ParentsOptions and Choices for Parents Instructional Methods Flexibility KEY POINTS

26. Options and Choices for Parents All Title I Schools: –Increased parent notification and reporting requirements for all districts –Emphasis on parental involvement OPTIONS

27. Key Points Accountability Teacher Quality Options and Choices for Parents Instructional MethodsInstructional Methods Flexibility KEY POINTS

28. Instructional Methods Resources concentrated on scientific, research-based programs Characteristics of scientific research-based studies: –Uses scientific method –Has been replicated –Can be generalized to larger population –Meets rigorous standards –Other studies/programs point to same conclusion METHODS

29. Key Points Accountability Teacher Quality Options and Choices for Parents Instructional Methods FlexibilityFlexibility KEY POINTS

30. Flexibility Legislation allows for flexibility in use of funding FLEXIBILITY

31. Flexibility Schools identified for School Improvement –Up to 30% of funds allocated for Title II, Part A; Title II, Part D; Title IV, Part A; or Title V, Part A may be transferred to support Title I, Part A, school improvement activities FLEXIBILITY

32. Assessment for ALL students Accountability for ALL students Public reporting for ALL schools Increased options for ALL parents Highly qualified personnel in ALL schools Dollars to classrooms in ALL schools SUMMARY

33. Educational Technology (Title II, Part D) Language Instruction for LEP/Immigrant Students (Title III) Safe and Drug Free Schools/Communities (Title IV, Part A) 21 st Century Community Learning Centers (Title IV, Part B) Innovative Programs – State Grants (Title V, Part A) Rural Schools (Title VI) OTHER AREAS

34. KEY DATES 2002-2003 Adequate Yearly Progress formula defined Public school options provided, including parental notification in Title I schools with school improvement status All newly hired teachers and paraprofessionals must be highly qualified in Title I schools State will identify supplemental service providers Districts will provide supplemental services in Title I schools in the second year of school improvement status

35. KEY DATES 2002-2003 Annual assessment of Limited English Proficiency students Biennial NAEP testing in grades 4 and 8 in reading and math States and districts distribute annual report cards based on NCLB requirements Annual assessment in math and reading/language arts at least once in grades 3-5, 6-9, 10-12

36. KEY DATES 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 Districts failing to make AYP for previous 2 years will enter Year 2 School Improvement status Biennial NAEP testing in grades 4 and 8 in reading, math, and science Annual assessments of reading and math in grades 3-8 (fall) All public and charter school teachers must meet standards of high quality States must have science standards established Paraprofessionals hired prior to January 8, 2002 must meet new standards by January 8, 2006

37. KEY DATES 2006-2007 Biennial NAEP testing in grades 4 and 8 in reading, math, and writing Current reauthorization ends Annual assessment in science at least once a year in grades 3-5, 6-9, 10-12 Biennial NAEP testing in grades 4 and 8 in reading, math, and science All students must be proficient in reading and math 2007-2008 2008-2009 2014

38. United States Department of Education NCLB website @ www.nochildleftbehind.gov House Committee on Education and the Workforce website @ http://edworkforce.house.gov or http://edworkforce.house.gov/democrats/hr1qanda.html (thorough Q&A document) NASDSE website @ www.nasdse.org (Special Education implications) North Central Regional Educational Laboratory website @ www.ncrel.org (dates, timelines and policy issues by state) Education Commission of the States website @ www.ecs.org MORE INFORMATION