1. Is There a Culture of Sustainability at Santa Clara University? A Quantitative Measure Liza Dadiomov Environmental Ethics Fellow 2009-2010 AASHE 2010 Conference Is There a Culture of Sustainability at Santa Clara University? A Quantitative Measure Liza Dadiomov Environmental Ethics Fellow 2009-2010 AASHE 2010 Conference

2. What is a culture of sustainability? Culture: A set of shared values, beliefs, goals and practices. Sustainability: Meeting the environmental, economic and social needs of the present without compromising those needs of the future. Culture of sustainability: A community that exhibits a widespread understanding of sustainability as well as an intentional commitment to support it.

3. “As a Jesuit and Catholic University, we have the responsibility to provide leadership in developing a more sustainable way of living. By embracing sustainability, the University furthers its mission to act as a voice of reason, conscience, and service to society.” - SCU Website

5. Why Culture? Insight into campus mentality, motivation, and values Helpful tool for the development of sustainability programs

6. Background Research Interviews with undergraduate students (Mooney, 2008) Survey of undergraduate students (Asmar, 2009)

7. The Survey Survey composed of 7 questions about: 1.Definition of sustainability 2.Behavior 3.Motivation 4.Self-esteem 5.Relevance to professional life 511 participants: 73 faculty members (response rate of 7.4%) 125 staff members (response rate of 13%) 247 graduate students (response rate of 5.2%)

8. Which is most relevant to sustainability? Environmental (M=6.22), Economic (M=5.70), Social (M=5.23). F (2, 1008) = 181.86, p<.001

9. How are people motivated to be sustainable?

10. Actual Effectiveness 1. Driving a fuel efficient car (greatest impact) 2. Improving home insulation 3. Eating less beef 4. Recycling 5. Using energy efficient appliances 6. Adjusting thermostat Perceived Effectiveness 1. Recycling (perceived greatest impact) 2. Using energy efficient appliances 3. Improving home insulation 4. Driving a fuel-efficient car 5. Adjusting thermostat 6. Eating less beef Misperception of Effectiveness of Behaviors (Bonini and Oppenheim 2008)

11. What are people already doing? Personal (M=3.96), Civic (M=3.01), Transportation (M=2.83), Diet (M=2.45). F (3, 1302) = 385.81, p<.001.

12. Other notable results Negative effect of the use of the word “environmentalist” Sustainability moderately relevant to professional life

13. So, is there a culture of sustainability at SCU? No, because: No widespread understanding of the concept No intentional commitment to the behaviors most important for sustainability Sustainability remains a sub-culture at SCU rather than a widespread culture.

14. Recommendations 1.All three dimensions of sustainability should be emphasized equally. 2.The word “sustainability” should be used rather than “environmentalism.” 3.Reward/incentive systems should be avoided and instead programs should appeal to the identity of the individual and the community. 4.The impact of eating habits on the environment should continue to be promoted through dining services as well as the urban garden. 5.Santa Clarans, charge!

15. Recommendations 1.All three dimensions of sustainability should be emphasized equally. 2.The word “sustainability” should be used rather than “environmentalism.” 3.Reward/incentive systems should be avoided and instead programs should appeal to the identity of the individual and the community. 4.The impact of eating habits on the environment should continue to be promoted through dining services as well as the urban garden. 5.Santa Clarans, charge!

16. Recommendations 1.All three dimensions of sustainability should be emphasized equally. 2.The word “sustainability” should be used rather than “environmentalism.” 3.Reward/incentive systems should be avoided and instead programs should appeal to the identity of the individual and the community. 4.The impact of eating habits on the environment should continue to be promoted through dining services as well as the urban garden. 5.Santa Clarans, charge!

17. Recommendations 1.All three dimensions of sustainability should be emphasized equally. 2.The word “sustainability” should be used rather than “environmentalism.” 3.Reward/incentive systems should be avoided and instead programs should appeal to the identity of the individual and the community. 4.The impact of eating habits on the environment should continue to be promoted through dining services as well as the urban garden. 5.Santa Clarans, charge!

18. Recommendations 1.All three dimensions of sustainability should be emphasized equally. 2.The word “sustainability” should be used rather than “environmentalism.” 3.Reward/incentive systems should be avoided and instead programs should appeal to the identity of the individual and the community. 4.The impact of eating habits on the environment should continue to be promoted through dining services as well as the urban garden. 5.Santa Clarans, charge!

19. Recommendations 1.All three dimensions of sustainability should be emphasized equally. 2.The word “sustainability” should be used rather than “environmentalism.” 3.Reward/incentive systems should be avoided and instead programs should appeal to the identity of the individual and the community. 4.The impact of eating habits on the environment should continue to be promoted through dining services as well as the urban garden. 5.Santa Clarans, charge!

20. Acknowledgments Markkula Center for Applied Ethics David DeCosse Lindsey Cromwell-Kalkbrenner Amara Brook Sean Watts Michelle Bezanson Eleanor Willemsen

21. Questions?