Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment Spanish & Japanese Partial Immersion Program Compiled by Michele Anciaux.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment Spanish & Japanese Partial Immersion Program Compiled by Michele Anciaux."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment Spanish & Japanese Partial Immersion Program Compiled by Michele Anciaux Aoki, Ph.D. John Stanford International School Seattle, WA

2 John Stanford International School 2 Overview of the Evaluation 2001 ELLOPA was conducted by team from Center for Applied Linguistics over 4 days in May with K and 1 st grade students (completing first year of immersion) 2002 Evaluation was completed by JSIS staff and UW graduate students over 3 weeks in May-June with K, 1 st, and 2 nd grade students (1 st and 2 nd graders completing second year of immersion) 2002 Evaluators received training in ELLOPA interviewing and rating at UW in April, 2002, as well as on-site training and coaching with Beverly Boyson of CAL in May, 2002

3 John Stanford International School 3 About the ELLOPA Language Areas: Oral Fluency Grammar Vocabulary Listening Comprehension Proficiency Levels: Junior Novice Low (1) Junior Novice Mid (2) Junior Novice High (3) Junior Intermediate Low (4) Notes: All ratings above 4 were categorized as 4 for the purposes of the ELLOPA statistics. Teachers used the same Rating Profile to rate students based on classroom experience.

4 John Stanford International School 4 What do we want the data to tell us? How well are our students learning Spanish or Japanese? (Can we see growth across years?) Do students learn Japanese at the same rate as Spanish? How well did we do in assessing our students’ language proficiency? (How do ELLOPA ratings compare to Teacher Ratings?)

5 John Stanford International School 5 ELLOPA – Kindergarten ELLOPA Spanish 2001 - K ELLOPA Spanish 2002 - K ELLOPA Japanese 2002 - K

6 John Stanford International School 6 Teacher Ratings – Kindergarten Teacher Ratings Spanish 2001 - K Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 - K Teacher Ratings Japanese 2002 - K

7 John Stanford International School 7 ELLOPA Spanish 2001 - K

8 John Stanford International School 8 ELLOPA Spanish 2002 - K

9 John Stanford International School 9 Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 - K

10 John Stanford International School 10 ELLOPA Japanese 2002 - K

11 John Stanford International School 11 Teacher Ratings Japanese 2002 - K

12 John Stanford International School 12 ELLOPA Spanish/Japanese K Mean or Average of Scores in 2001 and 2002

13 John Stanford International School 13 ELLOPA Spanish/Japanese 2001 - 2002 - K Mean or Average

14 John Stanford International School 14 ELLOPA 1 st Grade ELLOPA Spanish 2001 – 1 st (after first year of language) ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 1 st (after second year of language)

15 John Stanford International School 15 ELLOPA Spanish 2001 – 1 st (first year in the program)

16 John Stanford International School 16 ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 1 st (second year in the program)

17 John Stanford International School 17 Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 – 1 st (second year in the program)

18 John Stanford International School 18 ELLOPA & Teacher Ratings 2 nd Grade ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 2 nd (after second year of language) Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 – 2 nd (after second year of language)

19 John Stanford International School 19 ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 2 nd (second year in the program)

20 John Stanford International School 20 Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 – 2 nd (second year in the program)

21 John Stanford International School 21 ELLOPA/Teacher Rating – K ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 vs. 2002 – K

22 John Stanford International School 22 ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 - K Mean or Average

23 John Stanford International School 23 ELLOPA/Teacher Rating 1 st – 2 nd ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 – 1 st, 2002 – 1 st ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2002 – 2 nd

24 John Stanford International School 24 ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – 1st Mean or Average (2001 – one year of study; 2002 – two years of study)

25 John Stanford International School 25 ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – 2 nd Mean or Average

26 John Stanford International School 26 ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Growth ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 – K, 2002 – 1 st ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 – 1 st, 2002 – 2 nd

27 John Stanford International School 27 ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – K-1 growth Mean or Average (growth over 2 years)

28 John Stanford International School 28 ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – 1-2 growth Mean or Average (growth over 2 years)

29 John Stanford International School 29 Paired ELLOPA Ratings 2001, 2002 – K-1 and 1-2 growth Mean or Average This is the most accurate representation of growth because it compares only students who were in the program both years. According to CAL, the rate of growth is statistically significant.

30 John Stanford International School 30 How did JSIS raters compare to CAL? Number of Ratings of Oral Fluency, Grammar, Vocabulary, and Listening Comprehension Beverly Boyson of CAL reviewed ELLOPA note sheets from JSIS raters and modified ratings where appropriate


Download ppt "1 ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment Spanish & Japanese Partial Immersion Program Compiled by Michele Anciaux."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google