1. B. Review Board Charter and ORR Success Criteria Muthu Jeganathan Project Manager, JPL

2. Board NameAffiliation Dr. Scott Gaudi, ChairOhio State University Dr. Theo ten BrummelaarGeorgia State / CHARA Dr. Sam RaglandWM Keck Observatory (WMKO) Dr. Gerard van BelleLowell Observatory Dr. Marc KuchnerGoddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Dr. Ellyn BainesNaval Research Laboratory (NRL) B-2 Observers Hashima HasanNASA, Program Scientist Debra WallaceNASA, Deputy Program Scientist Mario PerezNASA, Program Executive Gary BlackwoodJPL, Exoplanet Exploration Program Office

3. ORR Success Criteria (SC) 1.The ORR performance requirements [12 zodi, 0.4 mJy, and 35 in-guide stars] are sufficient to meet the PLRA science objectives [inform future mission design and sensitivity >10  higher than state of the art] 1.LBTI ORR performance requirements a)LBTI demonstrates 12-zodi sensitivity (1 , single star measurement, PLRA zodi model) b)In-guide plan (available nights) and assumptions (efficiencies and current capability) for SVP and HOSTS are documented and the science scope (<2 zodi uncertainty on median) are all consistent c)Credible plans* documented to meet PLRA threshold performance requirements (6 zodi, 0.3 mJy) by end of science validation phase with risk that is medium or lower 2.LBTI science data management planning and procedures meet all PLRA requirements 3.The necessary interferometer operations plans and procedures are complete, documented and in place, and under configuration management 4.The necessary pipeline processing algorithms, plans and procedures are complete, documented and in place, and under configuration management 5.The necessary staffing is in place and training has taken place 6.Project risks are documented and acceptable 7.During SVP, UA is ready to assume responsibility for LBTI operations and data delivery; and NExScI is ready to assume responsibility for archive * Scope, supporting analysis, baseline schedule, personnel, contingency, risks 0. B-3

4. Charge to the Board Evaluate whether the ORR performance requirements (SC 0) meet the PLRA science objectives/mission success criteria – Board and NASA APD/HQ briefed on April 14 Evaluate LBTI on success criteria 1–7 Document findings and recommendations – Verbally at end of review – Circulate draft board report within one week – Deliver final board report to Project/ExEPO/NASA within 4 weeks of review (May 25, 2015) Serve to close findings within 3 months B-4

5. Ground Rules Board Chairman: – Calls time on presentations/discussions – Recognizes speakers/questions from audience Project will respond to written recommendations from Board – The board chair and PM will disposition all recommendations – Project response will either provide closure information, identify future action plan to close, or acceptance as an advisory B-5