Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

:2 Evaluation of ATD Models Using National Emergency Support Function Information Requirements An Overview.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: ":2 Evaluation of ATD Models Using National Emergency Support Function Information Requirements An Overview."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 :2 Evaluation of ATD Models Using National Emergency Support Function Information Requirements An Overview

3 :3 Catastrophic Disaster Response Group Consists of the Assistant Secretaries of all Federal Response Plan signatory Departments and Agencies with emergency management responsibilities Acts as a Board of Directors for activities under the Federal Response Plan Directed the Emergency Support Function Leaders Group to establish emergency support information requirements

4 :4 EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTIONS Transportation Communications Public Works and Engineering Firefighting Information and Planning Mass Care Resource Support Health and Medical Services Urban Search and Rescue Hazardous Materials Food Energy ESF Department of Transportation National Communications System Department of Defense Department of Agriculture Federal Emergency Management Agency American Red Cross General Services Administration Department of Health and Human Services Federal Emergency Management Agency Environmental Protection Agency Department of Agriculture Department of Energy Primary Agency

5 :5 Emergency Support Function Leaders Group Consists of the Emergency Managers responsible for each of the 12 Emergency Support functions under the Federal Response Plan Delegated the development of the Emergency Support Function information requirements to information and planning specialists - the Rapid Assessment Working Group

6 :6 Developed Proposed Information Collection Methodology, including remote sensing sources, and data collected prior to an emergency event as well as after an event Assigned who was responsible to collect the information The form and timing of the information product was described as Emergency Support Information Requirements (ESIR) Information Collection Plan

7 :7 Emergency Support Information Requirement Essential Elements of Information are required. The EEI’s relate to the Emergency Support Information Requirement, but they are separate.

8 :8 EEI # 1 EEI # 2... EEI # 26 ESIR #1 ESIR #2... ESIR #67 The Relationship of EEIs to ESIRs

9 :9 Four Information Collection Plans by Major Hazard Hurricane - approved Earthquake - approval Flood - awaiting approval Hazardous Materials - awaiting approval Emergency Support Information Requirement can serve more than one hazard

10 :10 ESIR - FEMA Emergency Support Info Requirements: 1 Geographical Extent of the Disaster (by coordinates, by zip, by county, by state, and by Congressional District) 2 Number of Casualties/Injuries/Fatalities 3 Number of Single Family Homes Damaged 4 Number of Multi-Family Homes Damaged 5 Number of Mobile Homes Damaged 6 Population Affected by Housing Type 7 Population Affected by Primary Language Spoken 8 Population Affected by Age 9 Population Affected by Limited Mobility 10 Population Affected by Income 11 Hospitals(Beds?) unaffected in area 12 Hospitals(Beds?) affected in area 13 Doctors Offices/Clinics (Beds) unaffected in area 14 Doctors Offices/Clinics (Beds) affected in area 15 Nursing Homes (Beds) unaffected in area 16 Nursing Homes (Beds) affected in area 17 Power Plants impacted (Nuclear/Conventional) 18 High Voltage Network 19 Residential Power Grid 20 Radio/TV Stations Available in area 21 Radio/TV Stations affected in area 22 Urban Search and Rescue High Density Zones 23 Petroleum Product Storage 24 Petrochemical Plants 25 Superfund Sites 26 Toxic Release Inventory Sites 27 Land Line Switches affected 28 Cellular Phone Antennas affected 29 Airports Fully operable in area 30 Airports without Radar in area 31 Airports without Terminals in area 32 Airports inoperable 33 Damage to Railroad Stock 34 Damage to Railroad Bridges 35 Damage to Railroad Roundhouses 36 Damage to Railbeds 37 Damage to Trucks/Buses 38 Damage to Subways 39 Damage to Police, Fire and Emergency Services 40 Damage to Highway Bridges and Other Road Closings 41 Damage to Sewage Treatment Plants and # of customers 42 Damage to Water Treatment Plants and # of customers 43 Damage to Private Water Wells and # of customers 44 Damage to Federal Food Warehouses 45 Damage to Private Food Warehouses 46 Damage to Ports and Harbors 47 Potential for Fires/Actual Fires 48 Potential Mobilization Center Sites and Risk 49 Feeding and Water Requirements 50 Shelter Requirements 51 Medical Requirements 52 Population Support Requirements 53 Business Loss 54 Housing Loss 55 Warning and evacuation information 56 Remote Sensing Targeting information 57 Post Application Assessment (ACE) priorities 58 Forward Assessment Team target areas 59 Disaster Assistance Center site location 60 Amount of Debris to be removed 61 Weather 62 Status of Key Personnel 63 Status of Declarations 64 Major Issues/Activities of ESF/OFAs 65 Resource Shortfalls 66 Donations 67 Historical Information

11 :11 TRACE Hardware Software Personnel Facilities Support Data Base Communications Information System Element Categories D1. NRT GeoSpatial D2. Monitoring Data D3. Ad Hoc Data D4. Initial Analysis D5. Action Updates D6. Res. Updates D7. GeoSpatial Aids D8. Statistics E1. Resource Info E2. Hazard Info E3. GeoSpatial Data E4. Statistics E5. GeoSpatial Aids E6. Action Guidelins. E7. Monit. Directions E8. Resource Allocat F1. Hazard Info F2. GeoSpatial Data F3. Monitoring Data F4. Ad Hoc Data F5. Thematic GIS F6.ResourceStaging F7. Final Prep. Aids F8. Ad Hoc Aids G1. NRT GeoSpatial G2. Monitoring Data G3. Ad Hoc Data G4. Initial Analysis G5. Action Updates G6. Res. Updates G7. GeoSpatial Aids G8. Statistics K1. Mapping Requir. K2. Local GIS Status K3. Hazard ESIR K4. Staff POC K5. GIS Data Plan K6.RS Requirements K7. Budget Needs K8. ResourseAllocat. L1. Structures L2. DEM L3. RS Products L4. Soil & LandUse L5. Hazard Maps L6.ActionRecomend. L7. GIS & Images A8.ActionDataSuport Tech Notes and Reports D EFGKL ASAP AFTER 2 - 12 h. AFTER 12 - 48 h. AFTER 48 - 72 h. AFTER 2 - 4 wk. AFTER 1 month AFTER Requirements Event Related Applied to Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment Key Inputs: Key Outputs: Key Inputs Key Outputs Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

12 :12 Issues & Considerations in Assessment Spatial Accuracy Currency TimelinessCost Completeness Availability Options Usage Guidelines Trade-Off Understanding Tools Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

13 :13 Other Earthquake Flood ATD Hurricane TRACE Chart 1 System Description Technical Notes TRACE Automated Flow Input Processing Matrix All Inputs Data Handling Processes Derived System Element Requirements Matrix Information System Characteristics Data Handling Processes FEMA ESIRs and RAWG EIIs Event-Oriented Matrix ESIRsTime- Oriented Outputs A-Q 1.1 Pre-Event & Post-Event Output Matrix Pre- Event Data A-Q ESIRs Outputs A-Q Post- Event Data A-Q 1.1.A- 1.1.Q Pre-Event Input Characteristics Matrix Pre- Event Data A-Q Pre- Event Input Characte ristic A-Q 1.2.A- 1.2.Q Post-Event Input Characteristics Matrix Post- Event Data A-Q Post- Event Input Characte ristic A-Q 1.3.A- 1.3.Q 1.4.A- 1.4.N 1.5.A- 1.5.N 4 2 3 5-10 Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

14 :14 ATD Models ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

15 :15 Information Sources: A. Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling Resources, DOE, March 1995. B. Directory of Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Models, Equipment and Projects, DOC, April 1993. C. General Specifications for OFCM Directory from Carl Mazzola, August 1998. D. Directory of Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Consequence Assessment Models, DOC, March 1999 ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

16 :16 Information Considered: 1. Character 2. Terms 3. Type 4. Range 5. Validation Operational Research Global Special Short Terms Long Terms Radiological Biological Chemical Smoke/Dust Less than 100 km More than 100 km ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

17 :17 6. Inputs 7. Outputs Wind Temperature Humidity Rain -------------------- Terrain Ground Cover Other Air Concentration, Ground Deposition, Dosage, Health Consequences Information Considered: ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

18 :18 ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

19 :19 ATD Models - - - - - Operational - - - - - Verified - - - - - Meteorological Parameters Use - - - - - Terrain Data Use - - - - - Immediate Response Models Supporting ESIRs ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

20 :20 Built by Model Data Professional GIS Support to Decision Making Current Measurements Data Prepared GIS Data Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

21 :21 145 models evaluated  64 models were Verified and Validated  36 models are operational  3 include terrain (Topography & Ground Cover)  2 meet at least one Emergency Support Requirement ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD Modeling Assessment

22 :22 Recommendations Develop standardized Verification and Validation and Acceptances procedures. Select 6 - 7 best models and begin adding capabilities to meet Emergency Support Requirements. Web-enable the final models. ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD


Download ppt ":2 Evaluation of ATD Models Using National Emergency Support Function Information Requirements An Overview."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google