1. Adequate Yearly Progress Kansas State Department of Education 2007 Fall Assessment Conference Judi Miller, judim@ksde.orgjudim@ksde.org 785-296-5081

2. No Child Left Behind (NCLB)— Purpose: Ensure all children have an opportunity to obtain a high-quality education and reach, at a minimum, proficiency on challenging state assessments

3. Defining Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Method for making judgment about progress toward reaching goal

4. AYP is calculated on the percent of students at “Meets Standard” and above on state reading and mathematics assessments.

5. Changes KSDE will do AYP calculations rather than CETE Clarification—Science is not part of AYP Reauthorization may change this

6. Changes Apply remainder of 1% cap to 2% cap—not to exceed 3% Included former students with disabilities for 2 additional years

7. 1% Cap What does the 1% cap for alternate assessments mean? Limitation set by USDE Does not limit % taking alternate assessments Limits the % included in calculating AYP as meets standard and above at district and State levels Waiver process

8. What happens to those above the 1% cap? Reassigned at all levels as below standard for AYP Report to parents actual results Consider students in fewest subgroups Schools already not making AYP Submit waiver

9. KAMM and 2% Cap No limit on number of SWD’s taking KAMM 2% limitation on counting student results as proficient Reassigned in same manner as 1% cap No waiver or appeal on 2%

10. AYP Targets Changed May 2007 by SBOE Approved by USDE

13. Challenges Accountability data reside in multiple systems Data are sometimes not provided on a timely basis Federal timelines impact process Review & verification of data

14. Data Sources for AYP--CETE Assessment results General assessments General assessments with accommodations KAMM Alternate assessments KELPA--for recently arrived ELLs--participation Special circumstances (SC) codes—previously NT codes Accommodations

15. Data Sources--KIDS Disaggregated student groups: Race/ethnicity, lunch status, ELL, SWD AYP school Full academic year; exit information ELLs-recently arrived; monitored Test type

16. KIDS “TEST” Submission Upload replaces “PSLG” and “AUPD” Completed prior to any OTL testing Grade 10 & 11 student data uploaded to generate OTL reports Deadlines: 1/18/08 Math and Reading 2/18/08 Science and History

17. Data Sources--PBR Graduation and drop out data

18. System Changes What did you use? What worked well for you? What would have helped? What is missing?

19. KSDE Online Authentication AYP/QPA Accountability Principal’s Building Report QPA Quality Criteria Draft Report Card

20. AYP/QPA Accountability Application Implemented in 2006-2007 Included: Updates Information Reports Tools

21. 2006-2007 AYP/QPA Accountability - UPDATES

22. 2006-2007 AYP/QPA Accountability - INFORMATION

23. 2006-2007 AYP/QPA Accountability - REPORTS

24. AYP/QPA Reports AYP Report Participation Details & Proficiency by Test Type Participation & Proficiency Comparisons Performance by Grade Student Test Categories

25. AYP/QPA Reports cont’d Individual Assessment Report Student Subgroups & Reclassifications Complete Student Test File Writing Performance Report QPA

27. 2006-2007 AYP/QPA Accountability - REPORTS

28. Reading Student by Subgroups Includes reclassification of 1%, 2% Can sort each field Can export to Excel

29. 2006-2007 AYP/QPA Accountability - TOOLS Data Checklist/Signoff Data Correction Request Reclassification Decision Appeal

30. Data Checklist/Signoff Helps ensure quality of data Principals verify their school’s data Superintendents verify district data Required prior to reclassifying Required prior to waivers & appeals

31. Reclassification Tool Way to change the reclassifications automatically done by the sytem

32. 1% Waiver Tool Request to exceed the 1% cap on alternate assessments

33. AYP/QPA Appeals To change a determination Doesn’t change data but reflects change in status

34. Timelines What changes do you recommend? Order of reports & tools? Dates?

35. Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Submit KIDS AUPD, EOYA & EXIT Data The Road to Data Accuracy 2007 AYP and QPA Submit QPA Quality Criteria Return Assessments to CETE Data Collection & Review *Review KIDS AUPD, EOYA, EXIT Reports *Provide accurate NT & Accommodations to CETE 2007 Use AYP/QPA Verification Check to review and signoff on data sets used for AYP reporting and QPA determination Media Briefings and Release to SBOE Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct 2007

36. Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Submit KIDS AUPD, EOYA & EXIT Data The Road to Data Accuracy AYP and QPA Submit QPA Quality Criteria Return Assessments to CETE Data Collection & Review *Review KIDS AUPD, EOYA, EXIT Reports *Provide accurate NT & Accommodations to CETE 2007 Data Correction * KIDS AUPD, EOYA, EXIT *CETE NT & Accommodations Use AYP/QPA Data Correction Request to request a window for submitting to KIDS (AUPD, EOYA, EXIT) to correct your data Use AYP/QPA Verification Check to review and signoff on data sets used for AYP reporting and QPA determination Media Briefings and Release to SBOE Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct 2007

37. Submit KIDS AUPD, EOYA & EXIT Data The Road to Data Accuracy AYP and QPA Submit QPA Quality Criteria Return Assessments to CETE Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Data Collection & Review *Review KIDS AUPD, EOYA, EXIT Reports *Provide accurate NT & Accommodations to CETE 2007 Data Correction * KIDS AUPD, EOYA, EXIT *CETE NT & Accommodations Decision Appeals *AYP *QPA Use AYP/QPA Data Correction Request to request a window for submitting to KIDS (AUPD, EOYA, EXIT) to correct your data Use AYP/QPA Verification Check to review and signoff on data sets used for AYP reporting and QPA determination Use AYP/QPA Decision Appeal tool to file your appeal for a change in your AYP status or QPA determination. Media Briefings and Release to SBOE

38. 2008 Timelines--Draft 6/13 End of data collection submissions 6/13 QPA Quality Criteria due 6/16 -7/11 Data correction window 7/11 Data Checklist/Signoff 7/14 – 7/25 Reclassification 8/1 Appeals close

39. CELEBRATE! Thank you! Student achievement is increasing! Our schools and districts are doing well! The quality of data is improving. Your reviews are tremendously important. Your patience is appreciated.