Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byIsaiah Potter Modified over 3 years ago

1
Why empty strings? A bit like zero –you may think you can do without –but it makes definitions & calculations easier Definitions: –An alphabeth is a finite set of symbols assume is not a symbol –u is a string over an alphabet T iff u consists of only symbols in T –Hence is a string over any T allows us to define certain things more elegantly –Example: the notions substring, prefix, etc:

2
Definitions (from first lecture) A string u is a substring of w if there exist other strings x & y s.t. w = xuy. bab is a substring of babba. If u is a substring of w, and x above is, then u is a prefix of w. If u w, then u is a proper prefix. ba is a prefix of babba. If u is a substring of w, and y above is, then u is a suffix of w. If u w, then u is a proper suffix. bba is a suffix of babba.

3
some properties for any string u, u=u =u it follows that = = =...

4
some properties for any string u, u=u =u it follows that = = =...

5
edges We could easily have defined FSAs in such a way that edges dont exist Yet, our definition allowed FSAs to contain edges –We did this by allowing such moves explicitly:

6
FSA: Formal Definition A Finite State Automaton (FSA) is a 5-tuple (Q, I, F, T, E) where: Q = states = a finite set; I = initial states = a nonempty subset of Q; F = final states = a subset of Q; T = an alphabet; E = edges = a subset of Q (T + ) Q. FSA = labelled, directed graph =set of nodes (some final/initial) + directed arcs (arrows) between nodes + each arc has a label from the alphabet. Example: formal definition of A 1 Q = {1, 2, 3, 4} I = {1} F = {4} T = {a, b} E = { (1,a,2), (1,b,4), (2,a,3), (2,b,4), (3,a,3), (3,b,3), (4,a,2), (4,b,4) } A1A1 1 2 3 4 a b b b a a a,b

7
implications for strings accepted by FSA Recall –a string is accepted by an FSA iff the string is the label of a path from initial to final node Example: this NDFSA accepts the string 01 and the string 001. After reading the first 0, the FSA can either read a 0 or a λ i jkf 0 1 0 1 m

8
usefulness of edges in FSAa Sometimes we want to prove things like Every so-and-so language can be accepted by an FSA One often proves such things by showing how FSAs can actually be constructed The resulting FSAs often contain edges Example: proof that every Regular Expression has an equivalent FSA.

Similar presentations

OK

Transparency No. 4-1 Formal Language and Automata Theory Chapter 4 Patterns, Regular Expressions and Finite Automata (include lecture 7,8,9) Transparency.

Transparency No. 4-1 Formal Language and Automata Theory Chapter 4 Patterns, Regular Expressions and Finite Automata (include lecture 7,8,9) Transparency.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on antiarrhythmic medications Ppt on python programming language Ppt on web browser and web server Ppt on my school days Ppt on file tracking system Ppt on distance formula and midpoint Ppt on principles of object-oriented programming polymorphism Ppt on file system in unix run Ppt on limitation act 1623 Ppt on nelson mandela free download